Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bond, Nathan and Timmer, Jaap 2017. Wondrous geographies and historicity for state-building on Malaita, Solomon Islands. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, Vol. 3, Issue. 3, p. 136.


    Hovland, Ingie 2016. Christianity, place/space, and anthropology: thinking across recent research on evangelical place-making. Religion, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 331.


    ×
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: December 2015

Introduction

Summary

This book is written with the graduate student in mind. I had in mind to write a text that would introduce my students to the basic ideas and concepts behind many-body physics. At the same time, I felt very strongly that I would like to share my excitement about this field, for without feeling the thrill of entering uncharted territory I do not think one has the motivation to learn and to make the passage from learning to research.

Traditionally, as physicists we ask “what are the microscopic laws of nature?”, often proceeding with the brash certainty that, once revealed, these laws will have such profound beauty and symmetry that the properties of the universe at large will be self-evident. This basic philosophy can be traced from the earliest atomistic philosophy of Democritus to the most modern quests to unify quantum mechanics and gravity.

The dreams and aspirations of many-body physics interwine the reductionist approach with a complementary philosophy: that of emergent phenomena. In this view, fundamentally new kinds of phenomena emerge within complex assemblies of particles which cannot be anticipated from an a priori knowledge of the microscopic laws of nature. Many-body physics aspires to synthesize, from the microscopic laws, new principles that govern the macroscopic realm, asking:

What emergent principles and laws develop as we make the journey from the microscopic to the macroscopic?

This is a comparatively modern and far less familiar scientific philosophy. Charles Darwin was perhaps the first to seek an understanding of emergent laws of nature. Following in his footsteps, Ludwig Boltzmann and James Clerk Maxwell were among the first physicists to appreciate the need to understand how emergent principles are linked to microscopic physics. From Boltzmann's biography [1], we learn that he was strongly influenced and inspired by Charles Darwin. In more modern times, a strong advocate of this philosophy has been Philip W. Anderson, who first introduced the phrase “emergent phenomenon” into physics. In an influential article entitled “More is different,” written in 1967 [2], he captured the philosophy of emergence, writing:

The behavior of large and complex aggregations of elementary particles, it turns out, is not to be understood in terms of a simple extrapolation of the properties of a few particles.[…]

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Introduction to Many-Body Physics
  • Online ISBN: 9781139020916
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020916
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
[1] E. Broda and L. Gray, Ludwig Boltzmann: Man, Physicist, Philosopher,Woodbridge, 1983.
[2] P. W. Anderson, More is different, Science, vol. 177, p. 393, 1972.
[3] R. March, Physics for Poets, McGraw-Hill, 1992.
[4] A. Pais, Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World, Oxford University Press, 1986.
[5] L. Hoddeson, G. Baym, and M. Eckert, The development of the quantum mechanical electron theory of metals: 1928–1933, Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 59, p. 287, 1987.
[6] M. Riordan and L. Hoddeson, Crystal Fire, W.W. Norton, 1997.
[7] L. Hoddeson and V. Daitch, True Genius: The Life and Science of John Bardeen, National Academy Press, 2002.
[8] E.M.L. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevksii, Statistical Mechanics, Part 2: Theory of the Condensed State, Landau and Lifshitz Course on Theoretical Physics, vol. 9, trans. J.B. Sykes and M.J. Kearsley, Pergamon Press, 1980.
[9] P. W. Anderson, Basic Notions of Condensed Matter Physics, Benjamin Cummings, 1984.
[10] P. Phillips, Advanced Solid State Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., 2012.
[11] A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor'kov, and I. E. Dzyaloshinski, Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics, Dover, 1977.
[12] G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics, Plenum, 3rd edn., 2000.
[13] S. Doniach and E. H. Sondheimer, Green's Functions for Solid State Physicists, Imperial College Press, 1998.
[14] R. Mattuck, A Guide to Feynman Diagrams in the Many-Body Problem, Dover, 2nd edn., 1992.
[15] A. Tsvelik, Quantum Field Theory in Condensed Matter Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn., 2003.
[16] D. Pines, The Many-Body Problem, Wiley Advanced Book Classics, 1997.
[17] A. Altland and B. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[18] C. Nayak, Quantum Condensed Matter Physics, http://stationq.cnsi.ucsb.edu/nayak/courses.html, 2004.