Andersen, G. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in sociolinguistics. In O’Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, translated by V. W. McGee, edited by Emerson, C. & Holquist, M., Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E. (2009). The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(3), 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belić, A. (1951). Oko našeg književnog jezika. Članci, ogledi i popularna predavanja [Srpska književna zadruga XLV/312], Belgrade.Google Scholar

Belikov, V. (2010). Methodological novelties in sociolinguistic lexicography in the 21 century. In Mustajoki, A., Protassova, E., & Vakhtin, N., eds., Instrumentarium of Linguistics. Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-Standard Russian [in Russian], Helsinki: Slavica Helsingiensia, pp. 32–49.Google Scholar

Belikov, V., Kopylov, N., Selegey, V., & Sharoff, S. (2014). Variational corpus statistics using author profiles. In Proceedings of Dialogue, Russian International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bekasovo.Google Scholar

Belikov, V. & Krysin, L. (2001). Sociolinguistics [in Russian], Moscow: RSUH.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bošnjaković, Ž., ed. (2009). Govor Novog Sada, sv. 1: fonetske osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.Google Scholar

Bugarski, R. (2006). Žargon: lingvistička studija, Belgrade: Čigoja štampa.Google Scholar

Bugarski, R. (2009). Teorijske osnove urbane dijalektologije (Theoretical foundations of urban dialectology). In Bošnjaković, Ž, ed., Govor Novog Sada, sv. 1: fonetske osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar

Cherkassky, V. & Ma, Y. (2004). Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. Neural Networks, 17(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crystal, D. (2004). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Haan, F. (2002). Strong modality and negation in Russian. In Reppen, R, Fitzmaurice, S. M, & Biber, D, eds., Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferraresi, A., Zanchetta, E., Bernardini, S., & Baroni, M. (2008). Introducing and evaluating ukWaC, a very large web-derived corpus of English. In The 4th Web as Corpus Workshop: Can We Beat Google? (at LREC 2008), Marrakech.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. (1988). Generic situation and register: A functional view of communication. In Benson, J. D., ed., Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hanks, P. (2012). Corpus evidence and electronic lexicography. In Granger, S. & Paquot, M., eds., Electronic Lexicography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugen, E. (1987). Blessings of Babel, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. (1971). On Communicative Competence, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of Sociolinguistics. An Ethnographic Approach, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Jović, D. (1978). Jezičke i društvene osobine nekih promena u govoru urbanih sredina. Gledišta, 6, 492–504.Google Scholar

Karlić, V. & Šakić, S. (2019). Somewhere in Between: The language of Serbian writers from Croatia. Philological Studies, 17(1), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katinskaya, A. & Sharoff, S. (2015). Applying multi-dimensional analysis to a Russian webcorpus: Searching for evidence of genres. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing, Hissar, Bulgaria, 10–11 September, 2015, pp. 65–74. https://aclanthology.org/W15-5311.pdf (accessed August 30, 2023).Google Scholar

Kibrik, A. (2013). Discourse structure and communicative intentions: A study of Russian TV interviews. In Volodina, M., ed., Mediensprache und Medienkommunikation im interdisziplinären und interkulturellen Vergleich, Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, pp. 223–245.Google Scholar

Kovačević, M. (2014). Međuodnos Belićeve i Ivićeve knjige u kolu Srpske književne zadruge s obzirom na njihov značaj u istoriji i kulturi srpskoga jezika. In Srpski jezik u ogledalu Srpske književne zadruge, Belgrade: Srpska književna zadruga, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar

Krongauz, M. (2013). Samoučitel’ Olbanskogo (Teach Yourself Olbanian), East Windsor, NJ: Corpus.Google Scholar

Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar

Lauersdorf, M. R. (2009). Slavic sociolinguistics in North America: Lineage and leading edge. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 17(1–2), 3–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, D. & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ljubešić, N. & Klubička, F. (2014). {bs,hr,sr}WaC – web corpora of Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian. In Proceedings of the 9th Web as Corpus Workshop at EACL’14, Gothenburg: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesthrie, R., Swann, J., A., D., & Leap, W. L. (2009). Introducing Sociolinguistics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Miloradović, S. (2012). Lingvistički atlasi – “centralni instrument” savremene dijalektologije. In Terenska istraživanja – poetika susreta, zbornik 27, Belgrade: Etnografski institut SANU, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar

Nguyen, D., Doğruöz, A. S., Rosé, C. P., & de Jong, F. (2016). Computational sociolinguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 42(3), 537–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piperski, A. & Somin, A. (2013). Liturativy v russkom internete: semantika, sintaksis i texničeskie osobennosti bytovanija (Strikethrough on the Russian Web: Semantics, syntax and technical issues). In Proceedings of Dialogue, Russian International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bekasovo.Google Scholar

Radovanović, M. (2003). Sociolingvistika, 3rd ed., Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Novi Sad: Sremski Karlovci.Google Scholar

Rajić, L. (2009). Gradski govori (Urban vernaculars). In Bošnjaković, Ž, ed., Govor Novog Sada, sv. 1: fonetske osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar

Reppen, R., Fitzmaurice, S. M., & Biber, D., eds. (2002). Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, Vol. 9, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharoff, S. (2005). Methods and tools for development of the Russian Reference Corpus. In Archer, D., Wilson, A., & Rayson, P., eds., Corpus Linguistics Around the World, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 167–180.Google Scholar

Sharoff, S. (2006). Open-source corpora: Using the Net to fish for linguistic data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 11(4), 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharoff, S. (2017). Corpus and systemic functional linguistics. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 533–546.Google Scholar

Sharoff, S. (2018). Functional text dimensions for the annotation of Web corpora. Corpora, 13(1), 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharoff, S. (2021). Genre annotation for the web: Text-external and text-internal perspectives. Register Studies, 3, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharoff, S., Goldhahn, D., & Quasthoff, U. (2017). In Quasthoff, U., Fiedler, S., & Hallsteindóttir, E., eds., Frequency Dictionary: Russian, Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar

Stojanović, A. (2014). Stereotipnost’ naučnogo teksta, Belgrade: Meždunarodnaja associjacija “Stil”.Google Scholar

Straka, M., Hajič, J., & Straková, J. (2016). UDPipe: Trainable pipeline for processing CoNLL-U files performing tokenization, morphological analysis, POS tagging and parsing. In Proceedings of LREC 2016, Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, B. (2009). Typological parameters of intralingual variability: Grammatical analyticity versus syntheticity in varieties of English. Language Variation and Change, 21(3), 319–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timberlake, A. (1993). Russian. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G, eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY, pp. 887–826.Google Scholar

Šipka, D. (2021). Normative usage labels: a case study in Croatia. In Ristić, S. et al., eds., Lexicography and Lexicology in the Light of Current Issues, Belgrade: Serbian Language Institute of SASA, pp. 175–188.Google Scholar

Štasni, G. & Ajdžanović, M. (2011). Stanovnici Novog Sada i Petrovaradina: derivacioni modeli etnika i upotrebna norma (Residents of Novi Sad and Petrovaradin: Derivational models of gentilics and the norm of usage). In Vasić, V. & Štrbac, G., eds., Govor Novog Sada, sv. 2: morfosintaksičke, leksičke i pragmatičke osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, pp. 78–120.Google Scholar

Štrbac, G. & Vujović, D. (2011). Između dijalekta, mesnog govora i standardnog jezika: leksički dubleti i sinonimi (Between dialect, local speech and standard language: Lexical doublets and synonyms). In Vasić, V. & Štrbac, G., eds., Govor Novog Sada, sv. 2: morfosintaksičke, leksičke i pragmatičke osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, pp. 192–209.Google Scholar

Vujović, D. & Alanović, M. (2011). Tipična morfosintaksička obeležja u govoru Novog Sada (Typical morpho-syntactic features of Novi Sad vernacular). In Vasić, V. & Štrbac, G., eds., Govor Novog Sada, sv. 2: morfosintaksičke, leksičke i pragmatičke osobine, Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet, pp. 39–55.Google Scholar

Akulenko, V. V., ed., 1969. Anglo-russkij i russko-anglijskij slovar‘ “ložnyx druzej perevodčika”, Moscow: Sovetskaja Ènciklopedija.Google Scholar

Belinʹkaja, L. N. (2015). Serbsko-russkij, russko-serbskij slovarʹ-spravočnik mežʹʹjazykovyx omonimov “ložnye druz’ja”, Moscow: Troica.Google Scholar

Birbrajer, J. (1987). Friends and False Friends: A Dictionary of “False Friends” between Polish and Russian with an English Translation of All Entries, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar

Blažeka, Đ. & Vendi, F. (2017). O metodologiji istraživanja lažnih prijatelja između odabranih mjesnih govora kajkavskog narječja. Hrvatski dijalektološki zbornik, 21, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blažeka, Đ. (2013). “Lažni prijatelji” između govora Murskog Središća i govora Preloga. In Blažetin, S., ed., XI. međunarodni kroatistički znanstveni skup (Zbornik radova), Pécs: Znanstveni zavod Hrvata u Mađarskoj, pp. 84–96.Google Scholar

Boček, V. (2010). Studie k nejstarším romanismům ve slovanských jazycích, Prague: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar

Borisova, L. I. (2002). Ložnye druz’ja perevodčika. Obščenaučnaja leksika. Anglijskij jazyk, Moscow: NVI-Tezaurus.Google Scholar

Boryś, W. (2008). Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. (2020). False friends of the Slavist. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/FalseFriendsoftheSlavist (accessed July 27, 2020).Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. (2000). Das sprachwissenschaftliche Problem der innerslavischen “falschen Freunde” im Russischen. State examination thesis, Cologne.Google Scholar

Čemerikić, J. et al. (1988). Paronymes Russo/Serbo-Croates: “amis” et “faux amis”, Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar

Dubičinskij, V. V. & Rojter, T. (2011). Russko-nemeckij slovarʹ leksičeskix parallelej: okolo 1750 slovarnyx statej = Russisch-deutsches Wörterbuch lexikalischer Parallelen: ca. 1750 Wörterbuchartikel, Moscow: Èlpis.Google Scholar

Dubičinskij, V. V. & Rojter, T. (2015). Teorija i leksikografičeskoe opisanie leksičeskix parallelej, Kharkiv: Izdatel’stvo Pidručnik NTU “ХPІ”.Google Scholar

Dubičinskij, V. V. & Rojter, T. (2020). Leksykografuvanja leksyčnyx paralelej: teoretyčni položennja ta ukrains’ko-nimec’kij slovnyk [Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, Sonderband 99], Munich: Institut für Slavische Philologie.Google Scholar

Franek, M. (1998). Serbsko-chorwacko – polska homonimia i paronymia w ujęciu dydaktycznym, Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza.Google Scholar

Golubović, J. & Gooskens, C. (2015). Mutual intelligibility between West and South Slavic languages. Russian Linguistics 39(3), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotlib, K. & Genrix, M. (1985). Slovar’ “ložnyx druzej perevodčika” (russko-nemeckij i nemecko-russkij), Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar

Grabčikov, S. M. (1980). Mežʹʹjazykovye omonimy i paronimy: opyt russko-belorusskogo slovarja, Minsk: Izdatel’stvo BGU im. V.I. Lenina.Google Scholar

Ilievska, K. (2006). Slavjanskaja mežʹʹjazykovaja omonimija i polisemija – most ili prepjatstvie na puti k vzaimoponimaniju. Filološki studii, 4(2), 6.Google Scholar

Ivanova, C. & Marijana, A. (2007). Srpsko-bugarski rečnik: tematski, 2nd ed., Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike.Google Scholar

Ivir, V. (1968). Serbo-Croat–English false pair types. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia, 25–26, 149–159.Google Scholar

Kalenić, V. (2001). Pomenske razlike besed istega izvora v slovenščini in srbohrvaščini. In Hadži, V. P., ed., Izbrane študije Vatroslava Kalenića, Ljubljana: Oddelek za slovanske jezike in književnosti Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar

Karpaczewa, M. (1987). Aproksymaty – wyrazy różnych języków o podobnej formie a odmiennym znaczeniu (na przykładzie języka polskiego i bułgarskiego). Rocznik Slawistyczny XLV(1), 45–50.Google Scholar

Kanonič, S. I. (2001). 300 ložnyx druzej perevodčika. Ispansko-russkij slovar‘- spravočnik, Moscow: Menedžer.Google Scholar

Kočergan, M. P. (1997). Slovar’ russko-ukrainskix mežʹʹjazykovyx omonimov, Kyiv: Akademija.Google Scholar

Konickaja, E. (2011). Russko-slovenskie leksičeskie paralleli. Slavistica Vilnensis (Kalbotyra), 56(2), 53–66.Google Scholar

Kononenko, I. & Spivak, O. (2008). Ukrajinsko-polʹsʹkyj slovnyk mižmovnyx omonimiv i paronimiv, Kyiv: Vyšča škola.Google Scholar

Kovačević, Ž. (2009). Lažni prijatelji u engleskom jeziku – zamke doslovnog prevođenja, Belgrade: Albatros plus.Google Scholar

Kozdra, M. & Dubichynskyi, V. (2019). Dydaktyczny słownik tematyczny rosyjsko-polskich paraleli leksykalnych. Leksyka kulinarna (rzeczowniki), Warsaw: UW.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasnov, K. V. (2004). Anglo-russkij slovarʹ “ložnyx druzej perevodčika”, Moscow: E. RA.Google Scholar

Kusal, K. (2002). Rosyjsko-polski słownik homonimów międzyjęzykowych, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar

Leszczyński, R. (1996). Hornjoserbsko-pólski a pólsko-hornjoserbski słownik pozdatnych ekwiwalentow, Warsaw: Towarzystwo Polsko-Serbołużyckie.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. (2002). Rječnik hrvatskih i slavenskih lažnih prijatelja, Filologija, 38–39, 1–6.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. (2008). Dva aspekta neodređenosti pojma lažni prijatelji. In Příhoda, M. & Vaňková, H., eds., Slavistika dnes: vlivy a kontexty – Konference mladých slavistů II, Prague: Červeny Kostelec, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. (2015). Sprijateljite se s lažnim prijateljima. Hrvatski jezik: znanstveno-popularni časopis za kulturu hrvatskoga jezika, 2, 1–4.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. (2016). Lažni prijatelji: s Rječnikom hrvatsko-ruskih lažnih prijatelja, Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.Google Scholar

Lipczuk, R. (1988). О różnicach semantycznych w zakresie niektórych tautonimów czasownikowych w relacji niemiecko-polskiej. Języki Оbсе w szkole 5, 387–393.Google Scholar

Lobkovskaja, L. P. (2012). O ponjatii mežʺjazykovoj omonimii (k probleme termina “ložnye druzʹja perevodčika”). Vestnik Čeljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 20/274. Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie 67, 79–87.Google Scholar

Lotko, E. (1992). Zrádná slova v polštine a češtine, Olomouc: Votobia.Google Scholar

Lytov, D. (2020). Serbsko-xorvatsko-russkij slovarʹ ložnyx druzej perevodčika. https://mojsrpski.org/dictionary/false-friend (accessed July 21, 2020).Google Scholar

Opačić, N. (1995). Primjeri homonimije u nekim slavenskim jezicima prema hrvatskom. In Djigunović, J. M. & Pintarić, N., eds., Prevođenje: Suvremena strujanja i tendencije, Zagreb: Hrvatsko društvo za primijenjenu lingvistiku, pp. 367–370.Google Scholar

Orłoś, T. Z., ed. (2006). Czesko-polski słownik zdradliwych wyrazów i pułapek frazeologicznych, 2nd ed., Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar

Paxotin, A. I. (2006). Bolʹšoj anglo-russkij, russko-anglijskij slovarʹ mnimyx druzej perevodčika, Moscow: Izdatel’ Kareva.Google Scholar

Peti-Stantić, A. (2014). Pravi in lažni slovenski in hrvaški prijatelji. In Tivardar, H., ed., Prihodnost v slovenskem jeziku, literaturi in kulturi, Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta, pp. 201–209.Google Scholar

Popović, M. & Trostinska, R. I. (1988). O međujezičnoj (hrvatskosrpsko- ruskoj) homonimiji. Radovi Zavoda za slavensku filologiju, 23, 53–62.Google Scholar

Popović, M. & Trostinska, R. I. (1989). O međujezičnoj hrvatskosrpsko-ukrajinskoj homonimiji, Radovi Zavoda za slavensku filologiju, 24, 71–80.Google Scholar

Saenko, M. N. (2021). Semantika praslavjanskogo slova *žiwotъ i ego kontinuantov. Linguistica Brunensia, 69(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Sedakova, O. A. (2005). Cerkovnoslavjano-russkie paronimy. Materialy k slovarju, Moscow: Greko-latinskij kabinet Ju. A. Šičalina.Google Scholar

Sedakova, O. A. (2008). Slovar’ trudnyx slov iz bogosluženija: cerkovnoslavjanskorusskie paronimy, Moscow: Greko-latinskij kabinet Ju. A. Šičalina.Google Scholar

Snoj, M. (2016). Slovenski etimološki slovar. Tretja izdaja, Ljubljana: ZRC.Google Scholar

Soglasnova, L. (2018). Dealing with false friends to avoid errors in subject analysis in Slavic cataloging: An overview of resources and strategies, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 56(5–6), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2018.1438551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stojković, A. (2004). Závodnice ili riječi, koje zavode: o češko-hrvatskim homonimima, Zagreb: Vlastita naklada.Google Scholar

Szalek, M. & Nečas, J. (1993). Czesko-polska homonimia: Czesko-polski słownik wyrazów o identycznym lub podobnym brzmieniu oraz wyrazów o identycznym lub podobnym zapisie, lecz o odmiennym znaczeniu, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.Google Scholar

Šipka, D. (1991). Paronimi iz engleskog u srpskohrvatskom opštem i mentalnom leksikonu. In Kontrastivna jezička istraživanja, Novi Sad: University of Novi Sad, pp. 130–135.Google Scholar

Šipka, D. 2008. A Dictionary of Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian-English False Cognates, Hyattsville, MD: Dunwoody Press.Google Scholar

Šipka, D. (2015). Slavic false cognates: A cross-linguistic comparison. Mundo Eslavo, 14, 39–50.Google Scholar

Šipka, D. et al. (1999). Rečnik srpsko-poljskih međujezičkih homonima i paronima, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar

Šušarina, I. A. (2015). Pol’sko-russkij slovar’ ložnyx druzej perevodčika. Tom 1 (A–F), Kurgan: Izdatel’stvo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.Google Scholar

Tokarz, E. (1998). Pułapki leksykalne. Słownik aproksymatów polsko-chorwackich, Katowice: Wyd. Śląsk.Google Scholar

Tokarz, E. (1999). Pułapki leksykalne. Słownik aproksymatów polsko-słoweńskich, Katowice: Wyd. Śląsk.Google Scholar

Tokarz, E. et al. (1994). Pułapki leksykalne. Słownik aproksymatów polsko-bułgarskich, Katowice: Wyd. Śląsk.Google Scholar

Uryadov, G. (2015). Slovacko-russkij slovar’ ložnyx druzej perevodčika, ed. Z. Šántová. www.slovnik.org/cgi-bin/main/main.pl/ru/00004/n/ (аccessed July 27, 2020).Google Scholar

Vlček, J. (1966). Úskalí ruské slovní zásoby: Slovník rusko-české homonymie a paronymie, Prague: Svět sovětů.Google Scholar

Vyxota, V. A. (2002), Niamecka-ruska-belaruski sloŭnik: amanimija, paranimija, palisemiia, Minsk: Èncykladpedyks.Google Scholar

Vyxota, V. A. (2004). Belaruskа-ruski sloŭnik: mižmoŭnyia amonimy, paronimy i polisemija, Minsk: Belaruski knihazbor.Google Scholar

Weiss, P. (1990). Govori Zadrečke doline med Gornjim Gradom in Nazarjami: glasoslovje, oblikoslovje in skladnja, Magistrsko delo, Ljubljana: Narodna in Univerzitetna knjižnica.Google Scholar

Wijas, A. (2014). Polsko-rosyjski słownik fałszywych przyjaciół tłumacza. www.falsefriends.awijas.pl (accessed July 21, 2020).Google Scholar

Xucišvili, S. (2006). Tipy semantičeskix otnošenij v sfere mežʹʹjazykovoj omonimii i paronimii. Sbornik naučnyx statej – Slavistika v Gruzii. Vypusk No. 7, Тbilisi: Tbilisskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. Iv. Džavaxišvili, pp. 182–186.Google Scholar

Xucišvili, S. (2010). Slavjanskie mež‘’jazykovye omonimy. Dissertation, Tbilisi.Google Scholar

Žuravlev, A. I. & Zaxarov, S. S. (1977). “Ložnye druz’ja perevodčika” s češskogo jazyka, Moscow: Vsesojuznyj centr perevodov naučno-texničeskoj literatury i dokumentacii.Google Scholar

Andersen, H. (1969). Lenition in Common Slavic. Language, 45, 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, H. (1999). The Western South Slavic contrast Sn. sah-ni-ti // SC sah-nu-ti. Slovenski jezik/Slovene Linguistic Studies, 2, 47–62.Google Scholar

Arvaniti, A. & Joseph, B. (2000). Variation in voiced stop prenasalization in Greek. Glōssologia, 11–12, 131–166.Google Scholar

Baerman, M. (1999). The Evolution of Fixed Stress in Slavic [LINCOM Studies in Slavic Linguistics 15], Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Baran, V. D. (1990). Istoki ranneslavjanskix kul’tur vostočnoj Evropy v svete retrospektivnogo analiza. In Slavjane jugovostočnoj Evropy v predgosudarstvennyj period, Kyiv: Naukova dumka, pp. 334–362.Google Scholar

BDA-OT (2001) = Kočev, I., Vakarelska-Čobanska, D., Kostova, T., Kjaeva, El, & Tetovska-Troeva, M., eds., Bălgarski dialekten atlas. Obobštavašt tom. I–III. Fonetika. Akcentologija. Leksika, Sofia: Knigoizdatelska kăšta “Trud”.Google Scholar

BDA-SE (1964) = Stojkov, S. & Bernštejn, S. B., eds., Bălgarski dialekten atlas. Vol. 1. Jugoiztočna Bălgarija. Čast vtora: statii, komentari, pokazalci, Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite.Google Scholar

Bernštejn, S. B. (1963). Karpatskij dialektologičeskij atlas. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 12(4), 72–84.Google Scholar

Bidwell, C. E. (1967). Colonial Venetian and Serbo-Croatian in the Eastern Adriatic: A case study of languages in contact. General Linguistics, 7(1), 13–30.Google Scholar

Bräuer, H. (1961). Slavische Sprachwissenschaft. I. Einleitung, Lautlehre [Sammlung Göschen, Band 1191/1191a], Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broch, O. (1899). Weitere Studien von der slovakisch-kleinrussischen Sprachgrenze im östlichen Ungarn, Kristiania: Dybwad.Google Scholar

Bulatova, L. N. (1975). Perfektnye formy v odnom russkom govore Karel’skoj ASSR (k voprosu o grammatičeskix značenijax pričastij v funkcii skazuemogo v russkix govorax). In Kasatkin, L. L., Nemčenko, E. V., & Stroganova, T. J., eds., Russkie govory. K izučeniju fonetiki, grammatiki, leksiki, Moscow: Nauka, pp. 189–202.Google Scholar

Canepari, L. (1979). I suoni dialettali e il problema della loro trascrizione. In Cortelazzo, M., ed., Guida ai dialetti veneti. Vol. 1, Padua: CLEUP.Google Scholar

Dickey, S. M. (2011). The varying role of po- in the grammar of Slavic aspectual systems: Sequences of events, delimitives, and German language contact. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 19(2), 178–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drvošanov, V. (1993). Kajlarskiot govor, Skopje: Institut za makedonski jazik.Google Scholar

Ferguson, R. (2007). A Linguistic History of Venice [Biblioteca dell’ “Archivum Romanicum”. Serie II: Linguistica, 57], Venice: Leo. S. Olschki.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. (2018). Reflexes of common Slavic nasal vowels in Southwest Macedonian dialects revisited: An areal and balkanological account. In Bethin, C. Y., ed., American Contributions to the 16th International Congress of Slavists, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 121–138.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. (1955). Gwara kurpiowska, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

Garde, P. (1974). K istorii vostočnoslavjanskix glasnyx srednego pod"ema”. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 3, 106–115.Google Scholar

Giannelli, C. & Vaillant, A. (1958). Un lexique macédonien du XVIe siècle, Paris: Institut d’études slaves de l’Université de Paris.Google Scholar

Gołąb, Z. (1984). The Arumanian dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia SFR Yugoslavia, Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar

Goodwin, W. W. & Gulick, C. B. (1930). Greek Grammar, revised 1958 by C. B. Gulick, Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. (2000). A Historical Phonology of the Slovene Language, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. (2017). Slavic. In Kapović, M., ed., The Indo-European Languages, London & New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 519–552.Google Scholar

Ivić, P. (1994). Srpskohrvatski dijalekti, njihova struktura i razvoj. Prva knjiga. Opšta razmatranja i štokavsko narečje [S nemačkog prevela Pavica Mrazović) (= Pavle Ivić celokupna dela, Vol. III, ed. Milorad Radovanović], Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.Google Scholar

Kalsbeek, J. (2011). Contact-induced innovations in Istrian Čakavian dialects. In Language Contact in Times of Globalization [Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 38], pp. 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karadžić, V. (1852/1935). Srpski rječnik, 2nd ed., cited here in the 4th ed. (Državno izdanje), Belgrade.Google Scholar

Kasatkin, L. L. et al. (2012). Russkaja dialektologija, Moscow: Rossijskaja akademija nauk.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, V. (1968). Review of Veenker, Wolgang (1962), Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Uralic and Altaic Series, 82. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Slavic and East European Journal 12(4), 490–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuraszkiewicz, W. (1963). Zarys dialektologii wschodnosłowiańskiej, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, J. (2016). South Macedonian decomposed nasal vowels are not an archaism but an early Balkanism. Paper presented at the 11th Meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society, September 24–26, 2016. Toronto.Google Scholar

Liška, J. (1968). O kvantite sotáckych samohlások. Jazykovedný časopis, 19, 169–199.Google Scholar

Mackridge, P. (1985). The Modern Greek Language: A Descriptive Analysis of Standard Modern Greek, Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Małecki, M. (1929) Cakawizm z uwzględnieniem zjawisk podobnych [Pracy Komisji Językowej 14], Kraków.Google Scholar

Małecki, M. (1936). Dwie gwary macedońskie. Suche i Wysoka w Soluńskiem. Część II: Słownik [Bibljoteka Ludu Słowiańskiego, Dział A, Nr 3], Kraków.Google Scholar

Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R. (2008). On the adjectival definite article in Slovenian. Pismo, 5(1), 102–124.Google Scholar

Miletič, L. (1900). Knižninata i ezikăt na banatskite bălgari. Sbornik za narodni umotvorenija i narodopis 16–17, 339–482.Google Scholar

Miletič, L. (1912). Die Rhodopemundarten der bulgarischen Sprache [Schriften der Balkankommission, Linguistische Abteilung. Südslawische Dialektstudien 6], Vienna: A. Hölder.Google Scholar

Miller, R. (1988). The third person present tense and Common Slavic dialectology. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, 37, 7–33.Google Scholar

Mixajlova, L. P. (2019). Pribaltijsko-finskij fonetičeskij komponent v leksike govorov Zaonež’ja. Učenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 7(184), 38–43.Google Scholar

Mladenov, M. (1993). Bălgarskite govori v Rumănija, Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite.Google Scholar

Moguš, M. (1977). Čakavsko narječje, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar

Moskovljevič, X. (1972). Govor ostrova Vis. In Bulatova, R. V., ed., Issledovanija po serboxorvatskomu jazyku, Moscow, pp. 105–139.Google Scholar

Muljačić, Ž. (1966). Lo cakavizmo alla luce della linguistica contrastive. Die Welt der Slaven 11(4), 367–379.Google Scholar

Nedelčev, N. (1994). Dialekt na bălgarite-katolici. Severen pavlikjanski govor, Veliko Tărnovo: Abagar.Google Scholar

Newton, B. (1972). The Generative Interpretation of Dialect: A Study of Modern Greek Phonology [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 8], Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nežić, I. (2013). Fonologija i morfologija čakavskih ekavskih govora Labinštine. Doctoral dissertation, University of Rijeka.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. (1993). The linguistic geography of the Slavic expansion. In Maguire, R. A. & Timberlake, A., eds., American Contributions to the Eleventh International Congress of Slavists. Literature. Linguistics. Poetics, Columbus, OH: Slavica, pp. 377–392.Google Scholar

Nikolaev, S. L. (1988). Sledy osobennostej vostočnoslavjanskix plemennyx dialektov v sovremennyx velikorusskix govorax. I. Kriviči. In Ivanov, V. V., ed., Baltoslavjanskie issledovanija 1986 (Sbornik naučnyx trudov), Moscow: Nauka, pp. 115–154.Google Scholar

Nikolaev, S. L. (1994). Rannee dialektnoe členenie i vnešnie svjazi vostočnoslavjanskix dialektov. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1994(3), 23–49.Google Scholar

Nikolaev, S. L. & Tolstaja, M. N. (2001). Slovar’ karpatoukrainskogo torun’skogo govora. S grammatičeskim očerkom i obrazcami tekstov, Moscow: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, Institut slavjanovedenija.Google Scholar

Olander, T. (2015). Proto-Slavic Inflectional Morphology. A Comparative Handbook, Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrovič, E. & Vrabie, E. (1963). Bălgarskijat govor v s. Popešt-Leorden (Bukureštka oblast). Bălgarski ezik, 13(2), 110–122.Google Scholar

Piccio, G. (1928). Dizionario veneziano-italiano, Venice.Google Scholar

Popović, I. (1960). Geschichte der serbokroatischen Sprache [Bibliotheca Slavica], Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Pronk-Tiethoff, S. (2013). Germanic Loanwords in Proto-Slavic [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 20], Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saenko, M. (2017). Praslavjanskoe *pepelъ/*popelъ: isxodnaja forma i ètimologija. Slovenski jezik–Slovene Linguistic Studies, 11, 19–34.Google Scholar

Scatton, E. A. (1976). Forms such as [cal]/[cali] in dialects of East Balkan Slavic. In Magner, T. F., ed., Slavic Linguistics and Language Teaching, Cambridge, MA: Slavica, pp. 249–258.Google Scholar

Schallert, J. (2001). Southwest Bulgarian dialect features in the Fakija (Grudovo) dialect of Southeastern Bulgaria: (s)kina ‘to pluck’. In Friedman, V. A. & Dyer, D. L., eds., Of All the Slavs My Favorites. In Honor of Howard I. Aronson, on the Occasion of his 66th Birthday [Indiana Slavic Studies 12], Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 359–367.Google Scholar

Schallert, J. (2005). Historical phonology of the Macedonian dialect of Vrbnik (Albania). Balkanistica, 18, 85–111.Google Scholar

Schallert, J. (2011). Sotak prosody reconsidered (part one). In Dialektologie a geolingvistika, Slezská univerzita v Opavě, pp. 192–209.Google Scholar

Schallert, J. & Greenberg, M. (2007). The prehistory and areal distribution of Slavic *gъlčěti ‘speak’. Slovenski jezik–Slovene Linguistic Studies, 6, 9–76.Google Scholar

Schenker, A. M. (1993/2008). Proto-Slavonic. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 60–129.Google Scholar

Shevelov, G. (1965). A Historical Phonology of Slavic, Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Shevelov, G. (1979). A Historical Phonology of the Ukrainian Language, Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Skok, P. (1971–1973). Etimologijski rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika. I–III, Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti.Google Scholar

Sławski, F. (1962). Zarys dialektologii południosłowiańskiej. Z wyborem tekstów gwarowych, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar

Stieber, Z. (1973). A Historical Phonology of the Polish Language, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar

Stojkov, S. (1967). Banatskijat govor. Trudove po bălgarskata dialektologija 3, Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukiteGoogle Scholar

Stojkov, S, (1993). Bălgarska dialektologija, Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite.Google Scholar

Ter-Avanesova, A. V. (1989). Ob odnoj slavjanskoj akcentnoj innovacii. In Bulatova, R. V, Dybo, V. A., Nikolaeva, T. M, & Zaliznjak, A. A., eds., Slavjanskoe i balkanskoe jazykoznanie. Prosodija. Sbornik statej, Moscow: Nauka, pp. 216–250.Google Scholar

Thomas, G. (2008). Exploring the parameters of a Central European Sprachbund. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 50(2), 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolstoj, N. I. (1974 [1997]). Nekotorye voprosy sootnošenija lingvo- i etnografičeskix issledovanij. In Problemy kartografirovanija v jazykoznanii i etnografii, Leningrad, pp. 16–33 [reprinted in N. I. Tolstoj. Izbrannye trudy 1: 223–242.]Google Scholar

Townsend, C. E. (1990). A Description of Spoken Prague Czech, Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar

Vaillant, A. (1966). Grammaire comparée des langues slaves 3, Le verbe, Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Vasmer, M. (1941). Die Slaven in Griechenland, Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften in Kommission bei W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Velčić, N. (2003). Besedar Bejske Tramuntane [Čakavska biblioteka 11], Mali Lošinj, Beli, Rijeka: Adamic.Google Scholar

Vermeer, W. (1994). On explaining why the Early North Russian nominative singular in -e does not palatalize stem-final velars. Russian Linguistics, 18(2), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermeer, W. (2014). Early Slavic dialect differences involving the consonant system. In Dutch Contributions to the 15th International Congress of Slavists, Minsk. Linguistics [Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 40], Amsterdam & New York, NY: Rodopi, pp. 181–227.Google Scholar

Vidoeski, B. (1970/1999). Akcentnite sistemi vo makedonskite dijalekti, cited here from Dijalektite na makedonskiot jazik 3, pp. 101–116.Google Scholar

Vidoeski, B. (2005). The vocalic systems of Standard Macedonian and the dialects of Macedonian. In Dialects of Macedonian (anthology translation by P. M. Forster), Bloomington IN: Slavica, pp. 101–125.Google Scholar

Vidoeski, Bo., Koneski, B., & Jašar-Nasteva, O. (1968). Distribution des balkanismes en macédonien. In Actes du Premier Congrès Internationale des Études Balkaniques et Sud-Est Européennes. VI, Sofia: Académie Bulgare des sciences, pp. 517–546.Google Scholar

Vondrák, V. (1896). Frisinské památky. Jich vznik a význam v slovanském písemnictví, Prague: Nákladem České akademie.Google Scholar

Voráč, J. (1955). Česká nářečí jihozápadní: Studie jazykově zeměpisná. Část první, Prague.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, A.A. (1985). Ot praslavjanskoj akcentuacii k russkoj, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskij dialect, 2nd ed., Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar

Álvarez-Pedrosa, J. A. (2014). The reconstruction of the pre-Christian Slavic religion and Iranian lexical borrowing: A methodological review. Ollodagos, 30, 61–80.Google Scholar

Andersen, H. (2003). Slavic and the Indo-European migrations. In Andersen, H., ed., Language Contacts in Prehistory. Studies in Stratigraphy, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 45–76.Google Scholar

Andersen, H. (2020). On the formation of the Common Slavic koiné. In Klír, T., Boček, V., & Jansens, N., eds., New Perspectives on the Early Slavs and the Rise of Slavic. Contact and Migrations, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. D. S. (2005). Language Contact in South Central Siberia, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Asenova, P. (2002). Balkansko ezikoznanie. Osnovni problemi na balkanskija ezikov săjuz, 2nd ed., Veliko Tărnovo: Faber.Google Scholar

Berend, N. (1998). Sprachliche Anpassung. Eine soziologisch-dialektologische Untersuchung zum Rußlanddeutschen, Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Bilaniuk, L. (2005). Contested Tongues. Language Politics and Cultural Correction in Ukraine, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, H. (1982). The Slavonic language community as a genetic and typological class. Die Welt der Slaven, 27, 5–43.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, H. (1996). Language contact and language interference: The case of Greek and Old Church Slavonic. Suvremena lingvistika, 41(1–2), 39–44.Google Scholar

Bond, A. (1974). German Loanwords in the Russian Language of the Petrine Period, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bracki, A. (2009). Surżyk. Historia i teraźniejszość, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Google Scholar

Brehmer, B. (2007). Sprechen Sie Qwelja? Formen und Folgen russisch-deutscher Zweisprachigkeit in Deutschland. In Anstatt, T., ed., Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen: Erwerb, Formen, Förderung, Tübingen: Attempto, pp. 163–185.Google Scholar

Broch, I. & Jahr, E. H. (1981). Russenorsk – et pidginspråk i Norge, Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar

Broch, I. & Jahr, E. H. (1984). Russenorsk: A new look at the Russo-Norwegian pidgin in Northern Norway. In Sture Ureland, P. & Clarkson, I., eds., Scandinavian Language Contacts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–65.Google Scholar

Broch, O. (1927). Russenorsk. Archiv für slavische Philologie, 41, 209–262.Google Scholar

Broch, O. (1930). Russenorsk tekstmateriale. Maal og Minne, 1930, 113–140.Google Scholar

Čerepanov, S. I. (1853). Kjaxtinskoe kitajskoe narečie russkogo jazyka. Izvestija Imperatorskoj Akademii nauk po otdeleniju jazyka i slovesnosti, 2, 370–377.Google Scholar

Curta, F. (2004). The Slavic lingua franca. Linguistic notes of an archaeologist turned historian. East Central Europe/L’Europe du Centre-Est, 31(1), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daiber, T. (2012). Review of Gvozdanović 2009. Kritikon litterarum, 39(3–4), 180–202.Google Scholar

Daniel, M. A. & Dobrushina, N. R. (2013). Russkij jazyk v Dagestane: problemy jazykovoj interferencii. In Kompjuternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye texnologii: po materialam ežegodnoj meždunarodnoj koferencii «Dialog» (Bekasovo, 29 maja-2 ijunja 2013 g.). Moscow: RGGU, pp. 186–211.Google Scholar

Fedorova, K. (2012). Transborder trade on the Russian-Chinese border: Problems of interethnic communication. In Bruns, B. & Miggelbrink, J., eds., Subverting Borders. Doing Research on Smuggling and Small-Scale Trade, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 107–128.Google Scholar

Feuillet, J. (2012). Linguistique comparée des langues balkaniques, Paris: Institut d’études slaves.Google Scholar

Flier, M. S. (1998). Surzhyk: The rules of engagement. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 22, 113–136.Google Scholar

Fortson IV, B. W. (2010). Indo-European Language and Culture. An Introduction, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. & Joseph, B. D. (forthcoming). The Balkan Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giger, M. (2008). Partizipien als Exportschlager. Zum Einfluss des Russischen auf andere slavische Sprachen im 19. Jahrhundert. In Kosta, P. & Weiss, D., eds., Slavistische Linguistik 2006/2007. Referate des 32. und 33. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Munich: Otto Sagner, pp. 125–152.Google Scholar

Golovko, E. V. (1994). Mednyj Aleut or Copper Island Aleut: An Aleut-Russian mixed language. In Bakker, P. & Mous, M., eds., Mixed Languages. 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining, Amsterdam: IFOTT, 113–121.Google Scholar

Golovko, E. V. & Vachtin, N. B. (1990). Aleut in contact: The CIA enigma. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 22, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gołąb, Z. (1984). The Arumanian Dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia, SFR Yugoslavia, Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar

Gorham, M. S. (2000). Natsiia ili Snikerizatsiia? Identity and perversion in the language debates of late- and post-Soviet Russia. The Russian Review, 59, 614–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grenoble, L. A. (2000). Morphosyntactic change: The impact of Russian on Evenki. In Gilbers, D. J., Nerbonne, J., & Schaeken, J., eds., Languages in Contact, Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J. L. (1997). Global English invades Poland. English Today, 13(2), 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, J. L. (2001). Global English infiltrates Bulgaria. English Today, 17(4), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruzdeva, E. (2000). Aspects of Russian-Nivkh grammatical interference: The Nivkh imperative. In Gilbers, D. J., Nerbonne, J., & Schaeken, J., eds., Languages in Contact, Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gvozdanović, J. (2009). Celtic and Slavic and the Great Migrations. Reconstructing Linguistic Prehistory, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar

Henninger, T. (1990). The Bulgarian national revival: Enforced elimination of some turkisms from the lexis. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 32(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hentschel, G. (2013). Belorusskij, russkij i belorussko-russkaja smešannaja reč’. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 2013(1), 53–76.Google Scholar

Hentschel, G., Taranenko, O., & Zaprudski, S., eds. (2014). Trasjanka und Suržyk – gemischte weißrussisch-russische und ukrainisch-russische Rede. Sprachlicher Inzest in Weißrussland und der Ukraine?, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzer, G. (1989). Entlehnungen aus einer bisher unbekannten Indogermanischen Sprache im Urslavischen und Urbaltischen, Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Hüttl-Folter, G. (1996). Syntaktische Studien zur neueren russischen Literatursprache. Die frühen Übersetzungen aus dem Französischen, Vienna, Cologne, & Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Ivanova, N. I. (2004). Grammatičeskaja interferencija: narušenija norm upravlenija v ustnoj russkoj reči bilingvov-Saxa. In Krasovickij, A. M., ed., Issledovanija po jazykovoj interferencii [Evropejskaja Rossija, Sibir’, Dal’nij Vostok, Bjulleten’ Fonetičeskogo Fonda 9], Bochum, pp. 57–63.Google Scholar

Kallio, P. (2005). A Uralic substrate in Balto-Slavic revisited. In Meiser, G. & Hackstein, O., eds., Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel: Akten der XI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden: Reichert, pp. 275–283.Google Scholar

Kazakevič, O. A. (2000). Smešenie i pereključenie kodov v reči severnyx sel’kupov. In Krysin, L. P., ed., Rečevoe obščenie v uslovijax jazykovoj neodnorodnosti, Moscow: Ėditorial URSS, pp. 14–21.Google Scholar

Kent, K. (2012). Language Contact: Morphosyntactic Analysis of Surzhyk Spoken in Central Ukraine, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, V. (1969). Gibt es ein finnougrisches Substrat im Slavischen? [Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Ser. B, Vol. 153,4], Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar

Kittel, B., Lindner, D., Tesch, S., & Hentschel, G. (2010). Mixed language usage in Belarus. The sociostructural background and language choice. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 206, 47–71.Google Scholar

Kluge, F. (1913). Urgermanisch. Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte [Grundriss der germanischen Philologie 2], Strasbourg: K. J. Trübner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kochmann, S. (1967). Polsko-rosyjskie kontakty językowe w zakresie słownictwa w XVII wieku, Wrocław, Warsaw, & Kraków: Zakład narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar

Kollár, J. (1844). Ueber die literarische Wechselseitigkeit zwischen den verschiedenen Stämmen und Mundarten der slavischen Nation, 2nd ed., Leipzig: Otto Wigand.Google Scholar

Leinonen, M. (2006). The Russification of Komi. Slavica Helsingiensia, 27, 234–245.Google Scholar

Liskovec, I. V. (2009). Trasjanka: A code of rural migrants in Minsk. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lunt, H. G. (1987). On the relationship of Old Church Slavonic to the written language of Early Rus’. Russian Linguistics, 11, 133–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martynov, V. V. (1963). Slavjano-germanskoe leksičeskoe vzaimodejstvie drevnejšej pory, Minsk: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Navuk BSSR.Google Scholar

Mečkovskaja, N. B. (2007). Lingvističeskij kiberpank v russkom internete: funkcii i vidy jazykovoj igry s anglijskimi zaimstvovanijami. Slavistična revija, 54(1/2), 47–64.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. (1926). Le vocabulaire slave et le vocabulaire indo-iranien. Revue des Etudes Slaves, 6, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menovščikov, G. A. (1964). K voprosu o pronicaemosti grammatičeskogo stroja jezyka. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 1964–1965, 100–106.Google Scholar

Molnár, N. (1985). The Calques of Greek Origin in the Most Ancient Old Slavic Gospel Texts, Cologne & Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Moser, M. (1998). Die polnische, ukrainische und weißrussische Interferenzschicht im russischen Satzbau des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Moser, M. (2002). Čto takoe – “prostaja mova”? Studia Slavica Hungarica, 47, 221–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Namsaraeva, S. (2014). Border language: Chinese Pidgin Russian with a Mongolian ‘accent’. Inner Asia, 16, 116–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevskaja, I. (2000). Shor-Russian contact features. In Gilbers, D. J., Nerbonne, J., & Schaeken, J., eds., Languages in Contact, Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Offord, D. (2015). French and Russian in Catherine’s Russia. In Offord, D., Ryazanova-Clarke, L., Rjéoutski, V., & Argent, G., eds., French and Russian in Imperial Russia, 2 vols., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oglezneva, E. A. (2007). Russko-kitajskij pidžin: opyt sociolingvističeskogo opisanija, Blagoveshchensk: Amurskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar

Oglezneva, E. A. (2014). “Kitajskij russkij …” (K voprosu o sovremennyx formax russko-kitajskogo jazykovogo vzaimodejstvija). Slavica Helsingiensia, 45, 162–174.Google Scholar

Otten, F. (1985). Untersuchungen zu den Fremd- und Lehnwörtern bei Peter dem Großen, Cologne & Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Perexval’skaja, E. V. (2008). Russkie pidžiny, Saint Petersburg: Aletejja.Google Scholar

Pfandl, H. (2002). Wie gehen die slawischen Sprachen mit Anglizismen um? (Am Beispiel des Russischen, Tschechischen und Slowenischen). In Muhr, R. & Kettemann, B., eds., EUROSPEAK. Der Einfluss des Englischen auf europäische Sprachen zur Jahrtausendwende, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 117–154.Google Scholar

Pronk-Tiethoff, S. (2013). The Germanic Loanwords in Proto-Slavic, Amsterdam & New York, NY: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rathmayr, R. (2002). Anglizismen im Russischen: Gamburgery, Bifšteksy und die Voucherisierung Rußlands. In Muhr, R. & Kettemann, B., eds., EUROSPEAK. Der Einfluss des Englischen auf europäische Sprachen zur Jahrtausendwende, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 155–180.Google Scholar

Rozwadowski, J. (1915). Stosunki leksykalne między językami słowiańskimi a irańskimi. Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 1, 95–110.Google Scholar

Saarikivi, J. (2006). Substrata Uralica: Studies on Finno-Ugrian Substrate in Northern Russian Dialects, Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar

Sandfeld, K. (1930). Linguistique balkanique, problèmes et résultats, Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Schaller, H. W. (1975). Die Balkansprachen. Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Shapiro, R. (2012). Chinese Pidgin Russian. In Ansaldo, U., ed., Pidgins and Creoles in Asia, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar

Smith, M. (2006). The Influence of French on 18th Century Literary Russian. Semantic and Phraseological Calques, Oxford & Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Sobolev, A. N. & Domoselickaja, M. V., eds. (2005–2010). Malyj dialektologičeskij atlas balkanskix jazykov. Serija leksičeskaja, 4 vols, Munich: Otto Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2005). Taimyr Pidgin Russian (Govorka). Russian Linguistics, 29, 289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2009). The Taimyr Pidgin Russian morphology enigma. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(3), 378–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2012). Tajmyr-Pidgin-Russisch: Kolonialer Sprachkontakt in Nordsibirien. Munich, Berlin & Washington, DC: Otto Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2013a). Die Trasjanka und die Regiolektalisierung des Russischen in Weißrußland. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 58, 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2013b). Ein soziohistorischer Modellentwurf des Balkansprachbunds. In De Dobbeleer, M. & Vervaet, S., eds., (Mis)Understanding the Balkans. Essays in Honour of Raymond Detrez, Ghent: Academia Press, 137–155.Google Scholar

Stern, D. (2015). ‘Nado minimum!’ – Mediating respectability at informal markets on the Russian-Chinese border. Inner Asia 17, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, D. (2016). Negotiating goods and language on cross-border retail markets in the postsocialist space. In Kamusella, T., Nomachi, M., & Gibson, C., eds., The Palgrave Handbook of Slavic Languages, Identities and Borders, London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, G. (1996). Towards a history of Modern Czech purism: The problem of covert Germanisms. Slavonic and East European Review, 74(3), 410–420.Google Scholar

Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uspenskij, B. A. (1983). Diglossija i dvujazyčie v istorii russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics, 27, 81–126.Google Scholar

Van der Meulen, R. (1909). De Hollandsche zee- en scheepstermen in het Russisch, Amsterdam: Müller.Google Scholar

Van der Meulen, R. (1959). Supplement op de Hollandsche zee en scheepstermen in het Russisch, Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Vath, B. (2013). Review of Gvozdanović 2009. Historische Sprachforschung, 126, 313–319.Google Scholar

Veenker, W. (1967). Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Winter, W. (1978). The distribution of short and long vowels in stems of the type Lith. ė́sti : vèsti : mèsti and OCS jasti : vesti : mesti in Baltic and Slavic languages. In Fisiak, J., ed., Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witkowski, W. (1999). Słownik zapożyczeń polskich w języku rosyjskim, Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar

Wójtowicz, M. (1993). Anglijskie leksičeskie zaimstvovanija v russkom jazyke Petrovskoj èpoxi. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia, 24, 151–160.Google Scholar

Xelimskij, E. A. (1987). Russkij govorka mesto kazat’ budem (tajmyrskij pidžin). In Vardul‘, I. F. & Belikov, V. I., eds., Vozniknovenie i funkcionirovanie kontaktnyx jazykov, Moscow: Nauka, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar

Xelimskij, E. A. (2000). “Govorka” – Tajmyrskij pidžin na russkoj leksičeskoj osnove. E. A. Xelimskij: Komparativistika, Uralistika. Lekcii i stat’i, Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury, pp. 378–395.Google Scholar

Zeller, J. P. (2015). Phonische Variation in der weißrussischen “Trasjanka”. Sprachwandel und Sprachwechsel im weißrussisch-russischen Sprachkontakt, Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Google Scholar

Zemskaja, E. A. (2001). Jazyk russkogo zarubež’ja. Obščie processy i jazykovye portrety, Moscow & Vienna: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar

Baranova, V. V. (2014). Sostavlenie slovarja i roždenie novogo jazyka. Antropologičeskij forum, 21, 27–36.Google Scholar

Breu, W. (2018). Sud’ba mestnogo padeža v trex govorax molizsko-slavjanskogo mikrojazyka (pod vlijaniem ital’janskogo jazyka). In Duličenko, A. D. & Nomachi, M., eds., Slavjanskaja mikrofilologija, Sapporo: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, pp. 341–373.Google Scholar

Długosz, N. (2020). Language of the Goranci (Gorani). In Greenberg, M. L. & Grenoble, L. A., eds., Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online. https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_036103.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (1981). Slavjanskie literaturnye mikrojazyki. Voprosy formirovanija i razvitija, Tallin: Valgus.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (2003–2004). Slavjanskie literaturnye mikrojazyki I–II. Obrazcy tekstov, Tartu: Izdatel’stvo Tartuskogo universiteta.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (2011). Osnovy slavjanskoj filologii, Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski, Instytut Filologii Polskiej.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (2015). Vvedenie v slavjanskuju filologiju, Moscow: Flinta-Nauka.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (2017). Malye slavjanskie literaturnye jazyki (mikrojazyki). In Moldovan, A. M., Skorvid, S. S., Kibrik, A. A., Rogova, N. V., Jakuškina, E. I., Žuravlev, A. F., & Tolstaja, S. M., eds., Jazyki mira. Slavjanskie jazyki, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija, pp. 625–645.Google Scholar

Duličenko, A. D. (2018). Slavjanskaja mikrofilologija. In Duličenko, A. D. & Nomachi, M., eds., Slavjanskaja mikrofilologija, Sapporo: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

Fejsa, M. (2010). Nova Srbija i njena rusinska manjina, Novi Sad: Prometej.Google Scholar

Henzelmann, M. (2016). Die Bunjewatzen. Ein kurzer Überblick über eine ethnische Minderheit in Serbien und die Herausbildung ihrer Mikroliteratursprache, Leipzig: Biblion Media.Google Scholar

Knoll, V. (2017). Ot literaturnyx idiolektov k regional’nym literaturnym jazykam (ne tol’ko) v slavjanskom mire. In Skorvid, S. S., ed., Minoritarnye i regional’nye jazyki i kul’tury Slavii, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MIK, pp. 11–43.Google Scholar

Kočev, I. (1984). Standartnata i substandartnite (regionalni) formi na bălgarskija ezik. Bălgarski ezik, 4, 297–304.Google Scholar

Lifanov, K. (2018). Jazyk vostočnoslovackix tekstov s točki zrenija teorii literaturnyx mikrojazykov. In Stern, D., Nomachi, M., & Belić, B., eds., Linguistic Regionalism in Eastern Europe and Beyond. Minority, Regional and Literary Microlanguages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 166–183.Google Scholar

Łysohorsky, Ó. (1988). Lašsko poezyja 1931–1977, Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Maksymiuk, J. (2014). Čom ne po-svojomu?, Białystok: Struha Editions.Google Scholar

Maksymiuk, J. (2018). The development of a Latin spelling system for Podlachian. In Stern, D., Nomachi, M., & Belić, B., eds., Linguistic Regionalism in Eastern Europe and Beyond. Minority, Regional and Literary Microlanguages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 335–347.Google Scholar

Mečkovskaja, N. B. (2000). Social’naja lingvistika, Moscow: Aspekt Press.Google Scholar

Mladenova, M. (2021). Banatskijat bălgarski knižoven ezik v konteksta na slavjanskata mikrolingvistika (istorija, dinamika na formata i ezikovi politiki), Blagoevgrad: Universitetsko izdatelstvo Neofit Rilski.Google Scholar

Nomachi, M. (2018). The Gorani people in search of identity: The current sociolinguistic situation among the Gorani community of the former Yugoslavia. In Duličenko, A. D. & Nomachi, M., eds., Slavjanskaja mikrofilologija, Sapporo: Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, pp. 375–412.Google Scholar

Okuka, M. & Krenn, G. (2002). Wieser Enzyklopädie des Europäischen Ostens. Band 10: Lexikon der Sprachen des Europäischen Ostens, Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.Google Scholar

Osowski, B. (2018). Moravskij jazyk: istočniki regionalizma, sostojanie i perspektivy. In Stern, D., Nomachi, M., & Belić, B., eds., Linguistic Regionalism in Eastern Europe and Beyond. Minority, Regional and Literary Microlanguages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 204–216.Google Scholar

Piper, P. (2008). Uvod u slavistiku 1, Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike.Google Scholar

Popov, A. & Kujundžić-Ostojić, S. (2019). Gramatički i pravopisni priručnik bunjevačkog jezika, Subotica: Nacionalni savit bunjevačke nacionalne manjine.Google Scholar

Popowska-Taborska, H. (1988). Szkice z kaszubszczyzny. Dzieje, zabytki, słownictwo, Wejherowo: Muzeum Piśmiennictwa i Muzyki Kaszubsko-Pomorskiej w Wejherowie.Google Scholar

Rehder, P., ed., (1993). Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen, Darmstadt: WBG Wissen verbindet.Google Scholar

Rehder, P. (1984–1985). Slavische Mikro-Literatursprachen? Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku, 27/28, 665–670.Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2009). Zasady pisowni kurpiowskiego dialektu literackiego, Ostrołęka: Związek Kurpiów.Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2016). Kurpiowska koniugacja, Ostrołęka: Związek Kurpiów.Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2017). Kurpiowska deklinacja, Ostrołęka: Związek Kurpiów.Google Scholar

Rubach, J. (2019). Kurpiowska ortografia, Ostrołęka: Związek Kurpiów.Google Scholar

Salminen, T. (2008). Endangered languages in Europe. In Brenzinger, M., ed., Language Diversity Endangered, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siatkowska, E. (2004). Szkice z dziejów literackich języków słowiańskich, Warsaw: Towarzystwo Naukowe Warszawskie.Google Scholar

Skorvid, S. S. (2017). Peremeščaetsja li serbolužickij jazyk v dvux ego literaturnyx formax v kategoriju “slavjanskix (literaturnyx) mikrojazykov”? In Skorvid, S. S., ed., Minoritarnye i regional’nye jazyki i kul’tury Slavii, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MIK, pp. 116–128.Google Scholar

Stern, D. (2018). Languages without an army: Minority, regional and literary microlanguages. In Stern, D., Nomachi, M., & Belić, B., eds., Linguistic Regionalism in Eastern Europe and Beyond. Minority, Regional and Literary Microlanguages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 14–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suprun, A. E. (1989). Vvedenie v slavjanskuju filologiju, Minsk: Vyšèjšaja škola.Google Scholar

Šustek, Zbyšek. (1998). Otázka kodifikace spisovného moravského jazyka. In Duličenko, A. D., ed., Jazyki malye i bol‘šie …: in memoriam acad. Nikita I. Tolstoi, Tartu: Izdatel’stvo Tartuskogo universiteta, pp. 128–142.Google Scholar

Szatkowski, P. (2020). Mazurski fébel abo Mazurská fibla czyli Elementarz mowy mazurskiej, Ełk: Ełckie Centrum Kultury.Google Scholar

Večerka, R. (2008). Jazyky v komparaci 2: charakteristiky současných slovanských jazyků v historickém kontextu, Prague: Euroslavica.Google Scholar

Antonova Ünlü, E. & Wei, L. (2018). The acquisition of the weaker language: Evidence from the acquisition of Russian cases by a Turkish-Russian child. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(5), 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehmer, B. & Czachór, A. (2012). The formation and distribution of the analytic future tense in Polish-German bilinguals. In Braunmüller, K. & Gabriel, C., eds., Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehmer, B. & Rothweiler, M. (2012). The acquisition of gender agreement marking in Polish: A study of bilingual Polish-German-speaking children. In Braunmüller, K. & Gabriel, C., eds., Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehmer, B. & Sopata, A. (2021). Word order in complex verb phrases in heritage Polish spoken in Germany. Languages, 6(2), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brehmer, B. & Usanova, I. (2015). Let’s fix it? Cross-linguistic influence in word order patterns of Russian heritage speakers in Germany. In Peukert, H., ed., Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 161–188.Google Scholar

Dimitrijević-Savić, J. (2008). Convergence and attrition: Serbian in contact with English in Australia. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16(1), 57–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ďurovič, L. (1983). The case systems in the language of diaspora children. Slavica Lundensia, 9, 275–308.Google Scholar

Hansen, B. (2018). On the permeability of grammars: Syntactic pattern replications in heritage Croatian and heritage Serbian spoken in Germany. In Hansen, B., Grković-Major, J., & Sonnenhauser, B., eds., Diachronic Slavonic Syntax, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 125–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Isurin, L. & Ivanova-Sullivan, T. (2008). Lost in between: The case of Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 72–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanova-Sullivan, T. (2014). Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of Syntax-Discourse Interface in Heritage Grammars, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivanova-Sullivan, T. (2019). Acquisition of clitics in heritage Bulgarian in the USA: Initial variability and reduction of optionality. Linguistique Balkanique, 58(1), 19–28.Google Scholar

Janssen, B. & Meir, N. (2019). Production, comprehension, and repetition of accusative case by monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian-Dutch and Russian-Hebrew-speaking children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(4), 736–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozminska, K. (2015). Language contact in the Polish-American community in Chicago. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 239–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laleko, O. (2010a). On covert tense-aspect restructuring in heritage Russian: A case of aspectually transient predicates. In Iverson, M., Ivanov, I., Judy, T., Rothman, J., Slabakova, R., & Tryzna, M., eds., Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 72–83.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. (2010b). The Syntax–Pragmatics Interface in Language Loss: Covert Restructuring of Aspect in Heritage Russian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. (2018). What is difficult about grammatical gender? Evidence from heritage Russian. Journal of Language Contact, 11(2), 233–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laleko, O. & Dubinina, I. (2018). Word order production in heritage Russian: Perspectives from linguistics and pedagogy. In Bauckus, S. & Kresin, S., eds., Connecting across Languages and Cultures: A Heritage Language Festschrift in Honor of Olga Kagan, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 191–215.Google Scholar

Laleko, O. (2022). Word order and information structure in heritage and L2 Russian: Focus and unaccusativity effects in subject inversion. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(6), 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laskowski, R. (2014). Language Maintenance – Language Attrition: The Case of Polish Children in Sweden, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lyra, F. (1962). English and Polish in Contact, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Łyskawa, P. & Nagy, N. (2020). Case marking variation in heritage Slavic languages in Toronto: Not so different. Language Learning, 70(S1), 122–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meir, N., Parshina, O., & Sekerina, I.. (2020). The interaction of morphological cues in bilingual sentence processing: An eye-tracking study. In Brown, M. & Kohut, A., eds., Proceedings of the 44th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 376–389.Google Scholar

Meir, N. & Polinsky, M. (2021). Restructuring in heritage grammars: Adjective-noun and numeral-noun expressions in Israeli Russian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 222–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., Urek, O., & Westergaard, M. (2018). Bilinguals’ sensitivity to grammatical gender cues in Russian: The role of cumulative input, proficiency, and dominance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pereltsvaig, A. (2005). Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Kempchinsky, P. & Slabakova, R., eds., Aspectual Inquiries, Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polinsky, M. (1995). Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 14(1–2), 87–123.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. In Browne, W., Dornisch, E., Kondrashova, N., & Zec, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4. The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 370–406.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14(2), 191–262.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. (2008a). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 40–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polinsky, M. (2008b). Heritage language narratives. In Brinton, D., Kagan, O., & Bauckus, S., eds., Heritage Language Education. A New Field Emerging, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 149–164.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. (2009). Without aspect. In Corbett, G. & Noonan, M., eds., Case and Grammatical Relations, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 263–282.Google Scholar

Polinsky, M. (2018). Heritage Languages and Their Speakers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polinsky, M. & Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rinke, E., Flores, C., & Sopata, A. (2019). Heritage Portuguese and heritage Polish in contact with German: More evidence on the production of objects. Languages, 4, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodina, Y. & Westergaard, M. (2017). Grammatical gender in bilingual Norwegian-Russian acquisition: The role of input and transparency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodina, Y., Kupisch, T., Meir, N., Mitrofanova, N., Urek, O., & Westergaard, M. (2020). Internal and external factors in heritage language acquisition: Evidence from heritage Russian in Israel, Germany, Norway, Latvia and the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Education, 5, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, M. & Minkov, M. (2014). Russian case system acquisition among Russian-Hebrew speaking children. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 22(1), 51–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, M., Minkov, M., Dieser, E., Protassova, E., Moin, V., & Polinsky, M. (2015). Acquisition of Russian gender agreement by monolingual and bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 726–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seliger, H. & Vago, R., eds. (1991). First Language Attrition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolski-Moskoff, I. (2019). Case in Heritage Polish. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Alpatov, V. M. (2015). A Latin alphabet for the Russian language. In Tomelleri, V. S. & Kempgen, S., eds., Slavic Alphabets in Contact, Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Bircer, S. (2004). Transliteracija russkix grafem v latinicu v ėlektronnoj perepiske na russkom jazyke, Saint Petersburg: Izdatelʹstvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, H. (1996). How did Glagolitic writing reach the coastal regions of northwestern Croatia? Croatica 42/43/44, 69–79.Google Scholar

Bláha, O., Dittmann, R., Komárek, K., Polakovič, D., & Uličná, L. (2015). Kenaanské glosy ve středověkých hebrejských rukopisech s vazbou na české země, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. et al. (2016). Biscriptality: A Sociolinguistic Typology, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Čajka, F. (2011). Církevněslovanská legenda o svaté Anastázii, Prague: Slovanský ústav AV ČR.Google Scholar

Calvet, L.-J. (1999). Pour une écologie des langues du monde, Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. (1996). Typology of writing systems. In Günther, H. & Ludwig, O., eds., Schrift und Schriftlichkeit/Writing and Its Use: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung/An Interdisciplinary Handbook of International Research, Vol. 2, Berlin & New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1380–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulmas, F. (1999). Typology of writing systems. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Writing Systems, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, P. T. (2009). Grammatology. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchsbauer, J. (2021). Litterarum aenigmata: Zur Rekonstruktion des Zeichenbestandes der frühen Glagolica. In Fuchsbauer, J., Stadler, W., & Zink, A., eds., Kulturen verbinden/Connecting Cultures/Sbližaja kulʹtury: Festband anlässlich des 50-jährigen Bestehens der Slawistik an der Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press, pp. 83–114.Google Scholar

Fuhrhop, N. & Buchmann, F. (2009). Die Längenhierarchie: Zum Bau der graphematischen Silbe. Linguistische Berichte, 218, 127–155.Google Scholar

Gippius, A. A. & Mixeev, S. M. (2022). Drevnerusskie glagoličeskie nadpisi-graffiti XI–XII vekov iz Novgoroda: № 30–55. Slovo: Časopis Staroslavenskoga instituta u Zagrebu, 72(1), 47–92.Google Scholar

Hercigonja, E. (2006). Tropismena i trojezična kultura hrvatskoga srednjovjekovlja, 2nd ed., Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Google Scholar

Isaak der Syrer. (2015). Abhandlungen zur Askese. Band 1 (Facsimile der slavischen Kölner Handschrift aus dem XV. Jahrhundert), Cologne, Weimar, & Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Jončev, V. & Jončeva, O. (1982). Dreven i săvremenen bălgarski šrift, Sofija: Bălgarski chudožnik.Google Scholar

Kalajdžija, A. (2019). Predstandardni idiom bosanske alhamijado literature, Sarajevo: Institut za jezik.Google Scholar

Kempgen, S. (2015). Die kyrillische Schrift unter dem Einfluss der lateinischen: aktuelle Beobachtungen. In Tomelleri, V. S. & Kempgen, S., eds., Slavic Alphabets in Contact, Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press, pp. 33–58.Google Scholar

Kupfer, F. & Lewicki, T. (1956). Źródła hebrajskie do dziejów Słowian i niektórych innych ludów Środkowej i Wschodnej Europy, Wrocław & Warszawa: Zakład imienia Ossolińskich & Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar

Leciejewski, J. (1906). Runy i runiczne pomniki słowiańskie, Lviv: Altenberg.Google Scholar

Lesjuk, M. (2014). Stanovlennja i rozvytok ukrajinsʹkoji literaturnoji movy v Halyčyni, Ivano-Frankivsk: Misto NV.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, J., Spasov, L. & Nuorluoto, J., eds. (2008). The Konikovo Gospel – Konikovsko evangelie: Bibl. Patr. Alex. 268 [Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 125], Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar

Lupić, I. (2019). Najstariji hrvatski latinički molitvenik. Filologija, 73, 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macháček, J. & Nedoma, R., Dresler, P., Schulz, I., Lagonik, E., Johnson, S. M., Kaňáková, L., Slámová, A., Llamas, B., Wegmann, D., & Hofmanová, Z. (2021). Runes from Lány (Czech Republic) – The oldest inscription among Slavs: A new standard for multidisciplinary analysis of runic bones. Journal of Archaeological Science, 127 (2021), 105333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2021.105333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mazon, A. & Vaillant, A. (1938). L’Évangéliaire de Kulakia: Un parler slave du Bas-Vardar, Paris: Droz.Google Scholar

Meyer, A.-M. (2018). Latinica und Kyrillica im Kontakt – Überlegungen zum Phänomen “Schriftakzent”. In Meyer, A.-M. & Reinkowski, L., eds., Im Rhythmus der Linguistik: Festschrift für Sebastian Kempgen zum 65. Geburtstag, Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press, pp. 361–378.Google Scholar

Miškinene, G. (2001). Drevnejšie rukopisi litovskix tatar (Grafika, transliteracija, perevod, struktura i soderžanie tekstov), Vilnius: Izdatelʹstvo Vilʹnjusskogo universiteta.Google Scholar

Moskovič, V. et al., eds. (2014). Kenaanity: Evrei v srednevekovom slavjanskom mire/The Knaanites: Jews in the Medieval Slavic World, Moscow: Mosty kulʹtury.Google Scholar

Nowak, S. (2003). Schrift auf den Goldbrakteaten der Völkerwanderungszeit: Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Schriftzeichen und zu formalen und inhaltlichen Aspekten der Inschriften. Doctoral dissertation, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0006-AEE1–A.Google Scholar

Picchio, R. (1958). La “Istorija slavěnobolgarskaja” sullo sfondo linguistico-culturale della Slavia ortodossa. Ricerche Slavistiche, 6, 103–118.Google Scholar

Pronk, T. (2018). Czech and Sorbian in the 11th–13th century Judeo-Slavic glosses. In Kapetanović, A., ed., The Oldest Linguistic Attestations and Texts in the Slavic Languages, Vienna: Holzhausen, pp. 246–263.Google Scholar

Sampson, G. (1985). Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Schlund, K. (2020). Mehr als (nur) eine Schrift: Zwei- und Mehrschriftigkeit in Kroatien, Serbien und Bosnien-Herzegovina. Die Welt der Slaven, 65(2), 363–399.Google Scholar

Trunte, N. (2004). Πρὸς τὸ σαφέστερον: Zu Reformen in der glagolitischen Schrift. In Dürrigl, M.-A., Mihaljević, M., & Velčić, F., eds., Glagoljica i hrvatski glagolizam: Zbornik radova s Međunarodnoga znanstvenog skupa povodom 100. obljetnice Staroslavenske akademije i 50. obljetnice Staroslavenskog instituta (Zagreb–Krk, 2.–6. listopada 2002), Zagreb: Staroslavenski institute, pp. 419–434.Google Scholar

Trunte, N. (2019). Črъtami i rězami čьtěxǫ i gataaxǫ: Zu den Anfängen slavischer Schriftlichkeit. In Matulić, B. & Lupis, V. B., eds., Verba volant, scripta manent: Zbornik u čast akademika Stjepana Krasića O. P., Split, pp. 965–1006.Google Scholar

Tschernochvostoff, G. (1995). Zum Ursprung der Glagolica [1947; edited by Juhani Nuorluoto]. Studia Slavica Finlandensia, 12, 141–150.Google Scholar

Żak, J. (1985). Fundumstände der skandinavischen Goldbrakteaten des 5. bis 6. Jahrhunderts vom Typ C aus Wapno, Großpolen, 1850 [Festskrift till Brita Malmer]. Hikuin, 11, 27–32.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, A. A. (2010). Iz zametok o ljubitelʹskoj lingvistike, Moscow: Russkïj mïrʺ.Google Scholar

Żurek, P. (2006). Polska głagolica – relikt piśmiennictwa czeskiego czy chorwackiego? In Barciak, A., & Iwańczak, W., eds., Piśmiennictwo Czech i Polski w średniowieczu i we wczesnej epoce nowożytnej, Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, pp. 209–217.Google Scholar

Anić, V. (1981). Daničićeve duljine. In Isaković, A. & Torbarina, J., eds., Zbornik o Ðuri Daničiću, Beograd, pp. 359–364.Google Scholar

Bieder, H. (1998). Das Weißrussische. In Rehder, P., ed., Einführung in die slavischen Sprachen, 3rd ed., Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 110–125.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. (2003). Integracija inostrannyx slov iz evropejskix jazykov v kirillice i latinice. In Kotjurova, M. P., ed., Filologičeskie zametki: Mežvuzovskij zbornik naučnyx trudov, vypusk 2, Vol. 1, Perm: Permskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, pp. 122–150.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. (2017). Factors influencing the success and failure of writing reforms. Studi Slavistici, 14, 21–46.Google Scholar

Bunčič, D. (2023). On the etymology of diacritics in general and the origin of the Czech diacritics in particular. Slavia: Časopis pro slovanskou filologii, 92(4), 385–424.Google Scholar

Bunčić, D. et al. (2016). Biscriptality: A Sociolinguistic Typology, Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Bunin, I. A. (1935). Okajannye dni, Berlin: Petropolis.Google Scholar

Čejka, M. (1999). Srovnání Devotyho opisu Loutny české Adama Michny z Otradovic s původním tiskem. In Zand, G. & Holý, J., eds., Tschechisches Barock: Sprache, Literatur, Kultur, 21−32, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Coseriu, E. (1952). Sistema, norma y habla, Montevideo: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias.Google Scholar

Januszowski, J. (1983). Nowy karakter polski [1594]. In Urbańczyk, S., ed., Die altpolnischen Orthographien des 16. Jahrhunderts, Cologne: Böhlau, pp. 143–208.Google Scholar

Karpova, O. (2010). Istorija s orfografiej: Neudavšiesja reformy russkogo pravopisanija vtoroj poloviny XX veka. Neprikosnovennyj zapas, 3, 195–212.Google Scholar

Marti, R. (2012). On the creation of Croatian: The development of Croatian Latin orthography in the 16th century. In Baddeley, S. & Voeste, A., eds., Orthographies in Early Modern Europe, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 269–320.Google Scholar

Mazur, J. (1993). Geschichte der polnischen Sprache, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Pčelov, E. V. & Čumakov, V. T. (2000). Dva veka russkoj bukvy Ë: Istorija i slovarʹ, Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie.Google Scholar

Taraškevič, B. (1918). Belaruskaja hramatyka dlja škol, Vilnius: Kuxta.Google Scholar

Taraškiéwič, B. (1918). Biełaruskaja hramatyka dlja škoł, Vilnius: Kuchta.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, N. S. [= Trubeckoj, Nikolaj Sergeevič]. (1954). Altkirchenslavische Grammatik: Schrift‑, Laut‑ und Formensystem, Vienna: Rohrer.Google Scholar

Trunte, N. (2018). Kirchenslavisch in 14 Lektionen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Uspenskij, B. A. (1975). Pervaja russkaja grammatika na rodnom jazyke: Dolomonosovskij period otečestvennoj rusistiki, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Vuk Stefanović [Karadžić]. (1814). Pismenica serbskoga ïezika, po govoru prostoga Naroda, Vienna.Google Scholar

Vuk Stefanović [Karadžić]. (1818). Srpski rječnik, istolkovan njemačkim i latinskim riječma, Vienna.Google Scholar

Weth, C. & Bunčić, D. (2020). Foreign schriftdenken in ausbau languages: Luxembourgish and Rusyn orthographies in multiple language contact. Written Language & Literacy, 23(2), 289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaborowski, S. (1983). Orthographia seu modus recte scribendi et legendi polonicum idioma quam utilissimus [1514]. In Urbańczyk, S., ed., Die altpolnischen Orthographien des 16. Jahrhunderts, Cologne: Böhlau, pp. 51–115.Google Scholar

Zaliznjak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt, 2nd ed., Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kulʹtury (1st ed. 1995).Google Scholar

Zhóp, [= Čop, Matija]. (1833). Nuovo discacciamento di lettere inutili, das ist: Slowenischer ABC-Krieg: Eine Beilage zum Illyr. Blatt, Ljubljana: Kleinmayr.Google Scholar