Adamson, L. B., Bakeman, R., & Deckner, D. F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75(4), 1171–1187.Google Scholar

Alessandroni, N. (2016). Development of metaphorical thought before language: The pragmatic construction of metaphors in action. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9373-3.Google Scholar

Amorim, K. S, dos Anjos, A. M., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M. C. (2012). Processos interativos de bebês em creche. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(2), 378–389.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. & Swettenham, J. (1996). The relationship between SAM and ToMM. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. (Eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 158–168). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barthélémy-Musso, A., Tartas, V., & Guidetti, M. (2013). Prendre les objets et leurs usages au sérieux: Aproche développementale de la co-construction de conventions sémiotiques entre enfants. Psychologie Française, 58, 67–88.Google Scholar

Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2011). Usos, gestos y vocalizaciones privadas: De la interacción social a la autorregulación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 181–194. DOI: 10.1174/021037011795377593.Google Scholar

Basilio, M. & Rodríguez, C. (2016). How toddlers think with their hands: social and private gestures as evidence of cognitive self-regulation in guided play with objects. Early Child Development and Care, 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1202944.Google Scholar

Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205–226.Google Scholar

Belsky, J. & Most, R. K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 630–639.Google Scholar

Borges, J. & Di Giovanni, N. (1970/1972). Doctor Brodie's Report (trans. di Giovanni, N.). London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Brizuela, B. & Cayton-Hodges, G. (2013). Young children's self-constructed maps. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 22–42). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Bronckart, J. P. (2002). La explicación en psicología ante el desafío del significado. Estudios de Psicología, 23(3), 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckart, J. P. (2012). Contributions of Piagetian constructivism to social interactionism. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 43–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(1), 255–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterworth, G. (2003). Pointing is the royal road to language for babies. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing. Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 9–33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, K. (2012). Primeros usos simbólicos de niños con síndrome de Down en contextos de interacción triádica: Un estudio longitudinal entre los 12 y 21 meses de edad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., Miranda-Zapata, E., & Palacios, P. (forthcoming). Usos simbólicos de los objetos de niño/as con síndrome de Down de 12 a 21 meses: Un estudio longitudinal en interacción niño/a-adulto-objeto.Google Scholar

Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2014). First symbols in a girl with Down syndrome: A longitudinal study from 12 to 18 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 37, 416–427. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.06.003.Google Scholar

Carpendale, J. I. M. & Carpendale, A. B. (2010). The development of pointing: From personal directedness to interpersonal direction. Human Development, 53, 110–126.Google Scholar

Carpendale, J. I. M. & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79–151.Google Scholar

Cavalcante, S. (2016). Desarrollo del número de dos a cuatro años: De los usos de objetos en interacción con un adulto a los usos numéricos. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Facultat de Psicologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar

Cavalcante, S. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The understanding of die as an object that has numerical functions: A longitudinal study using two children from the ages of 24 to 36 months interacting with an adult / La comprensión del dado como objeto con funciones numéricas: Un estudio longitudinal con dos niños desde los 24 a los 36 meses en interacción con un adulto. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 48–70. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2014.1000028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. AVANT, 3(2), 85–93.Google Scholar

Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2009). Private pointing and private speech: Developing parallelisms. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C. & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, B., Gómez, J. C., & Sarriá, E. (2011). Pointing gestures as a cognitive tool in young children: Experimental evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 299–312.Google Scholar

Del Olmo, M. J., Rodríguez, C., & Ruza, F. (2010). Music therapy in the PICU: 0 to 6 month-old babies. Music and Medicine, 2(3) 158–166.Google Scholar

Dimitrova, N. & Moro, C. (2013). Common ground on object use associates with caregivers’ gestures. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 618–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duque, M. P. & Packer, M. J. (2014). Pensamiento y lenguaje: El proyecto de Vygotski para resolver la crisis de la Psicología. Tesis Psicológica, 9(2), 30–57.Google Scholar

El'konin, D. B. (1966). Symbolics and its functions in the play of children. Soviet Education, 8(3), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Español, S. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas sin palabras: Gesto y ficción en la infancia temprana. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar

Español, S. (2006). Possible precursors of private speech: Deictic, symbolic and aesthetic self-directed gestures. In Montero, I. (Ed.), Current Research Trends in Private Speech: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 120–124). Madrid: Ediciones UAM.Google Scholar

Foster, R. & Kreitzman, L. (2004). Rhythms of Life: The Biological Clocks that Control the Daily Lives of Every Living Thing. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Fuson, K. (1988). Children's Counting and Concept of Nnumber. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, R. & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The Child's Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (1979/2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (classical edn. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Göncü, A. & Gaskins, S. (2011). Comparing and extending Piaget's and Vygotsky's understanding of play: Symbolic play as individual, sociocultural, and educational interpretation. In Pellegrini, A. D. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Play (pp. 48–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1990). Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Graham, T. (1999). The role of gesture in children's learning to count. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 333–355.Google Scholar

Groupe µ (1992). Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l'image. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, H. (2016). How a young child learns how to take part in mealtimes in a Japanese day-care center: A longitudinal case study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(1), 13–27.Google Scholar

Jackson-Maldonado, D., Badillo, B., & Aguilar, N. (2010). Verbal and non-verbal requests in Spanish-speaking children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 12(2), 98–102.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2012). From constructivism to neuroconstructivism: The activity-dependent structuring of the human brain. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 1–14). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Kaye, K. (1982/1986). La vida mental y social del bebé. Cómo los padres crean personas. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar

Kontopodis, M. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2016). Educational settings as interwoven socio-material orderings: An introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0269-2.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind.” Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.Google Scholar

Li, X. (2012). Peer relations. In Valsiner, J. (Ed.). Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0045.Google Scholar

Lillard, A., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children's development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1–34. DOI: 10.1037/A0029321.Google Scholar

Liszkowski, U., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal Child Language, 34, 1–20.Google Scholar

Luria, A. (1979). The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology (ed. by Cole, M. & Cole, S.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Martí, E. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente: La adquisición infantil de los sistemas externos de representación. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar

Martí, E. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic actions to external systems of representation. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151–170). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Martí, E., Scheuer, N., & de la Cruz, M. (2013). Symbolic use of quantitative representations in young children. In Brizuela, B. & Gravel, B. (Eds.), “Show Me What You Know”: Exploring Student Representations across STEM Disciplines (pp. 7–21). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

McCune, L. (1995). A normative study of representational play at the transition to language. Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 198–206.Google Scholar

Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2015). The rhythmic, sonorous and melodic components of adult–child–object interactions between 2 and 6 months old. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(4), 737–756. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9298-2.Google Scholar

Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2017). Rhythmic ostensive gestures: How adults facilitate infants’ entrance into early triadic interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 49, 168–181.Google Scholar

Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C. & Miranda-Zapata, E. (forthcoming). Getting away from the point: The emergence and functions of ostensive gestures. Gesture.Google Scholar

Moro, C. (2012). Heuristique des thèses sémiotiques vygotskiennes pour l'approche du développement des fonctions exécutives chez le jeune enfant. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, Vygotskij and language/Vygotskij e illinguaggio, 6(2) 210–224.Google Scholar

Moro, C. (2016). To encounter, to build the world and to become a human being: Advocating for a material-cultural turn in developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 586–602. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-016-9356-4.Google Scholar

Moro, C., Dupertuis, V., Fardel, S., & Piguet, O. (2015). Investigating the development of consciousness through ostensions toward oneself from the onset of the use-of-object to first words. Cognitive Development, 36, 150–160.Google Scholar

Moro, C. & Muller Mirza, N. (Eds.). (2012). Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Moro, C. & Rodríguez, C. (2005). L'objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé: Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Müller, U. & Kerns, K. (2015). The development of executive function. In Lerner, R., Liben, L. S., & Müller, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science. Volume 2: Cognitive Processes (pp. 1058–1160). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (2015). Making sense with private speech. Cognitive Development, 36, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palacios, P. & Rodríguez, C. (2015). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: A pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development, 24, 23–43. DOI: 10.1002/icd.1873.Google Scholar

Palacios, P., Rodríguez, C., Méndez-Sánchez, C., Hermosillo, A. E., Sahagún, M. A., & Cárdenas, K. (2016). The development of the first symbolic uses in Mexican children from the pragmatics of object/ Desarrollo de los primeros usos simbólicos en niños mexicanos desde la Pragmática del Objeto. Estudios de Psicología, 37, 59–89. DOI: 10.1080/02109395.2015.1122437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papoušek, H. (1996). Musicality in infancy research: Biological and cultural origins of early musicality. In Deliegé, I. & Sloboda, J. A. (Eds.), Musical Beginnings: Origins and Development of Musical Competence (pp. 37–55). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perinat, A. (1993). Comunicación animal, comunicación humana. Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1936/1977). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1945/1976). La formation du symbole chez l'enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar

Reddy, V. (2008). How Infants Know Minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reddy, V. (2012). Moving others matters. In Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J. (Eds.), Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language (pp. 139–163). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rivière, A. (1985). La psicología de Vygotski. Madrid: Antonio Machado.Google Scholar

Rivière, A. (1990). Origen y desarrollo de la función simbólica en el niño. In Palacios, J., Marchesi, A., & Coll, C. (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación, I Psicología Evolutiva (pp. 113–130). Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar

Rochat, P. (2012). Baby assault on Piaget. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 71–82). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo: Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: Horsori.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. (2007). Object use, communication and signs: The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In Valsiner, J. & Rosa, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Socio-Cultural Psychology (pp. 257–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. (2009). The “circumstances” of gestures: Proto-interrogatives and private gestures. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 288–303.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (123–150). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. (2015). The connection between language and the world: A paradox of the linguistic turn? Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49, 89–103. DOI 10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C., Benassi, J., Estrada, L., & Alessandroni, N. (2017). Early social interactions with people and objects. In Slater, A. & Bremner, G. (Eds.), An Introduction to Developmental Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 211–257). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C., Estrada, L., Moreno-Llanos, I., & de los Reyes, J. L. (2017). Executive functions and educational actions in an infant school: Private uses and gestures at the end of the first year / Funciones Ejecutivas y acción educativa en la Escuela Infantil: Usos y gestos privados al final del primer año. Estudios de Psicología (special issue on Executive Functions / Funciones ejecutivas), 38(2), 385–423.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C., Moreno-Núñez, A., Basilio, M., & Sosa, N. (2015). Ostensive gestures come first: Their role in the beginning of shared reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 142–149.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (1999). El mágico número tres: Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity (pp. 89–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(2), 180–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rodríguez, C., Palacios, P., Cárdenas, K., & Yuste, N. (2014). Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisième sens? In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement Psychologique (pp. 99–116). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Rodríguez, C. & Scheuer, N. (2015). The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children / La paradoja entre el bebé numéricamente competente y el lento aprendizaje de los niños de dos a cuatro años de edad. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 18–47.Google Scholar

Rosa, A. (chapter 6 this volume).Google Scholar

Rosa, A. & Valsiner, J. (chapter 1 this volume).Google Scholar

Saada-Robert, M. (2012). From individual to didactic microgenesis: Studies on situated knowledge transformations. In Martí, E. & Rodríguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 187–205). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, B., Eggleston, V. H., & Scott, J. L. (1974). Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 357–379.Google Scholar

Sinha, C. (2014). Signification et matérialité: Le langage au fondement des artefacts symboliques. In Moro, C. & Mirza, N. Muller (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique (pp. 117–138). Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. & Lenninger, S. (2015). The psychological development of semiotic competence: From the window to the movie by way of the mirror. Cognitive Development, 36, 191–201.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. S. (2000, November). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233–1243.Google Scholar

Tartas, V. (2008). La construction du temps social par l'enfant. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Tartas, V., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Baucal, A. (2016). Experimental micro-histories, private speech and a study of children's learning and cognitive development. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(4), 772–811. DOI: 10.1080/02103702.2016.1221055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Material Culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Trehub, S. (2003). The developmental origins of musicality. Nature Neuroscience, 7(6), 669–673.Google Scholar

Trevarthen, C. (2003). Conversations with a two-month-old. Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar

Vallotton, C. (2008). Infants take self-regulation into their own hands. Zero to Three, September, 29–34.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2016, July). The human psyche on the border of irreversible time: Forward-oriented semiosis. Invited address at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar

Vergnaud, G. (2013). Pourquoi la théorie des champs conceptuels? Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36(2), 131–161.Google Scholar

Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995a). El problema del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiores. In Vygotski, L. S., Obras escogidas (vol. III, pp. 11–46). Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Vygotski, L. S. (1931/1995b). La prehistoria del desarrollo del lenguaje escrito. In Vygotski, L.S., Obras Escogidas (vol. III, pp. 183–206).Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar

Vygotski, L. S. (1934/1985). Pensée et langage. Paris: Terrains/Editions Sociales.Google Scholar

Wallon, H. (1942/1970). De l'acte à la pensée. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes. Human Development, 51(1), 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winsler, A. (2009). Still talking to ourselves after all these years: A review of current research on private speech. In Winsler, A., Fernyhough, C., & Montero, I. (Eds.), Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-regulation (pp. 3–41). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yuste, N. (2012). Desarrollo simbólico e interacción entre iguales en la escuela infantil. Unpublished DEA dissertation, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar

Yuste, N., Rodríguez, C., & de los Reyes, J. L. (forthcoming). Interacción entre iguales y el estatus de los objetos en la producción de usos simbólicos.Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D. & Müller, U. (2004). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp. 445–469).Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T. (2010). How does an object become symbolic? Rooting semiotic artifacts in dynamic shared experiences. In Wagoner, B. (Ed.), Symbolic Transformation: The Mind in Movement through Culture and Society (pp. 173–192). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zulauf, M. (2002). Limites et promesses de quelques théories du développement musical. In Wirthner, M. & Zulauf, M. (Eds.), À la recherche du développement musical (pp. 19–51). Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar