Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allingham, M. G., and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Cherry, T., Jones, M., and McKee, M. (2010). Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Kirchler, E., and Muehlbacher, S. (2012). Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 42, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., and McClellan, C. (2012). Tax Morale and Tax Compliance from the Firm’s Perspective. Kyklos(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why Do People Pay Taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., and Torgler, B. (2006). Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., and Torgler, B. (2011). Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 635–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreoni, J., Erard, B., and Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818–860.Google Scholar

Ariel, B. (2012). Deterrence and Moral Persuasion Effects on Corporate Tax Compliance: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Criminology, 50, 27–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkworth, J. M., and Murphy, K. (2015). Procedural Justice Policing and Citizen Compliance Behaviour: The Importance of Emotion. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21, 254–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazart, C., and Bonein, A. (2014). Reciprocal Relationships in Tax Compliance Decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 169–217.Google Scholar

Beer, S., Kasper, M., Kirchler, E., and Erard, B. (2015). Annual Report to Congress: Audit Impact Study. Retrieved from tinyurl.com/zzcouolGoogle Scholar

Blumenthal, M., Christian, C., and Slemrod, J. (2001). Do Normative Appeals Affect Tax Compliance? Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota. National Tax Journal, 54(1), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., and Kelliher, C. F. (2013). Analyzing the Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 115, 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordignon, M. (1993). A Fairness Approach to Income Tax Evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bott, K., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., and Tungodden, B. (2014). You’ve Got Mail: A Randomised Field Experiment on Tax Evasion. Bergen, Norway: NHH Norwegian School of Economics.Google Scholar

Boylan, S. J., and Sprinkle, G. B. (2001). Experimental Evidence on the Relation Between Tax Rates and Compliance: The Effect of Earned vs. Endowed Income. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (2003). Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in Taxation and Governance: Resisting and Dismissing Authority in a Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, V., Murphy, K., and Reinhart, M. (2007). Taxation Threat, Motivational Postures, and Responsive Regulation. Law and Policy, 29, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casagrande, A., Cagno, D., Di, Pandimiglio, A., and Spallone, M. (2015). The Effect of Competition on Tax Compliance: The Role of Audit Rules and Shame. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 59, 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casal, S., Kogler, C., Mittone, L., and Kirchler, E. (2016). Tax Compliance Depends on Voice of Taxpayers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, O. H., Nichols, D. R., and Schultz, J. J. (1987). Taxpayer Attitudes Toward Tax Audit Risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian, R. C., and Alm, J. (2014). Empathy, Sympathy, and Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., and Trost, M. R. (1998). Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T and Lindzey, G. (Ed.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Boston: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., Joffily, M., Montmarquette, C., and Villeval, M. C. (2010). Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion. Experimental Economics, 13, 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coricelli, G., Rusconi, E., and Villeval, M. C. (2014). Tax Evasion and Emotions: An Empirical Test of Re-integrative Shaming Theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuccia, A. D., and Carnes, G. A. (2001). A Closer Look at the Relation Between Tax Complexity and Tax Equity Perceptions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullis, J. G., and Lewis, A. (1997). Why People Pay Taxes: From a Conventional Economic Model to a Model of Social Convention. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social Dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Simone, L., Sansing, R. C., and Seidman, J. K. (2013). When Are Enhanced Relationship Tax Compliance Programs Mutually Beneficial? Accounting Review, 88, 1971–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doerrenberg, P., and Peichl, A. (2013). Progressive Taxation and Tax Morale. Public Choice, 155, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. J. (1997). Influencing the Prospects of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., Weigel, R. H., and Hessing, D. J. (1987). The Consequences of Different Strategies for Measuring Tax Evasion Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eriksen, K., and Fallan, L. (1996). Tax Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Taxation: A Report on a Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission. (2015). Study to Quantify and Analyse the VAT Gap in the EU Member States. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/common/public-ations/studies/vat_gap2013.pdfGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust Breeds Trust: How Taxpayers Are Treated. Economics of Governance, 3, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, L. P., and Frey, B. S. (2007). Tax Compliance as the Result of a Psychological Tax Contract: The Role of Incentives and Responsive Regulation. Law and Policy, 29, 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frecknall-Hughes, J., and Kirchler, E. (2015). Towards a General Theory of Tax Practice. Social and Legal Studies, 24, 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. (1997). A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues. Economic Journal, 107, 1043–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S., and Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Morale and Conditional Cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaisbauer, H. P., Schweiger, G., and Sedmak, C. (2015). Outlining the Field of Tax Justice. In Gaisbauer, H. P., Schweiger, G., and Sedmak, C. (Eds.) Philosophical Explorations of Justice and Taxation (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gangl, K., Muehlbacher, S., De Groot, M., et al. (2013). “How Can I Help You?” Perceived Service Orientation of Tax Authorities and Tax Compliance. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 69, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gemmell, N., and Hasseldine, J. (2014). Taxpayers’ Behavioural Responses and Measures of Tax Compliance “Gaps”: A Critique and a New Measure. Fiscal Studies, 35, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallsworth, M., List, J., Metcalfe, R., and Vlaev, I. (2014). The Behavioralist as Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance (No. w20007). SSRN Electronic Journal. ssrn.com/abstract=2418122Google Scholar

Hasseldine, J., Hite, P., James, S., and Toumi, M. (2007). Persuasive Communications: Tax Compliance Enforcement Strategies for Sole Proprietors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24, 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holler, M., Hoelzl, E., Kirchler, E., Leder, S., and Mannetti, L. (2008). Framing of Information on the Use of Public Finances, Regulatory Fit of Recipients and Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 597–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

IRS (Internal Revenue Service). (2012). IRS Releases New Tax Gap Estimates. Retrieved from www.irs.gov/uac/irs-releases-new-tax-gap-estimates-compliance-rates-remain-statistically-unchanged-from-previous-studyGoogle Scholar

IRS. (2014). Your 2014 Taxpayer Receipt. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/2014- taxreceiptGoogle Scholar

Jun, B.-h., Cho, M., and Park, M.-H. (2015). Procedural Fairness and Taxpayers’ Response: Evidence from an Experiment. Korean Economic Review, 31, 301–326.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplan, S. E., Reckers, P. M., West, S. G., and Boyd, J. C. (1988). An Examination of Tax Reporting Recommendations of Professional Tax Preparers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kastlunger, B., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., and Pitters, J. (2009). Sequences of Audits, Tax Compliance, and Taxpaying Strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kastlunger, B., Lozza, E., Kirchler, E., and Schabmann, A. (2013). Powerful Authorities and Trusting Citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and Tax Compliance in Italy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kastlunger, B., Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., and Mittone, L. (2011). What Goes Around Comes Around? Experimental Evidence of the Effect of Rewards on Tax Compliance. Public Finance Review, 39, 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, C. K., Evans, J. H., and Moser, D. V. (2005). Economic and Equity Effects on Tax Reporting Decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 609–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., and Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced Versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The “Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 210–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Kogler, C., and Muehlbacher, S. (2014). Cooperative Tax Compliance from Deterrence to Deference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., and Maciejovsky, B. (2001). Tax Compliance Within the Context of Gain and Loss Situations, Expected and Current Asset Position, and Profession. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Hoelzl, E., and Webley, P. (2009). Effort and Aspirations in Tax Evasion: Experimental Evidence. Applied Psychology, 58, 488–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Kastlunger, B., and Wahl, I. (2010). Why Pay Taxes? A Review of Tax Compliance Decisions. In Alm, J. M.-V. J. and Torgler, B. (Ed.), Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance (pp. 15–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kleven, H. J., Knudsen, M. B., Kreiner, C. T., Pedersen, S., and Saez, E. (2011). Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 79, 651–692.Google Scholar

Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., and Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and Power as Determinants of Tax Compliance: Testing the Assumptions of the Slippery Slope Framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., and Kirchler, E. (2014). Cross-cultural Research on Tax Compliance, Corruption and Shadow Economy. Paper presented at the 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology in Paris, France.Google Scholar

Kogler, C., Mittone, L., and Kirchler, E. (2015). Delayed Feedback on Tax Audits Affects Compliance and Fairness Perceptions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 124, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lago-Peñas, I., and Lago-Peñas, S. (2010). The Determinants of Tax Morale in Comparative Perspective: Evidence from European Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, A. (1982). The Psychology of Taxation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Luttmer, E. F. P., and Singhal, M. (2014). Tax Morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maciejovsky, B., Kirchler, E., and Schwarzenberger, H. (2007). Misperception of Chance and Loss Repair: On the Dynamics of Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maciejovsky, B., Schwarzenberger, H., and Kirchler, E. (2012). Rationality Versus Emotions: The Case of Tax Ethics and Compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J. (2004). Framing and Taxation: Evaluation of Tax Policies Involving Household Composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 679–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKerchar, M. (2001). The Study of Income Tax Complexity and Unintentional Non-Compliance: Research Method and Preliminary Findings. ATAX Discussion Paper. University of Sydney. Australia.Google Scholar

Mendoza, J. P., Wielhouwer, J., and Kirchler, E. (2015). The Backfiring Effect of Auditing on Tax Compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal. ssrn.com/abstract=2597479Google Scholar

Mittone, L. (2006). Dynamic Behaviour in Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moeschler, D. (2015). Social Representations of Taxes and Intentions Toward Compliance. Economies and Finances. Retrieved from http://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01108337.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., and Kirchler, E. (2015). Mental Accounting and Tax Compliance Experimental Evidence for the Effect of Mental Segregation of Tax Due and Revenue on Compliance. Public Finance Review, 45(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., and Schwarzenberger, H. (2011). Voluntary Versus Enforced Tax Compliance: Empirical Evidence for the “Slippery Slope” Framework. European Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K. (2004). The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

OECD (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development). (2013). Co-operative Compliance: A Framework from Enhanced Relationship to Co-operative Compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD. (2015). Tax Administration 2015: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Onu, D., and Oats, L. (2015). The Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance: Theoretical Overview and Practical Implications. Journal of Tax Administration, 1, 113–137.Google Scholar

Pickhardt, M., and Seibold, G. (2014). Income Tax Evasion Dynamics: Evidence from an Agent-Based Econophysics Model. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porcano, T. M. (1985). Distributive Justice and Tax Policy. Accounting Review, 59, 619–635.Google Scholar

Rechberger, S., Hartner, M., Kirchler, E., and Hämmerle, F. K. (2010). Tax Amnesties, Justice Perceptions, and Filing Behavior: A Simulation Study. Law and Policy, 32, 214–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sandmo, A. (2005). The Theory of Tax Evasion: A Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, 58, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schepanski, A., and Shearer, T. (1995). A Prospect Theory Account of the Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmölders, G. (1959). Fiscal Psychology: A New Branch of Public Finance. National Tax Journal, 12, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schneider, F. (2015). Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 Other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2015: Different Developments. Retrieved from www.econ.jku.at/members/Schneider/files/publications/2015/ShadEcEurope31.pdfGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, R. D., and Orleans, S. (1967). On Legal Sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., and Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the Beginning Makes Ethics Salient and Decreases Dishonest Self-Reports in Comparison to Signing at the End. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 15197–15200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slemrod, J. (1998). On Voluntary Compliance, Voluntary Taxes, and Social Capital. National Tax Journal, 51, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slemrod, J., Blumenthal, M., and Christian, C. (2001). Taxpayer Response to an Increased Probability of Audit: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota. Journal of Public Economics, 79, 455–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, N. (2003). Understanding Taxpayer Attitudes Through Understanding Taxpayer Identities. In Braithwaite, V. (ed.), Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion (pp. 71–92). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2004a). Tax Morale in Asian Countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 237–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2004b). Moral Suasion: An Alternative Tax Policy Strategy? Evidence from a Controlled Field Experiment in Switzerland. Economics of Governance, 5, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2005). Tax Morale and Direct Democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2006). The Importance of Faith: Tax Morale and Religiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis: Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B., and Schneider, F. (2009). The Impact of Tax Morale and Institutional Quality on the Shadow Economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wahl, I., Muehlbacher, S., and Kirchler, E. (2010). The Impact of Voting on Tax Payments. Kyklos, 63, 144–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wartick, M., and Rupert, T. (2010). The Effects of Observing a Peer’s Likelihood of Reporting Income on Tax Reporting Decisions. Advances in Taxation, 19, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2002). The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance: The Role of Taxpayers’ Identity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wenzel, M. (2003). Tax Compliance and the Psychology of Justice: Mapping the Field. In Braithwaite, V. (Ed.), Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion (pp. 41–70). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2004a). An Analysis of Norm Processes in Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2004b). The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 547–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wolters Kluwer CCH. (2015). Federal Tax Law Keeps Piling Up. Retrieved July 14, 2016, from www.cch.com/TaxLawPileUp.pdfGoogle Scholar

Yaniv, G. (1999). Tax Compliance and Advance Tax Payments: A Prospect Theory Analysis. National Tax Journal, 52, 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zeelenberg, M., and Pieters, R. (2006). Feeling Is for Doing: A Pragmatic Approach to the Study of Emotions in Economic Behavior. In De Cremer, D., Zeelenberg, M., and Murnighan, K. (Eds.), Social Psychology and Economics (pp. 117–137). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Allcott, H., and Mullainathan, S. (2012). External Validity and Partner Selection Bias. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18373.Google Scholar

Allingham, M. G., and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, Explaining, and Controlling Tax Evasion: Lessons from Theory, Experiments, and Field Studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19, 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M., and McKee, M. (2015). On the External Validity of Laboratory Tax Compliance Experiments. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 1170–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., and Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why Do People Pay Taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angrist, J. D., and Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariel, B. (2012). Deterrence and Moral Persuasion Effects on Corporate Tax Compliance: Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Criminology, 50(1), 27–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bargh, J. A., and Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The Unbearable Automaticity of Being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, G., Levell, P., and Milligan, K. (2013). A Comparison of Micro and Macro Expenditure Measures Across Countries Using Differing Survey Methods. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 19544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonell, C., Fletcher, A., Morton, M., Lorenc, T., and Moore, L. (2012). Realist Randomised Controlled Trials: A New Approach to Evaluating Complex Public Health Interventions. Social Science and Medicine, 75(12), 2299–2306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bristow, D., Carter, L., and Martin, S. (2015). Using Evidence to Improve Policy and Practice: The UK What Works Centres. Contemporary Social Science, 10(2), 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burtless, G. (1995). The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. (2011). The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List. SSRN 1977749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Rabin, M. (eds.). (2011). Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, N., and Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choo, C. L., Fonseca, M. A., and Myles, G. D. (2016). Do Students Behave Like Real Taxpayers in the Lab? Evidence from a Real Effort Tax Compliance Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 124, 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., and Reno, R. R. (1991). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coricelli, G., Joffily, M., Montmarquette, C., and Villeval, M. C. (2010). Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion. Experimental Economics, 13(2), 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coricelli, G., Rusconi, E., and Villeval, M. C. (2014). Tax Evasion and Emotions: An Empirical Test of Re-Integrative Shaming Theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doerrenberg, P., and Schmitz, J. (2015). Tax Compliance and Information Provision: A Field Experiment with Small Firms. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 15–028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., and Kremer, M. (2007). Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. Handbook of Development Economics, 4, 3895–3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunning, T., Monestier, F., Piñeiro, R., Rosenblatt, F., and Tuñón, G. (2015). Positive vs. Negative Incentives for Compliance: Evaluating a Randomized Tax Holiday in Uruguay. SSRN 2650105.Google Scholar

Dwenger, N., Kleven, H., Rasul, I., and Rincke, J. (2016). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations for Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Germany. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 203–232.Google Scholar

Elffers, H., Robben, H. S., and Hessing, D. J. (1992). On Measuring Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13(4), 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elffers, H., Weigel, R. H., and Hessing, D. J. (1987). The Consequences of Different Strategies for Measuring Tax Evasion Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ettelt, S., Mays, N., and Allen, P. (2015). Policy Experiments: Investigating Effectiveness or Confirming Direction? Evaluation, 21(3), 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: Tax and Development: Cooperating with Developing Countries on Promoting Good Governance in Tax Matters. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

Exadaktylos, F., Espín, A. M., and Branas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental Subjects Are Not Different. Scientific Reports, 3, 1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feld, L. P., and Larsen, C. (2012) Self-Perceptions, Government Policies and Tax Compliance in Germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, B. (1987). Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical Research. New England Journal of Medicine, 317(3), 141–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gerber, A. S., and Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gillitzer, C., and Skov, P. (2013). Evidence on Unclaimed Charitable Contributions from the Introduction of Third-Party Information Reporting in Denmark. Working Paper 2013-04, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Glennerster, R., and Powers, S. (2016). Balancing Risk and Benefit. In: DeMartino, G. F and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 367–401.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J. M., Eccles, M. P., Lavis, J. N., Hill, S. J., and Squires, J. E. (2012). Knowledge Translation of Research Findings. Implementation Science, 7(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hallsworth, M. (2014). The Use of Field Experiments to Increase Tax Compliance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(4), 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D., and Vlaev, I. (2017). The Behavioralist as Tax Collector: Using Natural Field Experiments to Enhance Tax Compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference. London: Random House.Google Scholar

Harrison, G. W., and List, J. A. (2004). Field Experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasseldine, J., and Hite, P. A. (2003). Framing, Gender and Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(4), 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessing, D. J., Elffers, H., and Weigel, R. H. (1988). Exploring the Limits of Self-Reports and Reasoned Action: An Investigation of the Psychology of Tax Evasion Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessing, D., Robben, H., and Elffers, H. (1989). The Relationship Between Self-Reported and Documented Behaviour in the Case of Fraud with Unemployment Benefits. Madison, WI: 1989 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association.Google Scholar

Hite, P. A. (1987). An Application of Attribution Theory in Taxpayer Noncompliance Research. Public Finance, 42(1), 105–118.Google Scholar

Hurst, E., Li, G., and Pugsley, B. (2014). Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms? Evidence from Income Underreporting of the Self-Employed. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. W., Keil, L. G., Holland, W. C., Caughey, M. C., and Platts-Mills, T. F. (2015). Comparison of Registered and Published Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kettle, S., Hernandez, M., Ruda, S., and Sanders, M. (2016). Behavioral Interventions in Tax Compliance: Evidence from Guatemala. Working Paper 7690. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Kirchler, E. (1999). Reactance to Taxation: Employers’ Attitudes Towards Taxes. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(2), 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchler, E., Muehlbacher, S., Kastlunger, B., and Wahl, I. (2010). Why Pay Taxes? A Review of Tax Compliance Decisions In: Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., and Torgler, B., (eds.) Developing Alternative Frameworks for Explaining Tax Compliance. London: Routledge, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar

Kleven, H. (2016) Bunching. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kleven, H. J., Knudsen, M. B., Kreiner, C. T., Pedersen, S., and Saez, E. (2011). Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 79(3), 651–692.Google Scholar

Levitt, S., and List, J. A. (2007). What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, A. (1982). The Psychology of Taxation. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Marriott, L. (2014). Using Student Subjects in Experimental Research: A Challenge to the Practice of Using Students as a Proxy for Taxpayers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(5), 503–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J., and Baron, J. (2006). Thinking About Tax. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12(1), 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, B. D., Mok, W. K., and Sullivan, J. X. (2015). Household Surveys in Crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moser, D. V., EvansIII, J. H., and Kim, C. K. (1995). The Effects of Horizontal and Exchange Inequity on Tax Reporting Decisions. Accounting Review, 70(4), 619–634.Google Scholar

Muehlbacher, S., and Kirchler, E. (2016). About the External Validity of Laboratory Experiments in Tax Compliance Research. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 76(1), 7–19.Google Scholar

Muehlbacher, S., Mittone, L., Kastlunger, B., and Kirchler, E. (2012). Uncertainty Resolution in Tax Experiments: Why Waiting for an Audit Increases Compliance. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(3), 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, K. (2005). Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship Between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-Compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 32(4), 562–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newhouse, J. P., and RAND Corporation Insurance Experiment Group (1993). Free for All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Oakley, A. (1998). Experimentation and Social Interventions: A Forgotten but Important History. British Medical Journal, 317, 1239–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2010). Understanding and Influencing Taxpayers’ Compliance Behaviour. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar

Ortega, D., and Scartascini, C. (2015) Don’t Blame the Messenger: A Field Experiment on Delivery Methods for Increasing Tax Compliance. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Working Paper IDB-WP-627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pawson, R., and Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Roth, A. (1995). Introduction to Experimental Economics. In: Kagel, J. and Roth, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–110.Google Scholar

Saez, E. (2010). Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(3), 180–212.Google Scholar

Sánchez, G. (2014). The Impact of Low-Cost Intervention on Tax Compliance: Regression Discontinuity Evidence. Texas A&M University Working Paper.Google Scholar

Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-Reports: How the Questions Shape the Answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slemrod, J. (2016) Tax Compliance and Enforcement. New Research and Its Policy Implications. SSRN 2726077.Google Scholar

Spicer, M. W., and Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit Probabilities and the Tax Evasion Decision: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(3), 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to Theorists and Searching for Facts: Tax Morale and Tax Compliance in Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(5), 657–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

US Treasury (2009). Update on Reducing the Federal Tax Gap and Improving Voluntary Compliance. Washington, DC: US Treasury.Google Scholar

Webb, T. L., and Sheeran, P. (2006). Does Changing Behavioral Intentions Engender Behavior Change? A Meta-analysis of the Experimental Evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Webley, P., Robben, H., Elffers, H., and Hessing, D. (1991). Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weiss, C. H. (1979). The Many Meanings of Research Utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Howell, R., Lilley, R., and Pykett, J. (2014). Nudging All over the World: Assessing the Global Impact of the Behavioural Sciences on Public Policy. Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar

Ainslie, G. (1991). Derivation of ’Rational’ Economic Behaviour from Hyperbolic Discount Curves. American Economic Review, 81(2), 334–340.Google Scholar

Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J. Expanding the Theory of Tax Compliance from Individual to Group Motivations, in Forte, F., Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. M. (eds.) (2014). A Handbook of Alternative Theories of Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 260–277.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, M. (2011). Energy the Environment and Behavioural Change: A Survey of Insights from Behavioural Economics, CWPE 1162, University of Cambridge. Available at: www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/242028.Google Scholar

Banford, N. D., Knetsch, J. L., and Mauser, G. A. (1979). Feasibility Judgements and Alternative Measures of Benefits and Costs. Journal of Business Administration, 11(1), 25–35.Google Scholar

Barile, L., Cullis, J. and Jones, P. (2015). Will One Size Fit All? Incentives Designed to Nurture Pro-Social Behaviour. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Economics, 57, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1971). Economic Theory. New York: A. A.Knopf.Google Scholar

Berglund, C. (2006). The Assessment of Households’ Recycling Costs: The Role of Personal Motives. Ecological Economics, 56(4), 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernheim, B. D. (2016). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioural Welfare Economics. Journal of Cost Benefit Analysis, 7(1), 12–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beverly, S., Schneider, D. and Tufano, P. (2006). Splitting Tax Refunds and Building Savings: An Empirical Test, in Poterba, J. M. (ed.), Tax Policy and Economy, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 111–162.Google Scholar

Bishop, R. C., and Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 926–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brekke, K. A., Kipperberg, G. and Nyborg, K. (2007). Reluctant Recyclers: Social Interaction in Responsibility Ascription. Available at: ssrn.com/abstract=1116149 or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1116149.Google Scholar

Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. and Weber, M. (1992). Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2012). Behavioural Economics and Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal Discounting and Utility for Health and Money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 771–791.Google ScholarPubMed

Christian, R. C. and Alm, J. (2014). Empathy, Sympathy and Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, C. F., Kotchenb, M. J. and Moorea, M. R. (2003). Internal and External Influences on Pro-EnviEmpathy, Sympathy and Tax Compliance. ronmental Behaviour: Participation in a Green Electricity Program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congdon, W., Kling, J. R. and Mullainathan, S. (2009). Behavioural Economics and Taxation. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 15328.Google Scholar

Cullis, J. and Jones, P. (2009). Public Finance and Public Choice (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N. and Nyborg, K. (2017). Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-Environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(4), 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daskalakis, M. (2016). Specification Required? A Survey of Scientists’ Views About the Role of Behavioural Economics for Assessing Environmental Policy Instruments, in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics, Berlin: Springer, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000a). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000b). Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Co-operation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Y. and Perez, O. (2009). How Law Changes the Environmental Mind: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Legal Norms on Moral Perceptions and Civic Enforcement. Journal of Law and Society, 36(4), 501–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischbacher, U. and Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods. Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx) Discussion Paper No. 2006-01. Available at: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/67967/1/506605825.pdf.Google Scholar

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. and Fehr, E. (2001). Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, R. H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2001). Cost–Benefit Analysis and Relative Position. University of Chicago Law Review, 68(2), 323–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. (1997). Not Just for the Money, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Eichenberger, R. (1994). Economic Incentives Transform Psychological Anomalies. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 23(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. (2006). Environmental Morale and Motivation. Available at: www.iew.uzh.ch/wp/iewwp288.pdf.Google Scholar

Gneezy, U., Meier, S. and Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behaviour. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1982). Discounting Discounting. Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guth, W. and Ortmann, A. (2006). A Behavioural Approach to Distribution and Bargaining, in Altman, M. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Behavioural Economics. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 379–404.Google Scholar

Hammack, J. and BrownJr., G. M. (1974). Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Hanley, N. and Shogren, J. (2005). Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Anomaly Proof? Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanneman, W. M. (1991). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647.Google Scholar

Heberlein, T. A., and Bishop, R. C. (1985). Assessing the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Three Field Experiments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Man’s Role in Changing Global Environment, Italy.Google Scholar

Henderson, N. and Bateman, I. (1995). Empirical and Public Choice Evidence for Hyperbolic Social Discount Rates and the Implications for Intergenerational Discounting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 5(4), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Her Majesty’s Treasury (2003). Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Howarth, R. B. and Wilson, M. A. (2006). A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregating by Mutual Consent. Land Economics, 82(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R.H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R. (2005). Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khalil, E. L. (2003). Behavioural Economics and the Transactional View. Transactional Viewpoints, 11(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. (1990). Environmental Policy Implication of Disparities Between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(3), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. (2010). Values of Gains and Losses: Reference States and Choices of Measure. Environmental and Resource Economics 46(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knox, T. M. (1952). Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Translated with Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lange, A., Loschel, A., Vogt, C. and Ziegler, A. (2010). On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations. European Economic Review, 54(3), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A. and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart Strings and Purse Strings. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption. Economic Journal, 97(387), 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (2007). Exotic Preferences: Behavioural Economics and Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löfgren, Å., Martinsson, P., Hennlock, M. and Sterner, T. (2012). Does Experience Eliminate the Effect of a Default Option? A Field Experiment on CO₂-Offsetting for Air Transport. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loock, C.-M., Staake, T. and Thiesse, F. (2013). Motivating Energy-Efficient Behaviour with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1313–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J. and Slemrod, J. (2006). Behavioral Public Finance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. and Quah, E. (2007). Cost-Benefit Analysis (5th Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oberholzer-Gee, F., Bohnet, I. and Frey, B. S. (1997). Fairness and Competence in Democratic Decisions. Public Choice 91(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1998). A Behavioural Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasche, M. (2016). What Can Be Learned from Behavioural Economics and Environmental Policy? in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics. Berlin: Springer, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pichert, D. and Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green Defaults: Information Presentation and Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabin, M. (2013). An Approach to Incorporating Psychology into Economics. American Economic Review, 103(3), 1281–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, L. A. and Hammitt, J. K. (2011). Behavioural Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Toward Principles and Standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(2), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandford, C. T., Godwin, M. R. and Hardwick, P. J. W. (1989). Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation. Bath: Fiscal Publications.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1981). Economic Reasoning and the Ethics of Policy. Public Interest, 63, 37–61.Google Scholar

Shefrin, H. M. and Thaler, R. H. (1988). The Behavioural Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. and Taylor, L. O. (2008). On Behavioural-Environmental Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access, 2(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. and Thunstrőm, L. (2016). Do We Need a New Behavioural Benchmark for BCA? Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organisations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.Google Scholar

Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776/1937). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stigler, G. and Becker, G. (1977). ‘De gustibus non est disputandum’. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. and Reisch, L. A. (2016). Behaviourally Green: Why, Which and When Defaults Can Help, in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics. Berlin: Springer, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economic Letters, 8(3), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. and Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B., Frey, B. S. and Wilson, C. (2009). Environmental and Pro-Social Norms: Evidence on Littering. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9(1), 1–39.Google Scholar

Venkatacalam, L. (2008). Behavioural Economics for Environmental Policy. Ecological Economics, 67(4), 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viscusi, W. K. and Gayer, T. (2016). Rational Benefit Assessment for an Irrational World: Toward a Behavioural Transfer Test. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, T. O., Fooken, J. and Herrmann, B. (2014). Behavioural Economics and Taxation. European Commission Working Paper No. 41.Google Scholar

Willig, R. (1976). Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology. American Economic Review, 66(4), 589–97.Google Scholar

Wittman, D. A. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar