Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:47:59.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Monique M. Hennink
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
International Focus Group Research
A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences
, pp. 250 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akwara, P. 2002. ‘Perception of Risk and Sexual Behaviour in Kenya’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Allen, S. 2006. Informed consent document used in ongoing project ‘Formative Focus Group and Interviews in Two African Capitals’, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group (RZHRG), Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Benaya, K. 2004. ‘Factors Influencing Contraceptive Use and Method Choice Among Women and Men in Zambia’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Bernard, H. 1994. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, second edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Blanc, A. K. and Tsui, A. O. 2005. The Dilemma of Past Success: Insiders' Views on the Future of the International Family Planning Movement. A working paper. The Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Chapter 5.
Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M. and Robson, K. 2001. Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdan, R. and Taylor, S. J. 1975. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Borrayo, E. A., Buki, L. and Feigal, B. 2005. ‘Breast Cancer Detection among Older Latinas: Is it Worth the Risk?’, Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1244–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chimbwete, C. 2001. ‘Socio-Demographic Aspects of Young People's Reproductive Behaviour in Malawi’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton.
Cooper, P., Diamond, I., Gould, C., High, S. and Partridge, J. 1992. Choosing and Using Contraceptives: Consumers Experiences in Wessex, Department of Social Statistics, University of Southampton. Report to the Wessex Regional Health Authority Measures in Family Planning Steering Group.
Corden, A. and Sainsbury, R. 1996. Using Quotations in Qualitative Research. Paper presented to the Fourth International Social Science Methodology Conference, University of Essex, United Kingdom, 1–5 July 1996.
David, M. and Sutton, C. 2004. Social Research: The Basics. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 1998a. Strategies of Qualitative Enquiry. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 1998b. The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, I., Stephenson, R. and Sheppard, Z.et al. 2000. Perceptions of Aircraft Noise, Sleep and Health. United Kingdom: Civil Aviation Authority.Google Scholar
Farquar, C. and Das, R. 1999. ‘Are Focus Groups Suitable for “Sensitive” Topics?’ in Barbour, R. and Kitzinger, J. (eds.) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fern, E. 1982. ‘The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: the Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality’, Journal of Marketing Research 19: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fern, E. 2001. Advanced Focus Group Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flick, U. 1998. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Flick, U. 2002. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. 1997. ‘Focus Groups’, Social Research Update, Issue 19. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Green, J. and Thorogood, N. 2004. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, T. 2000. Moderating Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Group Facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. L. and Bentley, M. E. 2005. ‘Understanding Indian Women's Perceptions of Overweight: A Study of Lifestyle and Obesity Risk Factors’, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59: 1217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, M. and Diamond, I. 1999. ‘Using Focus Groups in Social Research’, in Memnon, A. and Bull, R. (eds.) Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Hennink, M., Diamond, I. and Cooper, P. 1999. ‘Contraceptive Use Dynamics of Asian Women in Britain’, Journal of Biosocial Science 31(4): 537–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennink, M., Diamond, I., Clements, S. and Johnson, F. 2002. Evaluation of Marie Stopes Family Planning Programme: Pakistan. Report of Phase II: Evaluation. University of Southampton, UK.
Hennink, M. and Stephenson, R. 2000. Evaluation of Marie Stopes Family Planning Programme in Pakistan, Report of Phase I: Baseline. University of Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Hennink, M. and Simkhada, P. 2004. ‘Sex Trafficking in Nepal: Context and Process’, Asia Pacific Migration Journal 13(3): 305–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennink, M. and Madise, N. 2005. ‘Influence of User Fees for Reproductive Health in Malawi’, African Population Studies 20(2): 125–41.Google Scholar
Hennink, M., Rana, I. and Iqbal, R. 2005. ‘Knowledge of Personal and Sexual Development Amongst Young People in Pakistan’, Culture, Health and Sexuality 7(4): 319–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holliday, A. 2002. Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink. Second edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jarrett, R. 1993. ‘Focus Group Interviewing with Low Income Minority Populations: A Research Experience’ in Morgan, D. (ed.) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art 184–281. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jourard, S. 1964. The Transparent Self. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kauser, F. 2001. Maternal Health Care Utilisation Among the Urban Poor of Maharashtra, India, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton.
Kitzinger, J. 1994. ‘The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction Between Research Participants’, Sociology of Health and Illness 16: 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, R. 1988. Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. 1998a. Developing Questions for Focus Groups. Focus Group Kit 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, R. 1998b. Moderating Focus Groups. Focus Group Kit 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, R. and Casey, M. 2000. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R. 2005. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lazarfeld, P. 1986. The Art of Asking Why. New York: The Advertising Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Lennon, A., Gallois, C., Owen, N. and McDermott, L. 2005. ‘Young Women as Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Qualitative Social Identity Approach’, Qualitative Health Research 15(10): 1345–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litosseliti, L. 2003. Using Focus Groups in Research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lofand, J. and Lofand, L. 1995. Analysing Social Settings. Third Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Madise, N., Hennink, M. Dambula, I. and Kainja, E. 2000. Meeting Demographic Targets and User Fees for Family Planning Methods: Can Both Work in Poor Countries? Paper presented at the Workshop on Reproductive Health Research in Developing Countries, 7 June 2000, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Marin, G. and Marin, B. 1991. Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Researching. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J. and Miller, T. 2002. Ethics in Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Tucker, G. 2000. ‘Conducting Focus Groups in Developing Countries: Skill Training for Bi-Lingual Facilitators’, Qualitative Health Research 10(3): 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, G., Powell, J. and Usher, P. 1997. Understanding Social Research: Perspectives on Methodology and Practice. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, G. 1998. ‘Displaying opinions: Topics and Disagreement in Focus Groups’, Language in Society 27(1): 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. and Krueger, R. 1993. ‘When to Use Focus Groups and Why’, in Morgan, D. (ed.) Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art 3–19. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Qualitative Research Methods Series 16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D. and Scannell, A. 1998. Planning Focus Groups: Focus Group Kit 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics 2002. The Ethics of Research Related to Healthcare in Developing Countries. Bedford Square, London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
Patton, M. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Pearson, S., Cornah, D. and Diamond, I.et al. 1996. Promoting Young People's Sexual Health. United Kingdom: Health Education Authority.Google Scholar
Punch, K. 2005. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Richards, L. 2005. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. 2003. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rubin, H. and Rubin, I. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rubin, H. and Rubin, I. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheyvens, R. and Storey, D. 2003. Development Fieldwork. A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schinke, S. and Gilchrist, L. 1993 ‘Ethics in Research’, in Grinnell, R. M. (ed.) Social Work Research and Evaluation. Fourth Edition. Illinois: F. E. Peacock publishers.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. Second Edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Stephenson, R. 2000. The Impact of Rural-Urban Migration on Child Survival in India. PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
Stephenson, R. and Hennink, M. 2004. ‘Barriers to Family Planning Services Among the Urban Poor in Pakistan’, Asia-Pacific Population Journal 19(2): 5–26.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. and Shamdasani, R. 1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 20, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. 1998. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. and Henley, N. 1975. (eds.) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ulin, P., Robinson, E. and Tolley, E.et al. 2002. Qualitative Methods: A Field Guide for Applied Research in Sexual and Reproductive Health. North Carolina: Family Health International, Research Triangle Park.Google Scholar
Ulin, P., Robinson, E. and Tolley, E. 2005. Qualitative Methods in Public Health. A Field Guide for Applied Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Varga, C. A. 2003. ‘How Gender Roles Influence Sexual and Reproductive Health Among South African Adolescents’, Studies in Family Planning 34(3): 160–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasquez, M. and Han, A. 1995. ‘Group Interventions and Treatments with Ethnic Minorities’, in Aponte, J., Rivers, R. and Wohl, J. (eds.) Psychological Interventions and Cultural Diversity (pp. 109–27). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Schumm, Shay J. and Sinagub, J. 1996. Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. 1985. Applied Qualitative Research. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Wells, W. 1979. ‘Group Interviewing’, in Higgenbotham, J. B. and Cox, K. (eds.) Focus Group Interview: A Reader (pp. 2–12). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
Wengraf, T. 2001. Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcott, H. 2001. Writing Up Qualitative Research. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
World Medical Association (WMA) 2000. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, adopted by the 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Monique M. Hennink, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: International Focus Group Research
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619458.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Monique M. Hennink, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: International Focus Group Research
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619458.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Monique M. Hennink, Emory University, Atlanta
  • Book: International Focus Group Research
  • Online publication: 12 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619458.014
Available formats
×