Book contents
- Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 An Introduction to Critical Thinking: Maybe It Will Change Your Life
- Chapter 2 Nobelists Gone Wild
- Chapter 3 Why Science Succeeds, and Sometimes Doesn’t
- Chapter 4 Critical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
- Chapter 5 Promoting Critical Thinking by Teaching, or Taking, Psychology Courses
- Chapter 6 Avoiding and Overcoming Misinformation on the Internet
- Chapter 7 Critical Thinking Impacts Our Everyday Lives
- Chapter 8 Research Suffers When We All Agree
- Chapter 9 When All Is Just a Click Away
- Chapter 10 Critical Thinking
- Chapter 11 Evaluating Experimental Research
- Chapter 12 Critical Thinking as Scientific Reasoning
- Chapter 13 Critical Thinking in STEM Disciplines
- Chapter 14 Why Would Anyone Do or Believe Such a Thing?
- Chapter 15 Conclusion: How to Think Critically about Politics … and Anything Else!
- Index
- References
Chapter 10 - Critical Thinking
Promise, Progress, and Paradox
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2019
Book contents
- Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Critical Thinking in Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Chapter 1 An Introduction to Critical Thinking: Maybe It Will Change Your Life
- Chapter 2 Nobelists Gone Wild
- Chapter 3 Why Science Succeeds, and Sometimes Doesn’t
- Chapter 4 Critical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
- Chapter 5 Promoting Critical Thinking by Teaching, or Taking, Psychology Courses
- Chapter 6 Avoiding and Overcoming Misinformation on the Internet
- Chapter 7 Critical Thinking Impacts Our Everyday Lives
- Chapter 8 Research Suffers When We All Agree
- Chapter 9 When All Is Just a Click Away
- Chapter 10 Critical Thinking
- Chapter 11 Evaluating Experimental Research
- Chapter 12 Critical Thinking as Scientific Reasoning
- Chapter 13 Critical Thinking in STEM Disciplines
- Chapter 14 Why Would Anyone Do or Believe Such a Thing?
- Chapter 15 Conclusion: How to Think Critically about Politics … and Anything Else!
- Index
- References
Summary
Higher education touts critical thinking as both a key educational objective and a learning outcome. Yet, as we know, there is no single approach for defining or presenting critical thinking. In this chapter, we identify and discuss an additional problem: Ten paradoxes that surround the teaching, learning, and application of critical thinking skills. We believe by making educators and other readers of this chapter aware of these paradoxes, we can help them to overcome the associated pedagogical challenges resulting from them. Indeed, after explaining each paradox, we suggest ways for psychology educators to lead their students toward greater understanding of critical thinking. Such discussions promote these critical thinking experiences as the sort of desirable difficulty opportunities teachers should routinely build into their courses. In turn, teachers of critical thinking as process and outcome need to assess their practices in order to demonstrate their efficacy and, when needed, update their efforts.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Thinking in Psychology , pp. 224 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
American Psychological Association. (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing, Abridged Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bjork, E., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In Gernsbacher, M. A. & Pomerantz, J. R. (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society. New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., Mehrotra, C., & Halonen, J. S. (Eds.) (2004). Measuring up: Educational assessment challenges and practices for psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., McCarthy, M., Baker, S., Halonen, J. S., & Hill, G. W., IV (2007). Quality benchmarks in undergraduate psychology programs. American Psychologist, 62, 650–670.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., Brewer, C. L., Cautin, R. L., Gurung, R. A., Keith, K. D., McGregor, L. N., Nida, S. A., Puccio, P., & Voight, M. J. (2010). The undergraduate psychology curriculum: Call for a core. In Halpern, D. F. (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (pp. 47–61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., McCarthy, M. A., Baker, S. C., & Halonen, J. S. (2011a). Using quality benchmarks for assessing and developing undergraduate programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., McCarthy, M. A., Baker, S. C., Halonen, J. S., & Boyer, S. (2011b). Understanding faculty reluctance as reactance and opportunity for persuasion: A social psychology of assessment. In Mashek, D. & Hammer, E. Y. (Eds.), Empirical research in teaching and learning: Contributions from social psychology (pp. 143–159). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., Baker, S. C., Mehrotra, C. M., McCarthy, M., & Landrum, R. E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessing teaching and learning in psychology: Current and future perspectives. Belmont, CA: Cengage.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. S., Gurung, R. A. R., Naufel, K. Z., & Wilson, J. H. (Eds.). (2013). Controversy in the psychology classroom: Using hot topics to foster critical thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking and dispositions and abilities. Online. https://tinyurl.com/yxj6v4pkGoogle Scholar
Gershoff, E. T., Goodman, G. S., Miller-Perrin, C. L., Holden, G. W., Jackson, Y., & Kazdin, A. E. (2018). The strength of the causal evidence against physical punishment of children and its implications for parents, psychologists, and policy makers. American Psychologist, 73, 626–638. DOI:10.1037/amp0000327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. W., & Kahneman, D. (Eds). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halonen, J. S. (Ed.). (1986). Teaching critical thinking in psychology. Milwaukee: Alverno Publications.Google Scholar
Halonen, J. S. (2018, July). KISS assessment in general education and the major: A workshop. Workshop given at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Teaching of Psychology Conference, James Madison University, Staunton, VA.Google Scholar
Halonen, J. S., Dunn, D. S., Baker, S. C., & McCarthy, M. A. (2012). Are you really above average? Documenting your teaching effectiveness. In Schwartz-Kenney, B. & Gurung, R. A. (Eds.), Evidence-based teaching for higher education (pp. 130–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Halonen, J. S., & Gray, C. (2015). The critical thinking companion (3rd ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2003a). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (2003b). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, S. O., & Kuh, G. D. (2015). From compliance to ownership: Why and how colleges and universities assess student learning. In Kuh, G. D. (Ed.). Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langer, E. J. (1992). Matters of mind: Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 1(4), 289–305. DOI:10.1016/1053-8100(92)90066-JGoogle Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. L. (2010). Fifty great myths of popular psychology: Shattering widespread misconceptions about human behavior. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2017). The construct of mindfulness. In Gaudiano, B. A. (Ed.), Mindfulness: The roots of mindfulness: History, philosophy, and definitions, (pp. 307–315). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Nolan, S. H. (2018, August). What we can learn from fake news: Building critical thinking and scientific literacy in the classroom. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stanny, C. J. (2015). Assessing the psychology curriculum: A primer for faculty and administration. In Dunn, D. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of undergraduate psychology education (pp. 813–831). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanny, C. J., & Halonen, J. S. (2011). Accreditation, accountability, and assessment: Faculty development’s role in addressing multiple agendas. In Stefani, L. (Ed.), Evaluating the effectiveness of academic development practice: A professional guide (pp. 169–182). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Roediger, III, H. L., & Halpern, D. F. (Eds.), (2007). Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. (2018, August 10). iGen: Reaching today’s students. American Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco.Google Scholar