Standard Objections to Public Reason

Ronald C. Den Otter

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809507.008

7 - Standard Objections to Public Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2010

Ronald C. Den Otter

Show author details

Ronald C. Den Otter: Affiliation:
California Polytechnic State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In the first part of this chapter, I defend public reason against a number of well-known objections and then try to explain its appeal in a society like our own. An ideal of public justification cannot be too controversial if it is to serve as the mode of public reasoning that will help us to resolve constitutional disputes as fairly as possible. Those who are reasonable but have different conceptions of good must use the same principle of public reason when they exchange reasons with one another to narrow the range of their initial disagreement. I shall show that none of these objections is compelling and that some of them rest on misconceptions about the nature of Rawlsian public reason.

In doing so, I deviate from Rawls's own view by insisting that people who are not judges should not feel obligated to limit themselves to public reasons when they deliberate and vote on the most important political questions. Public deliberation should be as participatory and open ended as possible to enable everyone to express their sentiments and articulate their deepest convictions. My position is distinct, then, from that of Rawls, who believes that citizens and public officials should have a self-imposed duty to limit themselves to sufficiently public reasons in certain circumstances. Instead, I believe that judges should limit themselves and others to public reasons when they exercise the power of judicial review.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Judicial Review in an Age of Moral Pluralism , pp. 200 - 230

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809507.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dworkin, Ronald, Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press, 2006), 252–3Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, The Liberal Theory of Justice (Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, 1973), 127Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, The Anatomy of Antiliberalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 244Google Scholar

Kronman, Anthony T., Education's End: Why Our Colleges and Universities Have Given Up on the Meaning of Life (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007), esp. 9–35Google Scholar

Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Thomson, J.A.K. (London: Penguin Books, 1988), 68

Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), esp. 495–521Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate, in Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), 186Google Scholar

Arneson, Richard J., “The Priority of the Right over the Good Rides Again,” 108 Ethics (1997), 169–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J., “Justice and the Good,” in Liberalism and Its Critics, ed. Sandel, Michael J. (New York: New York University Press, 1984), 159–76Google Scholar

Alejandro, Roberto, “Rawls's Communitarianism,” 23 Canadian Journal of Philosophy (1993), 78–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “The Doctrine of Virtue,” in The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 147CrossRef Google Scholar

Audi, Robert, Religious Commitment and Secular Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 70CrossRef Google Scholar

Marneffe, Peter, “Liberalism, Liberty, and Neutrality,” 19 Philosophy and Public Affairs (1990), 254Google Scholar

Chan, Joseph, “Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism,” 29 Philosophy and Public Affairs (2000), 8, n.8CrossRef Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, “Rawls and Liberalism,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 77Google Scholar

George, Robert P. and Wolfe, Christopher, “Natural Law and Liberal Public Reason,” 42 American Journal of Jurisprudence (1997), 31CrossRef Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Peter, “The Ambiguities of Rawls's Influence,” 4 Perspectives on Politics (2006), 124CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 243, n.32Google Scholar

Westmoreland, Robert, “The Truth about Public Reason,” 18 Law and Philosophy (1999), 283–4Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, Animal Liberation (New York: Harper Collins, 1975)Google Scholar

Regan, Tom, The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983)Google Scholar

Rawls, John, “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” in The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 169n80Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R., Why Societies Need Dissent (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003), 177Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty and Other Writings, ed. Collini, Stephan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), esp. 5–18Google Scholar

Neal, Patrick, “Is Public Reason Innocuous?” 11 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2008), 140CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, “Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), 383–406Google Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, Liberalism and Pluralism: Towards a Politics of Compromise (New York: Routledge, 1999), 58Google Scholar

Horton, John, “Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification,” 2 Contemporary Political Theory (2003), 18CrossRef Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (New York: Routledge, 1992), 102Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence B., “Novel Public Reasons,” 29 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1996), 1477Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, “Religious Contributions in Public Deliberation,” 30 San Diego Law Review (1993), 838Google Scholar

Galston, William A., Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 109CrossRef Google Scholar

Galston, William A., Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 116CrossRef Google Scholar

Charney, Evan, “Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere,” 92 American Political Science Review (1998), 101CrossRef Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence,” 19 Philosophy and Public Affairs (1990), 4Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas, “The Role of Religion in Political Issues,” Religion in the Public Square, ed. Audi, Robert and Wolterstorff, Nicholas (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), 104–5Google Scholar

Smolin, David M., “Regulating Religious and Cultural Conflict in a Postmodern America: A Response to Professor Perry,” 76 Iowa Law Review (1991), 1067Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent, “On Public Reason,” 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 683Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas, “Why We Should Reject What Liberalism Tells Us about Speaking and Acting in Public for Religious Reasons,” in Religion and Contemporary Liberalism, ed. Weithman, Paul J. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), 162–81Google Scholar

Carter, Stephen L., Culture of Disbelief: How American Law and Politics Trivializes Religious Devotion (New York: Anchor Books, 1993)Google Scholar

Neuhaus, Richard John, The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdsmans, 1994)Google Scholar

Neal, Patrick, “Political Liberalism, Public Reason, and the Citizen of Faith,” in Natural Law and Public Reason, ed. George, Robert P. and Wolfe, Christopher (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000), 184Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel, Rawls (New York: Routledge, 2007), 371Google Scholar

Kelly, Erin and McPherson, Lionel, “On Tolerating the Unreasonable,” 9 Journal of Political Philosophy (2001), 39CrossRef Google Scholar

Marneffe, Peter, “Rawls's Idea of Public Reason,” 75 Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (1994), 234CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, “John Rawls and the Search for Stability,” 105 Ethics (1995), 874–915CrossRef Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard, The God Delusion (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006), esp. 317–87Google Scholar

Solum, Lawrence, “Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason,” 30 San Diego Law Review (1993), 741Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Hurka, Thomas's Perfectionism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Sher, George, Beyond Neutrality (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRef Google Scholar

Wall, Steven, Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, Marilyn, “John Rawls and the Political Coercion of Unreasonable People,” in The Idea of Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls, ed. Davion, Victoria and Wolf, Clark (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), 16Google Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent, Private Consciences and Public Reasons (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 84CrossRef Google Scholar

Galston, William, “What Is Living and What Is Dead in Kant's Practical Philosophy?” in Kant and Political Philosophy: The Contemporary Legacy, ed. Beiner, Ronald and Booth, William James (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993), 222Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism,” 96 Journal of Philosophy (1999), 608CrossRef Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, Equality and Partiality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 38Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen, Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 188–211Google Scholar

Lister, Andrew, “Public Reason and Democracy,” 11 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2008), 285CrossRef Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, “The Pursuit of the Ideal,” in The Crooked Timber of Humanity (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1991), 13Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, “Rawls on Justice,” in Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls' A Theory of Justice, ed. Daniels, Norman (New York: Basic Books, 1989), 9Google Scholar

Dworkin, Gerald, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 9CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, Culture and Inequality (Cambridge University Press, 2001), 283Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph, “Facing Epistemic Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence,” 19 Philosophy and Public Affairs (1990), 40Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion, “Survey Article: Rawls's Political Liberalism,” 3 Journal of Political Philosophy (1995), 181–90CrossRef Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M., “Political Philosophy versus Political Theory,” 69 Chicago-Kent Law Review (1994), 692Google Scholar

Downing, Lyle A. and Thigpen, Robert B., “Beyond Shared Understandings,” 14 Political Theory (1986), 451–2CrossRef Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983)Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin, The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Honig, Bonnie, Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993), 12Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon, “The Liberal/Democratic Divide: On Rawls's Political Liberalism,” review, 24 Political Theory (1996), 98CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, “A More Democratic Liberalism,” 92 Michigan Law Review (1994), 1503–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Brettschneider, Corey, Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, “Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Freeman, Samuel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 174Google Scholar

Hampton, Jean, “Should Political Philosophy Be Done without Metaphysics?” 99 Ethics (1989), 806CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceaser, James W., Liberal Democracy and Political Science (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Gunnell, John G., Between Philosophy and Politics: The Alienation of Political Theory (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.