Exclusivity: the misconceived idea of <span class='italic'>lex specialis</span>

Gerd Oberleitner

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316103869.010

5 - Exclusivity: the misconceived idea of lex specialis

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015

Gerd Oberleitner

Show author details

Gerd Oberleitner: Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Separation and self-contained regimes

From a strictly separatist position, human rights and humanitarian law are fundamentally different and irreconcilable to the extent that there can be no meaningful debate on human rights in armed conflict. The different historic development of the two systems, the dissimilar nature of their respective norms and the different goals they pursue in law and policy keep them apart and prevents any discussion on their simultaneous applicability for theoretical as well as practical reasons. It was asserted that the law of armed conflict is so radically different from international human rights law in its origin, foundation, nature, object and content that the two are not only diametrically opposed but that neither can be derived from the other.

Such a position maintains that international humanitarian law and international human rights law neither share a common history nor common goals but have a fundamentally different legal structure and “no over-reaching axiology, no value system that unifies the objectives of these fields of international law.” They are mutually exclusive. Such a complete separation of international humanitarian law and international human rights law has been suggested only rarely. Where a separation was argued for, metaphorical concepts such as presenting international humanitarian law and international human rights law as “two curtains” were introduced instead. Each of these curtains was meant to shield the individual from threats in different moments: international humanitarian law in times of war and international humanitarian law in times of peace. But even this suggestion was mitigated by the argument that during armed conflicts the curtain of international human rights law (i.e., the two UN human rights Covenants) would not be drawn back completely but only “largely.”

Type: Chapter
Information: Human Rights in Armed Conflict
Law, Practice, Policy
, pp. 83 - 104

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316103869.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Meyrowitz, Henri, “Le droit de la guerre et les droits de l’homme” (1972) 88 Revue de droit pénal militaire et de droit de la guerre1104.Google Scholar

Partsch, Karl-Josef, “Menschenrechte und Rotkreuz-Grundsätze. Justitiartagung 1973” in Voit, Wolfgang (ed.),Völkerrechtliche Beiträge der Tagungen der Justitiare und Konventionsbeauftragten des deutschen Roten Kreuzes 1957–1989 (Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 1995), pp. 201–2.Google Scholar

Scobbie, Iain, “Principle or Pragmatics? The Relationship between Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict” (2009) 14(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law457CrossRef Google Scholar

Feinstein, Barry, “The Applicability of the Regime of Human Rights in Times of Armed Conflict and Particularly to Occupied Territories: The Case of Israel’s Security Barrier” (2005) 4(2) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights301.Google Scholar

Suter, Keith D., “An Enquiry into the Meaning of the Phrase ‘Human Rights in Armed Conflict’” (1976) 15(3–4) Revue de droit pénal militaire et de droit de la guerre422.Google Scholar

Bowring, Bill, “Fragmentation, Lex Specialis and the Tensions in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights” (2010) 14(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law485.CrossRef Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey, War and Law Since 1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), p. 75.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables” in Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983), p. 2.Google Scholar

S.S. Wimbledon Case, Permanent International Court of Justice, P.I.C.J. Series A., No. 1 (1923).

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, “Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law” (2003) 17(3) European Journal of International Law491Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martii, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682 (13 April 2006) (“ILC Study on Fragmentation”), paras. 152 and 156–57.

