Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T17:30:42.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Natural philosophy: Astrology and magic

from PART 2 - PHILOSOPHY AND ITS PARTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Brian Copenhaver
Edited by
C. B. Schmitt ,
Quentin Skinner ,
Eckhard Kessler  and
Jill Kraye
Get access

Summary

A SCEPTIC'S DEFINITION OF MAGIC

When Henricus Cornelius Agrippa published an enlarged edition of his De occulta philosophia in Cologne in 1533, seven years after he had written his invective De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum atque artium (1526), he appended to it a Censura sive retractio in which he reprinted the chapters on magic from De incertitudine. Since in these chapters Agrippa's ardour for occult wisdom had somewhat abated, we may take their definition of natural magic to be the tempered judgement of a man who was, in any event, sincere in his Christian piety and skilled as a vulgariser of other people's ideas. ‘That magic is natural’, he explained, ‘which, having observed the forces of all things natural and celestial and having examined by painstaking investigation the sympathy among those things, brings into the open powers hidden and stored away in nature; thus, magic links lower things (as if they were magical enticements) to the gifts of higher things… so that astonishing miracles thereby occur, not so much by art as by nature to which – as nature works these wonders – this art of magic offers herself as handmaid.’

Agrippa recognised that magic was an art, a practical technique, but he also insisted on a theoretical content in magic, an analytic basis in the study of nature. Learned men had called magic ‘the highest point of natural philosophy’ because they saw in it speculative as well as pragmatic responses to the cosmos. The obverse of this learned natural magic, was sinful demonic magic. Warning that ‘natural magic has sometimes relapsed into sorcery and theurgy (most often through strategems of evil demons)’, Agrippa raised the spectre of demonology that haunted the Renaissance revival of ancient magic as it animated the concurrent witchcraft craze.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy , pp. 264 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agricola, Rudolph (1533). De occulta philosophia libri tres, [Cologne] (repr. Graz, 1967, ed. Nowotny, K. A.).Google Scholar
Agricola, Rudolph (1958). ‘Dialogus de homine’, ed. Zambelli, P., Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 13.Google Scholar
Ailly, Pierre d' (1967). Book of Minerals, ed. and trans. Wyckoff, D., Oxford.Google Scholar
Ailly, Pierre d' (1977). Speculum astronomiae, ed. Caroti, S. et al, Pisa.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1984a). The Platonism of Marsilio Ficino, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. H. (1948). The Philosophy of Francis Bacon, Chicago.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1955–6). ‘Was Plotinus a magician?’, Phronesis, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aune, D. E. (1980). ‘Magic in early Christianity’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt: Principat, xxiii, 2, Berlin.Google Scholar
Avicenna, (1507). Liber Canonis, Venice.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1857–74). Works, ed. Spedding, J. et al, 14 vols., London.Google Scholar
Bianchi, M. L. (1982). ‘Occulto e manifesto nella medicina del Rinascimento: Jean Fernel e Pietro Severino’, Atti e memorie dell'Accademia toscana di scienze e lettere ‘La Colombaria’, n.s., 33.Google Scholar
Brickman, B. (1941). An Introduction to Francesco Patrizi's ‘Nova de universis philosophia’, New York.Google Scholar
Bruno, Giordano (1879–91). Opera latine conscripta, ed. Fiorentino, F. et al., 3 vols, in 8 parts, Naples–Florence.Google Scholar
Burckhardt, J. (1860). Die Cultur der Renaissance in Italien, Basle.Google Scholar
Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy (1970). ed. Armstrong, A. H., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Campanella, Tommaso (1949–). Theologicorum (libri), ed. Amerio, R., Florence.Google Scholar
Capp, B. (1979). Astrology and the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800, London–Boston.Google Scholar
Cardano, Girolamo (1962). The Book of My Life, trans. Stoner, J., New York.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1927). Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance, Berlin–Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clulee, N. H. (1977). ‘Astrology, magic and optics: facets of John Dee's natural philosophy’, Renaissance Quarterly, 30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, N. (1975). Europe's Inner Demons, London.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1977). ‘Lefèvre d'Étaples, Symphorien Champier, and the secret names of God’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1978a). Symphorien Champier and the Reception of the Occultist Tradition in Renaissance France, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1978b). ‘Essay review: Hermeticism and the Scientific Revolution’, Annals of Science, 35.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1984). ‘Scholastic philosophy and Renaissance magic in the De vita of Marsilio Ficino’, Renaissance Quarterly, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1986). ‘Renaissance magic and Neoplatonic philosophy: Ennead 4.3–5 in Ficino's De vita coelitus comparanda’, in Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di Platone: studi e documenti, ed. Garfagnini, G., Florence, II.Google Scholar
Crouzel, H. (1977). Une controverse sur Origène à la Renaissance: Jean Pic de la Mirandole et Pierre Garcia, Paris.Google Scholar
Culianu, I. P. (1981). ‘Magia spirituale e magia demoniaca nel Rinascimento’, Rivista di storia e letteratura religiosa, 17.Google Scholar
D'Alverny, M.-T. and Hudry, F. (1974). ‘Al-Kindi De radiis’ Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 41.Google Scholar
Deck, J. N. (1967). Nature, Contemplation and the One, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcorno Branca, D. (1976). ‘Un discepolo del Poliziano: Michele Acciari’, Lettere italiane, 28.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Giambattista (1658). Natural Magick, London (repr. New York, 1957).Google Scholar
Di Napoli, G. (1947). Tommaso Campanella, filosofo della restaurazione cattolica, Padua.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1975). Purity and Danger, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.Google Scholar
Erastus, Thomas (1574). De occultis pharmacorum potestatibus, Basle.Google Scholar
Evans–Pritchard, E. E. (1965). Theories of Primitive Religion, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fernel, Jean (1550). De abditis rerum causis libri duo, Venice.Google Scholar
Festugière, A.-J. (1944–54). La Revélation d'Hermes Trismegiste, 4 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1576). Opera omnia, 2 vols., Basle (repr. Turin, 1959).Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1937). Supplementum Ficinianum, ed. Kristeller, P. O., 2 vols., Florence.Google Scholar
Ficino, Marsilio (1956). Commentaire sur le Banquet de Platon, ed. Marcel, R., Paris.Google Scholar
Galen, (1821). Opera omnia, ed. Kühn, C. G., 20 vols., Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim, 1964–5).Google Scholar
Garcia, Pedro (1489). Determinationes magistrales … contra conclusiones apologeticas Joannis Pici, Rome.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1937a). Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottrina, Florence.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1969). L'età nuova, Naples.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1976a). ‘Postille sull'ermetismo nel Rinascimento’, Rinascimento, ser. ii, 16.Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1976c). Lo zodiaco della vita, Bari (English trans. London, 1983).Google Scholar
Grafton, A. (1983). ‘Protestant versus prophet: Isaac Casaubon on Hermes Trismegistus’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graiff, F. (1976). ‘I prodigi e l'astrologia nei comment di Pietro Pomponazzi al De caelo, alla Meteora e al De generatione’, Medioevo, 2.Google Scholar
Harvey, E. R. (1975). The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, London.Google Scholar
Heninger, S. K. (1974). Touches of Sweet Harmony, San Marino.Google Scholar
Hopfner, T. (1974). Griechisch-ägyptischer Offenbarungszauber, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hull, J. M. (1974). Hellenistic Magic and the Synoptic Tradition, Napierville, Ill.Google Scholar
Hutchison, K. (1982). ‘What happened to occult qualities in the scientific revolution?’, Isis, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingegno, A. (1978). Cosmologia e filosofia nel pensiero di Giordano Bruno, Florence.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. (1959). Spiritual Reformers in the 16th and 17th Centuries, Boston.Google Scholar
Klein, R. (1970). La Forme et l'intelligible, Paris.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. J. (1971). ‘Patronage and reform in the France of the Préréforme: the case of Clichtove’, Canadian Journal of History, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1953a). Il pensiero filosofico di Marsilio Ficino, Florence.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1960). ‘Lodovico Lazzarelli e Giovanni da Correggio, due ermetici del Quattrocento, e il manoscritto 11.D.1.4 della Biblioteca comunale degli Ardenti di Viterbo’, in Biblioteca degli Ardenti della città di Viterbo, Viterbo.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1964a). Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance, Stanford.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. (1965a). Renaissance Thought II: Papers on Humanism and the Arts, New York.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d'Étaples, Jacques (1972). The Prefatory Epistles, ed. Rice, E. F., New York.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1982). ‘Astrology: arguments pro and contra’, in Science and Speculation, ed. Barnes, J. et al., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Michel, P.-H. (1962). La Cosmologie de Giordano Bruno, Paris.Google Scholar
Nauert, C. G. (1965). Agrippa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thought, Urbana.Google Scholar
Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance (1984). ed. Vickers, B., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, W. (1958a). Paracelsus: Introduction to the Philosophical Medicine of the Era of the Renaissance, Basle–New York.Google Scholar
Parinetto, L. (1974). Magia e ragione: una polemica sulle streghe in Italiae intorno al 1750, Florence.Google Scholar
Perrone Compagni, V. (1975). ‘Picatrix Latinus: Concezioni filosofico-religiose e prassi magica’, Medioevo, 1.Google Scholar
Pomponazzi, Pietro (1957). Libri quinque de fato, de libero arbitrio et de praedestinatione, ed. Lemay, R., Lugano.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. H. (1979). The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza, rev. edn, Berkeley–Los Angeles–London.Google Scholar
Rees, G. (1975). ‘Francis Bacon's semi-Paracelsian cosmology’, Ambix, 22.Google Scholar
Röhr, J. (1923). Der okkulte Kraftbegriff im Altertum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rosán, L. J. (1949). The Philosophy of Proclus, New York.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. (1974). Francesco Bacone: Dalla magia alla scienza, new edn, Turin (Eng. trans, London, 1968).Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1959). Physics of the Stoics, London.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1967). Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola (1469–1533) and His Critique of Aristotle, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. and Knox, D. (1985). Pseudo-Aristoteles Latinus, London.Google Scholar
Scholem, G. (1974). Kabbalah, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Secret, F. (1964). Les Kabbalistes chrétiens de la Renaissance, Paris.Google Scholar
Sharpe, E. J. (1975). Comparative Religion: A History, London.Google Scholar
Shumaker, W. (1982). Renaissance Curiosa, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Sleeman, J. H. and Pollet, G. (1980). Index Plotinianum, Leiden.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1974). Porphyry's Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition, The Hague.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1978). Jesus the Magician, New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. (1971). Religion and the Decline of Magic, London.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L. (1923–58). A History of Magic and Experimental Science, 8 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Van Deusen, N. C. (1932). Telesio: The First of the Moderns, New York.Google Scholar
Védrine, H. (1967). La Conception de la nature chez Giordano Bruno, Paris.Google Scholar
Verbeke, G. (1945). L'Évolution de la doctrine du pneuma du stoïcisme à S. Augustin, Paris–Louvain.Google Scholar
Vickers, B. (1979). ‘Frances Yates and the writing of history’, Journal of Modern History, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. P. (1958). Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella, London.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P. (1972). The Ancient Theology, London.Google Scholar
Webster, C. (1982). From Paracelsus to Newton: Magic and the Making of Modern Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weinstein, D. (1970). Savonarola and Florence, Princeton.Google Scholar
Wellmann, M. (1928). Die Φύσιкα des Bolos Demokritos und der Magier Anaxilaos aus Larissa, part 1 (Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 1928, 7), Berlin.Google Scholar
Westman, R. S. andMcGuire, J. E. (1977). Hermeticism and the Scientific Revolution, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Yates, F. A. (1964). Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, London.Google Scholar
Yates, F. A. (1982–4). Collected Essays, 3 vols., London.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1960). ‘A proposito del De vanitate scientiarum et artium di Cornelio Agrippa’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 15.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1965). Di un'opera sconosciuta di Cornelio Agrippa: Il ‘Dialogus de vanitate scientiarum et ruina cristianae religionis’, Castrocaro Terme.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1966). ‘Humanae literae, verbum divinum, docta ignorantia negli ultimi scritti di Enrico Cornelio Agrippa’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 45.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1969). ‘Agrippa von Nettesheim in den neueren kritischen Studien und in den Handschriften’, Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1973a). ‘Platone, Ficino e la magia’, in Studia humanitatis: Ernesto Grassi zum 70. Geburtstag, Munich.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1973b). ‘Il problema della magia naturale nel Rinascimento’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 28.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1975). ‘I problemi metodologici del necromante Agostino Nifo’, Medioevo, 1.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1976). ‘Magic and radical Reformation in Agrippa of Nettesheim’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1977). Une réincarnation de Jean Pic à l'époque de Pomponazzi (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur: Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissen schaftlichen Klasse, 1977, 10), Mainz.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1978). ‘Aut diabolus aut Achillinus: Fisionomia, astrologia e demonologia nel metodo di un aristotelico’, Rinascimento, ser. ii, 18.Google Scholar
Zambelli, P. (1985). ‘Scholastiker und Humanisten: Agrippa und Trithemius zur Hexerei. Die natürliche Magie und die Entstehung kritischen Denkens’, Archiv für Kulturgeschichte, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanier, G. (1975b). Ricerche sulla diffusione e fortuna del ‘De incantationibus’ di Pomponazzi, Florence.Google Scholar
Zanier, G. (1977). La medicina astrologica e la sua teoria: Marsilio Ficino e i suoi critici contemporanei, Rome.Google Scholar
Zika, C. (1976). ‘Reuchlin's De verbo mirifico and the magic debate of the late fifteenth century’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zintzen, C. (1965). ‘Die Wertung von Mystik und Magie in der neuplatonischen Philosophie’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, N.F., 108.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×