Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5kfdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T21:21:47.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Sense, intellect, and imagination in Albert, Thomas, and Siger

from VIII - Philosophy of mind and action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Edward P. Mahoney
Edited by
Norman Kretzmann ,
Anthony Kenny ,
Jan Pinborg  and
Eleonore Stump
Get access

Summary

Albert the Great

Albert the Great reveals the influence of Avicenna and Averroes in his psychology, though he certainly does not agree with them on all points. Although he maintains that sense as such is a material and passive power, Albert admits that after it has been actualised by the sensible form, it can make judgements. However, it appears to do so only through the common sense. Albert rejects the argument that just as there is in the soul an agent intellect which abstracts and thus actualises intelligible species so there must be an active sense which abstracts and thus actualises the sensible. He replies that it is something in the nature of the intellect which renders the potentially intelligible actually intelligible, but it is something in external reality, not anything in the powers of the soul, which renders material things actually sensible. However, what is in the sense is certainly not the form united in existence with matter as found in the external thing, but rather an intention (intentio) or species of the material thing which enables us to have sense knowledge of that thing. Since sense apprehends the sensible object through such an intention, the first grade of abstraction is found in sensation, namely, separation from the matter of the external thing. However, in so far as sensation is of actually existing sensible things, which are individuated by matter, there must remain in sense apprehension a reference to matter as present and to the individuating conditions of matter.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy
From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600
 , pp. 602 - 622
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allers, Rudolf (1941). ‘The Intellectual Cognition of Particulars’, The Thomist 3:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anawati, Georges C. (1974). Éludes de philosophic musulmane (Études musulmanes, No. 15), VrinGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos (1972). Siger de Brabant: Quaestiones in tertium de anima, De anima intellectiva, De aeternitate mundi, Édition critique (Philosophes médiévaux, Tome 13), Publications Universitaires and Béatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos (1974). ‘Le dialogue philosophique entre Siger de Brabant et Thomas d'Aquin. A Propos d'un ouvrage récent de E. H. Weber O.P.’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 72:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo Carlos (1975). ‘La unión entre el intelecto separado y los individuos, según Sigerio de Brabante’, Patristica et mediaevalia (Buenos Aires), 1:Google Scholar
Bertola, Ermenegildo (1967). ‘E esistito un avicennismo latino nel medioevo?’, Sophia 35:.Google Scholar
Bertola, Ermenegildo (1971). ‘E esistito un avicennismo latino nel medieoevo?’, Sophia 39:.Google Scholar
Blanche, F.-A. (1934). ‘La théorie de l'abstraction chez Saint Thomas d'Aquin’ in Mélanges Thomistes (Bibliothèque Thomiste, vol. 3), VrinGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W. (1970). Review of Marcia L. Colish, The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge, Yale University Press, 1968, in Speculum 45:Google Scholar
Bowman, Leonard J. (1972–3). ‘The Development of the Doctrine of the Agent Intellect in the Franciscan School of the Thirteenth Century’, The Modem Schoolman 50:.Google Scholar
Boyer, Charles (1925). ‘Réflexions sur la connaissance sensible selon Saint Thomas’, Archives de philosophic, vol. 3, Cahier 2, Gabriel BeauchesneGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Robert E. (1941). ‘The Thomistic Concept of Imagination’, The New Scholasticism 15:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckmüller, Franz (1908). Untersuchungen über Sigers (von Brabant) Anima intellectiva, Manz, G.J. (Inauguraldissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich)Google Scholar
