Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T17:56:48.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

110 - Hyperdensity Following Endovascular Intervention

from Section 4 - Abnormalities Without Significant Mass Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Zoran Rumboldt
Affiliation:
Medical University of South Carolina
Benjamin Huang
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Zoran Rumboldt
Affiliation:
Medical University of South Carolina
Mauricio Castillo
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Benjamin Huang
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Andrea Rossi
Affiliation:
G. Gaslini Children's Research Hospital
Get access

Summary

Specific Imaging Findings

Head CT scans obtained immediately following procedures involving intra-arterial injection of large volumes of iodinated contrast media may show parenchymal or subarachnoid space enhancement mimicking intracranial hemorrhage. The findings include diffuse parenchymal hyperintensity and increased subarachnoid space attenuation usually corresponding to the arterial territory injected, without associated gyral swelling. Occasionally, ventricular CSF may also demonstrate increased density. The presence of contrast does not exclude hemorrhage, as the two can coexist. Measuring the attenuation of the involved regions may be helpful, as contrast enhancement will usually demonstrate higher values (as high as 160 HU) than blood. Follow-up CT is also useful, as the contrast enhancement typically resolves completely within 24 h. In patients undergoing attempted endovascular revascularization for acute infarct, a hyperdense lesion with maximum HU > 90 that persists after 24 h is considered contrast extravasation and is highly associated with hematoma formation. On the other hand, the common finding of parenchymal, subarachnoid, and intraventricular hyperattenuation due to contrast accumulation following uneventful embolization of cerebral aneurysms is almost always clinically insignificant. In unclear cases parenchymal contrast stain may also be differentiated from hemorrhage by performing brain MRI. Dual-energy CT with 80 and 140 KV seems to reliably distinguish intracranial hemorrhage from iodinated contrast. In acute ischemic patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis, sulcal hyperintensity may be found on FLAIR images, which is likely caused by iodinated contrast medium.

Type
Chapter
Information
Brain Imaging with MRI and CT
An Image Pattern Approach
, pp. 227 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brisman, JL, Jilani, M, McKinney, JS. Contrast enhancement hyperdensity after endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR 2008;29:588–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Yoon, W, Seo, JJ, Kim, JK, et al. Contrast enhancement and contrast extravasation on computed tomography after intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2004;35:876–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Phan, CM, Yoo, AJ, Hirsch, JA, et al. Differentiation of hemorrhage from iodinated contrast in different intracranial compartments using dual-energy head CT. AJNR 2012; Mar 1. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kim, EY, Kim, SS, Na, DG, et al. Sulcal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: iodinated contrast media as its possible cause and the association with hemorrhagic transformation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:264–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Guimaraens, L, Vivas, E, Fonnegra, A, et al. Transient encephalopathy from angiographic contrast: a rare complication in neurointerventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33:383–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×