Barman-Adhikari, A., Rice, E., Winetrobe, H., & Petering, R. (2015). Social network correlates of methamphetamine, heroin, and cocaine use in a sociometric network of homeless youth. Journal of the Society of Social Work and Research, 6(3), 433–457.10.1086/682709CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkman, L. F. & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology, 1, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernard, H. D., Johnsen, E. C., Killworth, P. D., McCarty, C. & Shelley, G. A., & Robinson, S. (1990). Comparing four different methods for measuring personal social networks. Social Networks, 12, 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolden, C. L. (2014). Friendly foes: Hybrid gangs or social networking. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(6), 730–749.10.1177/1368430214548284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bojanowski, M. & Corten, R. (2014). Measuring segregation in social networks. Social Networks, 39, 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C., & Everett, M. G. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), 27–36.Google Scholar

Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892–895.10.1126/science.1165821CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burk, W. J., Vorst, H. V. D., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2012). Alcohol use and friendship dynamics: selection and socialization in early-, middle-, and late-adolescent peer networks. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 89–98.10.15288/jsad.2012.73.89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burt, R. (1997). A note on social capital and network content. Social Networks 19, 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Capitanio, J. P., & Cole, S. W. (2015). The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 733–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, K. E. (1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13, 203–221.10.1016/0378-8733(91)90006-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrington, J. S., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (Eds) (2005). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.10.1056/NEJMsa066082CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifton, A., Pilkonis, P. A., & McCarty, C. (2007). Social networks in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(4), 434–441.10.1521/pedi.2007.21.4.434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Curry, D. G. (2015). The logic of defining gangs revisited. In Decker, S. H. & Pyrooz, D. C. (Eds), The Handbook of Gangs (pp. 7–27). Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118726822.ch2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erickson, B. H. (1997). Social networks and history: a review essay. Historical Methods, 30(3), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espelage, D., Wasserman, S., & Fleisher, M. S. (2007). Social networks and violent behavior. In Flannery, D. J., Vazsonyi, A., & Waldman, I. (Eds), Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior (pp. 450–464). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816840.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, M. G. (1990). A testing example for positional analysis techniques. Social Networks, 12, 253–260.10.1016/0378-8733(90)90008-WCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, M. G. & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181–201.10.1080/0022250X.1999.9990219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Everett, M. G. & Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Ego network betweenness. Social Networks, 27(1), 31–38.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferligoj, A. & Hlebec, V. (1999). Evaluation of social network measurement instruments. Social Networks, 21, 111–130.10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00007-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feld, S. L. (1997). Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social Networks, 19, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. (2002). Women and Gangs: A Field Research Study. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Retrieved April 24, 2017 from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/198317.pdf.Google Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. (2005). The application of social network analysis to field research: Different methods creating complementary perspectives. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(5), 120–134.10.1177/1043986204273436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. (2006). Degree centrality and youth gangs as an ecological adaptation. In Short, J. & Hughes, L. (Eds), Studying Youth Gangs (pp. 85–98). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. (2015a). Living Black: Social Life in an African American Neighborhood. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. (2015b). Gang and drugs: connections, divergence, and culture. In Decker, S. H. & Pyrooz, D.C. (Eds), The handbook of gangs (pp. 193–207). Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. & Krienert, J. L. (2004). Life-course events, social networks, and the emergence of violence among female gang members. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(5), 607–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. & McCarty, C., (2004). Structural Holes: Macher or Nebbish: the structural position of important people. International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Slovenia, May 2004.Google Scholar

Fleisher, M. S. & Papachristos, A. V. (2010). Social Network Analysis and Ethnography: Complementary Tools to Understand the Complexities of Real-life Behavior. International Network of Social Network Analysts Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy, July.Google Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, L. C. (2008). Going the wrong way on a one-way street: centrality in physics and biology. Journal of Social Structure, 9(2), 1–15.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.10.1086/225469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granovetter, M. S. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74, 358–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedstrom, P. & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms: An Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hlebec, V. & Ferligoj, A. (2001). Respondent mood and the instability of survey network measurements. Social Networks, 23(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hu, Y. & Goldman, N. (1990). Mortality differentials by marital status: an international comparison. Demography, 27(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huang, G. & Tausig, M. (1990). Network range in personal networks. Social Networks, 12, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killworth, P. D., Johnsen, E. C., & Bernard, H. R., Shelley, G. A., & McCarty, C. (1990). Estimating the size of personal networks. Social Networks, 12, 289–312.10.1016/0378-8733(90)90012-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klerks, P. (2001). The network paradigm applied to criminal organisations [sic]: Theoretical nitpicking or a relevant doctrine for investigators? Recent developments in the Netherlands. Connections, 24(3), 53–65.Google Scholar

Klein, M. W. (1997). The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kogovsek, T. & Ferligoj, A. (2005). Effects of reliability on validity of ego-centered network measurements. Social Networks, 27, 205–229.10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183–210.Google Scholar

Krackhardt, D. & Kilduff, M. (2002). Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Social Networks, 24, 279–290.10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00008-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kriegel, L. S., Hsu, H. T., & Wenzel, S. L. (2015). Personal networks: A hypothesized mediator in the association between incarceration and HIV risk behaviors among women with histories of homelessness. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(3), 407–432.10.1086/682585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451 (1939).Google Scholar

Lazega, E. & van Duijn, M. (1997). Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Social Networks, 19, 375–397.10.1016/S0378-8733(97)00006-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lofors, J. & Sundquist, K. (2007). Low-linking social capital as a predictor of mental disorders: a cohort study of 4.5 million Swedes. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 21–34.10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Luke, D. A. & Harris, J. K. (2007). Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 69–93.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lusher, D., Robins, G., & Kremer, P. (2010). The application of social network analysis to team sports. Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 14(4), 211–224.10.1080/1091367X.2010.495559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, C. (2002). Measuring Structure in Personal Networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3(1), 20.Google Scholar

McCarty, C., Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Shelley, G. A., & Johnsen, E. C. (1997). Eliciting representative samples of personal networks. Social Networks, 19, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mische, A. (2008) Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, J. C. (1974). Social networks. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 279–299.10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.001431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, D. L., Neal, M. B., & Carder, P. (1997). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19(1), 9–25.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00288-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mutzel, S. (2009). Networks as culturally constituted processes: a comparison of relational sociology and actor-network theory. Current Sociology, 57(6), 871–887.10.1177/0011392109342223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papachristos, A. V. (2006). Social network analysis and gang research: theory and methods. In Short, J. & Hughes, L. (Eds), Studying Youth Gangs (pp. 99–116). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar

Papachristos, A. V., Wildeman, C., & Roberto, E. (2015). Tragic, but not random: the social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 139–150.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orth-Gomer, L. & Johnson, J. V. (1987). Social network interaction and mortality: a six year follow-up study of a random sample of the Swedish population. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(10), 949–957.10.1016/0021-9681(87)90145-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rice, E. & Yoshioka-Maxwell, A. (2015). Social network analysis as a toolkit for the science of social work. Journal of the Society of Social Work and Research, 6(3), 369–383.10.1086/682723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Woolcock, J. (2004). Missing data in networks: exponential random graph (p*) models for networks with non-respondents. Social Networks, 26, 257–283.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruan, D., Freeman, L. C., Dai, X., Pan, Y., & Zhang, W. (1997). On the changing structure of social networks in urban China. Social Networks, 19(1), 75–89.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00292-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Short, J. F. & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Shye, D., Mullooly, J. P., Freeborn, D. K., & Pope, C. R. (1995). Gender differences in the relationship between social network support and mortality: a longitudinal study of an elderly cohort. Social Science & Medicine, 41(7), 935–947.10.1016/0277-9536(94)00404-HCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sierra-Arevalo, M., & Papachristos, A. V. (2015). Social network analysis and gangs. In Decker, S. H. and Pyrooz, D. C. (Eds), The Handbook of Gangs (pp. 157–177). Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skolnick, J. H. (1990). Gang organization and migration: drugs, gangs, and law enforcement. Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Smith, K. P. & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Social networks and Heath. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429.10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sparrow, M. K. (1991). The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: an assessment of the prospects. Social Networks 13, 251–274.10.1016/0378-8733(91)90008-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suitor, J. & Keeton, S. (1997). Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women’s support networks across a decade. Social Networks, 13, 51–62.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00290-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suitor, J. J., Wellman, B., & Morgan, D. L. (1997). It’s about time: how, why, and when networks change. Social Networks, 19, 17.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00287-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519.10.2307/257851CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolnay, S. E. (2003). The African American “Great Migration” and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 209–232.10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyson, A. & Maniam, S. (2016). Behind Trump’s victory: divisions by race, gender, education. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 9, 2017 from ww.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education.Google Scholar

Uzzi, B., (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.10.2307/2393808CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valente, T. W. (2003). Social network influences on adolescent substance use: an introduction. Connections, 25(2), 11–16.Google Scholar

Valente, T. W. & Pitts, S. R. (2017). An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health: challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Public Health, 38(4), 1–4, p. 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Van der Hulst, R. C. (2009). Introduction to social network analysis as an investigative tool. Trends in Organized Crime, 12, 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigil, J. D. (1988). Group process and street identity: adolescent Chicano gang members. Ethos, 16(4), 412–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogt, T. M., Mullooly, J. P., Ernst, D., Pope, C. R., & Hollis, J. F.. (1992). Social networks as predictors of ischemic heart disease, cancer, stroke and hypertension: incidence, survival and mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45(6), 659–666.10.1016/0895-4356(92)90138-DCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ward, M. D., Stovel, K., & Sacks, A. (2011). Network analysis and political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 243–264.10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040907.115949CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watts, D. J. (2004). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243–70.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wellman, B., Wong, R. Y., Tindal, D., & Nazer, N. (1997). A decade of network change: turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks, 19, 27–50.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00289-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zemljic, B. & Hlebec, V. (2005). Reliability of measures of centrality and prominence. Social Networks, 27, 73–88.10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar