The Value of Expertise and Expert Performance: A Review of Evidence from the Military

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511609817.024

20 - The Value of Expertise and Expert Performance: A Review of Evidence from the Military

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010

J. D. Fletcher

Edited by

K. Anders Ericsson

Show author details

K. Anders Ericsson: Affiliation:
Florida State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Intuitively we seek expertise in all areas of human activity as observers, beneficiaries, and performers. Beyond intuition, however, can we justify the resources we expend in developing expertise and expert performance? This chapter concerns the value of expertise and expert performance in a high stakes area: military operations. It provides some quantitative evidence of this value and its relation to themes that appear to be common to the development of expertise across many areas and are raised in the chapters of this book.

THEMES

This book addresses the development, measurement, and assessment of expertise from many directions and in many contexts. Findings and conclusions from its chapters may be summarized and organized around a number of “themes.” These themes apply to the development, measurement, and assessment of expertise in the military. They help crystallize and focus the ways individuals and groups prepare for the exigencies that inevitably arise in the performance of many activities, including military operations. These themes may be summarized and described, in no particular order, as the following.

Self-Assessment and Self-Directed Learning

Learners at all levels of development are increasingly expected to take responsibility for their professional growth. This trend has been accompanied by an increasing emphasis on techniques, capabilities, and tools that help them become more self-directed and self-assessing.

Type: Chapter
Information: Development of Professional Expertise
Toward Measurement of Expert Performance and Design of Optimal Learning Environments
, pp. 449 - 469

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609817.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bloedorn, G. (1992). Presentation of the fight (troops). In Orlanksy, J. & Thorpe, J. (Eds.), 73 Easting: Lessons learned from Desert Storm via advanced distributed simulation technology (IDA Document D-1110) (pp. I-119– I-152). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar

Cavalluzzo, L. (1984). OPTEMPO and training effectiveness (Professional Paper, 427). Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Christianson, W. M., & Zirkle, R. A. (1992). 73 Easting battle replication – a Janus combat simulation (IDA Paper P-2770). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 257 266).CrossRef

Dodds, P. V. W., & Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Opportunities for new “smart” learning environments enabled by next generation web capabilities. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 391– 404.

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice in the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683– 703). New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. D. (1999). Using networked simulation to assess problem solving by tactical teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 375– 402.CrossRef

Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Cognitive Readiness: Preparing for the Unexpected (IDA Document D-3061) Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 417 618).CrossRef Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. D., & Chatelier, P. R. (2000). Military Training. In Tobias, S. & Fletcher, J. D. (Eds.), Training and retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 267– 288). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gorman, P. F. (1990). The military value of training (IDA Paper P-2515). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 232 460).CrossRef

Hammon, C. P., & Horowitz, S. A. (1990). Flying hours and aircrew performance (IDA Paper P-2347). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 228 582).CrossRef

Hammon, C. P., & Horowitz, S. A. (1992). Relating flying hours to aircrew performance: Evidence for attack and transport missions (IDA Paper P-2609). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 253 988).

Hammon, C. P., & Horowitz, S. A. (1996). The Relationship Between Training and Unit Performance for Naval Patrol Aircraft – Revised (IDA Paper P-3139). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 328 922).

Hiller, J. H. (1987). Deriving useful lessons from combat simulations. Defense Management Journal, 23, 29– 33.

Holz, R. F., O'Mara, F., & Keesling, W. (1994). Determinants of effective unit performance at the National Training Center: Project overview. In Holz, R. F., Hiller, J. H., & McFann, H. (Eds.), Determinants of eff ective unit performance: Research on measuring and managing unit training readiness. Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences(DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 292 342).Google Scholar

Jones, M. B. (1974). Regressing groups on individual effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 426– 451.CrossRef

Keegan, J. (1976). The face of battle. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Keegan, J. (1993). A history of warfare. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1987). Evaluation. In Craig, R. L. (Ed.), Training and development handbook (3rd ed., pp. 301– 319). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Marshall, S. L. A. (1978). Men against fire: The problem of battle command in future wars. Glouster, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar

McMaster, H. R. (1992). May 21, 1992 testimony before the United States Senate Armed Services Committee.

