Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- 26 Reading the Contested Forms of Nation through the Contested Forms of Kinship and Marriage
- 27 The Prison as a Technology of Care in Northeast Brazil
- 28 The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings
- 29 A Global Family: Kinship, Nations, and Transnational Organizations in Botswana’s Time of AIDS
- 30 Kinship, World Religions, and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
28 - The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings
from Part VI - Kinship and the Nation-State
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2019
By
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Cambridge Handbooks in Anthropology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Conceiving Kinship in the Twenty-First Century
- Part I Opening Frameworks
- Part II The (Non)Biological Basis of Relatedness
- Part III Reproducing Society: Gender, Birth, and Power
- Part IV Transnational Connections
- Part V Technological Conceptions
- Part VI Kinship and the Nation-State
- 26 Reading the Contested Forms of Nation through the Contested Forms of Kinship and Marriage
- 27 The Prison as a Technology of Care in Northeast Brazil
- 28 The Interface between Kinship and Politics in Three Different Social Settings
- 29 A Global Family: Kinship, Nations, and Transnational Organizations in Botswana’s Time of AIDS
- 30 Kinship, World Religions, and the Nation-State
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship , pp. 658 - 674Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Barnard, A. and Good, A.. 1984. Research Practices in the Study of Kinship. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. 1982. “On Value” (Radcliffe brown Lecture 1980). Proceedings of the British Academy 66: 207–241.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., eds. 1940. African Political Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P., 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, T. and Sillander, K., eds. 2011. Anarchic Solidarity: Autonomy, Equality, and Fellowship in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1984. Society and Cosmos: Chewong of Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (New paperback ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 1989.)Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1985. “Equality and Hierarchy in Chewong Classification.” In Context and Levels, ed. Barnes, R. H., De Coppet, D. and Parkin, R. J., 167–180. JASO Occasional Paper, 4. Oxford: JASO.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 1986. “Of Persons and Things: Exchange and Valuables among the Lio of Eastern Indonesia.” MAN (n.s.) 24: 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 1995b. “The Lio House: Building, Category, Idea, Value.” In About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, ed. Carsten, J. and Hugh-Jones, S., 149–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 1996. “Many Contexts, Many Meanings? Gendered Values among the Lio of Indonesia.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (incorporating MAN) 2(2): 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2001. “Self-Conscious Kinship: Some Contested Values in Norwegian Transnational Adoption.” In Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, ed. Franklin, S. and McKinnon, S., 203–223. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2003. “Kinning: The Creation of Life Trajectories in Transnational Adoptive Families.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (incorporating MAN) 9(3): 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. 2009. “Accelerated Globalisation and the Conflicts of Values Seen through the Lens of Transnational Adoption: A Comparative Perspective.” In The Anthropology of Moralities, ed. Heintz, Monica, 81–101. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2011. “Sources of Sociality in a Cosmological Frame: Chewong, Peninsular Malaysia.” In Anarchic Solidarity: Autonomy, Equality, and Fellowship in Southeast Asia, ed. Gibson, T. and Sillander, K., 40–61. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2013. “Knowledge, Morality and Causality in a ‘Luckless’ Society.” Social Analysis 56(1): 133–147.Google Scholar
Howell, S. 2017. “Rules without Rulers?” HAU: Journal of Etnographic Theory 7(3): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A. 1973. Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School 1922–1972. London: Alan Lane.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. S. 2003. “The Cognitive Machinery of Paoer: Reflections on Valeri’s ‘The Forest of Taboos.’” American Ethnologist 30(3): 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. 1954. Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1969 [1949]. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Melhuus, M. 2012. Problems of Conception: Issues of Law, Biotechnology, Individuals and Kinship. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Melhuus, M. and Howell, S.. 2009. “Adoption and Assisted Conception: One Universe of Unnatural Procreation. An Examination of Norwegian Legislation.” In European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, ed. Edwards, Jeanette and Salazar, Carles, 144–161. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2013. What Kinship Is – and Is Not. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M. 2017. “The Original Political Society.” HAU: Journal of Etnographic Theory 7(2): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, T and Alber, E., eds. 2017. Reconnecting State and Kinship. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by