Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499968.004

4 - Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2009

Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.

Edited by

Diane Pecher and

Rolf A. Zwaan

Show author details

Raymond W. Gibbs Jr.: Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz, California, USA
Diane Pecher: Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Rolf A. Zwaan: Affiliation:
Florida State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

How would you describe the way you think about your life? When asked this question, many people immediately embrace some convenient metaphor to characterize their self-conception. Consider two narratives from individuals in their late 40s who had re-entered college to finally obtain their degrees. The first, Sara, talked of her life as being a journey. She said that completing school was critical “because it's important to where I want to end up.” It represents “this little highway to, um, a new life, I guess. Each one of the steps I take down this road was well thought out. You take your journey and end up back where you started and you see it in a new way, and you see it for the first time, and I really believe that's what I did” (Horton, 2002, p. 283).

A different person, Porter, described his life as a kind of play within a play. He said, “I think that when you do that, when you create a play within a play, and you say, well, if my life was already, which it seems to be, a staged production, up and running, ready to go, there were no surprises … it was a set production. … It was me. I was the character in the play that had become the protagonist. I am in my own show right now, absolutely. I get to be the star in my show” (Horton, 2002, p. 284).

Type: Chapter
Information: Grounding Cognition
The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking
, pp. 65 - 92

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atneave, F., & Olson, R. (1967). Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 74, 149–157CrossRef Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577–609Google Scholar PubMed

Becker, A. (1997). Disrupted lives. Berkeley: University of California Press

Beer, F. (2001). The Meanings of War and Peace. College Station: Texas A&M Press

Beitel, D., Gibbs, R., & Sanders, P. (2000). Psycholinguistic perspectives on polysemy. In H. Cuykens & B. Zawada (Eds.), Polysemy in cognitive linguistics (pp. 213–239). Amsterdam: Benjamins

Blank, A., & Koch, P. (Eds.) (1999). Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton

Cataldi, S. (1996). Emotion, depth, and flesh. Albany: SUNY Press

Cienki, A. (1998). STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 107–149CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, D. H., & Gravano, S. (1982). Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion. Perception Psychophysics 31, 411–420CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gibbs, R. (1992). What do idioms really mean?Journal of Memory and Language 31, 485–506CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press

Gibbs, R. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: BenjaminsCrossRef

Gibbs, R., Beitel, D., Harrington, M., & Sanders, P. (1994). Taking a stand on the meanings of “stand”: Bodily experience as motivation for polysemy. Journal of Semantics 11, 231–251CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., Bogdonovich, J., Sykes, J., & Barr, D. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 141–154CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., & Colston, H. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6, 347–378CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, R., & Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women's narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication 14, 139–166CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gibbs, R., Lima, P., & Francuzo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1189–1210CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Kashak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9, 558–565CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Glenberg, A. M., & Roberston, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 379–401CrossRef Google Scholar

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphor to Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press

Goosens, L., Pauwels, B., Rudzka-Ostyn, M., Simon-Vanderberger, J., & Varpays, J. (1995). By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy, and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins

Grady, J. (1997). THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8, 267–290CrossRef Google Scholar

Grady, J. (1999). A typology for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.) Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: BenjaminsCrossRef

Horton, S. (2002). Conceptualizing transition: The role of metaphor in describing the experience of change at midlife. Journal of Adult Development 9, 277–290CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in Mind (p. 30). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it?Journal of Memory & Language 43, 576–593CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press

Lakoff, G. (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas?Cognitive Linguistics 1, 39–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books

Low, S. (1996). Embodied metaphors: Nerves as lived experiences. In T. Csordas (Ed.), Embodiment and Experience (pp. 139–162). New York: Cambridge University Press

Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Barsalou, L., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Sciences, 27, 767–780CrossRef Google Scholar

Siegelmann, E. (1990). Metaphor and Meaning in Psychotherapy. New York: Norton

Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-Body Metaphor in Semantic Structure and Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R. (2004). Body movement primes metaphor comprehension Manuscript submitted for publication

Winters, M. (1992). Diachronicity within synchrony: The challenge of cognitive grammar. In M. Putz (Ed.), Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution (pp. 503–512). Amsterdam: BenjaminsCrossRef

Zubin, D., & Choi, S. (1984). Orientation and gestalt: Conceptual organizing principles in the lexicalization of space. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, & J. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics (pp. 333–345). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society

Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. K., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science 13, 168–171CrossRef Google Scholar