Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
8 - Lay Expertise
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 February 2019
Book contents
- Environmental Expertise
- Reviews
- Environmental Expertise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 What Is Science? (And Why Does This Matter?)
- 3 Frames: Beyond Facts Versus Values
- Case A Framing Climate Change
- 4 Science, Politics, and the Public in Knowledge Controversies
- Case B What Does ‘Climategate’ Tell Us About Public Knowledge Controversies
- Case C Whose Deficit Anyway? Institutional Misunderstanding of Fracking-Sceptical Publics
- 5 The Limits to Knowledge
- Case D Angry Bulbs
- 6 Usable Knowledge
- Case E Expertise for European Fisheries Policy
- 7 Interdisciplinarity and the Challenge of Knowledge Integration
- Case F Knowledge Integration in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
- Case G Integrated Assessment for Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution
- 8 Lay Expertise
- Case H Lay Expertise and Botanical Science
- Case I The Loweswater Care Project
- 9 Environmental Experts at the Science–Policy–Society Interface
- Case J Groupthink and Whistle Blowers in CO2 Capture and Storage
- 10 Environmental Knowledge in Democracy
- 11 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental ExpertiseConnecting Science, Policy and Society, pp. 184 - 199Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Acheson, J. M. (2006). Institutional Failure in Resource Management. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35(1), 117–134.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. S. (1993). Testing the ‘Ecologically Noble Savage’ Hypothesis: Interspecific Prey Choice by Piro Hunters of Amazonian Peru. Human Ecology, 21(4), 355–387.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., et al. (2009). Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science, Knowledge, and Scientific Literacy. Bioscience, 59, 977–984.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2014). Chipko Legacies: Sustaining an Ecological Ethic in the Context of Agrarian Change. Asian Studies Review, 38(4), 639–657.Google Scholar
Bruyninckx, J. (2015). Trading Twitter: Amateur Recorders and Economies of Scientific Exchange at the Cornell Library of Natural Sounds. Social Studies of Science, 45(3), 344–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryan, J. (2011). Walking the Line: Participatory Mapping, Indigenous Rights, and Neoliberalism. Geoforum, 42, 40–50.Google Scholar
Chilvers, J., and Kearnes, M., eds. (2015). Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H., and Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Downie, B. (2015). Conservation Influences on Livelihood Decision-making: A Case Study from Saadani National Park, Tanzania. Unpublished dissertation, Department of Geography University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Edgerton, R. B. (1992). Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ellingson, T. (2001). The Myth of the Noble Savage. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., and Waterton, C. (2004). Environmental Citizenship in the Making: The Participation of Volunteer Naturalists in UK Biological Recording and Biodiversity Policy. Science and Public Policy, 31(2), 95–105.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Gimenez, M., Huntington, H., and Frost, K. (2006). Integration or Co-optation? Traditional Knowledge and Science in the Alaska Beluga Whale Committee. Environmental Conservation, 33(4), 306–315.Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S., and Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation. Ambio, 22(2/3), 151–156.Google Scholar
Gadgil, M., Seshagiri Rao, P. R., Utkarsh, G., Pramod, P., and Chhatre, A. (2000). New Meanings for Old Knowledge: The People’s Biodiversity Registers Program. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1307–1317.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S. (2006). The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s New Social Contract with Society. Nature, 402, c81–c84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Goldman, M. (2007). Tracking Wildebeest, Locating Knowledge: Maasai and Conservation Biology Understandings of Wildebeest Behavior in Northern Tanzania. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(2), 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halffman, W. (2005). Science–Policy Boundaries: National Styles? Science and Public Policy, 32(6), 457–467.Google Scholar
Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In Sui, D., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M., eds. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (pp. 105–122). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, P. M., Davies, J., and Baena, P. M. (2014). The Governance of Rangelands: Collective Action for Sustainable Pastoralism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science, a Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature, Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Haberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., and Welti, M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag.Google Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. (2010). Impeding Dispossession, Enabling Repossession: Biological Open Source and the Recovery of Seed Sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(3), 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, S. N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. J., Ward, N., and Bradley, S. (2011). Doing Flood Risk Science Differently: An Experiment in Radical Scientific Method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2010). Taking Stock of Nature: Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy Planning and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A., and Turnhout, E. (2010). Personal Meaning in the Public Sphere: The Standardisation and Rationalisation of Biodiversity Data in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(4), 353–360.