United Nations Human Rights Council: monitoring armed conflicts

Gerd Oberleitner

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316103869.025

17 - United Nations Human Rights Council: monitoring armed conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015

Gerd Oberleitner

Show author details

Gerd Oberleitner: Affiliation:
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A mandate for armed conflicts?

The UN Human Rights Council, created in 2006 as successor to the Commission on Human Rights, is at the centre of the UN’s human rights system. The Council’s many functions are laid down in General Assembly Resolution 60/251 of 2006 and include “promoting universal respect for the protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction of any kind and in a fair and equal manner,” particularly in “situations of violations of human rights, including gross and systematic violations,” upon which it can make recommendations. The Council is also meant to “respond promptly to human rights emergencies” and “[s]erve as a forum for dialogue on thematic issues on all human rights.” In light of this mandate it comes as no surprise that the Council is regularly confronted with situations of armed conflicts where the kind of grave and serious human rights violations which the Council is meant to deal with are most likely to occur.

The Council has repeatedly held that it is mandated to consider the human rights situation in armed conflicts and that it sees human rights as applicable in such situations. To give one example: in Resolution 9/9 of 2008 on the protection of the human rights of civilians in armed conflict, the Council stated that the protection provided by human rights law continues in situations of armed conflict; that international human rights law and international humanitarian law are complementary and mutually reinforcing; that international humanitarian law has the status of lex specialis; and that certain rights of the ICCPR are non-derogable in times of armed conflict. The resolution was adopted without a vote. The Commission on Human Rights had used similar language in earlier thematic and country-specific resolutions, e.g., in Resolution 2005/34 on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions, where it “[a]cknowledg[ed] … that international human rights law and international humanitarian law are complementary and not mutually exclusive.”

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Human Rights in Armed Conflict
Law, Practice, Policy
, pp. 241 - 258

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316103869.025 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kälin, Walter, Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Kuwait under Iraqi Occupation, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1992/26 (16 January 1992) (with reference to the involvement of the Council in Kuwait, Chile, Sri Lanka, El Salvador, Guatemala, Afghanistan and the former Yugoslavia)

de Zayas, Alfred, “Human Rights and Humanitarian Law” (1993) 61–62 Nordic Journal of International Law259CrossRef Google Scholar

Ramcharan, Bertrand, The Human Rights Council (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011), pp. 15–105Google Scholar

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict (New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2011), p. 103Google Scholar

Alston, Philip, Morgan-Foster, Jason and Abresch, William, “The Competence of the UN Human Rights Council and Its Special Procedures in Relation to Armed Conflicts: Extrajudicial Executions in the ‘War on Terror’” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law198–99CrossRef Google Scholar

van Boven, Theo, “Reliance on Norms of Humanitarian Law by United Nations’ Organs” in Delissen, Astrid J. M. and Tanja, Gerard J. (eds.), Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict: Challenges Ahead, Essays in Honour of Frits Kalshoven (Dordrecht: Nijhoff, 1991), p. 511Google Scholar

Doswald-Beck, Louise and Vité, Sylvain, “International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law” (1993) 33(293) International Review of the Red Cross115CrossRef Google Scholar

Report of the Commission on Human Rights, Economic and Social Council Official Records, Supplement No. 3, UN Doc. E/259 (1947), para. 22

Alston, Philip, “The Commission on Human Rights” in Alston, Philip (ed.), The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), p. 193Google Scholar

Oberleitner, Gerd, Global Human Rights Institutions: Between Remedy and Ritual (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), pp. 63–66Google Scholar

Sunga, Lyal S., “The Special Procedures of the UN Commission on Human Rights: Should They be Scrapped?” in Alfredsson, Gudmundur, Grimheden, Jonas, Ramcharan, Bertrand and de Zayas, Alfred (eds.), International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms, Essays in Honour of Jakob Th. Möller (The Hague: Nijhoff, 2001), pp. 236–41Google Scholar

Ricca, Michaela, “Human Rights and the UN Special Rapporteurs’ System: Tendencies in Reporting on Conflict Areas” (2002) 15(3) Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict169Google Scholar

Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1993/24 (12 January 1993), Annex IV, para. 16

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report on the Outcome of the Expert Consultation on the Issue of Protecting the Human Rights of Civilians in Armed Conflict, UN Doc. A/HRC/11/31 (4 June 2009), para. 24

Hunt, Paul, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2006/120 (27 February 2006), paras. 15–16

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, Fact Sheet No. 6 (Rev.3) (Geneva: United Nations, 2009), p. 11Google Scholar

Report of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, UN Doc. A/HRC/19/58/Rev.1, Annex II (Revised methods of work of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, adopted on 11 November 2011)

Kothari, Miloon, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2001/51 (25 January 2001), para. 73

Kothari, Miloon, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2004/48 (2 November 2004), paras. 18 and 92

Ibeanu, Okechukwu, Report, UN Doc. A/HRC/5/5 (11 June 2007), paras. 4 and 47–57

Despouy, Leandro, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2006/52 (23 January 2006), paras. 14–15

Petit, Juan Migueal, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2006/67 (12 January 2006), paras. 61–64

Scheinin, Martin, Report, Addendum: Mission to America, UN Doc. A/HRC/6/17/Add.3 (22 November 2007), para. 7

Scheinin, Martin, Report, Addendum: Mission to Israel, including Visit to Occupied Palestinian territory, UN Doc. A/HRC/6/17/Add.4 (16 November 2007), para. 6

Kothari, Miloon, Report: Mission to Lebanon and Israel, UN Doc. A/HRC/2/7 (2 October 2006), in particular paras. 22–31 and 61

Jahangir, Asma, Report: Summary of Cases Transmitted to the Government and Replies Received, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2004/7/Add.1 (2004), para. 579

Alston, Philip, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/7 (22 December 2004), para. 45

Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 29 on States of Emergency (Article 4), UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11 (31 August 2001), para. 10

Report, UN Doc. A/62/265 (16 August 2007), paras. 22–54

Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2005/7 (22 December 2004), para. 45

Report, UN Doc. A/62/265 (16 August 2007), para. 53

Wako, Amos, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1983/16 (31 January 1983), paras. 29–39

Ndiaye, Bacre Waly, Report, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1993/46 (23 December 1992), para. 60

Ndiaye, Bacre Waly, Joint Report: Mission to Colombia, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1995/111 (16 January 1995), para. 57

Ndiaye, Bacre Waly, Report, Addendum: Mission to Burundi from 19 to 29 April 1995, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1996/4/Add.1 (24 July 1995), para. 61

Report of the Independent International Fact-finding Mission to Investigate the Implications of the Israeli Settlements on the Civil, Political, Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of the Palestinian People Throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, UN Doc. A/HRC/22/63 (7 February 2013), para. 16

Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, The UN Human Rights Council: Commissions of Inquiry Conference Brief (December 2011), pp. 2–4, available at (last accessed 15 April 2014)

Lempinen, Miko and Scheinin, Martin, The New Human Rights Council: The First Two Years, Substantive Report of the Workshop organized by the European University Institute, Istituto Affari Internazionali, and the Institute for Human Rights at Abo Akademi University, European University Institute, 7–8 November 2007 (Abo: Abo Akademi Institute, 2007), p. 5, available at (last accessed 15 April 2014)Google Scholar

Kälin, Walter, “Universal Human Rights Bodies and International Humanitarian Law” in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 454–55Google Scholar

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Somalia, UN Doc. A/HRC/18/6 (11 July 2011), para. 62

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: United States of America, UN Doc. A/HRC/16/11 (4 January 2011), para. 53

Draft Report of the Human Rights Council on its Twelfth Session, UN Doc. A/HRC/12/L.10 (2 October 2009), para. 386

Draft Report of the Human Rights Council on its Twelfth Session, UN Doc. A/HRC/12/L.10 (2 October 2009), para. 220

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Afghanistan, UN Doc. A/HRC/12/9 (20 July 2009), Recommendation 66

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Côte d’Ivoire, UN Doc. A/HRC/13/9 (5 January 2010), Recommendation 65

Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Central African Republic, UN Doc. A/HRC/12/22 (4 June 2009), paras. 17, 40, 58 and 59

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Israel, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/76 (8 January 2010), para. 24

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Israel, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/76 (8 January 2010), paras. 57, 74 and 81

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Israel, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/76 (8 January 2010), para. 34

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Pakistan, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/42 (4 June 2008), Recommendation 25

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Democratic Republic of the Congo, UN Doc. A/HRC/13/8 (4 January 2010), Recommendations 48, 77 and 87

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Sri Lanka, UN Doc. A/HRC/8/46 (5 June 2008), para. 74

Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review: Democratic Republic of the Congo, UN Doc. A/HRC/13/8 (4 January 2010), Recommendation 11

UPR Info, Universal Periodic Review: On the Road to Implementation (2012), available at (last accessed 15 April 2014)

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.