Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T22:01:39.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Parsimonious spatial representation of tropical soils within dynamic rainfall—runoff models

from Part IV - New methods for evaluating effects of land-use change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

N. A. Chappell
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Environmental Systems and Statistics, IENS, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK
K. Bidin
Affiliation:
School of Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88999, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
M. D. Sherlock
Affiliation:
Lancaster University, UK
J. W. Lancaster
Affiliation:
Arup Water, UK
M. Bonell
Affiliation:
UNESCO, Paris
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Models are used increasingly to simulate hydrological processes within tropical regions. There is now a wealth of publications addressing evaporation modelling (particularly wet-canopy evaporation) of local areas of tropical forest in, for example, Niger (Gash et al., 1997), Guyana (Jetten, 1996), Puerto Rico (Schellekens et al., 1999), Columbia (Marin et al., 2000) and Indonesia (Asdak et al., 1999; van Dijk and Bruijnzeel, 2001). Elsewhere in this volume, Roberts et al. provide an overview of evaporation processes and modelling. Other modelling studies have addressed the impact of such tropical evaporation on regional climates and global circulation (e.g. Polcher and Laval, 1994; Zeng, 1999; Zeng and Neelin, 1999; Zheng et al., 2001). New studies using time-series models are highlighting the effects of cycles in the rainfall, such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) on tropical evaporation, riverflow and water quality (e.g. Zeng, 1999; Chappell et al., 2001; Krishnaswamy et al., 2001; Whitaker et al., 2001; Chappell, Tych et al., this volume). Similarly, models that simulate the generation of riverflow from the rainfall received by a tropical catchment are also beginning to be applied more frequently. These models include:

  1. Metric-conceptual models of waterflow, based upon transfer functions. For example, application of the DBM modelling approach to a nested catchment system in Malaysian Borneo (Chappell et al., 1999a) and the application of IHACRES to a large Thai basin (Scoccimarro et al., 1999).

  2. Conceptual models of waterflow based upon stores and pre-determined empirical relationships. For example, application of the Nash model to Kenyan catchments (Onyando and Sharma, 1995), the Modhydrolog model to a tropical catchment (Chiew et al., 1996), the Reservoir-Water-Balance-Simulation model to Namibian catchments (Hughes and Metzler, 1998), and the HBV-96 model (discussed in Barnes and Bonell, this volume) to catchments in Zimbabwe, Tanzania and Bolivia (Liden and Harlin, 2000).

  3. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics
Past, Present and Future Hydrological Research for Integrated Land and Water Management
, pp. 756 - 769
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambroise, B., Beven, K., and Freer, J. (1996). Toward a generalization of the TOPMODEL concepts – topographic indexes of hydrological similarity. Water Resources Research, 32, 2135–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asdak, C., Jarvis, P. G. and Gardingen, P. V. (1998). Modelling rainfall interception in unlogged and logged forest areas of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2: 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barling, R. D., Moore, I. D. and Grayson, R. B. (1994). A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial-distribution and soil-water content. Water Resources Research, 30, 1029–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, C. J. and Bonell, M. (1996). Application of unit hydrograph techniques to solute transport in catchments. Hydrological Processes, 10: 793–8023.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. (1982). On subsurface stormflow – an analysis of response times. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 27, 505–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. (1997). TOPMODEL: A critique. Hydrological Processes, 11, 1069–10853.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. J. (2001a) Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer. Chichester: Wiley
Beven, K. J. (2001b) How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling?. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 5: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. J. and Freer, J. (2001). A dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrological Processes, 15: 1993–2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, K. J., and Kirkby, M. J. (1979). A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull., 24, 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidin, K, 1995. Subsurface flow controls of runoff in a Bornean natural rainforest. Unpublished MSc. thesis, Manchester: University of Manchester
Blain, C. A. and Milly, P. C. D. (1991). Development and application of a hillslope hydrologic model. Advances in Water Resources, 14: 168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonell, M. (1998). Selected challenges in runoff generation research in forests from the hillslope to headwater drainage basin scale. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34: 765–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonell, M., Gilmour, D. A., and Cassells, D. S. (1983). A preliminary survey of the hydraulic properties of rainforest soils in tropical north-east Queensland and the implications for the runoff processes. In Rainfall simulation, runoff, and soil erosion, Catena Suppl. 4, ed. J. De Ploey. pp. 3–24. Cremlingen-Destedt: Catena Verlag
Bonell, M with Balek, J. (1993). Recent scientific developments and research needs in hydrological processes of the humid tropics. In Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics, eds. M. Bonell, M. M. Hufschmidt, and J. S. Gladwell, pp. 167–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Brassington, J. and Richards, K. (1998). Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL. Computers and Geosciences, 24, 299–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, E. M., Batjes, N. H. and Nachtergate, F. O. (1998) World reference base for soil resources: Atlas. Leuven: Acco
Buckingham, E. (1907). Studies on the movement of soil moisture. Publication 38. USDA Bureu of Soils
Bunting, B. T. (1961). The role of seepage moisture in soil formation, slope development, and stream initiation. American Journal of Soil Science, 259, 503–518Google Scholar
Burt, T. P. and Butcher, D. P. (1985). Patterns of soil-moisture and throughflow in relation to defined tropographic indexes – some preliminary results. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 140: 322Google Scholar
Cardwell, W. T. and Parsons, R. L. (1945) Averaging permeability of heterogeneous oil sands. Transactions of the American Institute for Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 160: 34–42Google Scholar
Chappell, N. A. and Binley, A. M. (1992). The impact of rainforest disturbance upon near-surface groundwater flow: modelling of hillslope flow experiments. Annales Geophysicae, 10 (II): c330Google Scholar
Chappell, N. A. and Ternan, J. L. (1992). Flow-path dimensionality and hydrologic modelling, Hydrological Processes, 6: 327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A., and Franks, S. W. (1996). Property distributions and flow structure in the Slapton Wood Catchment. Field Studies, 8: 559–5758Google Scholar
Chappell, N. and Ternan, L. (1997). Ring permeametry: design, operation and error analysis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22: 1197–12053.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A., Franks, S. W. and Larenus, J. (1998). Multi-scale permeability estimation for a tropical catchment. Hydrological Processes, 12: 1507–15233.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A., McKenna, P., Bidin, K., Douglas, I. and Walsh, R. P. D. (1999a). Parsimonious modelling of water and suspended-sediment flux from nested-catchments affected by selective tropical forestry. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 354: 1831–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A., Ternan, J. L. and Bidin, K. (1999b). Correlation of physicochemical properties and sub-erosional landforms with aggregate stability variations in a tropical Ultisol disturbed by forestry operations. Soil and Tillage Research, 50: 55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A., Bidin, K. and Tych, W. (2001). Modelling rainfall and canopy controls on net-precipitation beneath selectively-logged tropical forest. Plant Ecology, 153: 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, N. A. Yusop, Z., Nik, A. R. H., Tych, W. and Kasran, B. (this volume). Spatially-significant effects of selective tropical forestry on water, nutrient and sediment flows: a modelling-supported review
Chiew, F. H. S., Pitman, A. J. and McMahon, T. A. (1996). Conceptual catchment scale rainfall-runoff models and AGCM land-surface parameterisation schemes, Journal of Hydrology, 179: 137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, R. D., Silburn, D. M. and Ciesiolka, C. A. A. (1997). Distributed parameter hydrology model (ANSWERS) applied to a range of catchment scales using rainfall simulator data. 3. Application to a spatially complex catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 193: 183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, H. (1856). Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon. Paris: Victor Dalmont
Duan, J. F. and Miller, N. L. (1997). A generalised power function for the subsurface transmissivity profile in TOPMODEL. Water Resources Research, 33: 2559–2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsenbeer, H., and Cassel, D. K. (1993). Surficial processes in the rain-forest of western Amazonia. In Research needs and applications to reduce erosion and sedimentation in tropical steeplands, IAHS Publication 192, eds. R. R. Ziemer, C. L. O'Loughlin, and L. S. Hamilton, pp 289–297. Paris: IAHS
Elsenbeer, H., Lorieri, D. and Bonell, M. (1995). Mixing model approaches to estimate storm flow sources in an overland flow-dominated tropical rain-forest catchment, Water Resources Research, 31: 2267–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, E. A. (1971). Pedology: A Systematic Approach to Soil Science. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd
Franchini, M.Wendling, J., Obled, C. and Todini, E. (1996). Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL. Journal of Hydrology, 175: 293–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franchini, M. and Pacciani, M. (1991). Comparative analysis of several conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Journal of Hydrology, 122: 161–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., Chappell, N. A. and Gineste, P. (1997). The utility of multi-objective conditioning of a distributed hydrological model using uncertain estimates of saturated areas. In Proceedings of the international congress on modelling and simulation: MODSIM ‘97: volume 1, eds. A. D. McDonald and M. McAleer, pp 335–340. Canberra: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia
Freedman, V. L., Lopes, V. L., and Hernandez, M. (1998). Parameter identifiability for catchment-scale erosion modelling: a comparison of optimization algorithms. Journal of Hydrology, 207: 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer, J., McDonnell, J., Beven, K. J., Brammer, D., Burns, D., Hooper, R. P. and Kendal, C. (1997). Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchments. Hydrological Processes, 11: 1347–13523.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeze, R. A. (1980). A stochastic-conceptual analysis of rainfall-runoff processes on a hillslope. Water Resources Research, 16: 391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gash, J. H. C., Kabat, P., Monteny, B. A., Amadou, M., Bessemoulin, P., Billing, H., Blyth, E. M., deBruin, H. A. R., Elbers, J. A., Friborg, T., Harrison, G., Holwill, C. J., Lloyd, C. R., Lhomme, J. P., Moncrieff, J. B., Puech, D., Soegaard, H., Taupin, J. D., Tuzet, A. and Verhoef, A. (1997). The variability of evaporation during the HAPEX-Sahel intensive observation period. Journal of Hydrology, 189: 385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M. K. (1940). The theory of groundwater flow. Journal of Geology, 48: 785–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughs, D. A. and Metzler, W. (1998). Assessment of three monthly rainfall-runoff models for estimating the water resource yield of semi-arid catchments in Namibia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 43: 283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iorgulescu, I. and Musy, A. (1997). Generalisation of TOPMODEL for a power law transmissivity profile. Hydrological Processes, 11: 1353–13553.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakeman, A. J. and Hornberger, G. M. (1993). How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?Water Resources Research, 29: 2637–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetten, V. G. (1996). Interception of tropical rainforest: Performance of a canopy water balance model. Hydrological Processes, 10: 671–6853.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. A. A. (1990). Piping effects in humid lands. In Groundwater Geomorphology, Geological Society of America Special Paper 252, eds. Higgins, C. G., and Coates, D. R., pp. 111–138, Boulder: Geological Society of AmericaCrossRef
Jordan, J.-P. (1994). Spatial and temporal variability of stormflow generation processes on a Swiss catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 153: 357–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkby, M. J. (1975). Hydrograph modelling strategies. In Processes in Physical and Human Geography. eds. Peel, R. Chisholm, R. and Haggett, P., pp. 69–90, Oxford: Heinemann
Kokkonen, T. S. and Jakeman, A. J. (2001). A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications. Water Resources Research, 37: 2345–2352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnaswamy, J., Halpin, P. N. and Richter, D. D. (2001). Dynamics of sediment discharge in relation to land-use and hydro-climatology in a humid tropical watershed in Costa Rica. Journal of Hydrology, 253: 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R. and Beven, K J. (1997). Using interactive recession curve analysis to specify a general catchment storage model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 1: 101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R., Beven, K. J. and MyrabØ, S. (1997) A generalised topographic-soils hydrological index. In Landform Monitoring, Modelling and Analysis, eds. Lane, S. N., Richards, K. S. and Chandler, J. H. Chichester: Wiley
Lancaster, J. (2000). Multi-scale estimation of effective permeability within the Greenholes Beck catchment. Unpublished PhD thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University
Liden, R. and Harlin, J. (2000). Analysis of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling performance in different climates. Journal of Hydrology, 238: 231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loague, K. M. and Freeze, R. A. (1985). Comparison of rainfall-runoff modelling techniques on small upland catchments. Water Resources Research, 21, 229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmer, A. (1993). Dynamics of hydrology and nutrient losses as response to establishment of forest plantation. A case study of a rainforest in Sabah, Malaysia. Unpublished PhD thesis. Upsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Marin, C. T., Bouten, W. and Sevink, J. (2000). Gross rainfall and its partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and evaporation of intercepted water in four forest ecosystems in western Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology, 237: 40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaud, M. J. and Sorooshian, S. (1994). Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized semiarid watershed. Water Resources Research, 30: 593–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R. D. and Thompson, J. C. (1996) Are water table variations in a shallow forest soil consistent with the TOPMODEL concept?Water Resources Research, 32: 663–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mroczkowski, M., Raper, G. P. and Kuczera, G. (1997). The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models. Water Resources Research, 33: 2325–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molicova, H, Grimaldi, M, Bonell, M, and Hubert, P. (1997). Using TOPMODEL towards identifying and modelling the hydrological patterns within a headwater, humid, tropical catchment. Hydrological Processes, 11: 1169–11963.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, 1: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10: 282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcliff, S. and Thornes, J. (1981). Seasonal variations in the hydrology of a small forested catchment near Manaus, Amazonia, and the implications for its management. In Tropical Agricultural Hydrology, eds, R. Lal and E. W. Russell, Chichester: Wiley
O'Loughlin, E. M. (1981). Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties. Journal of Hydrology, 53: 229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Loughlin, E. M. (1986). Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resources Reearch, 22: 794–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Loughlin, E. M. (1990). Perspectives on hillslope research. In Process Studies in Hillslope Hydrology, eds. Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P., pp 501–516. Chichester: Wiley
Onyando, J. O. and Sharma, T. C. (1995). Simulation of direct runoff volumes and peak rates for rural catchments in Kenya, East-Africa. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 40: 367–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polcher, J. and Laval, K. (1994). The impact of African and Amazonian deforestation on tropical climate. Journal of Hydrology, 155: 389–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P., Beven, K., Chevallier, P. and Planchono, O. (1991). The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models. Hydrological Processes, 5: 59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Refsgaard, C., Seth, S. M., Bathurst, J. C., Erlich, M., Storm, B., Jorgensen, G. H. and Chandra, S. (1992). Application of the SHE to catchments in India. 1. General results. Journal of Hydrology, 140: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Refsgaard, C. and Knudsen, J. (1996). Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 32: 2189–2202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, L. A. (1931). Capillary conduction of liquids through porous media. Physics, 1: 318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C. C. M., Beven, K., Morris, E. M. and Anderson, M. G. (1985). Sensitivity analysis, calibration and predictive uncertainty of the Institute of Hydrology Distributed Model. Journal of Hydrology, 81: 179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandstrom, K. (1996). Hydrochemical deciphering of streamflow generation in semi-arid East Africa, Hydrological Processes, 10: 703–7203.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellekens, J. (2000). Hydrological processes in a humid tropical rainforest: A combined experimental and modelling approach, Unpublished PhD thesis. Amsterdam: Free University
Schellekens, J.Scatena, F. N., Bruijnzeel, L. A. and Wickel, A. J. (1999). Modelling rainfall interception by a lowland tropical rainforest in northeastern Puerto Rico. Journal of Hydrology, 225: 168–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoccimarro, M., Walker, A., Dietrich, C., Schreider, S., Jakeman, T. and Ross, H. (1999). A framework for integrated catchment assessment in northern Thailand. Environmental Modelling and Software, 14: 567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulnier, G-M., Obled, C., and Beven, K. (1997). Analytical compensation between DTM grid resolution and effective values of saturated hydraulic conductivity within a TOPMODEL framework, Hydrological Processes, 11: 1331–13463.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, G. A. (1994). Mesoscale modelling of runoff and water balances using remote-sensing and other GIS data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 39: 121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, M. D. (1997). Plot-scale hydrometric and tracer characterisation of soil water flow in two tropical rainforest catchments in South East Asia. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster: Lancaster University
Sherlock, M. D., Chappell, N. A., and Greer, T. (1995). Tracer and Darcy-based identification of subsurface flow, Bukit Timah forest, Singapore. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 16: 197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherlock, M. D.Chappell, N. A. and McDonald, J. J. (2000). Effects of experimental uncertainty on the calculation of hillslope flow paths. Hydrological Processes, 14: 2457–24713.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., Subramanian, K. and Refsgaard, J. C. (1999). Hydrological modelling of a small watershed using MIKE SHE for irrigation planning. Agricultural Water Management, 41: 149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinun, W. (1991). Hillslope hydrology, hydrogeomorphology and hydrochemistry of an equatorial lowland rainforest, Danum Valley, Sabah, Malaysia. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. Manchester: University of Manchester
Sloan, P. G., Moore, I. D., Coltharp, G. B. and Eigel, J. D. (1983). Modelling surface and subsurface stormflow on steeply-sloping forest watersheds. Research Paper 142. Lexington: Water Resources Institute
Sulebak, J. R., Tallaksen, L. M. and Erichsen, B. (2000). Estimation of aeral soil moisture by use of terrain data. Geografiska Annaler Series A – Physical Geography, 82A: 89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S. (2001). Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 37: 2521–2535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troch, P. A., Mancini, M., Paniconi, C. and Wood, E. F. (1993). Evaluation of a distributed catchment scale water-balance model. Water Resources Research, 29: 1805–1817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, A. I. J. M. and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2001). Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 2. Model validation for a tropical upland mixed cropping system. Journal of Hydrology, 247: 239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertessy, R., O'Loughlin, E., Beverly, E. and Butt, T. (1994). Australian experiences with the CSIRO Topog model in land and water resources management. In Proceedings of UNESCO International Symposium on Water Resources Planning in a Changing World, pp. III-135–144. Paris: UNESCO
Vertessy, R. A. and Elsenbeer, H. (1999). Distributed modeling of stormflow generation in an Amazonian rainforest catchment: Effects of model parameterization. Water Resources Research, 35: 2173–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, X. and Gómez-Hernández, J. J. (1996). Up-scaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 183: 9–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, D. W., Wasimi, S. A. and Islam, S. (2001). The El Niño-Southern Oscillation and long-range forecasting of flows in the Ganges. International Journal of Climatology, 21: 77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, P. G., Young, P. C. and Hornberger, G. M. (1979). A systems model of stream flow and water quality in the Bedford-Ouse River: I stream flow modelling. Water Research, 13: 1155–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigmosta, M. S. and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1999). A comparison of simplifed methods of routing topographically driven subsurface flow. Water Resources Research, 35: 255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, S., Kalma, J., and Kuczera, G. (2001). Parameterisation of a simple semi-distributed model for assessing the impact of land-use on hydrologic response. Journal of Hydrology, 254: 16–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, P. C. (1984). Recursive estimation and time series analysis. Berlin: Springer
Young, P. C. (2001). Data-based mechanistic modelling and validation of rainfall-flow processes. In Model Validation in Hydrological Science. ed. Anderson, M. G. pp 117–161. Chichester: Wiley
Zeng, N. (1998). Understanding climate sensitivity to tropical deforestation in a mechanistic model. Journal of Climate, 11: 1969–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, N. (1999). Seasonal cycle and interannual variability in the Amazon hydrologic cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 104(D8): 9097–9106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, N. and Neelin, J. D. (1999). A land-atmosphere interaction theory for the tropical deforestation problem. Journal of Climate, 12: 857–8722.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, H., Henderson-Sellers, A. and McGuffie, K. (2001). The compounding effects of tropical deforestation and greenhouse warming on climate. Climate Change, 49: 309–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×