Arendholz, J. (2017). Message boards. In Hoffman, C. R. & Bublitz, W. (Eds.), Pragmatics of social media (pp. 125–149). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assimakopoulos, S. (2020). Incitement to discriminatory hatred, illocution and perlocution. Pragmatics and Society, 11(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18071.assCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T. & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society, 19(3), 273–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, T., & Bowcher, W. L. (2021). Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Principles and parameters. Functions of Language, 28(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20017.barCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartley, L. (2020). ‘Please make your verdict speak the truth’: Insights from an Appraisal analysis of the closing arguments from a rape trial. Text & Talk, 40(4), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloch, K. R. (2016). ‘It is just SICKENING’: Emotions and discourse in an anti-immigrant discussion forum. Sociological Focus, 49(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2016.1169901CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bowcher, W. L. (2014). Issues in developing unified systems for contextual Field and Mode. Functions of Language, 21(2), 176–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.2.02bowCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowcher, W. L. (2017). Field, tenor and mode. In Bartlett, T. & O’Grady, G. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 391–403). Routledge.Google Scholar

Bowcher, W. L. (2021). Context of situation and the role of language. Functions of Language, 28(3), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20014.bowCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, D. G., Moore, A. R., Wu, C. & Cartmill, J. (2021). The pragmatism of drawing context networks: Social hierarchy and social distance as dimensions of Tenor. Functions of Language, 28(3), 260–290. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20040.butCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosma, S., & Gurevich, M. (2020). Securing sex: Embattled masculinity and the pressured pursuit of women’s bodies in men’s online sex advice. Feminism & Psychology, 30(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519857754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crown Prosecution Service. (2021). Inchoate offences: Incitement. Retrieved 29 March 2023 from www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/inchoate-offencesGoogle Scholar

Crump, D. (1994). Camouflaged incitement: Freedom of speech, communicative torts, and the borderland of the Brandenburg test. Georgia Law Review, 29(1), 1–80.Google Scholar

Dayter, D., & Messerli, T. C. (2021). Persuasive language and features of formality on the r/ChangeMyView subreddit. Internet Pragmatics, 5(1), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00072.dayCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2016). Reporting from the field: The narrative reconstruction of experience in pick-up artist online communities. Open Linguistics, 2(1), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2019). In other words: ‘The language of attraction’ used by pick-up artists. English Today, 35(2), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841800007XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2020). Talking about women: Elicitation, manual tagging, and semantic tagging in a study of pick-up artists’ referential strategies. In Rüdiger, S. & Dayter, D. (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 63–86). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.03dayCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2022). The language of pick-up artists: Online discourses of the seduction industry. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denes, A. (2011). Biology as consent: Problematizing the scientific approach to seducing women’s bodies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34(5), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donlan, L. (2020). The control and censorship of linguistic resources in an online Community of Practice. In Rüdiger, S. & Dayter, D. (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 41–62). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.98.02donCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In van Dijk, T. A. & Petöfi, J. S. (Eds.), Grammars and descriptions (pp. 176–225). Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hardaker, C., & McGlashan, M. (2016). ‘Real men don’t hate women’: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasan, R. (1999). Speaking with reference to context. In Ghadessy, M. (Ed.), Text and context in Functional Linguistics (pp. 219–328). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasan, R. (2014). Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554–014-0009-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasan, R. (2020). Tenor: Rethinking interactant relations. Language, context and text. The Social Semiotics Forum, 2(2), 213–333. https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00029.hasGoogle Scholar

Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, A. (2007). Criminal prohibitions on direct and indirect encouragement of terrorism. The Criminal Law Review, June, 441–468.Google Scholar

Introne, J., Yildirim, I. G., Iandoli, L., DeCook, J. & Elzeini, S. (2018). How people weave online information into pseudoknowledge. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511878563. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785639CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaconelli, J. (2018). Incitement: A study in language crime. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 12(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572–017-9427-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krendel, A., McGlashan, M. & Koller, V. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurzon, D. (1998). The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(5), 571–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378–2166(97)00083-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawson, R. (2023). Language and mediated masculinities: Cultures, contexts, constraints. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibowitz, Z. (2017). Terror on your timeline: Criminalizing terrorist incitement on social media through doctrinal shift. Fordham Law Review, 86(2), 795–824.Google Scholar

Liang, J. Y. (2021). Understanding context in computer-mediated communication: A focus on Danmaku discourse. Functions of Language, 28(3), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20041.liaCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, F., & Hood, S. (2019). Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: The play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials. Text & Talk, 39(5), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, S., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2020). Intentional and performative persuasion: The linguistic basis for criminalizing the (direct and indirect) encouragement of terrorism. Criminal Law Forum, 31(4), 473–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609–020-09405-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacLeod, N. (2023). Intentionally encouraging or assisting others to commit an offence: The anatomy of a language crime. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37(2), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mountford, J. (2018). Topic modeling The Red Pill. Social Sciences, 7(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7030042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muntigl, P. (2002). Policy, politics, and social control: A systemic functional linguistic analysis of EU employment policy. Text, 22(3), 393–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.016Google Scholar

O’Neill, R. (2018). Seduction: Men, masculinity and mediated intimacy. Polity.Google Scholar

OED Online. 2023. ‘incite, v.’. Oxford University Press (online). Retrieved 29 March 2023 from www.oed.com/view/Entry/93523?redirectedFrom=inciteGoogle Scholar

Rediker, E. (2015). The incitement of terrorism on the internet: Legal standards, enforcement, and the role of the European Union. Michigan Journal of International Law, 36(2), 321–351.Google Scholar

Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, S. (2020). Manbragging online: Self-praise on pick-up artists’ forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 161, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitz, R., & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in Men’s Rights Activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Serious Crime Act 2007. (c.27). (online) The Stationery Office. Retrieved 29 March 2023 from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/27/contentsGoogle Scholar

Sillence, E. (2010). Seeking out very like-minded others: Exploring trust and advice issues in an online health support group. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 6(4), 376. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2010.035840CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, P. (2001). ‘Reason’ and ‘tickle’ as pragmatic constructs in the discourse of advertising. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(4), 589–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00004-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis: In search of meaning. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Berg, K. (2019). A case of crying wolf? A linguistic approach to evaluating hate speech allegations as linguistic acts of violence. In Ralarala, M. K., Kaschula, R. & Heydon, G. (Eds.), New frontiers in forensic linguistics: Themes and perspectives in language and law in Africa and beyond (pp. 301–326). African Sun Media.Google Scholar

Wagner, A., Marusek, S. & Yu, W. (2020). Emojis and law: Contextualized flexibility of meaning in cyber communication. Social Semiotics, 30(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, D. (2020). The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 36, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, I. (2021). Big Tech has created a breeding ground for extremists: Jake Davison’s rampage in Plymouth wasn’t the first act of violence by those radicalised in online incel communities. The Times. Retrieved 30 April 2022 from www.thetimes.co.uk/article/big-tech-has-created-a-breeding-ground-for-extremists-mdhtwxgpfGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barfar, A. (2022). A linguistic/game-theoretic approach to detection/explanation of propaganda. Expert Systems with Applications, 189, 116069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxter, J., & Wallace, K. (2009). Outside in-group and out-group identities? Constructing male solidarity and female exclusion in UK builders’ talk. Discourse & Society, 20(4), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogetić, K., Heritage, F., Koller, V., & McGlashan, M. (2021). ‘This shit is what happens when a stud marries a plastic bitch’: Exploring dehumanizing metaphors in an online community of incels. Paper presented at Researching and Applying Metaphor (RAAM) Conference. Vilnius University, Lithuania.Google Scholar

Bogetić, K., Heritage, F., Koller, V., & McGlashan, M. (2023). Landwhales, femoids and sub-humans: Dehumanising metaphors in incel discourse. Metaphor and the Social World. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23005.bogCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolsmann, C., & Miller, H. (2009). International student recruitment to universities in England: Discourse, rationales and globalisation. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 262–297). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Da San Martino, G., Yu, S., Barrón-Cedeno, A., Petrov, R., & Nakov, P. (2019, November). Fine-grained analysis of propaganda in news article. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 5636–5646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, S. E., & Laskovtsov, A. (2022). ‘Goodbye, my friendcels’: An analysis of incel suicide posts. Journal of Qualitive Criminology, 11(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.b7b8b295Google Scholar

Daly, S. E., & Reed, S. M. (2022). ‘I think most of society hates us’: A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with incels. Sex Roles, 86(1), 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhaliwal, S., & Kelly, L. (2020). Literature review: The links between radicalisation and violence against women and girls. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furl, K. (2022). Denigrating women, venerating ‘chad’: Ingroup and outgroup evaluations among male supremacists on Reddit. Social Psychology Quarterly, 85(3), 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gal, N. (2019). Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work. New Media & Society, 21(3), 729–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glace, A. M., Dover, T. L., & Zatkin, J. G. (2021). Taking the black pill: An empirical analysis of the ‘incel’. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 22(2), 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, K., Levon, E., & Milani, T. M. (2019). Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society, 48(4), 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansard, . Volume 698: debated on Wednesday 7 July 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2022 from https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-07-07/debates/2845D17E-D624–4BC4-A5FB-B0263D06643C/OnlineAbuseAndHateTowardsWomenGoogle Scholar

Hegghammer, T. (2013). The recruiter’s dilemma: Signalling and rebel recruitment tactics. Journal of Peace Research, 50(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, F. (2023). Incels and ideologies: Exploring how incels use language to construct gender and race. Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heritage, F., & Koller, V. (2020). Incels, in-groups, and ideologies: The representation of gendered social actors in a sexuality-based online community. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(2), 152–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, B., Ware, J., & Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43(7), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irfan, M., & Khaja, H. (2019). An analysis of the linguistic techniques of propaganda in marketing and politics. International Journal of English Learning & Teaching Skills, 2(2), 1181–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaki, S., De Smedt, T., Gwóźdź, M., Panchal, R., Rossa, A., & De Pauw, G. (2019). Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(2), 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jong, W., & Dückers, M. L. (2016). Self-correcting mechanisms and echo-effects in social media: An analysis of the ‘gunman in the newsroom’ crisis. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kheovichai, B. (2014). Marketization in the language of UK university recruitment: A critical discourse analysis and corpus comparison of university and finance industry job advertisements [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ([1980] 2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leidig, E. (2021). Why terrorism studies miss the mark when it comes to incels. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. Retrieved 30 April 2022 from https://icct.nl/publication/why-terrorism-studies-miss-the-mark-when-it-comes-to-incels/Google Scholar

Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maxwell, D., Robinson, S. R., Williams, J. R., & Keaton, C. (2020). ‘A short story of a lonely guy’: A qualitative thematic analysis of involuntary celibacy using Reddit. Sexuality & Culture, 24(6), 1852–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCulloch, G. (2019). Because internet: Understanding how language is changing. Vintage.Google Scholar

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prażmo, E. (2020). Foids are worse than animals. A cognitive linguistics analysis of dehumanizing metaphors in online discourse. Topics in Linguistics, 21(2), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rank, H. (1980). Analyzing political rhetoric. The English Journal, 69(9), 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

r/IncelTears. (2019). Homepage. Reddit. Retrieved 30 April 2022 from https://web.archive.org/web/20190317152210/https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/Google Scholar

r/IncelTears. (2022). Homepage. Reddit. Retrieved 30 April 2022 from https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTearsGoogle Scholar

Scott, M. (2020). WordSmith tools manual, Version 8. Lexical Analysis Software Ltd.Google Scholar

Scotto di Carlo, G. (2022). An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 09579265221099380.Google Scholar

Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023). Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the incel community on TikTok. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugiura, L. (2021). The incel rebellion: The rise of the manosphere and the virtual war against women. Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2004). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tranchese, A., & Sugiura, L. (2021). I don’t hate all women, just those stuck-up bitches: How incels and mainstream pornography speak the same extreme language of misogyny. Violence Against Women, 27(14), 2709–2734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Valkenburgh, S. P. (2021). Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc. Waseda University. http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/Google Scholar

Askanius, T. (2021). On frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor-hate nexus at the intersection of neo-Nazi and alt-right movements in Sweden. Television & New Media, 22(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. G. (2019). From ‘incel’ to ‘saint’: Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Political Violence, 8(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Baker, P., & Levon, E. (2016). ‘That’s what I call a man’: Representations of racialised and classed masculinities in the UK print media. Gender and Language, 10(1), 106–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, J. (2016, 21 November). The ‘not-all-manosphere’: Masculinity and the online alt-right. https://scatter.wordpress.com/2016/11/21/the-not-all-manosphere-masculinity-and-the-online-alt-right/Google Scholar

Barber, P. (2023). ‘SAVE ME WHITE JESUS!’ Conspiracy and the spectre of a folkloric, Alt-right masculine ideal. In Fowler-Watt, K. & McDougall, J. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of media misinformation (pp. 101–108). Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, L. (2017, 5 October). Exposé on Breitbart proves the ‘alt-right’ is just a euphemism for White supremacists. https://thinkprogress.org/breitbart-expose-white-supremacists-e348021c491a/Google Scholar

Bleakley, P. (2021). Panic, pizza and mainstreaming the alt-right: A social media analysis of Pizzagate and the rise of the QAnon conspiracy. Current Sociology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139212110348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boe, B. (2012). PRAW: The Python Reddit API wrapper. https://github.com/praw-dev/praw/Google Scholar

Braddock, K., Hughes, B., Goldberg, B., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2022). Engagement in subversive online activity predicts susceptibility to persuasion by far-right extremist propaganda. New Media & Society, February, 146144482210772.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (2018, 24 September). Russian troll sites infiltrated Donald Trump subreddit as recently as this month. The Verge. www.theverge.com/2018/9/24/17896586/reddit-the-donald-russia-troll-farm-ira-influence-operationGoogle Scholar

Collins, L. C. (2019). Corpus linguistics for online communication: A guide for research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copland, S. (2022). The online manosphere and misogyny in the far-right: The case of the #thotaudit. In Devries, M., Bessant, J., & Watts, R. (Eds.), Rise of the far right: Technologies of recruitment and mobilization (pp. 107–126). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Cornelisse, J. (2018). Cucks, Keks, and Pepes: A linguistic approach to studying user migration from the manosphere to the alt-right [MA dissertation]. Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cousineau, L. S. (2022). ‘A positive identity for men’: Pathways to far-right participation through Reddit’s /r/MensRights and /r/TheRedPill. In Devries, M., Bessant, J., & Watts, R. (Eds.), Rise of the far right: Technologies of recruitment and mobilization (pp. 127–146). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the ‘alt-right’. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCook, J. R. (2018). Memes and symbolic violence: #proudboys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(4), 485–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derksen, C., Serlachius, A., Petrie, K. J., & Dalbeth, N. (2017). ‘What say ye gout experts?’ A content analysis of questions about gout posted on the social news website Reddit. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Donovan, J., Lewis, B., & Friedberg, B. (2019). Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech. In Fielitz, M. & Thurston, N. (Eds.), Post-digital cultures of the far right: Online actions and offline consequences in Europe and the US (pp. 49–65). Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebner, J. (2021). Going dark: The secret social lives of extremists. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Ehrenfreund, M. (2016, 21 November). What the alt-right really wants, according to a professor writing a book about them. Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/21/what-the-alt-right-really-wants-according-to-a-professor-writing-a-book-about-them/Google Scholar

Evans, R. (2018, 11 October). From memes to infowars: How 75 fascist activists were ‘red-pilled’. Bellingcat. www.bellingcat.com/news/americas/2018/10/11/memes-infowars-75-fascist-activists-red-pilled/Google Scholar

Formato, F., & Iveson, M. (2022). ‘Men of today, soyboys of tomorrow’: Constructions of masculinities in YouTube responses to Gillette’s The Best Men Can Be. Discourse, Context & Media, 49, 100628.Google Scholar

Ganesh, B. (2020). Weaponizing White Thymos: Flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies, 34(6), 892–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaudette, T., Scrivens, R., Davies, G., & Frank, R. (2021). Upvoting extremism: Collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3491–3508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grover, T., & Mark, G. (2019). Detecting potential warning behaviors of ideological radicalization in an alt-right subreddit. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guazzini, A., Stefanelli, F., & Imbimbo, E. (2020). Further examples of violent attitudes: The online radicalisation. In Meringolo, P. (Ed.), Preventing violent radicalisation in Europe: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 191–208). Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habib, H., Srinivasan, P., & Nithyanand, R. (2022). Making a radical misogynist: How online social engagement with the manosphere influences traits of radicalization. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 2056305120921575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, S. L. (2018). Alt-White: Conceptualizing the ‘alt-right’ as a rhetorical bridge between White nationalism and mainstream public discourse. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 8(1–2), 6–25.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2016, 9 November). Are young, White males being radicalized online? Esquire. www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a50513/young-trump-voters-undercover/Google Scholar

Jacobson, E. (2019). Performing and resisting toxic masculinities on sports comment boards. In Guzzetti, B. J., Bean, T. W., & Dunkerly-Bean, J. (Eds.), Literacies, sexualities, and Gender: Understanding identities from preschool to adulthood (pp. 169–181). Routledge.Google Scholar

Johnson, G. (2017, 4 January). White nationalism, the alt right, & the alt light. Counter-Currents. https://counter-currents.com/2017/01/white-nationalism-the-alt-right-and-the-alt-lightGoogle Scholar

Johnson, P. E. (2017). The art of masculine victimhood: Donald Trump’s demagoguery. Women’s Studies in Communication, 40(3), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimmel, M. (2017). Angry White men: American masculinity at the end of an era. Nation Books.Google Scholar

Kimmel, M. (2018). Healing from hate: How young men get into―and out of―violent extremism. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kutner, S. (2020). Swiping right: The allure of hyper masculinity and cryptofascism for men who join the proud boys. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2016, 24 July). Understanding Trump. George Lakoff [blog]. https://georgelakoff.com/2016/07/23/understanding-trump-2/Google Scholar

Lawson, R. (2022a). Tackling online radicalisation: Language, masculinities, and the role of the English curriculum. Teaching English, 28, 57–62.Google Scholar

Lawson, R. (2022b, 27 October). Andrew Tate: How the ‘manosphere’ influencer is selling extreme masculinity to young men. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/andrew-tate-how-the-manosphere-influencer-is-selling-extreme-masculinity-to-young-men-192564Google Scholar

Lawson, R.. (2023). Language and mediated masculinities: Cultures, contexts, constraints. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2022, 12 October). Manipulation and cyber-crime: The case of digital grooming. Paper presented at the Online Selves – Self Online Digital Lecture Series, Tampere University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Baker, M., Francis, G., & Tognini-Bonelli, E. (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynskey, D. (2018, 7 February). How dangerous is Jordan B Peterson, the rightwing professor who ‘hit a hornets’ nest’? The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/how-dangerous-is-jordan-b-peterson-the-rightwing-professor-who-hit-a-hornets-nestGoogle Scholar

Lyons, M. N. (2017, 20 January). Ctrl-Alt-Delete: The origins and ideology of the alternative right. Political Research Associates [blog]. www.politicalresearch.org/2017/01/20/ctrl-alt-delete-report-on-the-alternative-right#sthash.pyfXkALX.uO2xtz0b.dpbsGoogle Scholar

Lyons, M. N. (2018). Insurgent supremacists: The U.S. far right’s challenge to state and empire. PM Press.Google Scholar

Macklin, G. (2019). Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents. In Sedgwick, M. (Ed.), Key thinkers of the radical right: Behind the new threat to liberal democracy (pp. 204–223). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mamié, R., Ribeiro, M. H., & West, R. (2021). Are anti-feminist communities gateways to the far right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTube. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (pp. 139–147). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marantz, A. (2017, 6 July). The alt-right branding war has torn the movement in two. The New Yorker. www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-alt-right-branding-war-has-torn-the-movement-in-twoGoogle Scholar

Martin, T. (2017, 23 March). Dissecting Trump’s most rabid online following. FiveThirtyEight [blog]. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/dissecting-trumps-most-rabid-online-following/Google Scholar

Marwick, A. (2022, 19 May). What people misunderstand about red-pilling. Slate. Retrieved from https://slate.com/technology/2022/05/red-pill-buffalo-shooter-online-hate-groups-research.htmlGoogle Scholar

Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.Google Scholar

McIntosh, J. (2020). Introduction: The Trump era as a linguistic emergency. In McIntosh, J. & Mendoza-Denton, N. (Eds.), Language in the Trump era: Scandals and emergencies (pp. 1–43). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLamore, Q., & Uluğ, Ö. M. (2020). Social representations of sociopolitical groups on r/The_Donald and emergent conflict narratives: A qualitative content analysis. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 508–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munn, L. (2019). Alt-right pipeline: Individual journeys to extremism online. First Monday, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i6.10108Google Scholar

Park, A., & Conway, M. (2018). Harnessing Reddit to understand the written-communication challenges experienced by individuals with mental health disorders: Analysis of texts from mental health communities. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), e8219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perry, B. (2021). Right wing extremism and youth recruitment. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(1), 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prakasam, N., & Huxtable-Thomas, L. (2021). Reddit: Affordances as an enabler for shifting loyalties. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(3), 723–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proferes, N., Jones, N., Gilbert, S., Fiesler, C., & Zimmer, M. (2021). Studying Reddit: A systematic overview of disciplines, approaches, methods, and ethics. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 205630512110190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ribeiro, M. H., Jhaver, S., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., De Cristofaro, E., & West, R. (2021). Do platform migrations compromise content moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romano, A. (2021, 17 January). Baked Alaska’s clout-chasing spiral into White supremacy is an internet morality tale. Vox. www.vox.com/22235691/baked-alaska-tim-gionet-arrest-capitol-riot-alt-right-buzzfeedGoogle Scholar

Roose, J., Flood, M., & Alfano, M. (2020). Challenging the use of masculinity as a recruitment mechanism in extremist narratives. Department of Justice and Community Safety.Google Scholar

Roose, J., Flood, M., Greig, A., Alfano, M., & Copland, S. (2022). Masculinity and violent extremism: Global masculinities. Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, N. (2009). WordSmith frequency lists and keywords: Keyword analysis. www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/corpus/blue/l03_2.htmGoogle Scholar

Sonnad, N., & Squirrell, T. (2017, 30 October). The alt-right is creating its own dialect. Here’s the dictionary. Quartz. https://qz.com/1092037/the-alt-right-is-creating-its-own-dialect-heres-a-complete-guide/Google Scholar

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2017). Alt-right. Southern Poverty Law Center. www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alt-rightGoogle Scholar

Squirrell, T. (2017, 18 August). Linguistic data analysis of 3 billion Reddit comments shows the alt-right is getting stronger. Quartz [blog]. https://qz.com/1056319/what-is-the-alt-right-a-linguistic-data-analysis-of-3-billion-reddit-comments-shows-a-disparate-group-that-is-quickly-uniting/Google Scholar

Sugiura, L. (2021). The incel rebellion: The rise of the manosphere and the virtual war against women. Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Trott, V. A. (2020). ‘Gillette: The best a beta can get’: Networking hegemonic masculinity in the digital sphere. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1–18.Google Scholar

Trzybinski, C., Van De Wiele, C., & Schumacher, M. (2022). Radicalization and recruitment online: An analysis of alt-right online extremist groups in the United States. Poster presented at the Undergraduate Research and Engagement Symposium, Chicago.Google Scholar

Washington Post Staff. (2021, 15 January). Identifying far-right symbols that appeared at the U.S. Capitol Riot. Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2021/far-right-symbols-capitol-riot/Google Scholar

Weimann, G., & Masri, N. (2023). Research note: Spreading hate on TikTok. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(5), 752–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, A. (2019). Online hate: From the far-right to the ‘alt-right’ and from the margins to the mainstream. In Lumsden, K. & Harmer, E. (Eds.), Online othering (pp. 39–63). Springer International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar