Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:35:21.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Intergroup Threats

from Part I - General Theoretical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

By
Walter G. Stephan  and
Cookie White Stephan
Edited by
Chris G. Sibley  and
Fiona Kate Barlow
Walter G. Stephan
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University
Cookie White Stephan
Affiliation:
New Mexico State University
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Fiona Kate Barlow
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Intergroup Threats

We believe that intergroup threats play a significant role in causing the problems that plague intergroup relations. In this chapter, we lay out the reasoning and research on which this claim is based. We begin by addressing the causes of intergroup threats (see Figure 7.1). We argue that some types of people are more prone than others to perceive intergroup threats. Negative attitudes and related cognitions also play a role in causing intergroup threats. Likewise, prior intergroup relations and intergroup contact contribute to the perception of intergroup threats. In addition, the circumstances in which intergroup interactions occur can lead people to perceive that their group is under threat. Next, we argue that intergroup threats can lead to negative attitudes and expectations, activate cognitive biases, and reduce the effectiveness of cognitive processing. In addition, they often elicit negative emotions such as fear and anger. Perceived intergroup threats commonly lead to negative intentions and behaviors toward outgroups including aggression and discrimination. Intergroup threats can also generate retaliatory and other negative reactions from outgroups that further complicate intergroup relations. However, under some conditions intergroup threats can lead to positive outcomes such as amicable interactions and productive attempts to resolve conflicts. We end with a discussion of the implications of intergroup threats for intergroup interactions.

To encourage future research on intergroup threats, we speculate freely about their causes and consequences. We present examples of relevant research when they are available. Our presentation of these issues is shaped by our previous theoretical articles on intergroup threats, our disciplinary background (social psychology), and the fact that the overwhelming majority of the research on these topics has been conducted in Western countries.

Types of Intergroup Threats

Realistic and symbolic threats have been the focus of most of the extensive research on intergroup threats (Stephan, Ybarra, & Morrison, 2015). Realistic threats are those in which an outgroup is perceived to pose a threat of tangible harm to the ingroup. The potential types of tangible harm range from experiencing negative psychological outcomes such as frustration, embarrassment, feeling inept, being confused, or being perceived as prejudiced, to being concerned about being the target of physical harm, discrimination, economic loss, theft, destruction of personal property or being exposed to infectious diseases.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice , pp. 131 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberson, C. L., & Gaffney, A. M. (2008). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 808–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, G. (2011). Spheres of citizenship: The role of distinct perceived threats in legitimizing allocation of political, welfare and cultural rights in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, J., & McGlone, M. S. (2015). Stereotype and social identity threat. In Nelson, T. D. (Ed.) Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 153–178). New York: Psychology Press.
Asbrock, F., & Fritsche, I. (2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the Me or the We? International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 35–49.Google Scholar
Avery, D. R., Richeson, J. A., Hebl, M. R., & Ambady, N. (2009). It does not have to be uncomfortable: The role of behavioral scripts in Black–White interracial interactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1382–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York: Delacorte Press.
Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R., & Hewstone, M. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R., & Terry, D. J. (2010). Minority report: Social identity, cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety predicting prejudice from one racially marginalized group towards another. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 805–818.Google Scholar
Berti, C., Pivetti, M., & Di Battista, S. (2013). The ontologization of Romani: An Italian study on the cross-categorization approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(4), 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai–Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butz, D. Canetti, D., Halperin, E., Hobfoll, S. E., Shapira, O., & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2009). Authoritarianism, perceived threat and exclusionism on the eve of the Disengagement: Evidence from Gaza. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33(6), 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coman, A., Stone, C. B., Castano, E., & Hirst, W. (2014). Justifying atrocities: The effect of moral-disengagement strategies on socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1281–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corenblum, B., & Stephan, W. G. (2001). White fears and Native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33(4), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, K., & Hodson, G. (2011). Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowson, H. M. (2009). Predicting perceptions of symbolic and realistic threat from terrorists: The role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Individual Differences Research, 7(2) 113–118.Google Scholar
Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Bos, K. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, T. L., Major, B., Kunstman, J. W., & Sawyer, P. J. (2015). Does unfairness feel different if it can be linked to group membership? Cognitive, affective, behavioral and physiological implications of discrimination and unfairness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrheim, K., Dixon, J., Tredoux, C., Eaton, L., Quayle, M., & Clack, B. (2011). Predicting support for racial transformation policies: Intergroup threat, racial prejudice, sense of group entitlement and strength of identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(1), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonsalkorale, K., Carlisle, K., & Von Hippel, W. (2007). Intergroup threat increases implicit stereotyping. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7(2), 189–200.Google Scholar
Gray, H. M., Mendes, W. B., & Denny-Brown, C. (2008). An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1233–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackel, L. M., Looser, C. E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kauff, M., & Wagner, U. (2012). Valuable therefore not threatening: The influence of diversity beliefs on discrimination against immigrants. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 714–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kervyn, N., Fiske, S., & Yzerbyt, V. (2015). Forecasting the primary dimension of social perception: Symbolic and realistic threats together predict warmth in the stereotype content model. Social Psychology, 46(1), 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N.R. & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littleford, L. N., Wright, M. O. D., & Sayoc-Parial, M. (2005). White students’ intergroup anxiety during same-race and interracial interactions: A multimethod approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Esses, V. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). National identification, perceived threat, and dehumanization as antecedents of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Australia and Canada. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(Suppl 2), 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, B. (2006). New perspectives on stigma and psychological well-being. In Levin, S. & Laar, C. Van (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 193–210). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Matthews, M., & Levin, S. (2012). Testing a dual process model of prejudice: Assessment of group threat perceptions and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 564–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81(3), 909–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, W. B., & Koslov, K. (2013). Brittle smiles: Positive biases toward stigmatized and outgroup targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. L., Zielaskowski, K., & Plant, E. A. (2012). The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1358–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, C., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1231–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does contact reduce prejudice? A meta-analytic test of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, E. A., Goplen, J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1274–1281. doi: 0146167211408617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohmann, A., Florack, A., & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlueter, E., & Scheepers, P. (2010). The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat and intergroup contact theory. Social Science Research, 39(2), 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Rodgers, J., & McGovern, T. (2002). Attitudes toward the culturally different: The role of intercultural communication barriers, affective responses, consensual stereotypes, and perceived threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(6), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. … Renfro, C. L. (2002). The role of threats in racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. (2015). Intergroup threat theory. In Nelson, T. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 255–278). New York: Psychology Press.
Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., & Roy, R. (2009). The relationships between contact, status and prejudice: An integrated threat theory analysis of Hindu-Muslim relations in India. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toosi, N. R., Babbitt, L. G., Ambady, N., & Sommers, S. R. (2012). Dyadic interracial interactions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trawalter, S., Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3) 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrey, K. L., & Amason, P. (2001). Intercultural communication between patients and health care providers: An exploration of intercultural communication effectiveness, cultural sensitivity, stress, and anxiety. Health Communication, 13(4), 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Zomeren, M., Fischer, A. H., & Spears, R. (2007). Testing the limits of tolerance: How intergroup anxiety amplifies negative and offensive responses to out-group–initiated contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(12), 1686–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco González, K., Verkuyten, M., Weesie, J., & Poppe, E. (2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in the Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 667–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2009). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and out-group threat. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viki, G. T., Osgood, D., & Phillips, S. (2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorauer, J. D. (2006). An information search model of evaluative concerns in intergroup interaction. Psychological Review, 113(4), 862–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorauer, J. D. (2013). Getting past the self: Understanding and removing evaluative concerns as an obstacle to positive intergroup contact effects. In Hodson, G. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 23–48). New York: Psychology Press.
Wagner, U., Christ, O., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2008). Prejudice and group-related behavior in Germany. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodarczyk, A., Basabe, N., & Bobowik, M. (2014). The perception of realistic and symbolic threat and its influence on prejudice, ingroup favouritism and prosocial response: The native population in the face of immigration/Percepción de amenaza realista y simbólica, su influencia sobre el prejuicio, el favoritismo endogrupal y la respuesta prosocial: la población nativa ante la inmigración. Revista de Psicología Social, 29(1), 60–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, M. J., Branscombe, N. R., & Reysen, S. (2010). Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 898–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J., Shi, Y., Luo, Y. L., Shi, J., & Cai, H. (2014). The Brief Implicit Association Test is valid: Experimental evidence. Social Cognition, 32(5), 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×