Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- 9 A critical theory of transnational regimes
- 10 Materialism of form
- 11 The dialectic of democracy and capitalism before the backdrop of a transnational legal pluralism in crisis
- 12 Putting proportionality in proportion
- 13 On the critical potential of law – and its limits
- Index
- References
9 - A critical theory of transnational regimes
Creeping managerialism and the quest for a destituent power
from Part III - Collisions otherwise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- 9 A critical theory of transnational regimes
- 10 Materialism of form
- 11 The dialectic of democracy and capitalism before the backdrop of a transnational legal pluralism in crisis
- 12 Putting proportionality in proportion
- 13 On the critical potential of law – and its limits
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contested Regime CollisionsNorm Fragmentation in World Society, pp. 255 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abensour, M., Democracy against the State: Marx and the Machiavellian Moment (Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Agamben, G., ‘What Is a Destituent Power?’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (2014), pp. 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, K. J., and Meunier, S., ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’, Perspectives on Politics, 7 (2009), pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amstutz, M., and Fischer-Lescano, A. (eds.), Kritische Systemtheorie: Zur Evolution einer normativen Theorie (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2013).Google Scholar
Assange, J., ‘Conspiracy as Governance’ (2006), http://web.archive.org/web/20070129125831/http://iq.org/conspiracies.pdf.Google Scholar
Bachur, J. P., Kapitalismus und funktionale Differenzierung (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, M. S., and Miller, G. P., ‘Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), pp. 15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaud, O., La Puissance de l’Etat (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, P. S., Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breaugh, M., The Plebeian Experience: A Discontinuous History of Political Freedom (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H., Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions (London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014).Google Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘Between Co-option and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law’, NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 37 (2004), pp. 799–827.Google Scholar
Chimni, B. S., ‘International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, E., ‘On the Politics of Societal Constitutionalism’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 629–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. W., Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Cutler, C., Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, C., ‘Legal Pluralism as the “Common Sense” of Transnational Capitalism’, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3 (2013), pp. 719–40.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, P., Egermann, E., Holert, T., Kastner, J. and Schaffner, J., Regime: Wie Dominanz organisiert und Ausdruck formalisiert wird (Münster: edition assemblage, 2012).Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., ‘Critical Systems Theory’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 38 (2012), pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Gill, S., and Cutler, C. A., New Constitutionalism and World Order (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, G. L., Il Rifugio delle Aspettative. Saggio sulla Certezza del Diritto (Lecce and Rovato: Pensa Multimedia, 2013).Google Scholar
Hardt, M., and Negri, A., Commonwealth (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P. and Rittberger, V., Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts, Werke Band 7 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986 [orig. 1821]).Google Scholar
Holmes, P., ‘The Rhetoric of Legal Fragmentation and Its Discontents. Evolutionary Dilemmas in the Constitutional Semantics of Global Law’, Utrecht Law Review, 7 (2011), pp. 113–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, A., Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life (Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, J., ‘Politiken der Entparadoxierung. Versuch einer Bestimmung des Politischen in der funktional ausdifferenzierten Weltgesellschaft’ in Amstutz, M. and Fischer-Lescano, A. (eds.), Kritische Systemtheorie. Zur Evolution einer normativen Theorie (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2013), pp. 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D. R., Norval, A. J. and Stavrakakis, Y., Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change (Manchester University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jessop, B., The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., ‘Law and the Political Economy of the World’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 26 (2013), pp. 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S. and Moravcsik, A., ‘Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism’, International Organization, 63 (2009), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T., Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht. Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen Völkerrechtslehre (Heidelberg and others: Springer, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., Frank, T. and De Mazza, E. M., Der fiktive Staat: Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 2007).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘What Should International Lawyers Learn from Karl Marx?’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 17 (2004), pp. 229–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later’, European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), pp. 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘Hegemonic Regimes’ in Young, M. A. (eds.), Regime Interaction in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 305–24.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D., ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, International Organization, 36 (1982), pp. 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M., ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism. An Integrated Conception of Public Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20 (2013), pp. 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E, New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London and New York: Verso, 1990)Google Scholar
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C., Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London and New York: Verso, 2001 [orig. 1985]).Google Scholar
Lang, A., World Trade after Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic Order (Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ley, I., Opposition im Völkerrecht. Ein Beitrag zur Legitimation internationaler Rechtserzeugung (Heidelberg and others: Springer, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorey, I., Figuren des Immunen: Elemente einer politischen Theorie (Zurich: Diaphanes, 2011).Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., and Walker, N., The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘Observing Re-entries’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 16 (1993), pp. 485–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., Protest. Systemtheorie und soziale Bewegungen (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’ in Luhmann, N. (ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft (Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, 2005 [orig. 1971]), pp. 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K., ‘Der 18. Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte’ in Engels, F. and Marx, K. (eds.), Marx-Engels-Werke Band 8 (Berlin, Dietz-Verlag, 1972 [orig. 1852]), pp. 111–207.Google Scholar
Marx, K., ‘Kritik des Hegelschen Staatsrechts’ in Engels, F. and Marx, K. (eds.), Marx-Engels-Werke Band 1 (Berlin, Dietz-Verlag, 1972 [orig.1843]), pp. 203–333.Google Scholar
Marx, K., ‘Zur Judenfrage’ in Engels, F. and Marx, K. (eds.), Marx-Engels-Werke Band 1 (Berlin, Dietz-Verlag, 1972 [orig. 1843]), pp. 347–77.Google Scholar
Maus, I., ‘Verfassung oder Vertrag. Zur Verrechtlichung globaler Politik’ in Herborth, B. and Niesen, P. (eds.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit. Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2007), pp. 383–405.Google Scholar
Möller, K., ‘Gouvernementales Wahrheitsregime oder dezentrales Netzwerk-Regieren?’, Leviathan, 37 (2009), 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, K., Formwandel der Verfassung. Die postdemokratische Verfasstheit des Transnationalen (Bielefeld: transcript, 2015).Google Scholar
Negri, A., Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Opitz, S., An der Grenze des Rechts. Inklusion/Exklusion im Zeichen der Sicherheit (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2012).Google Scholar
Renner, M., ‘Death by Complexity – The Crisis of Law in World Society’ in Kjaer, P. F., Febbrajo, A. and Teubner, G. (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 93–112.Google Scholar
Sassen, S., Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Schimank, U., ‘Die Moderne: Eine funktional differenzierte kapitalistische Gesellschaft’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 19 (2009), pp. 327–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderman, D., Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization. Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Scholz, S., and Wolf, K.-D., ‘Ordnungswandel durch Umkehrung einer Normenhierarchie. Der Schutz geistigen Eigentums und das Recht auf Gesundheit’, HSFK-Report, 5 (2014).Google Scholar
Simma, B., and Pulkowski, D., ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 17 (2006), pp. 483–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A., ‘Administration without Sovereignty’ in Loughlin, M. and Dobner, P. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 267–78.Google Scholar
Stäheli, U., Sinnzusammenbrüche. Eine dekonstruktive Lektüre von Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie (Weilerswist: Velbrück, 2000).Google Scholar
Streeck, W., Gekaufte Zeit. Die vertagte Krise des demokratischen Kapitalismus (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2013).Google Scholar
Sweet, A. S., ‘Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 16 (2009), pp. 621–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Privatregimes: Neo-Spontanes Recht und duale Sozialverfassungen in der Weltgesellschaft’ in Simon, D. and Weiss, M. (eds.), Zur Autonomie des Individuums: Liber Amicorum Spiros Simitis (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2000), pp. 437–53.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Global Private Regimes: Neo-spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors in World Society?’ in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, The Modern Law Review, 69 (2006), pp. 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hitting the Bottom”’ in Kjaer, P. F., Teubner, G. and Febbrajo, A. (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (Oxford: Hart, 2011), pp. 9–51.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C., ‘Contemporary Constitutionalism and the Dialectic of Constituent Power’, Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2012), pp. 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by