Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Botelho, M. G. 2019. The communal consultation video-Enhancing learning and broadening experience through observing dialogue. European Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 14.

    van Peppen, Lara M. Verkoeijen, Peter P. J. L. Heijltjes, Anita E. G. Janssen, Eva M. Koopmans, Denise and van Gog, Tamara 2018. Effects of Self-Explaining on Learning and Transfer of Critical Thinking Skills. Frontiers in Education, Vol. 3, Issue. ,

    Margulieux, Lauren E. and Catrambone, Richard 2018. Finding the Best Types of Guidance for Constructing Self-Explanations of Subgoals in Programming. Journal of the Learning Sciences, p. 1.

    Lachner, Andreas Ly, Kim-Tek and Nückles, Matthias 2018. Providing Written or Oral Explanations? Differential Effects of the Modality of Explaining on Students' Conceptual Learning and Transfer. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 86, Issue. 3, p. 344.

    Fiorella, Logan Kuhlmann, Shelbi and Vogel-Walcutt, Jennifer J. 2018. Effects of Playing an Educational Math Game That Incorporates Learning by Teaching. Journal of Educational Computing Research, p. 073563311879713.

    Fabic, Geela Venise Firmalo Mitrovic, Antonija and Neshatian, Kourosh 2018. Investigating the effects of learning activities in a mobile Python tutor for targeting multiple coding skills. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,

    Fabic, Geela Venise Firmalo Mitrovic, Antonija and Neshatian, Kourosh 2018. Adaptive Problem Selection in a Mobile Python Tutor. p. 269.

    Desy, Janeve Busche, Kevin Cusano, Ronald Veale, Pamela Coderre, Sylvain and McLaughlin, Kevin 2018. How teachers can help learners build storage and retrieval strength. Medical Teacher, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 407.

    ter Vrugte, Judith and de Jong, Ton 2017. Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. p. 141.

    Pickering, James D. 2017. Measuring learning gain: Comparing anatomy drawing screencasts and paper-based resources. Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 307.

    Fabic, Geela Venise Firmalo Mitrovic, Antonija and Neshatian, Kourosh 2017. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Vol. 10331, Issue. , p. 498.

    Rittle-Johnson, Bethany and Loehr, Abbey M. 2017. Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 24, Issue. 5, p. 1501.

    Lisk, Kristina Agur, Anne M. R. and Woods, Nicole N. 2017. Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Vol. 22, Issue. 5, p. 1071.

    Rittle-Johnson, Bethany Loehr, Abbey M. and Durkin, Kelley 2017. Promoting self-explanation to improve mathematics learning: A meta-analysis and instructional design principles. ZDM, Vol. 49, Issue. 4, p. 599.

    Margulieux, Lauren and Catrambone, Richard 2017. Using Learners' Self-Explanations of Subgoals to Guide Initial Problem Solving in App Inventor. p. 21.

    McCrudden, Matthew T. and Rapp, David N. 2017. How Visual Displays Affect Cognitive Processing. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 623.

    Rau, Martina A. 2017. Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 717.

    Damnik, Gregor Proske, Antje and Körndle, Hermann 2017. Designing a constructive learning activity with interactive elements: the effects of perspective-shifting and the quality of source material. Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 634.

    Blik, H. Harskamp, E.G. van Leeuwen, S. and Hoekstra, R. 2017. Video instruction with explanation to another person for intellectually disabled students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 33, Issue. 6, p. 606.

    Ayres, Paul 2015. State-of-the-Art Research into Multimedia Learning: A Commentary on Mayer's Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 631.

  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: August 2014

17 - The Self-Explanation Principle in Multimedia Learning

from Part III - Advanced Principles of Multimedia Learning
Essential overload occurs when the amount of essential cognitive processing required by the multimedia instructional message exceeds the learner's cognitive capacity. This chapter examines the research evidence concerning three principles of multimedia design aimed at minimizing the effects of essential overload: the segmenting principle, the pre-training principle, and the modality principle. According to the cognitive theory of multimedia learning, the three ways to handle an essential overload situation are to allow the learner to slow down the pace of presentation (segmenting principle), provide the learner with knowledge that reduces the need for cognitive processing of the presentation (pre-training principle), or off-load some of the visual information onto the auditory channel (modality principle). The research reviewed in the chapter shows that instructional designers should be sensitive to working memory constraints when presenting a complex multimedia lesson.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning
  • Online ISBN: 9781139547369
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669–681.
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 147–179.
Atkinson, R. K., Renkl, A., & Merrill, M. M. (2003). Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 774–783.
Berthold, K., Eysink, T. H. S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Assisting self-explanation prompts are more effective than open prompts when learning with multiple representations. Instructional Science, 37(4), 345–363.
Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221–252.
Butcher, K. R. (2006). Learning from text with diagrams: promoting mental model development and inference generation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 182–197.
Butcher, K., & Aleven, V. (2008). Diagram interaction during intelligent tutoring in geometry: Support for knowledge retention and deep understanding. In C. Schunn (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2008 (pp. 894–899). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Calin-Jageman, R. J., & Ratner, H. H. (2005). The role of encoding in the self-explanation effect. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 523–543.
Chamberland, M., et al. (2011). The influence of medical students’ self-explanations on diagnostic performance. Medical Education, 45(7), 688–695.
Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 161–238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Chi, M. T. H., Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (submitted). Differentiating four levels of engagement in learning: The ICAP hypothesis.
Clark, R., & Mayer, R. (2011). e-Learning and the science of instruction (3d ed.). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(4), 389–415.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2), 183–194.
Fonseca, B., & Chi, M. T. H. (2011). instruction based on self-explanation. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), The handbook of research on learning and instruction (vol. 36, pp. 296–321). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
Gadgil, S., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Chi, M. T. H. (2012). Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 47–61.
Graesser, A. C., Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. (2007). 25 principles of learning. Washington, DC: Task Force on Lifelong Learning at Work and at Home. Retrieved from
Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36(1), 93–103.
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(6), 717–742.
Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). Investigating the impact of integrating self-explanation into an educational game: A pilot study. M. Chang, W-Y. Hwang, M-P. Chen, & W. Muller (Eds.) In Edutainment technologies (pp. 250–254). Taipei: Springer.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1246–1252.
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303–323.
Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.
Kwon, K., Kumalasari, C. D., & Howland, J. L. (2011). Self-explanation prompts on problem-solving performance in an interactive learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(2), 96–112.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 157–176.
Matthews, P., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(1), 1–21.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107–119.
McNamara, D., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). iSTART: A Web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies (pp. 397–420). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
Najjar, L. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), 129–150.
Nathan, M., Mertz, K., & Ryan, R. (1994). Learning through self-explanation of mathematics examples: Effects of cognitive load. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
O’Reilly, T., Symons, S., & MacLatchy-Gaudet, H. (1998). A comparison of self-explanation and elaborative interrogation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 434–445.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
Pillow, B. H., Mash, C., Aloian, S., & Hill, V. (2002). Facilitating children’s understanding of misinterpretation: explanatory efforts and improvements in perspective taking. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 133–148.
Pine, K. J., & Messer, D. J. (2000). The effect of explaining another’s actions on children’s implicit theories of balance. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 35–52.
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2009). Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 441–448). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Recker, M. M., & Pirolli, P. (1995). Modeling individual differences in students’ learning strategies. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 1–38.
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15.
Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science, 36:4, 321–350.
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–110.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141–156.
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46(4), 426–445.
She, H. C., & Chen, Y.-Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1297–1307.
Siegler, R. (1995). How does change occur? A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225–273.
Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2011). The effects of directive self-explanation prompts to support active processing of multiple representations in a simulation-based learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 411–423.
VanLehn, K., Jones, R. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). A model of the self-explanation effect. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(1), 1–59.
Williams, J. J., Lombrozo, T., & Rehder, B. (2013). The hazards of explanation: Overgeneralization in the face of exceptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1006–1014.
Wylie, R., Koedinger, K. R., & Mitamura, T. (2009). Is self-explanation always better? The effects of adding self-explanation prompts to an English grammar tutor. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1300–1305). Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society.
Wylie, R., Koedinger, K., & Mitamura, T. (2010). Extending the self-explanation effect to second language grammar learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Learning Sciences, Chicago, June 29–July 2.
Wylie, R., Sheng, M., Mitamura, T., and Koedinger, K. (2011). Effects of adaptive prompted self-explanation on robust learning of second language grammar. In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED’11) (pp. 588–590). Berlin; Springer.
Yeh, Y. F., Chen, M. C., Hung, P. H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2010). Optimal self-explanation prompt design in dynamic multi-representational learning environments. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1089–1100.