Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- 9 A critical theory of transnational regimes
- 10 Materialism of form
- 11 The dialectic of democracy and capitalism before the backdrop of a transnational legal pluralism in crisis
- 12 Putting proportionality in proportion
- 13 On the critical potential of law – and its limits
- Index
- References
10 - Materialism of form
On the self-reflection of law*
from Part III - Collisions otherwise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- 9 A critical theory of transnational regimes
- 10 Materialism of form
- 11 The dialectic of democracy and capitalism before the backdrop of a transnational legal pluralism in crisis
- 12 Putting proportionality in proportion
- 13 On the critical potential of law – and its limits
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contested Regime CollisionsNorm Fragmentation in World Society, pp. 281 - 297Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adorno, T. W., et al., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, trans. Adey, G. and Frisby, D. (London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1977).Google Scholar
Agamben, G., State of Exception, trans. Attell, K. (University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Benjamin, W., “Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels” in Tiedemann, R. and Schweppenhäuser, H. (eds.), Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1977).Google Scholar
Derrida, J., “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority” in Anidjar, G. (ed.), Acts of Religion, (New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 230–98.Google Scholar
Esposito, R., Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life (Malden, MA: Polity, 2011).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. Rehg, W. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Knowledge and Human Interest, trans. Shapiro, J. J. (Boston: Bacon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., Parmenides, trans. Schuwer, A. and Rojcewicz, R. (Indiana University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hensel, I., “Klangpotentiale: Eine Annäherung an das Rauschen des Rechts” in Joerges, C. and Zumbansen, P. (eds.), Politische Rechtstheorie Revisited. Rudolf Wiethölter zum 100. Semester (Bremen: ZERP, 2013), pp. 69–99.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., “Subjektive Rechte: Zum Umbau des Rechtsbewußtseins für die moderne Gesellschaft” in Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik, Vol. 2 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981), pp. 45–104.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Social Systems, trans. Bednarz, J. Jr. and Baecker, D. (Stanford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., “Sign as Form” in Baecker, D. (ed.), Problems of Form (Stanford University Press, 1999), pp. 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., “The Paradox of Form” in Baecker, D. (ed.), Problems of Form (Stanford University Press, 1999), pp. 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N., Law as a Social System, eds. Kastner, F. et al., trans. Ziegert, K. A. (Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K., “Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of the State” in Early Writings, trans. Livingstone, R. and Benton, G. (London: Penguin, 1992), pp. 57–198.Google Scholar
Menke, C., “Nach dem Gesetz. Zum Schluß des Zerbrochnen Krugs” in Groß, M. and Primavesi, P. (eds.), Lücken sehen … Beiträge zu Theorie, Literatur und Performance (Festschrift for Hans-Thies Lehmann) (Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 2010), pp. 97–112.Google Scholar
Menke, C., Force: A Fundamental Concept of Aesthetic Anthropology, trans. Jackson, G. (New York: Fordham University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Menke, C., and Raimondi, F. (eds.), Die Revolution der Menschenrechte (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011).Google Scholar
Sellars, W., Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Law as an Autopoietic System, ed. Bankowski, Z., trans. Bankowska, A. and Adler, R. (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar
Teubner, G., “Selbstsubversive Gerechtigkeit: Kontingenz- oder Transzendenzformel des Rechts?,” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 29 (2008), 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trüstedt, K., “Nomos and Narrative. Zu den Verfahren des Orestie” in Augsberg, I. and Lenski, S.-C. (eds.), Die Innenwelt der Außenwelt der Innenwelt des Rechts. Annäherungen zwischen Rechts- und Literaturwissenschaft (Munich: Fink, 2012), pp. 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, ed. Winkelmann, J. (Tübingen: Mohr [Siebeck], 1980).Google Scholar