Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Book part
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Premeeting Activities and Context
- Part III The Meeting Itself
- Capturing and Understanding Dynamics and Processes of the Meeting
- 12 Meetings as Interactional Achievements
- 13 Multimodal Perspectives on Meeting Interaction
- 14 Toward a Theory of Strategic Meeting Interaction
- 15 Social Dynamics at Work
- 16 Networks in Meetings
- 17 Effective Leader Behaviors in Regularly Held Staff Meetings
- 18 They Meet, They Talk…but Nothing Changes
- 19 Relative Status and Emotion Regulation in Workplace Meetings
- 20 Dynamic Affect in Team Meetings
- Tools and Models for Promoting Meeting Success
- Part IV Special Types of Meetings
- Part V Synthesis and Conclusion
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
20 - Dynamic Affect in Team Meetings
An Interpersonal Construct Embedded in Dynamic Interaction Processes
from Capturing and Understanding Dynamics and Processes of the Meeting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Book part
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Premeeting Activities and Context
- Part III The Meeting Itself
- Capturing and Understanding Dynamics and Processes of the Meeting
- 12 Meetings as Interactional Achievements
- 13 Multimodal Perspectives on Meeting Interaction
- 14 Toward a Theory of Strategic Meeting Interaction
- 15 Social Dynamics at Work
- 16 Networks in Meetings
- 17 Effective Leader Behaviors in Regularly Held Staff Meetings
- 18 They Meet, They Talk…but Nothing Changes
- 19 Relative Status and Emotion Regulation in Workplace Meetings
- 20 Dynamic Affect in Team Meetings
- Tools and Models for Promoting Meeting Success
- Part IV Special Types of Meetings
- Part V Synthesis and Conclusion
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Team meetings are affect-laden environments in which team members may motivate and energize, or frustrate and agitate each other. The importance of affect in teams generally and in team meetings particularly has led to a growing body of research that focuses on group affect. Existing conceptual and empirical work has contributed to our understanding of the nature of group affect and its implications for critical organizational phenomena, including emotion convergence and divergence, emotional contagion, emotional norms, and leadership. In this chapter, we first review contemporary research that has used a compositional approach to group affect. We highlight the need for a dynamic approach to group affect and then make suggestions for future theoretical development and methodological approaches for this important interpersonal, dynamic construct.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science , pp. 456 - 480Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. A. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97–125. doi:10.1177/001872679504800201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–675. doi:10.2307/3094912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., Brief, A. P., & Spataro, S. E. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm. In Greenberg, J. (Ed.), OB: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 3–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (1998). Group emotion: A view from top and bottom. In Neale, M. A., & Mannix, E. A. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 81–102). Stamford, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group affect: Its influence on individual and group outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 119–123. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (in press). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol. 2. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., & O'Neill, O. A. (2014). What's love got to do with it? The influence of a culture of companionate love in the long-term care setting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 551–598. doi:10.1177/0001839214538636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836. doi:10.2307/2667020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 197–231. doi:10.2307/2667070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramesfeld, K. D., & Gasper, K. (2008). Happily putting the pieces together: A test of two explanations for the effects of mood on group-level information processing. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 285–309. doi:10.1348/000712607×218295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, N., Chung, Y., & Tsai, T. (2011). How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone, and team processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1421–1454. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2011.00767.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, M. M. (2008). Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 415–463. doi:10.1080/10508400802224830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., & Luong, A. (2011). Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 90–104. doi:10.1037/a0021549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 945–958. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.93.5.945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571–612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, R. W. (1997). The Emotional Contagion Scale: A measure of individual differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 131–154. doi:10.1023/A:1024956003661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 1–21. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413–091305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1997 ). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75, 77–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Eisenkraft, N., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2010). The way you make me feel: Evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psychological Science, 21, 505–510. doi:10.1177/0956797610364117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.48.4.384CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, P. (1994). Moods, emotion, and traits. In Ekman, P. & Davidson, R. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 56–58). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Cambridge, MA: Malor.Google Scholar
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). Is there an ingroup advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243–249. doi:10.1037//0033–2909.128.2.243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.75.2.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 778–794. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.1995.tb01775.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In West, M. (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 77–93). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
George, J. M., & King, E. B. (2007). Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in groups: Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. In Mannix, B., Neale, M., & Anderson, C. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 97–124). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B. (2003). The efficacy advantage: Factors related to the formation of group efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2153–2186. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2003.tb01879.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., & Kramer, T. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics, 7, 41–54. doi:10.1037/1089–2699.7.3.200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 905–922. doi:10.1002/job.226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A. (2008). Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35–59. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ilies, R., Wagner, D. T., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1140–1148. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.92.4.1140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43: 128–156. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Meyers, R. A. (2009). Complaint and solution-oriented circles: Interaction patterns in work group discussions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 267–294. doi:10.1080/13594320701693209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99–130. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. R., & Spoor, J. R. (2006). Affective influence in groups. In Forgas, J. P. (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 311–326). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at multiple levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooij-de Bode, H. J. M., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). Good effects of bad feelings: Negative affectivity and group decision-making. British Journal of Management, 21, 375–392. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8551.2009.00675.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581–615. doi:10.1177/1094428113493119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Chiu, M. M. & Lei, Z. (2013). The upward spiral in team interaction: Dynamic positivity in problem-solving teams. Paper presented at the 8th Annual INGRoup Conference, July 12–14, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639–668. doi:10.1177/1046496411398397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Z., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2014). Contagious peers in teams: Peer affective influence on individual emotions and performance. Paper presented at the CERE Conference, Humboldt University, March 27–28, Germany.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Asuncion, A. G., & Rosselli, F. (1992). Impact of positive affect on persuasion processes. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 247–270.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Emotional ties that bind: The roles of valence and consistency of group emotion in inferences of cohesiveness and common fate. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1703–1715. doi:10.1177/0146167206292094CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotions in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescosolido, A. T. (2002). Emergent leaders as managers of group emotion. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 583–599. doi:10.1016/S1048–9843(02)00145–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001). Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23, 1175–1191. doi:10.1109/34.954607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, J. L. (1995). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Poh, M., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57, 1243–1252. doi:10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487Google ScholarPubMed
Pugh, S. D. (2001). Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1018–1027. doi:10.2307/3069445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., Shanock, L., Scott, C., & Shuffler, M. (2010). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 49, 149–172. doi:10.1002/hrm.20339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.57.3.493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1987.tb00609.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. C., & Kleinman, S. (1989). Managing emotions in medical school: Students' contacts with the living and the dead. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnentag, S. (2001). High performance and meeting participation: An observational study in software design teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5, 3–18. doi:10.1037/1089–2699.5.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 437–453. doi:10.2307/2392766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sy, T., Cote, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295–305. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.90.2.295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiedens, L. Z., Sutton, R. I., & Fong, C. T. (2004). Emotional variation in work groups: Causes and performance consequences. In Tiedens, L. Z. & Leach, C. W. (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 164–186). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totterdell, P. (2000). Catching moods and hitting runs: Mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 848–859. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.85.6.848CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2003). Emotion regulation in customer service roles: Testing a model of emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 55–73. doi:10.1037/1076–8998.8.1.55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totterdell, P., Kellett, S., Teuchmann, K., & Briner, R. B. (1998). Evidence of mood linkage in work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1504–1515. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.74.6.1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Praet, E. (2009). Staging a team performance: A linguistic ethnographic analysis of weekly meetings at a British embassy. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 80–99. doi:10.1177/0021943608325754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kleef, G. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) Model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2009.01633.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2010). On angry leaders and agreeable followers: How leaders' emotions and followers' personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psychological Science, 21, 1827–1834. doi:10.1177/0956797610387438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Kleef, G., Homan, A. C., Beersma, B., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., & Damen, F. (2009). Searing sentiment of cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 562–580. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 239–261. doi:10.1002/job.505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.62.3.489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2008). Affective divergence: Automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1063–1079. doi:10.1037/a0011993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by