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (2002). Loving Nature: Towards an Ecology of Emotion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, K. (2009). Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1945–1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadasdy, P. (1999). The Politics of TEK: Power and the ‘Integration’ of Knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36, 1–18.Google Scholar
Nadasdy, P. (2003). Reevaluating the Co-Management Success Story. Arctic, 56(4), 367–380.Google Scholar
Nandy, A., ed. (1988). Science, Hegemony and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity. United Nations University.Google Scholar
Neves-Graca, K. (2004). Revisiting the Tragedy of the Commons: Ecological Dilemmas of Whale Watching in the Azores. Human Organization, 63(3), 289–300.Google Scholar
Neves-Graca, K. (2006). Politics of Environmentalism and Ecological Knowledge at the Intersection of Local and Global Processes. Journal of Ecological Anthropology, 10, 19–32.Google Scholar
Neves, K. (2010). Cashing in on Cetourism: A Critical Ecological Engagement with Dominant E-NGO Discourses on Whaling, Cetacean Conservation, and Whale Watching. Antipode, 42(3), 719–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottinger, G. (2010). Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology & Human Values 2010, 35, 244–270.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellizzoni, L., 2001. The Myth of the Best Argument: Power, Deliberation and Reason. British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 59–86.Google Scholar
Ponting, J., and O’Brien, D. (2014). Liberalizing Nirvana: An Analysis of the Consequences of Common Pool Resource Deregulation for the Sustainability of Fiji’s Surf Tourism Industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22(3), 384–402.Google Scholar
Raffles, H. (2002). Intimate Knowledge. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 325–335.Google Scholar
Rangan, H., ed. (1996). From Chipko to Uttaranchal. In Peet, R. and Watts, M., eds., Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development and Social Movement. London: Routledge, 205–226.Google Scholar
Redford, K. H. (1991). The Ecologically Noble Savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 15(1), 46.Google Scholar
Ruttan, L. M. (1998). Closing the Commons: Cooperation for Gain or Restraint? Human Ecology, 26(1), 43–66.Google Scholar
Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C., et al. (2012). Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29.Google Scholar
Shiva, V., and Bandyopadhyay, J. (1986). The Evolution, Structure, and Impact of the Chipko Movement. Mountain Research and Development, 6(2), 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, V. (1993). Monocultures of the Mind: Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. (1997). Biopiracy the Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Cambridge: South End PressGoogle Scholar
Star, L. S., and Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2006). Analysis, Participation and Power: Justification and Closure in Participatory Multi-Criteria Analysis. Land Use Policy, 23, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, A. (2008). ‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33, 262–294.Google Scholar
Toogood, M. (2013). Engaging Publics: Biodiversity Data Collection and the Geographies of Citizen Science. Geography Compass, 7(9), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsouvalis, J., and Waterton, C. (2012). Building ‘Participation’ Upon Critique: The Loweswater Care Project, Cumbria, UK. Environmental Modelling & Software, 36, 111–121.Google Scholar
Turnbull, D. (1997). Reframing Science and Other Local Knowledge Traditions. Futures, 29, 551–562.Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Lawrence, A., and Turnhout, S. (2016). Citizen Science Networks in Natural History and the Collective Validation of Biodiversity Data. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 532–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., and Leeuwis, C. (2013). New Roles of Science in Society: Different Repertoires of Knowledge Brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2002). Potatoes and Knowledge. In Hobart, M., ed., An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (pp. 209–224). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wall, D. (2014). The Commons in History: Culture, Conflict, and Ecology. Harvard: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whatmore, S. J., and Landström, C. (2011). Flood Apprentices: An Exercise in Making Things Public. Economy and Society, 40(4), 582–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B., and Wynne, B., eds., Risk, Environment and Modernity, Towards a New Ecology (pp. 44–83). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Yang, L. (2015). Local Knowledge, Science, and Instituational Change: The Case of Desertification Control in Northern China. Environmental Management, 55(3), 616–633.Google Scholar