Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:52:52.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

36 - Expertise and Situation Awareness

from PART VI - GENERALIZABLE MECHANISMS MEDIATING EXPERTISE AND GENERAL ISSUES

Mica R. Endsley
Affiliation:
SA Technologies
K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Neil Charness
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Paul J. Feltovich
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
University of West Florida
Get access

Summary

In thinking about expertise, we often focus on skilled physical performance (e.g., the world-class tennis player or gymnast) or skilled decision making (e.g., the chess grandmaster). In addition to these aspects of performance, however, situation awareness (SA), an up-to-date understanding of the world around them, forms a critical cornerstone for expertise in most domains, from driving to aviation to military operations to medical practice. The characteristics that allow people to develop high levels of SA often develop silently alongside more observable features like skilled physical performance, even in tasks such as sports that are considered primarily physical in nature.

Take for example the following excerpt from a magazine story about Wayne Gretzky, an all-time leading hockey scorer who set or tied 49 different National Hockey League records, including most goals, most points, and most assists.

Gretzky doesn't look like a hockey player. … His shot is only average – or, nowadays, below average … Gretzky's gift, his genius even, is for seeing … To most fans, and sometimes even to the players on the ice, hockey frequently looks like chaos: sticks flailing, bodies falling, the puck ricocheting just out of reach. But amid the mayhem, Gretzky can discern the game's underlying pattern and flow, and anticipate what's going to happen faster and in more detail than anyone else in the building. Several times during a game you'll see him making what seem to be aimless circles on the other side of the rink from the traffic, and then, as if answering a signal, he'll dart ahead to a spot where, an instant later, the puck turns up. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amalberti, R., & Deblon, F. (1992). Cognitive modeling of fighter aircraft process control: A step towards an intelligent on-board assistance system. International Journal of Man-machine Systems, 36, 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOPA. (1997). Nall report: “General aviation accident trends and factors for 1996.” Fredrick, MD: Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association Air Safety Foundation.
Currie, L. (1969). The perception of danger in a simulated driving task. Ergonomics, 12(6), 841–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society (pp. 97–101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Google Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (1989). Pilot situation awareness: The challenge for the training community. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training Systems Conference (I/ITSC) (pp. 111–117), Ft. Worth, TX: American Defense Preparedness Association.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M. R., & Bolstad, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in pilot situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(3), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endsley, M. R., Bolstad, C. A., Garland, D., Howell, C., Shook, R. W. C., Costello, A., et al. (2002). “Situation awareness training for general aviation pilots: Final report” (No. SATECH 02-04). Marietta, GA: SA Technologies.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Review Annual of Psychology, 47, 273–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horswill, M. S., & McKenna, F. P. (2004). Drivers hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road. In Banbury, S. & Tremblay, S. (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Jones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. (1996). Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 67(6), 507–512.Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & Clinton-Cirocco, A. (1986). Rapid decision making on the fire ground. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp 576–580), Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.Google Scholar
McGrath, C. (1997, March 13). New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
McKenna, F., & Crick, J. L. (1991). Hazard perception in drivers: A methodology for testing and training. Transport Research Laboratory Report No. 313. Crowthorne, U.K. Google Scholar
McKenna, F., & Crick, J. L. (1994). Developments in hazard perception. London, UK: Department of Transport.Google Scholar
McKenna, F., & Farrand, P. (1999). The role of automaticity in driving. In Grayson, G. B. (Ed.), Behavioural research in road safety ix. Crowthorne, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Mourant, R. R., & Rockwell, T. H. (1972). Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors, 14(4), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. (1973). Artificial inteligence and the concept of mind. In Schank, R. C. & Colby, K. M. (Eds.). Computer models of thought and language (pp. 1–60) San Francisco, W. H. Frelman.Google Scholar
NTSB. (1989). General aviation accidents involving visual flight rules flight into instrument meteorological conditions (No. NTSB/SR-89/01). Washington, DC: Author.
NTSB. (1998). “1997 U.S. Airline fatalities down substantially from previous year; general aviation deaths rise.” NTSB press release 2/24/98 (No. SB 98–12). Washington, DC: Author.
O'Hare, D. (1997). Cognitive ability determinants of elite pilot performance. Human Factors, 39(4), 540–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelz, D. C., & Krumpat, E. (1974). Caution profile and driving record of undergraduate males. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, M. (1986). Situation awareness: Let's get serious about the clue-bird. Unpublished Manuscript.
Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1998). Situation assessment for routine flight and decision making. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1(4), 315–324.Google Scholar
Quimby, A. R., Maycock, G., Carter, I. D., Dixon, R., & Wall, J. G. (1986). “Perceptual abilities of accident involved drivers” (No. Research Report 27). Transport and Road Research Laboratory. Crowthorne, UK.
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1985). “On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models” (No. DTIC #AD-A159080). Atlanta, GA: Center for Man-Machine Systems Research, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Shattuck, L., Graham, J., Merlo, J., & Hah, S. (2000). Cognitive integration: An investigation of how expert and novice commanders process battlefield data. In Benedict, M. E. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Federated Laboratory Symposium on Displays and Interactive Displays Consortium. Adelphi, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Strater, L. D., Endsley, M. R., Pleban, R. J., & Matthews, M. D. (2001a). “Measures of platoon leader situation awareness in virtual decision making exercises” (No. Research Report 1770). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strater, L. D., Jones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. (2001b). “Analysis of infantry situation awareness training requirements” (No. SATech 01–15). Marietta, GA: SA Technologies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trollip, S. R., & Jensen, R. S. (1991). Human factors for general aviation. Englewood, CO: Jeppesen Sanderson.Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Bowden, K., & Crundall, D. (2002). Visual search while driving: Skill and awareness during inspection of the scene. Transportation Research, Part F(5), 87–97.Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×