Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Grice, Martine Savino, Michelina and Roettger, Timo B. 2018. Word final schwa is driven by intonation—The case of Bari Italian. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 143, Issue. 4, p. 2474.

    Ormel, Ellen Crasborn, Onno Kootstra, Gerrit Jan and De Meijer, Anne 2017. Coarticulation of Handshape in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A Corpus Study. Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 10.

    Arboleda, Inmaculada de Jesús and Monroy, Rafael 2015. English syllabic consonants vs. schwa at discourse level: A perceptual analysis. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Recasens, Daniel 2014. Coarticulation and Sound Change in Romance. Vol. 329, Issue. ,

    Bang, Jeesoo Lee, Kyusong Ryu, Seonghan and Lee, Gary Geunbae 2014. Vowel-reduction feedback system for non-native learners of English. p. 935.

    GROSVALD, MICHAEL and CORINA, DAVID 2012. Perception of long-distance coarticulation: An event-related potential and behavioral study. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 33, Issue. 01, p. 55.

    Padgett, Jaye 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Han, Jeong-Im Hwang, Jong-Bai and Choi, Tae-Hwan 2011. The acquisition of phonetic details: Evidence from the production of English reduced vowels by Korean learners. Second Language Research, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 535.

    Silverman, Daniel 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Hall, Nancy 2011. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. p. 1.

    Braun, Bettina Lemhöfer, Kristin and Mani, Nivedita 2011. Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 129, Issue. 1, p. 376.

    Roussel, Nancye and Oxley, Judith 2010. Perception of American English dark /l/ by normally hearing young adult women. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Vol. 24, Issue. 6, p. 451.

    Grosvald, Michael 2010. Long-Distance Coarticulation in Spoken and Signed Language: An Overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 4, Issue. 6, p. 348.

    Blevins, Juliette and Pawley, Andrew 2010. Typological implications of Kalam predictable vowels. Phonology, Vol. 27, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Heselwood, Barry 2007. Schwa and the phonotactics of RP English. Transactions of the Philological Society, Vol. 105, Issue. 2, p. 148.

    Davidson, Lisa 2007. The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 261.

    Davidson, Lisa 2005. Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Vol. 19, Issue. 6-7, p. 619.

    Weismer, Gary and Berry, Jeff 2003. Effects of speaking rate on second formant trajectories of selected vocalic nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 113, Issue. 6, p. 3362.

    Ling, Low Ee Grabe, Esther and Nolan, Francis 2000. Q uantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 377.

    Schiller, Niels O. Meyer, Antje S. and Levelt, Willem J. M. 1997. The Syllabic Structure of Spoken Words: Evidence from the Syllabification of Intervocalic Consonants. Language and Speech, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 103.

  • Print publication year: 1992
  • Online publication date: December 2009

2 - “Targetless” schwa: an articulatory analysis

from Section A - Gesture


One of the major goals for a theory of phonetic and phonological structure is to be able to account for the (apparent) contextual variation of phonological units in as general and simple a way as possible. While it is always possible to state some pattern of variation using a special “low-level” rule that changes the specification of some unit, recent approaches have attempted to avoid stipulating such rules, and instead propose that variation is often the consequence of how the phonological units, properly defined, are organized. Two types of organization have been suggested that lead to the natural emergence of certain types of variation: one is that invariantly specified phonetic units may overlap in time, i.e., they may be coproduced (e.g., Fowler 1977, 1981a; Bell-Berti and Harris 1981; Liberman and Mattingly 1985; Browman and Goldstein 1990), so that the overall tract shape and acoustic consequences of these coproduced units will reflect their combined influence; a second is that a given phonetic unit may be unspecified for some dimension(s) (e.g., Öhman 1966b; Keating 1988a), so that the apparent variation along that dimension is due to continuous trajectories between neighboring units' specifications for that dimension.

A particularly interesting case of contextual variation involves reduced (schwa) vowels in English. Investigations have shown that these vowels are particularly malleable: they take on the acoustic (Fowler 1981a) and articulatory (e.g., Alfonso and Baer 1982) properties of neighboring vowels.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Gesture, Segment, Prosody
  • Online ISBN: 9780511519918
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *