RESEARCH DESIGN

Paul S. Gray; John B. Williamson; David A. Karp; John R. Dalphin

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819391.004

3 - RESEARCH DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

David A. Karp and

Paul S. Gray: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John B. Williamson: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
David A. Karp: Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John R. Dalphin: Affiliation:
Merrimack College, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The first two chapters have explained the elements of the scientific method and examined the connection between theory and the research process. After reading these chapters, you are now ready to look at how research is actually designed, step-by-step. research design is the overall process of using your imagination as well as the strategy and tactics of science to guide the collection and analysis of data. Have you have ever wondered: “What is a proper problem to write about in my term paper?” This issue, selecting a topic for study, is the first and most crucial one to be addressed in social research. The dilemmas of research design are sometimes difficult to resolve. Professional social scientists with years of experience sometimes wonder if investigating a problem that happens to interest them personally will produce a worthy addition to knowledge in their field of inquiry.

A related and equally thorny issue to be explored in this chapter is whether it is legitimate, or desirable, to be wholly descriptive in one's work, rather than explanatory. In other words, should all research make some theoretical contribution? In addition, we will examine the question of how much information is needed to substantiate an argument. The old axiom that “the more we know, the more we realize our own ignorance” certainly applies in social research. Are there guidelines to help us determine when we should stop collecting data and begin to analyze it?

Type: Chapter
Information: The Research Imagination
An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
, pp. 33 - 56

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819391.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burawoy, Michael, Gamson, Joshua, and Burton, Alice. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, Greg J., Hofferth, Sandra L., and Stafford, Frank. 2004. Evolution and Change in Family Income, Wealth, and Health: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–2000 and Beyond. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Leavitt, Fred. 2001. Evaluating Scientific Research: Separating Fact from Fiction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Leedy, Paul D., and Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis. 2000. Practical Research: Planning and Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Marshall, Katherine, and Gretchen, B. Rossman. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Nielsen Media Research. 2007. http://www.nielsenmedia.com.

Stern, Paul C., and Kalof, Linda. 1996. Evaluating Social Science Research. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adler, William M. 2001. Mollie's Job: A Story of Life and Work on the Global Assembly Line. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brewer, John, and Hunter, Albert. 2005. Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T., and Julian, C. Stanley. 2005. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Croteau, David, and Hoynes, William. 2002. Media/ Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna, S. Lincoln, eds. 2005. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Duncan, Greg J., Sandra, L. Hofferth, and Stafford, Frank. 2004. Evolution and Change in Family Income, Wealth, and Health: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–2000 and Beyond. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Goleman, Daniel. 1980. “1528 Little Geniuses and How They Grew.” Psychology Today 13 (9): 28– 53.Google Scholar

Gubrium, Jaber F., and James, A. Holstein, eds. 2000. Aging and Everyday Life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Poll, Harris. 2006. “Nation's Alienation Index up Significantly as More Feel Powerless and Isolated.” PR Newswire, December 8, 2005. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m4PRN/is_2005_Dec_8/ai_n15926904.Google Scholar

Holahan, Carole K., and Robert, R. Sears. 1995. The Gifted Group in Later Maturity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Ingraham, Chrys. 1999. White Weddings: Romancing Heterosexuality in Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, ed. 1997. Innovation: Breakthrough Thinking at 3M, DuPont, GE, Pfizer, and Rubbermaid. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

King, C. Richard, and Charles, F. Springwood. 2001. Beyond the Cheers: Race as Spectacle in College Sport. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Krippendorff, Klaus. 2003. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Kuh, George D. 2000. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties. Bloomington: Indiana University. http://nsse.iub.edu/redirect.cfm?target.Google Scholar

Leslie, Mitchell. 2000. “The Vexing Legacy of Lewis Terman.”Stanford Magazine, July–August.Google Scholar

Nardi, Peter M. 2005. Doing Survey Research. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Nielsen Media Research. 2007. http://www.nielsenmedia.com.

Useem, Michael. 2001. Leading Up: How to Lead Your Boss So You Both Win. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Vaughan, Diane. 1990. Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Judith S. 1996. The Good Marriage: How and Why Love Lasts. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, Philip G. 1972. “Pathology of Imprisonment.” Society 9 (April): 4–8.CrossRef Google Scholar