Callus, D. A. (1957) ‘Les sources de saint Thomas: État de la question’ in Aristote et saint Thomas d'Aquin (Chaire Cardinal Merrier, 1955), Publications Universitaires de Louvain and Éditions Beatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Carlo, William (1966a). ‘Idea and Concept: A Key to Epistemology’ in Adelmann, Frederick J. (ed.) The Quest for the Absolute (Boston College Studies in Philosophy, No. 1), Boston College and Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
Chenevert, Jacques (1961). ‘Le verbum dans le Commentaire sur les Sentences de Saint Thomas d'Aquin’, Sciences ecclésiastiques 13 : andGoogle Scholar
Chenu, M.-D. (1964). Toward Understanding Saint Thomas, trans. Landry, A. M. and Hughes, D., Henry RegneryGoogle Scholar
Chossat, M. (1914). ‘Saint Thomas d'Aquin et Siger de Brabant’, Revue de philosophie 24: 25:Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1968). The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Dähnert, Ulrich (1934). Die Erkenntnislehre des Albertus Magnus gemessen an den Stufen der ldquo;Abstractio” (Studien und Bibliographien zur Gegenwartsphilosophie, vol. 4), S. HirzelGoogle Scholar
Denifle, H., and Chatelain, A. (1889–97). Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (4 vols.), DelalainGoogle Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence (1980). ‘St Albert, the Sensibles, and Spiritual Being’ in Weisheipl, James A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Doncoeur, P. (1910). ‘Notes sur les averroistes latins: Boèce le Dace’, Revue des sciences philosophiques 4:.Google Scholar
Dondaine, A. (1947). ‘Le manuel de l'inquisiteur (1230–1330)’, Archivum Fratrum praedicatorum 17:.Google Scholar
Dondaine, A. and Bataillon, L.J. (1966). ‘Le manuscrit Vindob. lat. 2330 et Siger de Brabant’, Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 36:.Google Scholar
Ermatinger, Charles J. (1954). ‘Averroism in Early Fourteenth Century Bologna’, Mediaeval Studies 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermatinger, Charles J. (1969). ‘John of Jandun in his Relations with Arts Masters and Theologians’ in Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge, Institut d'Études médie Vales and J. VrinGoogle Scholar
Fioravanti, G. (1972). ‘sull' evoluzione del monopsichismo di sigieri di brabante’, atti delta accademia delle scienze di torino 106:.Google Scholar
Garceau, Benoit (1968). judicium: vocabulaire, sources, doctrine de saint thomas d'aquin (université de montréal, l'institut d'études médiévales, no. 20), institut d'études médiévales and vrinGoogle Scholar
Gardeil, A. (1934). ‘la perception expérimentale de l'âme par elle-même d'après saint thomas’ in mélanges thomistes (bibliothèque thomiste, vol. 3), vrinGoogle Scholar
Gardet, Louis (1974). ‘Saint Thomas et ses predecesseurs arabes’ in St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974: Commemorative Studies, vol. 1, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Garin, Pierre (1931). La théorie de I'idée suivant I'école thomiste, Desclée De BrouwerGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, R.-A. (1947–8). ‘Trois commentaires “averroistes” sur 1' Éthique à Nicomaque’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 22/23:Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne (1926–7). ‘Pourquoi Saint Thomas a critiqué Saint Augustin’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 1:.Google Scholar
Goichon, A.-M. (1951). La philosophic d'Avicenne et son influence en Europe médiévale, 2nd ed., Adrien-MaisonneuveGoogle Scholar
GÓMez, Izquierdo Alberto (1924). ‘Valor cognoscitivo de la “intentio” en Santo Tomàs de Aquino’, La Ciencia Tomista 29:.Google Scholar
GÓMez, Nogales Salvador (1976). ‘Saint Thomas, Averroes, et l'averroisme’ in Verbeke, G. and Verhelst, D. (eds.), Aquinas and the Problems of His Time (Mediae-valia Lovaniensia, Series I, Studia 5), Louvain, Publications UniversitairesGoogle Scholar
Grabmann, Martin (1924a). Neu aufgefundene Werke des Siger von Brabant und Boetius von Dacien (Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Abteilung, 1924, No. 2)Google Scholar
Grabmann, Martin (1931). Der lateinische Averroismus und seine Stellung zur christlichen Weltanschauung (Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil-hist. Abt., Heft 2)Google Scholar
Guillet, J. (1927). ‘La “lumière intellectuelle” d'après S. Thomas’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 2:.Google Scholar
