Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T13:19:26.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Drawing as a ‘window’ on deteriorating conceptual knowledge in neurodegenerative disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Karalyn Patterson
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge
Sharon W. Erzinçlioǧlu
Affiliation:
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge
Chris Lange-Küttner
Affiliation:
London Metropolitan University
Annie Vinter
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, France
Get access

Summary

Patterson and Erzinçlioǧlu discuss drawing as one technique for investigating the nature of semantic memory and its disorders. Semantic dementia (SD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by gradual degradation of central conceptual knowledge. Given that patients with SD have (a) well-preserved perceptual and motor skills (which means that they can easily copy drawings with the model present) and (b) reasonable preservation of at least some aspects of short-term and episodic memory, the technique of delayed copy drawing can be employed. A line drawing of a familiar object is presented for the patient to study; it is then removed and the patient does something else for 10 or 15 seconds, and is finally asked to draw what she or he was looking at. Because literal visual memory is fragile even in the normal cognitive system, the delayed-copy task evokes and relies on a combination of short-term visual memory and long-term conceptual knowledge. Thus normal individuals, in delayed copy drawing of a rhinoceros, draw it with horns and ‘armoured’ skin not only because they remember seeing these specific features but also because their conceptual knowledge of rhinos demands these features in the reproduction. The degraded knowledge in SD patients means that they cannot recognize this thing as a rhinoceros; they only know it is some sort of animal. The impoverished drawings that they produce a mere 10 seconds after studying the targets provide an informative window on the quality of their conceptual knowledge.

Type
Chapter
Information
Drawing and the Non-Verbal Mind
A Life-Span Perspective
, pp. 281 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bozeat, S., Ralph, Lambon M. A., Graham, K. S., Patterson, K., Wilkin, H., Rowland, J., Rogers, T. T. and Hodges, J. R. (2003). A duck with four legs: investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S., Van Sommers, P. and Howard, D. (1992). Drawing without meaning? Dissociations in the graphic performance of an agnostic artist. In Campbell, R. (ed.), Mental lives: case studies in cognition (pp. 178–98). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Graham, N. and Patterson, K. (1995). Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organization of semantic memory. Memory, 3, 463–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S. and Funnell, E. (1992). Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 115, 1783–1806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K. and Tyler, L. K. (1994). Loss of semantic memory: implications for the modularity of mind. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 505–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. and Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palmtrees: a test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Jefferies, E., Jones, R. W., Bateman, D. and Ralph, Lambon M. A. (2005). A semantic contribution to nonword recall? Evidence for intact phonological processes in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 183–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: evidence from children's drawing. Cognition, 34, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralph, Lambon M. A., Graham, K. S., Patterson, K. and Hodges, J. R. (1999). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia. Brain and Language, 70, 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, Lambon M. A. and Howard, D. (2000). Gogi aphasia or semantic dementia? Simulating and assessing poor verbal comprehension in a case of progressive fluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 437–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neary, D., Snowden, J. S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., Freedman, M., Kertesz, A., Robert, P. H., Albert, M., Boone, K., Miller, B. L., Cummings, J. and Benson, D. F. (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51, 1546–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestor, P. J., Fryer, T. D. and Hodges, J. R. (2006). Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. NeuroImage, 30, 1010–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, K., Ralph, Lambon M. A., Jefferies, E., Woollams, A., Jones, R., Hodges, J. R. and Rogers, T. T. (2006). ‘Pre-semantic’ cognition in semantic dementia: six deficits in search of an explanation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique [The psychological assessment of a case of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286–340.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T., Ralph, Lambon M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R. and Patterson, K. (2004a). The structure and deteriorationof semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, T. T., Ralph, Lambon M. A., Hodges, J. R. and Patterson, K. (2004b). Natural selection: the impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servos, P., Goodale, M. A. and Humphrey, G. K. (1993). The drawing of objects by a visual form agnostic: contribution of surface properties and memorial representations. Neuropsychologia, 31, 251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×