Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T12:07:52.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 21 - Fetal growth disorders

from Section 6 - Fetal growth and wellbeing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

By
Ai-Wei Tang  and
Umber Agarwal
Edited by
Bidyut Kumar  and
Zarko Alfirevic
Bidyut Kumar
Affiliation:
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Zarko Alfirevic
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Medicine , pp. 269 - 285
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kovo, M, Schreiber, L, Ben-Haroush, A, et al. The placental factor in early- and late-onset normotensive fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2013; 34(4): 320–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The investigation and management of the SGA fetus. RCOG Green-Top Guidelines No. 31. London: RCOG Press, February 2013.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Chang, A, Kalyan, B, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992; 339(8788): 283–7.Google Scholar
Persson, B, Stangenberg, M, Lunell, NO, et al. Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93(3): 206–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardosi, J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97(5): F314–7.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma, EO, Altman, DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014; 384(9946): 869–79.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A, Wilson, RD, Audibert, F, et al. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Genetics Committee. Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30(10): 918–49.Google Scholar
Goetzinger, KR, Cahill, AG, Macones, GA, et al. Echogenic bowel on second-trimester ultrasonography: evaluating the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(6): 1341–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, SP, Cole, J, Sanderson, M, et al. Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%. J Matern Fet Neonatal Med 2006; 19(9): 557–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Burd, I, Srinivas, S, Paré, E, et al. Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection? J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28(8): 1019–24.Google Scholar
Nabhan, AF, Abdelmoula, YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3): CD006593.Google ScholarPubMed
Cnossen, JS, Morris, RK, ter Riet, G, et al. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178(6): 701–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Gyte, GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 11: CD007529.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21(2): 124–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, et al. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22(3): 240–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GML, et al. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD007863.Google Scholar
Serra, V, Moulden, M, Bellver, J, et al. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG 2008; 115(9): 1101–7.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Lacasse, Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116(2): 402–14.Google Scholar
Boers, KE, Vijgen, SM, Bijlenga, D, et al. DIGITAT Study Group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010; 341: c7087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severi, FM, Bocchi, C, Visentin, A, et al. Uterine and fetal cerebral Doppler predict the outcome of third-trimester small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 19(3): 225–8.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Antenatal corticosteroids to prevent respiratory distress syndrome. RCOG Green-Top Guidelines No. 7. London: RCOG, Press, October 2010.Google Scholar
Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32(2): 160–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short-term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003; 110(1): 27–32.Google Scholar
Walker, DM, Marlow, N, Upstone, L, et al. The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204(1): 34. e1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, et al. TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42(4): 400–8.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, Middleton, PF, Bain, E, et al; WISH Project Team. Working to improve survival and health for babies born very preterm: the WISH project protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 239.Google Scholar
Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Kiserud, T. Fetal hemodynamic development in macrosomic growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(3): 303–8.Google Scholar
Irion, O, Boulvain, M. Induction of labor for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 2: CD000938.Google Scholar
Mulik, V, Usha Kiran, TS, Bethal, J, et al. The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 80(1): 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. The IUGR Newborn. Seminars in Perinatology 2008; 32(3): 219–24.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37(5): 501–14.Google Scholar
Barker, DJ. Fetal and infant origins of disease. Eur J Epidemiol 1995: 25: 457–63.Google Scholar
Crispi, F, Figueras, F, Cruz-Lemini, M, et al. Cardiovascular programming in children born small for gestational age and relationship with prenatal signs of severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207(2): 121.e1–9Google Scholar
Boney, CM, Verma, A, Tucker, R, et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005; 115(3): e290–6.Google Scholar
Ganzervoort, W, Alfirevic, Z, von Dadelszen, P, et al. STRIDER: Sildenafil Therapy In Dismal prognosis Early-onset intrauterine growth Restriction–a protocol for a systematic review with individual participant data and aggregate data meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 23.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×