Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:48:01.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Public Managers and Professionals in Collaborative Innovation

from Part II - Changing Roles of Public and Private Actors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

By
Victor Bekkers  and
Mirko Noordegraaf
Edited by
Jacob Torfing  and
Peter Triantafillou
Jacob Torfing
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Peter Triantafillou
Affiliation:
Roskilde Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance , pp. 139 - 159
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argyris, C. and Schön, D. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bekkers, V. 2004. ‘Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates’, Information Polity 9(3/4): 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, V. and Moody, R. 2014. Visual Culture and Public Policy. Towards a Visual Polity? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J. and Steijn, B. (eds.) 2011. Innovation in the Public Sector. Linking Capacity and Leadership. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 1987. All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brock, D., Powell, M. J. and Hinings, C. R. (eds.). 1999. Restructuring the Professional Organization: Accounting, Health Care and Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucher, R. and Strauss, A. L. 1961. ‘Professions in process’, American Journal of Sociology 66: 325–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. 1972. ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, M., Kirkpatrick, I. and Neogy, I. 2012. ‘Medical leadership and management reforms in hospitals’, in Teelken, C., Ferlie, E. and Dent, M. (eds.), Leadership in the Public Sector: Promises and Pitfalls. London: Routledge, pp. 105–25.Google Scholar
Exworthy, M. and Halford, S. (eds.). 1999. Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, C. and Morris, J. 2003. ‘The neo-bureaucratic state: Professionals, managers and professional managers in schools, general practices and social work’, Organization 10(1): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (eds.). 2007. Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, I. and Noordegraaf, M. 2014. ‘Organizations and occupations: Towards hybrid professionalism in professional service firms?’, in Empson, L., Broschak, L., J. and Muzio, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
Kurunmäki, L. 2004. ‘A hybrid profession – The acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professionals’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(3): 327–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurunmäki, L. and Miller, P. 2006. ‘Modernising government: The calculating self, hybridisation and performance measurement’, Financial Accountability & Management 22(1): 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1978. ‘Patterns in strategy formation’, Management Science 24(9): 934–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. 1995. Creating Public Value – Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2007. ‘From pure to hybrid professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains’, Administration & Society 39(6):761–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2011. ‘Risky business: How professionals and professionals fields (must) deal with organizational issues’, Organization Studies 32(10): 1349–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2015a. Public Management, Performance, Professionalism and Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2015b. ‘Hybridity and beyond: (New) forms of professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts’, Journal of Professions and Organizations 2(2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noordegraaf, M. 2015c. ‘Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services’, Administration & Society Forthcoming (Available online since November 2013).Google Scholar
Orton, J. D. and Weick, K. E. 1990. ‘Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization’, Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P. 2011. ‘Talking about government: The role of magic concepts’, Public Management Review 13(5): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reay, T. and Hinings, C. R. 2009. ‘Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics’, Organization Studies 30(6): 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelcher, C. and Smith, S. R. 2015. ‘Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits’, Public Administration 93(2): 433–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steen, M. et al. 2013. Early Signals Timely Strategy. The Early Warning System at the Dutch Rijkswaterstaat. The Hague: NSOB.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. 1976. ‘Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems’, Administrative Science Quarterly 21(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×