Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T11:17:04.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Leah Kronenberg
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome
Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil
, pp. 186 - 204
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, A. W. H. (1960) Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Adolf, R. (1975) “‘What Pierces or Strikes’: Prose Style in The Fable of the Bees,” in Primer (1975) 157–67.
Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R., eds. (2006) A Companion to Socrates. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Alfonsi, L. (1961–64) “La tradizione ciceroniana dell'«Economico» di Senofonte,” Ciceroniana 3–6: 7–17.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M., eds. (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Allen, D. (2004) “Burning The Fable of the Bees: The Incendiary Authority of Nature,” in Daston and Vidal (2004) 74–99.
Ambler, W. H. (1996) “On the Oeconomicus,” in Bartlett (1996) 102–31.
Ambler, W. H. trans. (2001) Xenophon: The Education of Cyrus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
André, J.-M. (1966) L'Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines à l'époque augustéenne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. (1990) “La critica filodemea all'Economico di Senofonte,” CErc 20: 39–51.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1992) “Ancient Ethics and Modern Morality,” Philosophical Perspectives 6: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J.(1999) Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2002) “What are Plato's ‘Middle’ Dialogues in the Middle of,” in Annas and Rowe (2002) 1–23.
Annas, J. and Rowe, C., eds. (2002) New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arieti, J. A. (1991) Interpreting Plato: The Dialogues as Drama. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A., and Skinner, M. B., eds. (2004) Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Ax, W. (1995) “Disputare in utramque partem. Zu literarischen Plan und zur dialektischen Methode Varros in de lingua Latina 8–10,” RhM 138: 146–77.Google Scholar
Badian, E. (1970) “Additional Notes on Roman Magistrates,” Athenaeum 48: 3–14.Google Scholar
Badian, E.(1996) “Tremelius Scrofa, Gnaeus,” Hornblower, S. and A. Spawforth, eds. (1996). Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press. 3rd edn.: 1549.Google Scholar
Baier, T. (1997) Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen: Von Cicero bis Ovid. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Holquist, M., trans. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. Emerson, C.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balansard, A. (2001) Technè dans les Dialogues de Platon: l'empreinte de la sophistique. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. (2001) Greed and Injustice in Classical Athens. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M., eds. (1997) Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bartlett, R. C., ed. (1996) Xenophon: The Shorter Socratic Writings; Apology of Socrates to the Jury, Oeconomicus, and Symposium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Batstone, W. (1997) “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics,” in Martindale (1997) 125–44.
Bayet, J. (1967) Mélanges de littérature latine. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Bernard, J. D., ed. (1986) Vergil at 2000: Commemorative Essays on the Poet and His Influence. New York: AMS Press.
Betensky, A. (1972) “The Literary Use of Animals in Lucretius' De Rerum Natura and Virgil's Georgics,” Dissertation Yale University.
Bettini, M. (1991) Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul. Trans. Sickle, J.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, A., trans. (1968) The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. (1997) Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blössner, N. (2007) “The City-Soul Analogy,” in Ferrari (2007) 345–85.
Bobonich, C. (1994) “Akrasia and Agency in Plato's Laws and Republic,” AGPh 76: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissier, G. (1861) Étude sur la vie et les ouvrages de M.T. Varron. Paris: L. Hachette et cie.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C. (1974) A Rhetoric of Irony. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bosman, P. (2006) “Selling Cynicism: The Pragmatics of Diogenes' Comic Performances,” CQ 56: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A. J., ed. (1979a) Virgil's Ascraean Song: Ramus Essays on the Georgics. Berwick, Vic.: Aureal Publications.
Boyle, A. J. (1979b) “In Medio Caesar. Paradox and Politics in Virgil's Georgics,” in Boyle (1979a) 65–86.
Boyle, A. J.(1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R., ed. (2003a) Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003b) “Introduction,” in Boys-Stones (2003a) 1–5.
Brandenburg, P. (2006) “Review of Varro. Über die Landwirtschaft. Texte zur Forschung 87 by D. Flach, ed.,” BMCR 2006.07.19.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. (1996) “Defacing the Currency: Diogenes' Rhetoric and the Invention of Cynicism,” in Branham and Goulet-Cazé (1996) 81–104.
Branham, R. B. and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., eds. (1996). The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Braund, S. H. (1988) Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal's Third Book of Satires. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. H.ed. (1989a) Satire and Society in Ancient Rome. University of Exeter.Google Scholar
Braund, S. H. (1989b) “City and Country in Roman Satire,” in Braund (1989a) 23–47.
Braund, S. H. (1996) The Roman Satirists and Their Masks. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (2000) The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bruell, C. (1987) “Xenophon,” in Strauss and Cropsey (1987) 90–117.
Brunt, P. A. (1972) “Cn. Tremellius Scrofa the Agronomist,” CR 22: 304–08.Google Scholar
Bryant, J. M. (1996) Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece: A Sociology of Greek Ethics from Homer to the Epicureans and Stoics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1972) Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Burck, E. (1929) “Die Komposition von Vergils Georgika,” Hermes 64: 279–321.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. (1993) Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. S. (1982) “Initiation and the Role of Aristaeus in Georgics Four,” Ramus 11: 105–15.Google Scholar
Cardauns, B. (2001) Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Carter, L. B. (1986) The Quiet Athenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cascardi, A. J., ed. (1987) Literature and the Question of Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cèbe, J.-P. (1972) Varron, Satires ménippées: Édition, traduction et commentaire. vol. I. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. R. (1934–35) “The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry,” CJ 30: 78–84.Google Scholar
Chomarat, J. (1974) “L'initiation d'Aristée,” REL 52: 185–207.Google Scholar
Christ, M. R. (2006) The Bad Citizen in Classical Athens. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, E. (1982) “Zur Antiken Georgica-Rezeption,” WJA 8: 57–67.Google Scholar
Cima, M. and Rocca, E., eds. (1998) Horti Romani: Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995. Rome: “L'Erma” di Bretschneider.
Clay, D. (1994) “The Origins of the Socratic Dialogue,” in Waerdt, Vander (1994) 23–47.
Clay, D. (2002) “Reading the Republic” in Griswold Jr. (2002a) 19–33.
Clay, J. S. (1976) “The Argument of the End of Vergil's Second Georgic,” Philologus 120: 232–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, D. L. (1980) Callimachus' Iambi. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2004) Irony. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collart, J. (1963) “Analogie et anomalie,” in Reverdin (1963) 117–40.
Collart, J. ed. (1978) Varron, grammaire antique et stylistique latine. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Connor, P. (1979) “The Georgics as Description: Aspects and Qualifications,” in Boyle (1979a) 34–58.
Connors, C. (1997) “Field and Forum: Culture and Agriculture in Roman Rhetoric,” in Dominik (1997) 71–89.
Conte, G. B. (1994) Latin Literature: a History. Trans. Solodow, J. B., Fowler, rev. D. and Most, G. W.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. (1895) “The Bee in Greek Mythology,” JHS 15: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossarini, A. (1976–77) “Dominus e praedium in Catone. Elementi di una ideologia,” AIV 135: 71–86.Google Scholar
Cossarini, A. (1979–80) “Il prestigio dell'agricoltura in Sallustio e Cicerone,” AIV 138: 355–64.Google Scholar
Cramer, R. (1998) Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, N. B. (1979) “Water and Wine as Symbols of Inspiration,” Mnemosyne 32: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, R. I., ed. (1989) Studia Pompeiana & Classica in Honor of Wilhelmina F. Jashemski. 2 vols. New Rochelle, NY: A. D. Caratzas.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. (1935) “M. Terentius Varro,” Pauly, A., G. Wissowa and W. Kroll, eds. (1894–1980) Paulys Real-Encylopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. Suppl. 6: 1172–1277.Google Scholar
Dahlmann, H. [1954]/(1999) “Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica,” in Hardie (1999) ii.253–67 = Abhandl. der Akad. der Wiss. & der Lit. Mainz, Geistes- & Sozialwiss. Kl. (1954) 10: 547–62.Google Scholar
Danzig, G. (2003) “Why Socrates was not a Farmer: Xenophon's Oeconomicus as a Philosophical Dialogue,” G&R 50: 57–76.Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Vidal, F., eds. (2004) The Moral Authority of Nature. The University of Chicago Press.
Davies, J. K. (1971) Athenian Propertied Families, 600–300 BC. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. (1979) “Vergil's Georgics and the Pastoral Ideal,” in Boyle (1979a) 22–33.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1999) “Protagoras and Antiphon: Sophistic Debates on Justice,” in Long (1999) 311–31.
Della Corte, F. (1970) Varrone, il terzo gran lume Romano. 2nd edn. Florence: La nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Dentith, S. (2000) Parody. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descat, R. (1988) “Aux origines de l'oikonomia grecque,” QUCC 28: 103–19.Google Scholar
Destrée, P. and Smith, N. D., eds. (2005) Socrates' Divine Sign: Religion, Practice and Value in Socratic Philosophy. Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing & Publishing.
Diederich, S. (2007) Römische Agrarhandbücher zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Literatur und Ideologie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A., eds. (1988) The Question of “Eclecticism”: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Dominik, W. J., ed. (1997) Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. New York: Routledge.
Doody, A. (2007) “Virgil the Farmer? Critiques of the Georgics in Columella and Pliny,” CP 102: 180–97.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (2006) “Xenophon's Socrates,” in Ahbel-Rappe and Kamtekar (2006) 93–109.
Dover, K. J. (1974) Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Reprint, 1994. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. R. (1937) A History of Cynicism: From Diogenes to the 6th Century AD. Reprint. Chicago: Ares Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W. (1936) Roman Satire: Its Outlook on Social Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (1987) “Why Intentionalism Won't Go Away,” in Cascardi (1987) 192–209.
Dyson, J. T. (1994) “Georgics 2.503–12: The Temple's Shadow,” Vergilius 40: 3–18.Google Scholar
Dyson, J. T. (1996) “Caesi Iuvenci and Pietas Impia in Virgil,” CJ 91: 277–86.Google Scholar
Earl, D. C. (1967) The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (2004) “The Practical Irony of the Historical Socrates,” Phoenix 58: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. (1993) The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelke, C. (1912) Quae ratio intercedat inter Vergilii Georgica et Varronis Rerum Rusticarum libros. Blankenburg: Typis O. Kircher.Google Scholar
Faraguna, M. (1994) “Alle origini dell'oikonomia: dall'Anonimo di Giamblico ad Aristotele,” RAL 9.5: 551–89.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1956–57) “Varro und die grammatische Lehre von der Analogie und der Flexion,” Glotta 35: 214–70 and 36: 48–100.Google Scholar
Fenik, B. (1962) “Horace's First and Sixth Roman Odes and the Second Georgic,” Hermes 90: 72–96.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1997) “Strauss's Plato,” Arion 5: 36–65.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. ed. (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ferrary, J.-L. (1984) “L'archéologie du De re publica (2, 2, 4–37, 63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon,” JRS 74: 87–98.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) “The Statesman and the Law in the Political Philosophy of Cicero,” in Laks and Schofield (1995) 48–73.
Field, G. C. (1967) Plato and His Contemporaries: A Study in Fourth-century Life and Thought. 3rd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. (forthcoming) “Xenophon and the Spartan Economy,” in Powell, and Richer, (forthcoming).
Firpo, L., ed. (1970) Storia delle idee politiche economiche e sociali. Vol. i. Turin: Unione tipografico-editrice torinese.
Fitzgerald, W. (1996) “Labor and Laborer in Latin Poetry: the Case of the Moretum,” Arethusa 29: 389–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flach, D., ed. (1996) Marcus Terentius Varro: Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Buch 1. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Flach, D. ed. (1997) Marcus Terentius Varro: Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Buch 2. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Flach, D. ed. (2002) Marcus Terentius Varro: Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Buch 3. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Fox, M. (2007) Cicero's Philosophy of History. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (1993) The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. ed. (2005) The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Frye, N. (1957) Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (1991) “Man and Beast in Lucretius and the Georgics,” CQ 41: 414–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. (1994) Myth and Poetry in Lucretius. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, M. (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. (2003) “Poetry and the Backward Glance in Virgil's Georgics and Aeneid,” TAPA 133: 323–52.Google Scholar
Geffcken, J. (1896) Leonidas von Tarent. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M., eds. (1996) Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1993. 3 vols. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Gigante, M. (1971) L'Edera di Leonida. Naples: Morano.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1988) “Cicero's Philosophical Affiliations,” in Dillon, and Long, (1988) 34–69.
Goldsmith, M. M. (1985) Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. (2000) “Mandeville's Pernicious System” in Prior, (2000) 71–84.
Gonzalez, F., ed. (1995) The Third Way: New Directions in Platonic Studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Gordon, J. (1996) “Against Vlastos on Complex Irony,” CQ 46: 131–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1980) “Varro and Ariston of Chios,” Mnemosyne 33: 359–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L., eds. (1965) The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams. Cambridge University Press.
Gray, V. J. (1998) The Framing of Socrates: The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon's Memorabilia. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. (2000) “Xenophon and Isocrates,” in Rowe, and Schofield, (2000) 142–54.
Gray, V. J. (2004) “A Short Response to David M. Johnson ‘Xenophon's Socrates on Law and Justice’,” AncPhil 24: 442–46.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. ed. (2007) Xenophon on Government. Cambridge University Press.
Green, C. M. C. (1997) “Free as a Bird: Varro De Re Rustica 3,” AJP 118: 427–48.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. (1994) Satire: A Critical Reintroduction. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (1979) “The Fourth Georgic, Virgil, and Rome,” G&R 26: 61–80.Google Scholar
Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J., eds. (1990) Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
Grilli, A. (1953) Il problema della vita contemplativa nel mondo greco-romano. Milan: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L., ed. (2002a) Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press. Originally published: New York: Routledge, 1988.
Griswold, C. L. (2002b) “Irony in Platonic Dialogues,” Philosophy and Literature 26: 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (2002c) “Comments on Kahn” in Annas, and Rowe, (2002) 129–44.
Gruen, E. S. (1974) The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Guiraud, C., ed. (1985) Varron: Économie rurale. Livre 2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Guiraud, C. ed. (1997) Varron: Économie rurale. Livre 3. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1971) Socrates. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1991) Theocritus' Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1998) Poetic Garlands: Hellenistic Epigrams in Context. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1990) “Sacrifice, Society, and Vergil's Ox-Born Bees,” in Griffith, and Mastronarde, (1990) 209–23.
Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A., eds. (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
Hardie, P. R. (1986) Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. ed. (1999) Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors. 4 vols. New York: Routledge.
Harrison, E. L. (1979) “The Noric Plague in Vergil's Third Georgic,” PLLS 2: 1–65.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., ed. (1995) Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hart, R. and Tejera, V., eds. (1997) Plato's Dialogues: The Dialogical Approach. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.
Harth, P. (1969) “The Satiric Purpose of The Fable of the Bees,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 2: 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, F. D. (1984) “The Wicked Wife of Ischomachus,” EMC 28: 68–70.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2000) Homer's People: Epic Poetry and Social Formation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, M. (2002) Interpreting Classical Texts. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Heisterhagen, R. (1952) “Die literarische Form der Rerum rusticarum libri Varros.” Diss. Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Hemmenway, S. R. (1999) “The Techne-analogy in Socrates' Healthy City: Justice and the Craftsman in the Republic,” AncPhil 19: 267–84.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2002) “Columella's Living Hedge: The Roman Gardening Book,” JRS 92: 110–33.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2005) “The Turnaround: A Volume Retrospect on Roman Satires,” in Freudenburg, (2005) 309–18.
Henrichs, A. (1967) “Zwei Fragmente über die Erziehung (Antisthenes),” ZPE 1: 45–53.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1975) “Two Doxographical Notes: Democritus and Prodicus on Religion,” HSCP 79: 93–123.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1984) “The Sophists and Hellenistic Religion: Prodicus as the Spiritual Father of the Isis Aretalogies,” HSCP 88: 139–58.Google Scholar
Heurgon, J. (1950) “L'effort de style de Varron dans les Res rusticae,” RPh 76: 57–71.Google Scholar
Heurgon, J. (1978) Varron: Économie rurale. Livre 1. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. (1997) Piscinae: Artificial Fishponds in Roman Italy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, W. E. (1977) Xenophon the Athenian: The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, T. P. (1993) “When did Lucullus Retire?Historia 42: 211–28.Google Scholar
Hind, G. (1968) “Mandeville's Fable of the Bees as Menippean Satire,” Genre 1: 307–15.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog: Ein literarhistorischer Versuch. 2 vols. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. and Harder, A., eds. (1991) Fragmenta Dramatica: Beiträge zur Interpretation der griechischen Tragikerfragmente und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Hooley, D. M. (2007) Roman Satire. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, W. D. and Ash, H. B., trans. (1934) Marcus Porcius Cato: On Agriculture. Marcus Terentius Varro: On Agriculture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Horne, T. A. (1978) The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville: Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth-Century England. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howland, J. (1991) “Re-reading Plato: The Problem of Platonic Chronology,” Phoenix 45: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howland, J. (1993) The Republic: The Odyssey of Philosophy. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Howland, J. (2000) “Xenophon's Philosophic Odyssey: On the Anabasis and Plato's Republic,” The American Political Science Review 94: 875–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (1993) Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2005) Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher, and Mathematician King. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humble, N. (2004) “The Author, Date and Purpose of Chapter 14 of the Lakedaimoniōn Politeia,” in Tuplin, (2004) 215–28.
Hundert, E. J. (1994) The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1985) The New Comedy of Greece and Rome. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1995) “Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phainomena of Aratus,” Arachnion 2: www.cisi.unito.it/arachne/num2/hunter.html.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. [1985]/(2000) A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. (1995) Irony's Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, D. A. (1995) Finitude and Transcendence in the Platonic Dialogues. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Innes, D. (2003) “Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style,” in Boys-Stones, (2003a) 7–27.
Irwin, T. (1995) Plato's Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, M. (1975) “Religion and Ethics in Mandeville,” in Primer, (1975) 34–42.
Jack, M. (1987) The Social and Political Thought of Bernard Mandeville. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Jack, M. (2000) “Mandeville, Johnson, Morality and Bees,” in Prior, (2000) 85–96.
Jashemski, W. F. (1979) “‘The Garden of Hercules at Pompeii’ (ii.viii.6): The Discovery of a Commercial Flower Garden,” AJA 83: 403–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkyns, R. (1998) Virgil's Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1982) “Varro's Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum and Religious Affairs in the Late Roman Republic,” BRL 65: 148–205.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. (2003) “Xenophon's Socrates on Law and Justice,” AncPhil 23: 255–81.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. (2004) “Reply to Vivienne Gray,” AncPhil 24: 446–48.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. W. (1961) “That Neo-Classical Bee,” Journal of the History of Ideas 22: 262–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (2004) “A Secret Garden: Georgics 4.116–148,” in Armstrong, , Fish, , Johnston, , and Skinner, (2004) 75–83.
Johnston, P. A. (1977) “Eurydice and Proserpina in the Georgics,” TAPA 107: 161–72.Google Scholar
Johnstone, S. (1994) “Virtuous Toil, Vicious Work: Xenophon on Aristocratic Style,” CP 89: 219–40.Google Scholar
Joly, R. (1956) Le thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l'antiquité classique. Brussels: Palais des Académies.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. (1939) “Cicero's Accuracy of Characterization in His Dialogues,” AJP 60: 307–25.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. and Campbell, L., eds. (1894) Plato's Republic: The Greek Text, vol. III. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kambylis, A. (1965) Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik: Untersuchungen zu Hesiodos, Kallimachos, Properz und Ennius. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kanelopoulos, C. (1993) “Les techniques et la cité: les positions de Xénophon,” ASNP 23: 33–70.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. (2000) Critical Synoptics: Menippean Satire and the Analysis of Intellectual Mythology. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, F. B. (1924) Bernard Mandeville: The Fable of the Bees, Or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. With a Commentary, Critical, Historical, and Explanatory by F. B. Kaye. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Keaveney, A. (1992) Lucullus: A Life. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, E. P. (1980) Menippean Satire: An Annotated Catalogue of Texts and Criticism. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Klingner, F. (1963) Virgils Georgica. Zürich: Artemis Verlag.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1985) “Wine, Water, and Callimachean Polemics,” HSCP 89: 107–19.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. and Foss, C., eds. (1998) Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Kraut, R., ed. (1997) Plato's Republic: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kretschmar, M. (1938) Otium, studia litterarum, Philosophie und βίος θεωρητικός im Leben und Denken Ciceros. Würzburg-Aumühle: Konrad Triltsch.Google Scholar
Kronenberg, L. (2000) “The Poet's Fiction: Virgil's Praise of the Farmer, Philosopher, and Poet at the End of Georgics 2,” HSCP 100: 341–60.Google Scholar
Kumaniecki, K. (1962) “Cicerone e Varrone. Storia di una conoscenza,” Athenaeum 40: 221–43.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2003) “Figures of Allegory from Homer to Latin Epic,” in Boys-Stones, (2003a) 151–75.
Laks, A. and Schofield, M., eds. (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Penna, A. [1962]/(1999) “Hesiod in the Culture and Poetry of Virgil,” in Hardie, (1999) ii.25–40 = Hésiode et son influence, Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique Tome 7, Fondation Hardt, Vandœuvres-Geneva (1962) 225–47.
Penna, A. (1977) “Senex Corycius,” in Atti del Convegno virgiliano sul bimillenario delle Georgiche (Napoli 17–19 Dicembre 1975): 37–66.Google Scholar
Penna, A. (1995) “Towards a History of the Poetic Catalogue of Philosophical Themes,” in Harrison, (1995) 314–28.
Laughton, E. (1956) “Varro the Grammarian. Review of Varron Grammairien Latin and De Lingua Latina, livre v by J. Collart,” CR 6: 38–41.Google Scholar
Laughton, E. (1960) “Observations on the Style of Varro,” CQ 10: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughton, E. (1978) “Humour in Varro,” in Collart, (1978) 105–11.
Laurenti, R. (1973) Filodemo e il pensiero economico degli epicurei. Milan: Istituto editoriale cisalpino-La goliardica.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1981) “Georgics 2 and the Poem,” Arethusa 14: 35–48.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1999) “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Papirius Paetus in 46 bce,” TAPA 129: 139–79.Google Scholar
Bonniec, H. and Vallet, G., eds. (1980) Mélanges de littérature et d'épigraphie latines, d'histoire ancienne et d'archéologie: Hommage à la mémoire de Pierre Wuilleumier. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Y. (1997) Varron théologien et philosophe romain. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1994) “Servius on Vergil's Senex Corycius: New Evidence,” MD 33: 181–95.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, W. (1965) “Beast and Man in the Third Book of Virgil's Georgics,” G&R 12: 64–77.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1985) “The Dramatic Date of Varro, De re rustica, Book iii and the Elections in 54,” Historia 34: 248–54.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1989) “Garden Parlors: Nobles and Birds,” in Curtis, (1989) ii.105–27.
Löbl, R. (1997) TEXNH–Techne: Untersuchung zur Bedeutung dieses Wortes in der Zeit von Homer bis Aristoteles. 2 vols. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978) “Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and Satirist,” PCPS 204: 68–91.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995) “Cicero's Politics in De officiis,” in Laks, and Schofield, (1995) 213–40.
Long, A. A. (1996a) “The Socratic Tradition: Diogenes, Crates, and Hellenistic Ethics,” in Branham, and Goulet-Cazé, (1996) 28–46.
Long, A. A. (1996b) Stoic Studies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. ed. (1999) The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N., eds. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lundström, S. (1976) “Der Eingang des Proömiums zum dritten Buche der Georgica,” Hermes 104: 163–91.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. [1974]/(1999) “Scilicet et Tempus Veniet…Virgil, Georgics 1.463–514,” in Hardie, (1999) ii.162–83 = Woodman, T. and West, D., eds. Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry, Cambridge University Press (1974) 47–66.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd edn. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maggiulli, G. (1994) “Utilitas/delectatio, utilitas/voluptas nell'ideologia delle Res rusticae,” BstudLat 24: 487–99.Google Scholar
Maggiulli, G. (1995) “Dixi in eo libro quem de rebus rusticis scripsi (Cic. Cato 54),” RCCM 37: 205–19.Google Scholar
Marasco, G. (1990) “Corycius Senex (Verg. Georg. 4.127),” RFIC 118: 402–07.Google Scholar
Marchant, E. C. and Todd, O. J., trans. (1923) Xenophon: Memorabilia, Oeconomicus; Symposium, Apology. Reprint, 2002. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1971) Recherches sur les agronomes latins et leurs conceptions économiques et sociales. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1995) “Ars an quid aliud? La conception Varronienne de l'agriculture,” REL 73: 80–91.Google Scholar
Martindale, C., ed. (1997) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherran, M. L. (1996) The Religion of Socrates. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. (1975) “Georgics 3.209–294: Amor and Civilization,” CSCA 8: 177–97.Google Scholar
Miles, G. B. (1980) Virgil's Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Monro, H. (1975) The Ambivalence of Bernard Mandeville. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moore, T. J. (1998) The Theater of Plautus: Playing to the Audience. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of Redemption in Virgil's Georgics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, D. R. (1987) “On Professor Vlastos' Xenophon,” AncPhil 7: 9–22.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. R. (1994) “Xenophon's Socrates as Teacher,” in Vander Waerdt, (1994) 181–208.
Morson, G. S. (1989) “Parody, History, and Metaparody,” in Morson, and Emerson, (1989) 63–86.
Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C., eds. (1989) Rethinking Bakhtin: Extensions and Challenges. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C. (1990) Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Muecke, F. (1979) “Poetic Self-Consciousness in Georgicsii,” in Boyle, (1979a) 87–107.
Münzer, F. (1937) “Scrofa,” Pauly, A., G. Wissowa and W. Kroll, eds. (1894–1980) Paulys Real-Encylopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. 6A: 2287–89.Google Scholar
Myles, M. (2006) Roman Manliness: Virtus and the Roman Republic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mynors, R. A. B., ed. (1990) Virgil: Georgics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nadon, C. (2001) Xenophon's Prince: Republic and Empire in the Cyropaedia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nagle, D. B. (2006) The Household as the Foundation of Aristotle's Polis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. (2005) Reading after Actium: Vergil's Georgics, Octavian, and Rome. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali, C. (1995) “Oikonomia in Hellenistic Political Thought,” in Laks, and Schofield, (1995) 95–128.
Nehamas, A. (1998) The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, S. (1998) God and the Land: The Metaphysics of Farming in Hesiod and Vergil. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1970) “Le livre iii des ‘Res rusticae’ de Varron et les allusions au déroulement des comices tributes,” REA 72: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1992) “Plato's Gorgias and Euripides' Antiope: A Study in Generic Transformation,” CA 11: 121–41.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1993) “The Folly of Praise: Plato's Critique of Encomiastic Discourse in the Lysis and Symposium,” CQ 43: 112–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995) Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noè, E. (1977) “L'agronomo Cneo Tremellio Scrofa,” NAC 6: 119–33.Google Scholar
Norden, E. [1898]/(1983) Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance. 2 vols. 9th edn. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Novara, A. (1980) “Le vieux Caton «aux champs» ou le plaisir exceptionnel de l'agriculture pour un sage vieillard (a propos de Cic., Cato Maior, 51–56),” in Bonniec, and Vallet, (1980) 261–68.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990) Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (2003) “Philosophy and Literature,” in Sedley, (2003) 211–41.
O'Hara, J. J. (2005) “Trying Not To Cheat: Responses to Inconsistencies in Roman Epic,” TAPA 135: 15–33.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar's Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, T. M. (2006) “The Mind in Motion: Walking and Metaphorical Travel in the Roman Villa,” CP 101: 133–52.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, T. M. (2007) “Walking with Odysseus: The Portico Frame of the Odyssey Landscapes,” AJP 128: 497–532.Google Scholar
Pagán, V. E. (2006) Rome and the Literature of Gardens. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Pangle, T. L. (1994) “Socrates in the Context of Xenophon's Political Writings,” in Waerdt, (1994) 127–50.
Parry, A. (1972) “The Idea of Art in Virgil's Georgics,” Arethusa 5: 35–52.Google Scholar
Parry, R. D. (1996) Plato's Craft of Justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Pendrick, G. J., ed. (2002) Antiphon the Sophist: The Fragments. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1981) “On the Corycian Farmer of Vergil's Fourth Georgic,” TAPA 111: 167–77.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. (1986) “Vergil's Theodicy Reconsidered,” in Bernard, (1986) 67–83.
Perkell, C. (1989) The Poet's Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil's Georgics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Perl, G. (1980) “Cn. Tremelius Scrofa in Gallia Transalpina. Zu Varro, RR 1,7,8,” AJAH 5: 97–109.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. (1984) “The Persian King and the Queen Bee,” AJAH 9: 98–108.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. (1994) Xenophon: Oeconomicus; A Social and Historical Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S. B. (1996) “Review of Xenophon: The Shorter Socratic Writings; Apology of Socrates to the Jury, Oeconomicus, and Symposium by R. C. Bartlett,” BMCR 96.9.4.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. [1936]/(1990) Römischer Staat und griechisches Staatsdenken bei Cicero: Untersuchungen zu Ciceros Schrift De re publica. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F., ed. (1995) Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Powell, A. and Hodkinson, S., eds. (1994) The Shadow of Sparta. London: Routledge for the Classical Press of Wales.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. and Richer, N., eds. (forthcoming) Xenophon and Sparta. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.
Press, G. A., ed. (1993) Plato's Dialogues: New Studies and Interpretations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Press, G. A. (1996) “The State of the Question in the Study of Plato,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 34: 507–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, G. A. (1997) “Introduction: The Dialogical Mode in Modern Plato Studies,” in Hart, and Tejera, (1997) 1–28.
Press, G. A. ed. (2000) Who Speaks for Plato? Studies in Platonic Anonymity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Primer, I., ed. (1975) Mandeville Studies: New Explorations in the Art and Thought of Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1670–1733). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, S. (2006) “Socrates, Antisthenes, and the Cynics,” in Ahbel-Rappe, and Kamtekar, (2006) 75–92.
Prior, C. W. A., ed. (2000) Mandeville and Augustan Ideas: New Essays. Victoria, BC: English Literary Studies, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1976) “Review of Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg by V. Buchheit,” CP 71: 279–82.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1979) Virgil's Poem of the Earth: Studies in the Georgics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1985) Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Reay, B. (2005) “Agriculture, Writing, and Cato's Aristocratic Self-Fashioning,” CA 24: 331–61.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. (1984) “On the Origin of ‘Menippean Satire’ as the Name of a Literary Genre,” CP 79: 226–29.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. (1993) Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Reshotko, N. (2006) Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-Nor-Bad. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverdin, O., ed. (1963) Varron: Six exposés et discussions par C. O. Brink et al. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. S. (1983) “The Triumph of Metellus Scipio and the Dramatic Date of Varro RR 3,” CQ 33: 456–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, W. (1969) “Einige Rekonstruktions- und Quellenprobleme in Cicero De re publica,” RFIC 97: 273–95.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2005) “The Satiric Maze: Petronius, Satire, and the Novel,” in Freudenburg, (2005) 160–73.
Ritschl, F. W. [1866]/(1978) Opuscula Philologica. 5 vols. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Rocca, S. (1983) Etologia Virgiliana. Genoa: Istituto di filologia classica e medievale.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollinson, P. (1981) Classical Theories of Allegory and Christian Culture. Appendix by Matsen, P.. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Trans. Lloyd, Janet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. (1996) Of Art and Wisdom: Plato's Understanding of Techne. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. (2003) Beautiful City: The Dialectical Character of Plato's “Republic.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Roscalla, F. (1990) “La dispensa di Iscomaco. Senofonte, Platone e l'amministrazione della casa,” QS 31: 35–55.Google Scholar
Rösch-Binde, C. (1998) Vom “δεινὸς ἀνήρ” zum “diligentissimus investigator antiquitatis”: Zur komplexen Beziehung zwischen M. Tullius Cicero und M. Terentius Varro. Munich: Utz.Google Scholar
Rose, M. A. (1993) Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-modern. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I., eds. (2006) City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975) “The Culex and Moretum as Post-Augustan Literary Parodies,” HSCP 79: 235–63.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1979) “Two Rustic Notes,” CP 74: 52–56.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1987) Virgil's Elements: Physics and Poetry in the Georgics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. and Schofield, M., eds. (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (1966) The Satires of Horace: A Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1945) A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ryberg, I. S. (1958) “Vergil's Golden Age,” TAPA 89: 112–31.Google Scholar
Salvatore, A. (1978) Scienza e poesia in Roma: Varrone e Virgilio. Naples: Guida.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. W. (1978) “Comedy in Callipolis: Animal Imagery in the Republic,” The American Political Science Review 72: 888–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaerer, R. (1930). ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗ et TEXNH: étude sur les notions de connaissance et d'art d'Homère a Platon. Macon: Protat frères.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1997) “The Boundaries of Knowledge in Virgil's Georgics,” in Habinek, and Schiesaro, (1997) 63–89.
Schneider, L. (1987) Paradox and Society: The Work of Bernard Mandeville. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. and Striker, G., eds. (1986) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1911) “Die Georgica in Vergils Stilentwicklung,” in Charites: Friedrich Leo zum sechzigsten Geburtstag dargebracht. Berlin: Weidmann. 359–70.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (2001) “Xenophon and Athenian Democratic Ideology,” CQ 51: 385–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D., ed. (2003) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, C. (1989) Orpheus. The Myth of the Poet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (1909) “Φύσις, Μελέτη, Ἐπιστήμη,” TAPA 40: 185–201.Google Scholar
Skydsgaard, J. E. (1968) Varro the Scholar: Studies in the First Book of Varro's De Re Rustica. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (1991) “The Quiet Life in Euripides' Antiope,” in Hofmann, and Harder, (1991) 137–51.
Smith, G. B. (1997) “Leo Strauss and the Straussians: An Anti-Democratic Cult?Political Science and Politics 30: 180–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. B. (2006) Reading Leo Strauss: Politics, Philosophy, Judaism. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speranza, F., ed. (1974) Scriptorum Romanorum de re rustica reliquiae. Messina: Università degli studi.Google Scholar
Spurr, M. S. (1986) “Agriculture and the Georgics,” G&R 33: 164–87.Google Scholar
Stafford, J. M., ed. (1997) Private Vices, Publick Benefits? The Contemporary Reception of Bernard Mandeville. Solihull: Ismeron.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. A. (1994) “Friendship and Profit in Xenophon's Oeconomicus,” in Vander Waerdt, (1994) 209–37.
Strauss, L. (1952) Persecution and the Art of Writing. Reprint, 1988. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1964) The City and Man. Reprint, 1978. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1970) Xenophon's Socratic Discourse: An Interpretation of the Oeconomicus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. and Cropsey, J., eds. (1987) History of Political Philosophy. 3rd edn. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stull, W. C. (2002) “Review of Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk by B. Cardauns,” BMCR 2002.06.40.Google Scholar
Stumpf, T. (2000) “Mandeville, Asceticism, and the Spare Diet of the Golden Age,” in Prior, (2000) 97–116.
Taragna Novo, S. (1968) Economia ed etica nell'Economico di Senofonte. Turin: G. Giappichelli.Google Scholar
Tarver, T. (1997) “Varro and the Antiquarianism of Philosophy,” in Barnes, and Griffin, (1997) 130–64.
Tatum, W. J. (1992) “The Poverty of the Claudii Pulchri: Varro, De Re Rustica 3.16.1–2,” CQ 42: 190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. (2002) “The Origins of Our Present Paradigms,” in Annas, and Rowe, (2002) 73–84.
Thibodeau, P. (2001) “The Old Man and His Garden (Verg. Georg. 4, 116–48),” MD 47: 175–95.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. T. (1978) “Religious Background for Virgil's Bee Symbol in the Georgics,” Vergilius 24: 32–36.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983) “Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman Poetry,” CQ 33: 92–113 = Thomas (1999) 68–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1987) “Prose into Poetry: Tradition and Meaning in Virgil's Georgics,” HSCP 91: 229–60 = Thomas (1999) 142–72.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. ed. (1988) Virgil. Georgics. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, R. F. (1990) “Ideology, Influence, and Future Studies in the Georgics,” Vergilius 36: 64–70.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1991) “The ‘Sacrifice’ at the End of the Georgics, Aristaeus, and Vergilian Closure,” CP 86: 211–18.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1992) “The Old Man Revisited: Memory, Reference and Genre in Virg., Georg. 4, 116–48,” MD 29: 35–70 = Thomas (1999) 173–205.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1998) “Virgil's Pindar?” in Knox, and Foss, (1998) 99–120 = Thomas (1999) 267–87.
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor: University Of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2000) “A Trope by Any Other Name: ‘Polysemy’, Ambiguity, and Significatio in Virgil,” HSCP 100: 381–407.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001a) Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001b) “Review of Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica by R. Cramer,” Gnomon 73: 580–85.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2001c) “The Georgics of Resistance: From Virgil to Heaney,” Vergilius 47: 117–47.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2004) “Review of Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition by M. Gale,” CR 54: 371–74.Google Scholar
Tilly, B., ed. (1973) Varro the Farmer: A Selection from the Res Rusticae. London: University Tutorial Press.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (1998) “Xenophon's Cyropaedia: Disfiguring the Pedagogical State,” in Too, and Livingstone, (1998) 282–302.
Too, Y. L. (2001) “The Economies of Pedagogy: Xenophon's Wifely Didactics,” PCPS 47: 65–80.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. and Livingstone, N., eds. (1998) Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traglia, A. (1985) “Le Res rusticae di Varrone come opera letteraria,” C&S 94: 89–97.Google Scholar
Tsouna McKirahan, V. (1994) “The Socratic Origins of the Cynics and the Cyrenaics,” in Vander Waerdt, (1994) 367–91.
Tsouna McKirahan, V (1996) “Epicurean Attitudes to Management and Finance,” in Giannantoni, and Gigante, (1996) II.701–14.
Tsouna, V. (2007) The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuplin, C. (1993) The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. (1994) “Xenophon, Sparta and the Cyropaedia,” in Powell, and Hodkinson, (1994) 127–81.
Tuplin, C. (1996) “Xenophon (1),” Hornblower, S. and A. Spawforth, eds. (1996). Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press. 3rd edn.: 1628–31.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. ed. (2004a) Xenophon and His World: Papers from a Conference Held in Liverpool in July 1999. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Tuplin, C. (2004b) “Xenophon and His World: An Introductory Review,” in Tuplin, (2004a) 13–31.
Vander Waerdt, P. A., ed. (1994a) The Socratic Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1994b) “Socrates in the Clouds,” in Vander Waerdt, (1994a) 48–86.
Woestijne, P. (1931) “Varron de Réate et Virgile,” RBPh 10: 909–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sickle, J. B. (2000) “Virgil vs. Cicero, Lucretius, Theocritus, Callimachus, Plato, and Homer: Two Programmatic Plots in the First Bucolic,” Vergilius 46: 21–58.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vasiliou, I. (1999) “Conditional Irony in the Socratic Dialogues,” CQ 49: 456–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiliou, I. (2002) “Socrates' Reverse Irony,” CQ 52: 220–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1970) “Il pensiero economico greco,” in Firpo, (1970) 583–607.
Virlouvet, C. (1996) “Une allusion varronienne aux fraudes de Clodius? À propos de Res rusticaeiii, 5, 18,” MEFRA 108: 873–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, K. (2000) “Review of Vergils Weltsicht: Optimismus und Pessimismus in Vergils Georgica by R. Cramer,” Vergilius 46: 162–67.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution,” in Habinek, and Schiesaro, (1997) 3–22.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1998) “Horti and Hellenization,” in Cima, and Rocca, (1998) 1–12.
Waterfield, R. (1997) “Review of Xenophon: Memorabilia by. A. L. Bonnette and Xenophon: The Shorter Socratic Writings; Apology of Socrates to the Jury, Oeconomicus, and Symposium by R. C. Bartlett,” CR 47: 416–17.Google Scholar
Wedeck, H. E. (1929) Humour in Varro and Other Essays. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weeber, K.-W. (2003) Die Schwelgerei, das süße Gift: Luxus im alten Rom. Darmstadt: Primus.Google Scholar
Weinbrot, H. D. (2005) Menippean Satire Reconsidered: From Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (2006) The Socratic Paradox and its Enemies. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wellman, R. R. (1976) “Socratic Method in Xenophon,” JHI 37: 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wender, D. S. (1969) “Resurrection in the Fourth Georgic,” AJP 90: 424–36.Google Scholar
White, K. D. (1973) “Roman Agricultural Writers i: Varro and His Predecessors,” ANRW I.4: 439–97.Google Scholar
White, K. D. (1977) Country Life in Classical Times. London: Elek Books Ltd.Google Scholar
White, N. (2002) Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, J. (1987) Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, R. M. (1976) “The Second Georgic: The Sowing of a Republic,” ZAnt 26: 63–72.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1969) The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey. Reprint, 1997. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. P. (1970) “Pindar and the Proem to the Third Georgic,” in Wimmel, (1970) 286–90.
Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1993) Shame and Necessity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1997) “The Analogy of City and Soul in Plato's Republic,” in Kraut, (1997) 49–60.
Williams, B. (2006) The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilms, H. (1995) Techne und Paideia bei Xenophon und Isokrates. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmel, W., ed. (1970) Forschungen zur römischen Literatur: Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Karl Büchner. Wiesbaden: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1954) “Cicero's Cum Dignitate Otium: A Reconsideration,” JRS 44: 1–13.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1999) “Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias,” in Long, (1999) 290–310.
Zetzel, J. E. G., ed. (1995) Cicero: De Re Publica; Selections. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. ed. (1999) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Leah Kronenberg, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729973.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Leah Kronenberg, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729973.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Leah Kronenberg, Rutgers University, New Jersey
  • Book: Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome
  • Online publication: 03 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511729973.013
Available formats
×