Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:08:00.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The climate-justice link: communicating risk with low-income and minority audiences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Julian Agyeman
Affiliation:
Tufts University
Bob Doppelt
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Kathy Lynn
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Halida Hatic
Affiliation:
Tufts University
Susanne C. Moser
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder
Lisa Dilling
Affiliation:
University of Colorado, Boulder
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter, we briefly detail the growth of the US environmental justice movement and one of its offshoots, the international climate-justice movement. This movement is attempting to “put a human face” on climate change. The “Bali Principles of Climate Justice” shift climate change from a scientific–technical issue to one of human rights and environmental justice. We then look at how these issues can be communicated in disadvantaged communities: Roxbury, a predominantly African-American area in Boston, Massachusetts; and in poor, rural communities in the western United States documented in a 2001 study by the University of Oregon Program for Watershed and Community Health (now Resource Innovation), focusing on wildfire management and preparedness.

Environmental justice

Environmental justice concerns have been around in North America since the Conquest of Columbus in 1492. Yet, as a social movement, Faber (1998: 1) calls the US environmental justice movement “a new wave of grassroots environmentalism” and Anthony (1998: ix) calls it “the most striking thing to emerge in the US environmental movement.” Whether it developed “in” the environmental movement or “from” the civil rights movement is perhaps a moot point. However, the US environmental justice movement, as opposed to environmental justice concerns, is generally believed to have started around fall 1982, when a large protest erupted in Warren County, North Carolina. The state wanted to dump more than 6,000 truckloads of soil contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into what was euphemistically described as “a secure landfill.” The protesters came from miles around.

Type
Chapter
Information
Creating a Climate for Change
Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change
, pp. 119 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agyeman, J. (2005). Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Agyeman, J., Bullard, R., and Evans, B. (2003). Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. London: Earthscan/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, C. (1998). Foreword. In The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States, ed. Faber, D.New York and London: The Guilford Press. pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar
Baer, P., Harte, J., Haya, B., et al. (2000). Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science, 289, 2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, R., Johnson, G., and Torres, A. (eds.) (2000). Sprawl City: Race, Politics and Planning in Atlanta. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (2002). Environmental Justice Policy. Boston, MA: State House.
Congressional Black Caucus Foundation (CBCF) (2004). African Americans and Climate Change: An Unequal Burden. Oakland, CA: Redefining Progress.
Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative (2002). Ten Principles for Just Climate Change.Oakland, CA: Redefining Progress.
Faber, D. (ed.) (1998). The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the United States. New York and London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Geiser, K. and Waneck, G. (1994). PCBs and Warren County. In Unequal Protection: Environmental Justice and Communities of Color, ed. Bullard, R.San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books. pp. 43–52.Google Scholar
General Accounting Office (1983). Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and Their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Global Commons Institute (2001). Contraction and Convergence: Equity and Survival. London: GCI; available at: http://www.gci.org.uk/refs/C&CUNEPIIIg.pdf, accessed November 9, 2005.
International Climate Justice Network (2002). Bali Principles of Climate Justice. Press Release of August 29, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kasperson, R. E., Golding, D., and Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 4, 161–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavelle, M. and Coyle, M. (eds.) (1992). Unequal protection: The racial divide in environmental law. National Law Journal, 15 (Special Supplement), 52–4.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (2000). Contraction & Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change. Schumacher Briefing 5. Devon, UK: Green Books.Google Scholar
Mohai, P. (2004). Dispelling old myths: African American concern for the environment. Environment, 45, 5, 10–26.Google Scholar
Mohai, P. and Bryant, B. (1998). Is there a “race” effect on concern for environmental quality?Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 4, 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Program for Watershed and Community Health (PWCH). (2001). Wildfire and Poverty: An Overview of the Interactions Among Wildfires, Fire-related Programs, and Poverty in the Western States. Eugene, OR: ECONorthwest.
Taylor, D. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 4, 508–80.Google Scholar
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice (1987). Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States. New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice.
United States Census (2000). Roxbury Data Profile; available at: http://www.cityofboston.gov/DND/PDFs/Profiles/Roxbury_PD_Profile.pdf, accessed June 12, 2004.
Vaughan, E. (1995). The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process. Risk Communication, 15, 2, 169–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×