Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T16:29:36.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Connective tissue stem and progenitor cells

from Part I - Introduction to stem cells and regenerative medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Pamela Gehron Robey
Affiliation:
National Institutes of Health
Peter X. Ma
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

History

The concept that post-natal tissues self-renew, and do so by means of a stem/progenitor cell, is not a new one, being based on observations made around 1900, primarily in the field of hematology. While this concept was originally thought to apply to tissues with a high rate of turnover (blood, the gastrointestinal tract, epidermis), studies over the past few decades have demonstrated that virtually all tissues, including connective tissues, have the ability to self-renew, albeit at different rates, depending on the demands imposed upon them [1]. Methods to establish cell cultures in vitro were first attempted in the late 1800s and early 1900s by a number of investigators, namely Bernard, Roux, Harrison, and others [2], but it is Alexis Carrel who is credited with the methodology employed to establish and maintain connective tissue cells in vitro [3]. With subsequent refinements in the following years, connective tissue cell cultures rapidly became an essential tool in cell physiology and molecular biology. Perhaps the first real evidence of stem/progenitor cells within a population of connective tissue cells emerged in the late 1960s, when Alexander Friedenstein and co-workers isolated clones of rapidly adherent bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), derived from a single cell, a colony-forming unit-fibroblast (CFU-F). Approximately 10%–20% of single CFU-F-derived strains had the ability to form bone, hematopoiesis-supportive stroma, and marrow adipocytes upon in-vivo transplantation in open systems, and cartilage as well in closed systems. Friedenstein and his collaborator, Maureen Owen, later called these cells “multipotent bone marrow stromal stem cells” [4, 5]; more recently, the term “skeletal stem cell” has been coined [6].

Connective tissue stem/progenitor cells in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Over the last several decades, putative stem/progenitor cells have been isolated from a long list of connective tissues. These cells have been collectively termed “mesenchymal stem cells” or more recently “mesenchymal stromal cells” (“MSCs”), because of their adherence to tissue culture plastic, fibroblastic morphology, and expression of cell surface markers [7]. How similar or dissimilar “MSCs” are from different connective tissues, and whether they are true stem/progenitor cells, is not well known [8]. Nonetheless, these populations may be useful in the reconstruction of connective tissues.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Robey, P. G. 2000. Stem cells near the century mark. J. Clin. Invest., 105(11), 1489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witkowski, J. A. 1979. Alexis Carrel and the mysticism of tissue culture. Med. Hist., 23(3), 279–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrel, A. 1913. Contributions to the study of the mechanism of the growth of connective tissue. J. Exp. Med., 18(3), 287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenstein, A. J., Chailakhyan, R. K. and Gerasimov, U. V. 1987. Bone marrow osteogenic stem cells: in vitro cultivation and transplantation in diffusion chambers. Cell Tissue Kinet., 20(3), 263–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Owen, M. and Friedenstein, A. J. 1988. Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found. Symp., 136, 42–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Bianco, P. and Robey, P. G. 2004. Skeletal stem cells. In Lanza, R. P., editor. Handbook of Adult and Fetal Stem Cells. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; pp. 415–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I. et al. 2006. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy, 8(4), 315–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianco, P., Robey, P. G. and Simmons, P. J. 2008. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell, 2(4), 313–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spalding, K. L, Arner, E., Westermark, P. O. et al. 2008. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature, 453(7196), 783–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gronthos, S., Brahim, J., Li, W. et al. 2002. Stem cell properties of human dental pulp stem cells. J. Dent. Res., 81(8), 531–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priya, N., Sarcar, S., Majumdar, A. S. and Sundarraj, S. 2012. Explant culture: a simple, reproducible, efficient and economic technique for isolation of mesenchymal stromal cells from human adipose tissue and lipoaspirate. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 27, 1–9.Google Scholar
Robey, P. G. 2011. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising). Tissue Eng. Part B Rev., 17(6), 423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suire, C., Brouard, N., Hirschi, K. and Simmons, P. J. 2012. Isolation of the stromal–vascular fraction of mouse bone marrow markedly enhances the yield of clonogenic stromal progenitors. Blood, 119(11), e86–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kharlamova, L. A. 1975. Colony formation inhibition in human bone marrow stromal cells exposed to a factor formed in vitro by peripheral blood leukocytes [in Russian]. Biull. Éksp. Biol. Med., 80(7), 89–91.Google Scholar
Grzesik, W. J., Cheng, H., Oh, J. S. et al. 2000. Cementum-forming cells are phenotypically distinct from bone-forming cells. J. Bone Miner. Res., 15(1), 52–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langille, R. M. and Solursh, M. 1990. Formation of chondrous and osseous tissues in micromass cultures of rat frontonasal and mandibular ectomesenchyme. Differentiation, 44(3), 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angele, P., Kujat, R., Nerlich, M. et al. 1999. Engineering of osteochondral tissue with bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells in a derivatized hyaluronan–gelatin composite sponge. Tissue Eng., 5(6), 545–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsov, S. A., Mankani, M. H. and Robey, P. G. 2000. Effect of serum on human bone marrow stromal cells: ex vivo expansion and in vivo bone formation. Transplantation, 70(12), 1780–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanovic, Z. 2009. Hypoxia or in situ normoxia: the stem cell paradigm. J. Cell Physiol., 219(2), 271–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsov, S. and Robey, P. G. 1996. Species differences in growth requirements for bone marrow stromal fibroblast colony formation in vitro. Calcified Tissue Int., 59(4), 265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bianco, P., Kuznetsov, S., Riminucci, M. and Robey, P. G. 2006. Postnatal skeletal stem cells. Meth. Enzymol., 419, 117–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacchetti, B., Funari, A., Michienzi, S. et al. 2007. Self-renewing osteoprogenitors in bone marrow sinusoids can organize a hematopoietic microenvironment. Cell, 131, 324–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, D. B., Sworder, B., Bouladoux, N. et al. 2012. Stromal-derived IL-6 alters the balance of myeloerythroid progenitors during Toxoplasma gondii infection. J. Leukoc. Biol., 92(1), 123–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedenstein, A. J. 1976. Precursor cells of mechanocytes. Int. Rev. Cytol., 47, 327–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsov, S. A., Mankani, M. H., Bianco, P. and Robey, P. G. 2009. Enumeration of the colony-forming units–fibroblast from mouse and human bone marrow in normal and pathological conditions. Stem Cell Res., 2(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsov, S. A., Krebsbach, P. H., Satomura, K. et al. 1997. Single-colony derived strains of human marrow stromal fibroblasts form bone after transplantation in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res., 12(9), 1335–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonewald, L. F., Harris, S. E., Rosser, J. et al. 2003. Von Kossa staining alone is not sufficient to confirm that mineralization in vitro represents bone formation. Calcif. Tissue Int., 72(5), 537–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diascro, D. D, Vogel, R. L., Johnson, T. E. et al. 1998. High fatty acid content in rabbit serum is responsible for the differentiation of osteoblasts into adipocyte-like cells. J. Bone Miner. Res., 13(1), 96–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szilvassy, S. J., Humphries, R. K., Lansdorp, P. M., Eaves, A. C. and Eaves, C. J. 1990. Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 87(22), 8736–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liechty, K. W., MacKenzie, T. C., Shaaban, A. F. et al. 2000. Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep. Nature Med., 6(11), 1282–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliopoulos, N., Stagg, J., Lejeune, L., Pommey, S. and Galipeau, J. 2005. Allogeneic marrow stromal cells are immune rejected by MHC class I- and class II-mismatched recipient mice. Blood, 106(13), 4057–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, B. R., Reginato, A. M. and Wang, W. 2000. Bone development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 16, 191–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akintoye, S. O., Lam, T., Shi, S. et al. 2006. Skeletal site-specific characterization of orofacial and iliac crest human bone marrow stromal cells in same individuals. Bone, 38(6), 758–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnette, E. W. 1972. Fate of an iliac crest graft. J. Periodontol., 43(2), 88–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minteer, D., Marra, K. G. and Rubin, J. P. 2013. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: biology and potential applications. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 129, 59–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Shadrach, J. L. and Wagers, A. J. 2011. Stem cells for skeletal muscle repair. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 366(1575), 2297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, C. G., Zhang, Q. J. and Zhou, J. R. 2011. Therapeutic potentials of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord. Stem Cell Rev., 7(1), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsov, S. A., Mankani, M. H., Gronthos, S. et al. 2001. Circulating skeletal stem cells. J. Cell Biol., 153(5), 1133–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, H. S., Lee, J., Lee, E. et al. 2009. A new role of substance P as an injury-inducible messenger for mobilization of D29(+) stromal-like cells. Nature Med., 15(4), 425–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieb, G., Steffens, G., Pallua, N., Bernhagen, J. and Bucala, R. 2011. Circulating fibrocytes – biology and mechanisms in wound healing and scar formation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol., 291, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi, B., James, A. W., Nelson, E. R. et al. 2010. Human adipose derived stromal cells heal critical size mouse calvarial defects. PLoS One, 5(6), e11177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×