Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T12:35:36.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Blending Emerging Technologies for Student-Centred Teaching

A Critical Analysis

from Part II - Changes in Teaching Formats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

By
Sameera Mubarak ,
Santoso Wibowo ,
Mubarak Rahamathulla ,
Rongbin Yang  and
Silke Schönert
Edited by
Andreas Kaplan
Andreas Kaplan
Affiliation:
ESCP Business School Berlin
Get access

Summary

Student-centred learning is an emerging terminology questioning the relevance of traditional terminologies such as teacher-centred and institution-centred learning. Teacher-centred and institution-centred learning align more towards teachers and institutions making the students passive recipients of knowledge. These traditional paradigms of teaching have been questioned in recent years and they have been replaced by student-centred learning which focuses on placing the students at the forefront and taking responsibility for their learning. Internet technology has offered tremendous support in the process of students playing a key role in student-centred learning. This chapter presents a summary of emerging technologies that have played a key role in enhancing the quality of student-centred learning in higher education. Five key technology trends such as Learning Management Systems, Virtual Reality, Internet of Things, MOOCs and Social Media are critically analysed to explore their role in the development of a student-centric learning and teaching program. The chapter identifies the strengths and weaknesses of these technologies and how they can be successfully applied to enhance the quality of student-centric learning and teaching program.

Keywords

student-centred teachinge-learningInternet of Thingslearning management systemsMOOCssocial mediavirtual realityhigher education
Type
Chapter
Information
Digital Transformation and Disruption of Higher Education , pp. 102 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Aufi, A. S., Al-Azri, H. M., and Al-Hadi, N. A. (2017). Perceptions of Information Literacy Skills among Undergraduate Students in the Social Media Environment. International Information & Library Review, 49(3), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almrashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M., and Alsmadi, M. (2011). Distance Learning Management System Requirements from Student’s Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 24(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. (2021). To Capture the Research Landscape of Lecture Capture in University Education. Computers & Education, 160, 104032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barman, L., McGrath, C., and Stöhr, C. (2019). Higher Education; For Free, For Everyone, For Real? Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the Responsible University: History and Enacting Rationalities for MOOC Initiatives at Three Swedish Universities. In Sørensen, M., Geschwind, L., Kekäle, J., Pinheiro, R., eds., The Responsible University. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 117–143.Google Scholar
Birzina, R., and Cedere, D. (2020). Students’ Readiness for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Latvia. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 22–23 May 2020, IV, 403–413.Google Scholar
Bonafini, F. C. (2017). The Effects of Participants’ Engagement with Videos and Forums in a MOOC for Teachers’ Professional Development. Open Praxis, 9(4), 433–447.Google Scholar
Buttussi, F., and Chittaro, L. (2017). Effects of Different Types of Virtual Reality Display on Presence and Learning in a Safety Training Scenario. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(2), 1063–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagiltay, N., Cagiltay, K., and Celik, B. (2020). An Analysis of Course Characteristics, Learner Characteristics, and Certification Rates in MITx MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 121–139.Google Scholar
Chang, Y. M., and Lai, C. L. (2020). Exploring the Experiences of Nursing Students in Using Immersive Virtual Reality to Learn Nursing Skills. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, S. K. W., Capio, C. M., van Aalst, J. C. W., and Cheng, E. W. L. (2017). Evaluating the Use of a Social Media Tool for Collaborative Group Writing of Secondary School Students in Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 110, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, J. C., Stamm, K. E., Pfund, R. A., Christidis, P., Hailstorks, R., and Norcross, J. C. (2020). Career Assistance from Psychology Programs and Career Services: Who Is Preparing Psychology Students?. Teaching of Psychology, 0098628320958695.Google Scholar
Cristino de Oliveira, P., Castro de Almeida Cunha, C. J., and Nakayama, M. K. (2016). Learning Management Systems (LMS) and e-Learning Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda, Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 157–180.Google Scholar
Davies, T., Lorne, C., and Sealey-Huggins, L. (2019). Instagram Photography and the Geography Field Course: Snapshots from Berlin. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(3), 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, F., and Cruzvergara, C. Y. (2014). Evolution of Career Services in Higher Education. New Directions for Student Services, 2014(148), 5–18.Google Scholar
Diver, P., and Martinez, I. (2015). MOOCs as a Massive Research Laboratory: Opportunities and Challenges. Distance Education, 36(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, A. (2020). Impact of Digital Social Media on Indian Higher Education: Alternative Approaches of Online Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(5), 604–611.Google Scholar
Ebner, M., Schön, S., and Braun, C. (2020). More Than a MOOC – Seven Learning and Teaching Scenarios to Use MOOCs in Higher Education and Beyond. In Yu, S., Ally, M. and Tsinakos, A., eds., Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum. Bridging Human and Machine: Future Education with Intelligence Singapore: Springer, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, E. (2013). MOOCs Taken by Educated Few. Nature, 503, 342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, H., and Lin, X. (2019). Chinese Parental Involvement and Class-Based Inequality in Education: The Role of Social Networking Sites. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L., Becker, A. S., Estrada, V., and Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2015/2/hr2015-pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. M. (2021). Higher Education at the Crossroads of Disruption: The University of the 21st Century. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. M., and Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher Education and the Digital Revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, Social Media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2019). MOOCs in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. The 5th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2019).Google Scholar
Liaw, S. Y., Wu, L. T., Soh, L. H., Ringsted, C., Lau, T. C., and Lim, W. S. (2020). Virtual Reality Simulation in Interprofessional Round Training for Health Care Students: A Qualitative Evaluation Study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 45, 42–46.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster, 2020. Definition of Social Media. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social%20media.Google Scholar
Mihelj, M., Novak, D., and Begus, S. (2014). Interaction with a Virtual Environment. Virtual Reality Technology and Applications. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 68. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Mtebe, J. S. (2015). Learning Management System Success: Increasing Learning Management System Usage in Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 11(2), 51–64.Google Scholar
Mulder, F., and Jansen, D. (2015). MOOCs for Opening up Education and the OpenupEd Initiative. In Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., and Reynolds, T. H., eds., MOOCs and Open Education around the World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., and Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality Applications for Higher Education: Design Elements, Lessons Learned, and Research Agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.Google Scholar
Şad, S. L. N., and Ebner, M. (2017). Digital Tools for Seamless Learning, Information Science Reference. Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tella, A. (2012). System-Related Factors That Predict Students’ Satisfaction with the Blackboard Learning Systems at the University of Botswana, African Journal of Library. Archives and Information Sciences, 22(1), 41.Google Scholar
University of Glasgow, 2020. Digital education. www.gla.ac.uk/colleges/mvls/digitaleducation/secondlife/.Google Scholar
Virtual Reality Society, 2020. Education and Second Life. www.vrs.org.uk/virtual-reality-education/second-life.html; www.vrs.org.uk/Google Scholar
Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., Chugh, R., and Sawir, E. (2016). A Pilot Study of an Electronic Exam System at an Australian University. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(1), 5–33.Google Scholar
Zuerner, H. (2014). The Internet of Things as Greenfield model: A Categorization Attempt for Labelling Smart Devices. IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 5–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×