Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T12:24:50.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Latent inhibition and creativity

from Current topics in latent inhibition research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

By
Shelley Carson
Edited by
Robert Lubow  and
Ina Weiner
Robert Lubow
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Ina Weiner
Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University
Get access

Summary

Latent inhibition (LI) is a robust phenomenon in which repeated preexposure to a stimulus that is not reinforced retards future associability to that stimulus (Lubow,1989). LI has been uniformly accepted as an adaptive mechanism across a variety of species (Lubow & Gewirtz, 1995). In humans, a deficit in LI has been associated with the active phase of schizophrenia and with psychosis-proneness (Baruch, Hemsley, & Gray, 1988a, 1988b; Lubow, Ingberg-Sachs, Zalstein-Orda, & Gewirtz, 1992). However, attenuated LI has also been reported in non-disordered normal subjects (see Braunstein-Bercovitz, Rammsayer, Gibbons, & Lubow, 2002), suggesting that attenuated LI exists on a continuum that extends from hospitalized psychotics to high-functioning normals. Recent research suggests that there may be situations in which attenuated LI actually confers an advantage to individuals. There is a growing body of evidence that indicates attenuated LI may be present in a subset of high-functioning and creative individuals (e.g. Carson, Peterson, & Higgins, 2003; Peterson & Carson, 2000). Attenuated LI may increase the probability of making novel or original associations among disparate stimuli by increasing the amount of information available to conscious awareness.

The theoretical relationship of creativity and latent inhibition

Latent inhibition is widely accepted as an index of the ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli (Lubow & Kaplan, 2005). When latent inhibition is expressed, the ability to form associations to information deemed irrelevant is reduced. Conversely, when latent inhibition is attenuated, the ability to form associations to seemingly irrelevant information is expanded.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Latent Inhibition
Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia
 , pp. 183 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abraham, A., & Windmann, S. (2008). Selective information processing advantages in creative cognition as a function of schizotypy. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: a Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (third edition). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andreasen, N. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.Google ScholarPubMed
Baas, M., DeDreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, F. (1969). Creative Person and Creative Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988a). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988b). Latent inhibition and “psychotic proneness” in normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of schizotypy and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunstein-Bercovitz, H., Rammsayer, T., Gibbons, H., & Lubow, R. E. (2002). Latent inhibition deficits in high-schizotypal normals: symptom-specific or anxiety-related? A review. Schizophrenia Research, 53, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burch, G. St. J., Hemsley, D. R., & Joseph, M. H. (2004). Trials-to-criterion latent inhibition in humans as a function of stimulus pre-exposure and positive-schizotypy. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burch, G. St. J., Hemsley, D. R., Pavelis, C., & Coor, P. J. (2006). Personality, creativity, and latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, G. St J., Pavelis, C., Hemsley, D. R., & Corr, P. J. (2006). Schizotypy and creativity in visual artists. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S. H. (2001). Demons and muses: An exploration of cognitive features and vulnerability to psychosis in creative individuals. Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. Harvard University (AAT3011334).Google Scholar
Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. (2005). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G., McCreery, C., Mason, O., et al. (1996). The factor structure of “schizotypal” traits: a large replication study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Cox, A. J., & Leon, J. L. (1999). Negative schizotypal traits in the relation of creativity to psychopathology. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casa, L. G., & Lubow, R. E. (2001). Latent inhibition with a response time measure from a within-subject design: effects of number of pre-exposures, masking task, context change, and delay. Neuropsychology, 15, 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: a double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1384–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykes, M., & McGhie, A. (1976). A comparative study of attentional strategies of schizophrenic and highly creative normal subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schyzotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995a). Creativity as a product of intelligence and personality. In Saklofske, D. H. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995b). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. F. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Folley, B. S., & Park, S. (2005). Verbal creativity and schizotypal personality in relation to prefrontal hemispheric laterality: a behavioral and near-infrared optical imaging study. Schizophrenia Research, 80, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, N. S., Pickering, A. D., Hemsley, D. R., Dawling, S., & Gray, J. A. (1992). Abolition of latent inhibition by a single 5 mg dose of d-amphetamine in man. Psychopharmacology, 107, 425–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, M. J., & Williams, L. M. (1999). Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haigler, E. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of neo–pi–r items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heston, L. L. (1966). Psychiatric disorders in foster home reared children of schizophrenic mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 819–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamison, K. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry, 52, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, J. L. (1970). Genetic association of giftedness and creativity with schizophrenia. Hereditas, 66, 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombroso, C. (1891/1976). The Man of Genius. London: Walter Scott Publishing.Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubow, R. E., & Kaplan, R. (2005). The visual search analogue of latent inhibition: implications for theories of irrelevant stimulus processing in normal and schizophrenic groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 224–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, A. (1995). The Price of Greatness: Resolving the Creativity and Madness Controversy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological basis of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, O., Linney, Y., & Claridge, G. (2005). Short scales for measuring schizotypy. Schizophrenia Research, 78, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. F., & Tal, I. R. (2007). Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality 40, 876–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Reilly, T., Dunbar, R., & Bentall, R. (2001). Schizotypy and creativity: an evolutionary connection. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1067–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickover, C. A. (1998). Strange Brains and Genius. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Poreh, A. M., Whitman, D. R., & Ross, T. P. (1994). Creative thinking abilities and hemispheric asymmetry in schizotypal college students. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 12, 344–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentky, R. (1989). Creativity and psychopathology: gamboling at the seat of madness. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D. (1985). Psychoticism, creativity, and dichotic shadowing. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 737–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2008). Dimensional schizotypy, autism, and unusual word associations in artists and scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. (1991). Divergent Thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Schuldberg, D., French, C., Stone, B. L., & Heberle, J. (1988). Creativity and schizotypal traits: creativity test scores and perceptual aberration, magical ideation, and impulsive nonconformity. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 176, 648–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, K. (2000). The Mammoth Book of Oddballs and Eccentrics. New York: Carroll & Graf.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1968). Examples and rationales of test tasks for assessing creative abilities. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: non-linear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 783–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×