Pauwelyn, Joost, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Rules Relate to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, “Rights at the Frontier: Protection of the Individual in Time of War” in Rider, Barry A. K. (ed.), Law at the Centre: The Institute of Advanced Legal Studies at Fifty (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999), p. 278.Google Scholar

Teubner, Gunther and Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, “Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law” (2004) 25(4) Michigan Journal of International Law1004.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, “Die Anwendung der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention in bewaffneten Konflikten – eine Überforderung?” (2005) 65 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht615.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, “Legal Conclusion or Interpretative Process? Lex Specialis and the Application of International Human Rights Standards” in Arnold, Roberta and Quénivet, Noelle (eds.), International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a Merger in International Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008), pp. 103–4.Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, “Lex superior, lex specialis, lex posterior – zur Rechtsnatur der “Konfliktlösungsregeln” (2005) 65 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht403.Google Scholar

Lindroos, Anja, “Addressing Norm Conflicts in a Fragmented Legal System: The Doctrine of Lex Specialis” (2005) 74 Nordic Journal of International Law39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Prud’homme, Nancy, “Lex specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship?” (2007), 40(2) Israel Law Review379.Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike, “A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study” (2006) 11(2) Journal of Conflict and Security Law280.CrossRef Google Scholar

Provost, René, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 277;CrossRef Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004 [2004] ICJ Reports, para. 136 (“Wall case”).

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), International Court of Justice, Judgment of 19 December 2005 [2006] ICJ Reports, para. 168.

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, International Court of Justice, Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996 [1996] ICJ Reports 226 (“Nuclear Weapons case”), para. 25.

Dennis, Michael J., “Application of Human Rights Treaties Extraterritorially in Times of Armed Conflict and Military Occupation” (2005) 99(1) American Journal of International Law141;CrossRef Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2011), p. 61.Google Scholar

Heintze, Hans-Joachim, “Konsequenzen der Konvergenz von Menschenrechtsschutz und humanitärem Völkerrecht” in Fischer, Horst, Froissart, Ulrike, Heinegg von Heintschel, Wolff and Raap, Christian (eds.), Krisensicherung und humanitärer Schutz / Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection. Festschrift für Dieter Fleck (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, 2004), p. 250.Google Scholar

Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, “The Right to Life and Genocide: The Court and International Public Policy” in de Chazournes, Laurence Boisson and Sands, Philippe (eds.), International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 321–26Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, Morgan-Foster, Jason and Abresch, William, “The Competence of the UN Human Rights Council and Its Special Procedures in Relation to Armed Conflicts: Extrajudicial Executions in the ‘War on Terror’” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law191.CrossRef Google Scholar

Imseis, Ardi, “Critical Reflections on the International Humanitarian Law Aspects” (2005) 99(1) American Journal of International Law102CrossRef Google Scholar

Heintze, Hans-Joachim, “On the Relationship between Human Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law (2004) 86(856) International Review of the Red Cross797.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: Opinion and Reaction” (2006) 11(1) Journal of Conflict and Security Law119.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram, The International Law of Belligerent Occupation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p. 87.CrossRef Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger, “Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory: A Commentary” (2004) 37 Revue Belge de Droit International135.Google Scholar

Schabas, William, “Lex specialis? Belts and Suspenders? The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus ad Bellum” (2007) 40(2) Israel Law Review597.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hampson, Françoise and Salama, Ibrahim, Working Paper of the UN Sub-commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights on the Relationship between Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/14 (21 June 2005), para. 57.

Milanovic, Marko, “Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian and International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 100.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor, The Humanization of International Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2006), p. 266Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “Legal Stability and Claims of Change: The International Court’s Treatment of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello” (2006) 75(3–4) Nordic Journal of International Law371.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruys, Tim and Verhoeven, Sten, “DRC v. Uganda: The Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in Occupied Territories” in Arnold, Roberta and Quénivet, Noelle (eds.), International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a Merger in International Law (Leiden: Nijhoff, 2008), p. 195.Google Scholar

Solis, Gary D., The Law of Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lorenz, Dirk, Der territoriale Anwendungsbereich der Grund- und Menschenrechte. Zugleich ein Beitrag zum Individualschutz in bewaffneten Konflikten (Vienna: Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2005), p. 212.Google Scholar

Hansen, Michelle, “Preventing the Emasculation of Warfare: Halting the Expansion of Human Rights Law into Armed Conflict” (2007) 194 Military Law Review65.Google Scholar

Melzer, Nils, Targeted Killing in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: United States of America, UN Doc. A/HRC/16/11 (4 January 2011), para. 53.

Hampson, Françoise, “The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law from the Perspective of a Human Rights Treaty Body” (2008) 90(871) International Review of the Red Cross551CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher, “Historical Development and Legal Basis” in Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 75Google Scholar

Eden, Paul and Happold, Matthew, “Symposium: The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law” (2010) 14(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law446Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, “A Norm Conflict Perspective on the Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law” (2009) 14(3) Journal of Conflict and Security Law462CrossRef Google Scholar

Campanelli, Danio, “The Law of Military Occupation Put to the Test” (2008) 90(871) International Review of the Red Cross657.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerald, Risks Ensuing from Fragmentation of International Law, Report of the International Law Commission, Annex 321, UN GAOR, 55th Session, Supplement No. 10, UN Doc. A/55/10 (27 September 2000).

Bianchi, Andrea, “Dismantling the Wall: The ICJ’s Advisory Opinion and its Likely Impact on International Law” (2004) 47 German Yearbook of International Law371.Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, Kirsten, “Application of Successive Treaties in relation to the Same Subject Matter” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, A Commentary (Heidelberg: Springer, 2012), p. 510.Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco and Olson, Laura M., “The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law Where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-international Armed Conflicts” (2008) 90(871) International Review of the Red Cross603.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sassòli, Marco, “The Role of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in New Types of Armed Conflicts” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian and International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 71.Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel, International Humanitarian Law: Theory, Practice, Context (The Hague: Hague Academy of International Law, 2011), p. 130CrossRef Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, “The Definition of ‘Norm-Conflict’ in International Law and Legal Theory” (2006) 17(2) European Journal of International Law399.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gioia, Andrea, “The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Monitoring Compliance with Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 214.Google Scholar

Balendra, Natasha, “Defining Armed Conflict” (2008) 29(6) Cardozo Law Review2490.Google Scholar

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report on the Outcome of the Expert Consultation on the Issue of Protecting the Human Rights of Civilians in Armed Conflict, UN Doc. A/HRC/11/31 (4 June 2009), para. 13.

Balendra, Natasha, “International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law: Alternative Frameworks for Interaction” in Eriksen, Christoffer C. and Emberland, Marius (eds.), The New International Law (The Hague: Nijhoff, 2010), p. 133.Google Scholar

Koller, David S., “The Moral Imperative: Toward a Human-Rights Based Law of War” (2005) 46(1) Harvard International Law Journal263.Google Scholar

Sommaruga, Cornelio, “Humanitarian Law and Human Rights in the Legal Arsenal of the ICRC” in Warner, Daniel (ed.), Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Quest for Universality (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1997), p. 127.Google Scholar

Lubell, Noam, “Challenges in Applying Human Rights Law to Armed Conflict” (2005) 87(860) International Review of the Red Cross751.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, “Humanitäres Völkerrecht und Schutz der Menschenrechte: Auf der Suche nach Synergien und Schutzlücken” in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Fassbender, Bardo, Shaw, Malcolm N. and Sommermann, Karl-Peter (eds.), Common Values in International Law, Essays in Honour of Christian Tomuschat (Kehl: Engel, 2006), pp. 83–85.Google Scholar

Ben-Naftali, Orna and Shany, Yuval, “Living in Denial: The Application of Human Rights in the Occupied Territories” (2004) 1(37) Israel Law Review56.Google Scholar

Doswald-Beck, Louise, “The Right to Life in Armed Conflict: Does International Humanitarian Law Provide All the Answers?” (2007) 88(864) International Review of the Red Cross903.Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, Jean and Tranchez, Elodie, “The Quest for a Non-Conflictual Coexistence of International Human Rights Law and Humanitarian Law: Which Role for the Lex Specialis Principle?” in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013), p. 242.Google Scholar