McMaster, H. R. (2005). The Battle of 73 Easting. In Kagan (Ed.), F., Leaders in war: West Point remembers the 1991 Gulf War (Cass Military Studies) (pp. 103– 117). London: Frank Cass Publishers.Google Scholar

Morrison, J. E., & Meliza, L. L. (1999). Foundations of the after action review process. Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.Google Scholar

,Naval Studies Board. (1997). Technology for the United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2000– 2035: (Vol. 4), Human Resources. Washington, DC: Naval Studies Board, National Research Council, 1997.Google Scholar

Orlansky, J., & Thorpe, J. (Eds.). (1992). 73 Easting: Lessons learned from Desert Storm via advanced distributed simulation technology (IDA Document D-1110). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 253 991).

Orvis, B. R., Childress, M. T., & Polich, J. M. (1992). Effect of personnel quality on the performance of Patriot air defense system operators. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Rodin, M., & Rodin, B. (1972). Student evaluations of teachers. Science, 177(4055), 1164–1166.CrossRef

Scribner, B.L., Smith, D. A., Baldwin, R. H., & Phillips, R. L. (1986). Are smart tankers better? AFQT and military productivity. Armed Forces & Society, 12, 193– 206.CrossRef

Simon, D. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002). Models of performance in learning multi-segment movement tasks: Consequences for acquisition, retention and judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 222– 232.

Smith, E. P., & Graham, S. E. (1987). Validation of psychomotor and perceptual predictors for armor officer M-1 gunnery performance (Technical Report 766). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Sciences.Google Scholar

Thorpe, J. (1992). Background and objective. In Orlansky, J. & Thorpe, J. (Eds.), 73 Easting: Lessons learned from Desert Storm via advanced distributed simulation technology (IDA Document D-1110) (pp. I-63–I-79). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 253 991).Google Scholar

Tillson, J. C. F., & Canby, S. L. (1992). Alternative approaches to organizing, training, and assessing Army and Marine Corps units, Part I. The active component (IDA Paper P-2791). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 261 943).

Tillson, J. C. F., Freeman, W. D., Burns, W. R., Michel, J., LeCuyer, J. A., Scales, R. H., & Worley, D. R. (2005). Learning to adapt to asymmetric threats (IDA Document 3114). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (DTIC/NTIS No. ADA 442 427).Google Scholar

Tziner, A., & Eden, D. (1995). Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 85– 93.CrossRef

,U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. (1993). A leader's guide to after-action reviews (Training Circular 25– 20). Fort Leavenworth, KS: Author.Google Scholar

,U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. (1997). The standard Army after-action review system (STAARS): After-action review (AAR) handbook (Version 2.1, 9 May 1997). Fort Leavenworth, National Simulations Center: Author.Google Scholar

Weiss, H. K. (1966). System analysis problems of limited war. In Proceedings of Fifth Annual Reliability and Maintainability Conference. New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar

Wetzel-Smith, S. K., Ellis, J. A., Reynolds, A. M., & Wulfeck, W. H. (1995). The Interactive Multisensor Analysis Training (IMAT) systems: An evaluation of operator and tactician training (NPRDC Technical Report TR-96– 3). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. D., Fernandez, J. C., & Polich, M. (1992). Effect of aptitude on the performance of Army communications operators. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Wulfeck, W. H., & Wetzel-Smith, S. K. (2007). Use of visualization techniques to improve high-stakes problem solving. In Baker, E., Dickieson, J., Wulfeck, W., & O'Neil, H. F. (Eds.), Assessment of problem solving using simulations (pp. 223– 238). Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis-Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar