Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 192
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Leahy, Wayne and Sweller, John 2005. Interactions Among the Imagination, Expertise Reversal, and Element Interactivity Effects.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 266.

    Mayer, Richard E. Hegarty, Mary Mayer, Sarah and Campbell, Julie 2005. When Static Media Promote Active Learning: Annotated Illustrations Versus Narrated Animations in Multimedia Instruction.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 256.

    Tindall-Ford, Sharon and Sweller, John 2006. Altering the Modality of Instructions to Facilitate Imagination: Interactions between the Modality and Imagination Effects. Instructional Science, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 343.

    Hasler, Béatrice Susanne Kersten, Bernd and Sweller, John 2007. Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 713.

    Mayer, Richard E. 2007. Research-Based Guidelines for Multimedia Instruction. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 127.

    Schnotz, Wolfgang and Kürschner, Christian 2007. A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 469.

    Gyselinck, Valérie Jamet, Eric and Dubois, Véronique 2008. The role of working memory components in multimedia comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 353.

    Waniek, Jacqueline and Ewald, Karolin 2008. Cognitive Costs of Navigation Aids in Hypermedia Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 185.

    Alkhalifa, Eshaa M. 2008. Towards Demonstrating Limited Cognitive Reception Bandwidth. p. 913.

    Nelson, Brian C. and Erlandson, Benjamin E. 2008. Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: reflection on design practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 56, Issue. 5-6, p. 619.

    Clark, Ruth Colvin and Mayer, Richard E. 2008. Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence-based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, Vol. 47, Issue. 9, p. 5.

    Wittwer, Jörg and Renkl, Alexander 2008. Why Instructional Explanations Often Do Not Work: A Framework for Understanding the Effectiveness of Instructional Explanations. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 49.

    Zolna, Jesse S. and Catrambone, Richard 2008. Constraining Presentation Pace and Using Multimodal Materials: Intertwined Design Considerations?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 52, Issue. 6, p. 552.

    Cook, David A Beckman, Thomas J Thomas, Kris G and Thompson, Warren G 2008. Introducing resident doctors to complexity in ambulatory medicine. Medical Education, Vol. 42, Issue. 8, p. 838.

    Norman, Geoff 2008. The end of educational science?. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 385.

    Posel, Nancy Fleiszer, David and Shore, Bruce M. 2009. 12 Tips: Guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases. Medical Teacher, Vol. 31, Issue. 8, p. 701.

    Bos, Floris A.B.H. Terlouw, Cees and Pilot, Albert 2009. The effect of a pretest in an interactive, multimodal pretraining system for learning science concepts. Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 15, Issue. 6, p. 571.

    Asher, Anthony Kondziolka, Douglas and Selden, Nathan R. 2009. ADDRESSING DEFICIENCIES IN AMERICAN HEALTHCARE EDUCATION. Neurosurgery, Vol. 65, Issue. 2, p. 223.

    de Freitas, Sara and Neumann, Tim 2009. Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of Synchronous Audiographic Conferencing: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 40, Issue. 6, p. 980.

    Tawfik, Andrew Zhenyu He and Ngoc Vo 2009. Impact of video game experience and gender differences in educational video games. p. 715.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: June 2012

2 - Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning

Summary

Abstract

Humans have evolved with a working memory that has no logical central executive available when required to organise novel information. Consequently, failing instruction, we must randomly propose organisational combinations and test them for effectiveness. This procedure is only possible with a very limited number of elements and as a consequence, working memory is severely limited when dealing with novel information. In contrast, familiar, organised information previously stored in long-term memory can act as a central executive and eliminate the need for working memory limitations. These structures are central to cognitive load theory. They suggest that instruction should act as substitute for the missing central executive when dealing with novel information and that factor, in turn, determines multimedia instructional principles.

Introduction

Good instructional design is driven by our knowledge of human cognitive structures and the manner in which those structures are organised into a cognitive architecture. Without knowledge of relevant aspects of human cognitive architecture such as the characteristics of and intricate relations between working memory and long-term memory, the effectiveness of instructional design is likely to be random. Cognitive load theory has been one of the theories used to integrate our knowledge of human cognitive structures and instructional design principles. This chapter is concerned with the elements of that theory and its general implications for multimedia learning, specifically, words presented in spoken or written form along with pictures or diagrams.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
  • Online ISBN: 9780511816819
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. & Spence, J. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81
Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362
Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1946.)
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245
Egan, D. E., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and Cognition, 7, 149–158
Jeffries, R., Turner, A., Polson, P., & Atwood, M. (1981). Processes involved in designing software. In Anderson, J. R. (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 255–283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–33
Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248–294
Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–348
Marcus, N., Cooper, M., & Sweller, J. (1996). Understanding instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 49–63
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8
Paas, F., & Mërrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398–422
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66
Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190
Simon, H., & Gilmartin, K. (1973). A simulation of memory for chess positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215–266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load and selective attention as factors in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176–192
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89
Sweller, J., Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257–287