Hessen, Johannes (1960). Augustins Metaphysik der Erkenntnis, 2nd ed., E.J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Hissette, R. (1977). Enquête sur les 219 articles condamnés à Paris le 7 Mars 1277, Publications Universitaires de LouvainGoogle Scholar
Hoenen, P. (1952). Reality and Judgment According to St Thomas, trans. Tiblier, Henry F., Regnery, H.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jean (1948). ‘Sur la connaissance de la verité’. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 32:Google Scholar
John, Duns Scotus (1639a). Opera omnia, ed. Wadding, L. (12 vols.). Lyons (Reprinted Georg Olms 1968)Google Scholar
John, Salisbury (1909). Policraticus, ed. Webb, C. C. J. (2 vols.), Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Herbert (1960). ‘Intellectual Abstraction in St Albert’, Philosophical Studies (Maynooth) 10:Google Scholar
Kaiser, Rudolf (1962). ‘Zur Frage der eigenen Anschauung Alberts d. Gr. in seinen philosophischen Kommentaren’, Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 9:.Google Scholar
Keeler, Leo (1934). The Problem of Error from Plato to Kant, Gregorian University PressGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A. (1959–60). ‘The Nature of the Human Intellect According to St Albert the Great’, The Modern Schoolman 37:.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Leonard A. (1962–3). ‘St Albert the Great's Doctrine of Divine Illumination’, The Modern Schoolman 40:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony (1969a). ‘Intellect and Imagination in Aquinas’ in Kenny, Anthony (ed.) Aquinas: A Collection oj Critical Essays, DoubledayCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klubertanz, George P. (1952). The Discursive Power: Sources and Doctrine of the “Vis Cogitativa” According to St Thomas Aquinas, The Modern SchoolmanGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Paul Oskar (1974). Medieval Aspects of Renaissance Learning (Duke Monographs in Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1), Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Paul Oskar (1952). ‘Petrarch's “Averroists”: A Note on the History of Aristotelianism in Venice, Padua, and Bologna’, Mélanges Augustin Renaudet, Bibliothèque d'Humanisme et Renaissance 14:.Google Scholar
Kuksewicz, Zdzislaw (1968). De Siger de Brabant à Jacques de Plaisance – la théorie de l'intellect chez les averroïstes latins des XIIIe et XIVe s., OssolineumGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, B. J. F. (1957). Insight. A Study of Human Understanding, Longmans Green (1967). Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas, ed. Burrell, David, University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Macclintock, Stuart (1954–5). ‘Heresy and Epithet: An Approach to the Problem of Latin Averroism’, The Review of Metaphysics 8:. andGoogle Scholar
Macclintock, Stuart (1956). Perversity and Error: Studies on the “Averroist” John ofjandun (Indiana University Publications, Humanities Series, No. 37), Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1970). ‘Pier Nicola Castellani and Agostino Nifo on Averroes' Doctrine of the Agent Intellect’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 25:.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1973a). ‘Themistius and the Agent Intellect in James of Viterbo and Other Thirteenth Century Philosophers (Saint Thomas, Siger of Brabant and Henry Bate)’, Augustiniana 23:Google Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1973b). Review of Marcia L. Colish, The Mirror of Language: A Study in the Medieval Theory of Knowledge, Yale University Press, 1968, in Journal of the History of Philosophy 11:Google Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1974a). ‘Saint Thomas and Siger of Brabant Revisited’, The Review of Metaphysics 27:.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1974b). ‘Saint Thomas and the School of Padua at the End of the Fifteenth Century’, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 48:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, Edward P. (1980a). ‘Albert the Great and the Studio Patavino in the Late Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries’ in Weisheipl, James A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Maier, Anneliese (1944). ‘Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Italienischen Averroismus im 14. Jahrhundert’, Quellen und Forschungen aus den Italienischen Archiven und Bibliothektn 33:Google Scholar
Mandonnet, P. (1911). ‘Autour de Siger de Brabant’,, Revue thomiste 19:Google Scholar
Mansion, Augustin (1953). ‘L'immortalité de l'âme et de l'intellect d'après Aristote’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 51:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlasca, Antonio (1971). ‘La antropologia sigeriana en las “Quaestiones super librum de causis”’, Estudios filosóficos 20:Google Scholar
Marlasca, Antonio (1972). Les Quaestiones super librum de causis de Siger de Brabant, Publications Universi– taires de LouvainGoogle Scholar
Marlasca, Antonio (1974). ‘De nuevo. Tomás de Aquino y Siger de Brabante’, Estudios Jilosóficos 23:.Google Scholar
Maurer, Armand (1956). ‘The State of Historical Research in Siger of Brabant’, Speculum 31:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarella, Pasquale (1974). ‘La critica di San Tommaso all‘ “averroismo gnoseolo-gico”’, Rivista difilosofia neo–scolastica 66:.Google Scholar
Meersseman, Gilles M. (1931) Introductio in opera omnia B. Alberti Magni O. P., C. BeyaertGoogle Scholar
Michaud–Quantin, Pierre (1955). ‘Albert le Grand et les puissances de l'ame’, Revue du moyen age latin 11:Google Scholar
Michaud–Quantin, Pierre (1966). La psychologie de I'activité chez Albert le Grand, VrinGoogle Scholar
Miller, Robert (1954). ‘An Aspect of Averroes' Influence on St. Albert’, Mediaeval Studies 16:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. (1936). ‘II preteso tomismo di Sigieri di Brabante’, Giornale critico delta filosofia italiana 17:.Google Scholar
Nardi, B. (1939). ‘Una nuova monografia su Sigieri di Brabante’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana 20:.Google Scholar
Nardi, B. (1940). Review of Fernand van Steenberghen, Les oeuvres et la doctrine de Siger der Brabant, Académie royale de Belgique, in Studi Danteschi 25:Google Scholar
Nardi, B. (1944). Nelmondo di Dante (Storia e letteratura, vol. 5), Edizioni di ‘Storia e letteratura’Google Scholar
Nardi, B. (1945). Sigieri di Brabante nel pensiero del Rinascimento Italiano, Edizioni ItalianeGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. (1960) Studi di filosofia medievale, Edizioni di Storia e LetteraturaGoogle Scholar
Naus, John E. (1959). The Nature of the Practical Intellect According to Saint Thomas Aquinas (Analecta Gregoriana, vol. 108), Gregorian UniversityGoogle Scholar
Nédoncelle, Maurice (1974). ‘Remarques sur la réfutation des averroïstes par saint Thomas’, Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 66:.Google Scholar
Nifo, Agostino (1521). Epitomata rethorica ludicra, VeniceGoogle Scholar
Owens, Joseph (1970). ‘Judgment and Truth in Aquinas’, Mediaeval Studies 32:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Joseph (1974). ‘The Primacy of the External in Thomistic Noetics’, Église et Thélogie 5:.Google Scholar
Paissac, H. (1951). Thélogie du verbe: Saint Augustin et Saint Thomas, Les Éditions du CerfGoogle Scholar
Park, Katharine (1980). ‘Albert's Influence on Late Medieval Psychology’ in Weisheipl, James A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Peghaire, Julien (1942–3). ‘A Forgotten Sense, The Cogitative according to St Thomas Aquinas’, The Modern Schoolman 20: andGoogle Scholar
Pegis, Anton C. (1934). St Thomas and the Problem of the Soul in the Thirteenth Century, St Michael's CollegeGoogle Scholar
Pegis, Anton C. (1974). ‘The Separated Soul and its Nature in St Thomas’ in St Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974: Commemorative Studies, vol. 1, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Peifer, John F. (1952). The Concept in Thomism, Bookman AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Peter, John Olivi (1922–6). Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum, ed. Jansen, B. (3 vols.), Bibliotheca Franciscana Scholastica Medii Aevi, Collegium S. BonaventuraeGoogle Scholar
Picard, Gabriel (1926). Essai sur la connaissance sensible d'après les scolastiques (Archives de Philosophic vol. 4, Cahier 1), BeauchesneGoogle Scholar
Poppi, Antonino (1970b). Saggi sul pensiero inedito di Pietro Pomponazzi (Centro per la Storia della Tradizione Aristotelica nel Veneto, Saggi e Testi, No. 8), Editrice AntenoreGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J. F. (1973). The Historical Constitution of St Bonaventure's Philosophy, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Rabeau, Gaston (1938). Species-Verbum: L'activité intellectuelle élémentaire selon S. Thomas d'Aquin (Bibliothèque Thomiste, vol. 22), VrinGoogle Scholar
Régis, Louis Marie (1959). Epistemology, trans. Byrne, Imelda C., The Macmillan CompanyGoogle Scholar
Reilly, George Cajetan (1934). The Psychology of Saint Albert the Great compared with that of St Thomas, The Catholic University of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Riet, G. (1953). ‘La théorie thomiste de la sensation externe’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 51:.Google Scholar
Rohmer, Jean (1951). ‘L'intentionnalité des sensations de Platon à Ockham’, Revue des sciences religieuses 25:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1910–11). ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s. vol. 11:Google Scholar
Ryan, Edmund J. (1951). The Role of the ‘Sensus Communis’ in the Psychology of St Thomas Aquinas, Messenger PressGoogle Scholar
Sajó, Géza (1958). ‘Boèce de Dacie et les commentaires anonymcs inédits de Munich sur la Physique et sur la Génération attribués à Siger de Brabant’, Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 33:.Google Scholar
Santeler, Josef (1939). Der Platonismus in der Erkenntnislehre des heiligen Thomas von Aquin, RauchGoogle Scholar
Schmugge, Ludwig (1966). Johannes von Jandun (1285/189–1328): Untersuchungen zur Biographie und Sozialtheorie eines lateinischen Averroisten (Pariser Historische Studien, No. 5), Anton HiersemannGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Arthur (1903–6). Die Psychologie Alberts des Grossen nach den Quellen dargestellt (BGPM IV), AschendorffGoogle Scholar
Siger, Brabant (1972a). Quaestiones in tertium De anima, De anima intellectiva, De aeternitate mundi ed. Bazán, B., Publications Universitaires de LouvainGoogle Scholar
Simonin, H. D. (1930a). ‘La notion d' “intentio” dans l'oeuvre de S. Thomas d'Aquin’, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 19:.Google Scholar
Simonin, H. D. (1930b). ‘La connaissance humaine des singuliers matériels d'après les maitres franciscains de la fin du XIIIe siècle’ in Mélanges Mandonnet, vol. 2 (Bibliothèque Thomiste, vol. 14), VrinGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1931). Siger de Brabant d'après ses oeuvres inédites, vol. 1: Les oeuvres inédites (Les philosophes belges, No. 12), Éditions de L'Institut Supérieur de PhilosophieGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1938). Les oeuvres et la doctrine de Siger de Brabant (Académie royale de Belgique. Classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques. Mémoires, vol. 39, fasc. 3), HayezGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1942). Siger de Brabant d'après ses oeuvres inédites, vol. 2: Siger dans l'histoire de l'aristotélisme (Les philosophes belges, No. 13), Éditions de L'Institut Supérieur de PhilosophieGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1956). ‘Nouvelles recherches sur Siger de Brabant et son école’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 54:.Google Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1966). La Philosophie au XIIIe sièle (Philosophes médiévaux 9), Publications universitaires de Louvain Béatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1971). ‘Un commentaire semi-averroïste du traité de l'âame (Oxford, Merton College 275, f. 67–84; Munich, Clm 9559, f. 74–82)’ in Giele, Maurice, Steenberghen, Fernand, Bazán, Bernard (eds.) Trois commentaires anonymes sur le traité de l'âme d'Aristote (Philosophes médiévaux, vol. 11), Publications Universitaires and Béatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1974). Introduction à I'étude de la philosophie médiévale (Philosophes médiévaux, vol. 18), Publications Universitaires and Beatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1977). Maître Siger de Brabant (Philosophes médiévaux, No. 21), Publications UniversitairesGoogle Scholar
Steenberghen, F. (1978). ‘Siger de Brabant et la condamnation de l'aristotelisme heterodoxe le 7 mars 1277’ Bulletin de I'Académie royale de Belgique, Classes des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques, 5th ser., Tome 44, Académie Royale de BelgiqueGoogle Scholar
Steneck, Nicholas H. (1974). ‘Albert the Great on the Classification and Localization of the Internal Senses’, Isis 65:.Google ScholarPubMed
Steneck, Nicholas H. (1980). ‘Albert on the Psychology of Sense Perception’ in Weisheipl, James A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Terrero, José Riesco (1960). ‘Juan de Janduno y el Gandavense’ Salmanticensis commentarius de sacris disciplinis 7:Google Scholar
Tyrrell, Francis M. (1948). The Role of Assent in Judgment, A Thomistic Study, The Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar
Vanni-Rovighi, S. (1971). ‘Gli averroisti bolognesi’ in Oriente e occidente nel medioevo: Filosofia e scienze, Convegno intemazionale 9–15 Aprile 1969 (Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni, vol. 13), Accademia Nazionale dei LinceiGoogle Scholar
Vansteenkiste, C. (1953). ‘Avicenna-citaten bij S. Thomas’, Tijdschrift voor Philosophie 15:.Google Scholar
Vennebusch, J. (1966). ‘Die Questiones metaphysice tres des Siger von Brabant’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 48:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, Gérard (1957). ‘Thémistius et le commentaire de S. Thomas au “De anima” d'Aristote’ and ‘Thémistius et le “De unitate intellectus” de saint Thomas’ in Verbeke, Gérard (ed.) Thémistius: Cornmentaire sur le Traité de I'âme d'Aristote, Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, Édition critique et étude sur I'utilisation du commentaire dans I'oeuvre de saint Thomas (Corpus latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem graecorum I), Publications Universitaires de Louvain and Éditions Béatrice-NauwelaertsGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, Gérard (1960). ‘L'unite de l'homme: saint Thomas contre Averroés’, Revue philosophique de Louvain 58:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walz, Angelo (1962). Saint Thomas d'Aquin, trans. Novarina, Paul (Philosophes médiévaux, No. 5), Publications universitaircs françhisesGoogle Scholar
Wéber, Édouard-Henri (1970). La controverse de 1270 à l'Université de Paris et son retentissment sur la pensée de S. Thomas d'Aquin (Bibliothèque thomiste, No. 40), J. VrinGoogle Scholar
Wéber, Édouard-Henri (1974). Dialogue et dissensions entre Saint Bonaventure et Saint Thomas d'Aquin à Paris (1252–1273) (Bibliothèque thomiste, No. 41), J. VrinGoogle Scholar
Wéber, Édouard-Henri (1976). ‘Les discussions de 1270 à l'Université de Paris et leur influence sur la pensée philosophique de S. Thomas d'Aquin’ in Zimmermann, Albert (ed.) Die Auseinandersetzungen an der Pariser Universität im XIII.Jahrhundert (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, Band 10), De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1974a). Friar Thomas d'Aquino: his life, thought, and work, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1980). ‘The Life and Works of St Albert the Great’ in Weisheipl, James A. (ed.) Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesGoogle Scholar
Wilpert, Paul (1931). Das Problem der Wahrheitssicherung bei Thomas von Aquin: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Evidenzproblems BGPM XXX, 3, AschendorffGoogle Scholar
Wippel, J. F. (1977). ‘The Condemnations of 1270 and 1277 at Paris’, The Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 7:.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn (1935). ‘The Internal Senses in Latin, Arabic, and Hebrew Philosophic Texts’, Harvard Theological Review 28:.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Harry Austryn (1973). Studies in the History of Philosophy and Religion, vol. 1, ed. Twersky, I. and Williams, G. H., Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Wulf, Maurice (1934–7). Histoire de la philosophic midiivale (6th edn.), I (1934), II (1936), III (1937) Institut Superieur de Philosophie/VrinGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (1967–8). ‘Dante hatte doch Recht: Neue Ergebnisse der Forschung iiber Siger de Brabant’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 75:Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (1973). ‘Thomas von Aquin und Siger von Brabant im Licht neuer Quellentexte’ in Alf Önnerfors, Johannes Rathofer and Wagner, Fritz (eds.) Literatur und Sprache im europäischen Mittelalter: Festschrift für Karl Langosch zum 70. Geburtstag, Wissen-schaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×