MEASUREMENT

Paul S. Gray; John B. Williamson; David A. Karp; John R. Dalphin

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819391.005

4 - MEASUREMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

David A. Karp and

Paul S. Gray: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John B. Williamson: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
David A. Karp: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John R. Dalphin: Affiliation:
Merrimack College, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Thus far we have examined the essentials of the scientific method, research process, and design. Only one more bit of background remains – a look at the measuring tools we employ in social investigation. measurement, the process of determining dimension, value, or degree, is a critical component of research. We have to be thoughtful about the measures we use in all science.

To find the height of a man, the price of a piece of property, or the temperature outside on a winter day, we need measuring devices – yardsticks, calculators, thermometers – as well as units of measurement – inches, dollars, and degrees. Social scientists face many problems in selecting both the tools and the units of measurement. It is usually more difficult for us to agree about the dimensions, value, and degree of human behavior, attitudes, and ideas than about the physical description of people, the size of things, or the characteristics of the physical environment. However, it is essential that we try to perfect the tools and categories of measurement. If theories of human behavior are to be accepted as reasonable, and if we are to test these theories systematically, we must use measurement procedures that are clear and convincing.

There are many ways to gauge complex variables such as “violent crime,” “freedom,” “mental illness,” or “political popularity.” A craftsperson in the tool and die industry must often be accurate to one ten-thousandth of an inch in making the parts for a complex machine.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Research Imagination
An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
, pp. 57 - 80

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819391.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blalock, H. M. Jr. 1979. “Measurement and Conceptualization Problems: The Major Obstacle to Integrating Theory and Research.” American Sociological Review 44 (December): 881–894.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T., and Julian, C. Stanley. 2005. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Martyn, and Gomm, Roger. 1997. “Bias in Social Research.” Sociological Research Online 2(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/2.html.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Delbert C., and Neil, J. Salkind. 2002. Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement. 6th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Newman, Isadore, Carolyn, R. Benz, and Ridenour, Carolyn. 1999. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, John P., Phillip, R. Shaver, and Lawrence, S. Wrightsman, eds. 1991. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Robert, and Jacobson, Lenore. 1992. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Nora Cate. 1980. “Evaluating Race of Interviewer Effects in a National Survey.” Sociological Methods and Research 8 (4) May: 400–419.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adler, Patricia A. 1998. Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Irwin, Fred, P. Pestello, and Frances, G. Pestello. 1993. Sentiments and Acts. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Devlin, Bernie, Stephen, E. Fienberg, and Daniel, P. Resnick, eds. 1997. Intelligence, Genes, and Success: Scientists Respond to The Bell Curve. New York: Copernicus Books.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, Claude S., et al. 1996. Inequality by Design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Foddy, William. 1993. Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fraser, Steven, ed. 1995. The Bell Curve Wars: Race, Intelligence, and the Future of America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Herrnstein, Richard J., and Murray, Charles. 1996. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Karp, David A., Holmstrom, Lynda Lytle, and Paul, S. Gray. 2004. “Of Roots and Wings: Letting Go of the College-Bound Child.” Symbolic Interaction 27 (3): 357–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kraizer, Sherryll. 2004. “Sexual Abuse: Behavioral Indicators in Child.” Coalition for Children, Inc.http://www.safechild.org/childabuse1.htm#Behavioral%20Indicators%20in%20Child.Google Scholar

Lambert, Michael J. 1991. “Introduction to Psychotherapy Research.” In Psychotherapy Research: An International Review of Programmatic Studies, 1–23. Bentler, L. and Crago, N., eds. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

MacGregor, John M. 1992. The Discovery of the Art of the Insane. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W., ed. 2001. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

McGoldrick, Monica, Giordano, Joe, and Garcia-Preto, Nydia, eds. 1996. Ethnicity and Family Therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mishler, Elliot G. 1991. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Morse, Robert J., and Flanigan, Samuel. 2001. “How We Rank Colleges.” In “America's Best Colleges 2001.” U.S. News and World Report.Google Scholar

Morse, Robert J., and , Samuel Flanigan. 2006. “Using the Rankings.” In “America's Best Colleges 2006.” U.S. News and World Report, August 28. Seehttp://www.usnews.com/usnews/rankguide/rghome.htmGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Derek. 1971. Knowledge from What?Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Robert, and Jacobson, Lenore. 1992. Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar

Santiago-Irizarry, Vilma. 2001. Medicalizing Ethnicity: The Construction of Latino Identity in Psychiatric Settings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Tatum, Beverly D. 1999. Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations About Race. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

U.S. News and World Report. 2006. “America's Best Colleges, 2006.” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/ranknatudoc_brief.php

Weiss, Yoram, and Fishelson, Gideon, eds. 1990. Advances in the Theory and Measurement of Unemployment. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef Google Scholar