Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Contemporary enquiries into a long-standing domain: Drawing research
- Part I Self, symbols and intention
- Part 2 Syntax, space systems and projection
- Part III Aging, blindness and autism
- 13 Benefits of graphic design expertise in old age: compensatory effects of a graphical lexicon?
- 14 Drawing as a ‘window’ on deteriorating conceptual knowledge in neurodegenerative disease
- 15 Drawings by a blind adult: orthogonals, parallels and convergence in two directions without T-junctions
- 16 Differences between individuals with and without autism in copying tasks: how knowledge interferes when drawing perspective
- Index
- References
14 - Drawing as a ‘window’ on deteriorating conceptual knowledge in neurodegenerative disease
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Contemporary enquiries into a long-standing domain: Drawing research
- Part I Self, symbols and intention
- Part 2 Syntax, space systems and projection
- Part III Aging, blindness and autism
- 13 Benefits of graphic design expertise in old age: compensatory effects of a graphical lexicon?
- 14 Drawing as a ‘window’ on deteriorating conceptual knowledge in neurodegenerative disease
- 15 Drawings by a blind adult: orthogonals, parallels and convergence in two directions without T-junctions
- 16 Differences between individuals with and without autism in copying tasks: how knowledge interferes when drawing perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
Patterson and Erzinçlioǧlu discuss drawing as one technique for investigating the nature of semantic memory and its disorders. Semantic dementia (SD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by gradual degradation of central conceptual knowledge. Given that patients with SD have (a) well-preserved perceptual and motor skills (which means that they can easily copy drawings with the model present) and (b) reasonable preservation of at least some aspects of short-term and episodic memory, the technique of delayed copy drawing can be employed. A line drawing of a familiar object is presented for the patient to study; it is then removed and the patient does something else for 10 or 15 seconds, and is finally asked to draw what she or he was looking at. Because literal visual memory is fragile even in the normal cognitive system, the delayed-copy task evokes and relies on a combination of short-term visual memory and long-term conceptual knowledge. Thus normal individuals, in delayed copy drawing of a rhinoceros, draw it with horns and ‘armoured’ skin not only because they remember seeing these specific features but also because their conceptual knowledge of rhinos demands these features in the reproduction. The degraded knowledge in SD patients means that they cannot recognize this thing as a rhinoceros; they only know it is some sort of animal. The impoverished drawings that they produce a mere 10 seconds after studying the targets provide an informative window on the quality of their conceptual knowledge.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Drawing and the Non-Verbal MindA Life-Span Perspective, pp. 281 - 304Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, , , , , , and (2003). A duck with four legs: investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S., Van Sommers, P. and Howard, D. (1992). Drawing without meaning? Dissociations in the graphic performance of an agnostic artist. In (ed.), Mental lives: case studies in cognition (pp. 178–98). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
, and (1995). Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organization of semantic memory. Memory, 3, 463–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1992). Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 115, 1783–1806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (1994). Loss of semantic memory: implications for the modularity of mind. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 505–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1992). Pyramids and palmtrees: a test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
, , and (2005). A semantic contribution to nonword recall? Evidence for intact phonological processes in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 183–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990). Constraints on representational change: evidence from children's drawing. Cognition, 34, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1999). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia. Brain and Language, 70, 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Gogi aphasia or semantic dementia? Simulating and assessing poor verbal comprehension in a case of progressive fluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 437–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , , , , , , , , and (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51, 1546–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2006). Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. NeuroImage, 30, 1010–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , , , and (2006). ‘Pre-semantic’ cognition in semantic dementia: six deficits in search of an explanation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique [The psychological assessment of a case of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286–340.Google Scholar
, , , , , and (2004a). The structure and deteriorationof semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004b). Natural selection: the impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 331–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1993). The drawing of objects by a visual form agnostic: contribution of surface properties and memorial representations. Neuropsychologia, 31, 251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 10
- Cited by