Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-skqgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T11:00:12.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II - Persuasion and (New) Contexts of Use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2025

Edited by
Sofia Rüdiger  and
Daria Dayter
Sofia Rüdiger
Affiliation:
Universität Bayreuth, Germany
Daria Dayter
Affiliation:
Tampere University, Finland
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Manipulation, Influence and Deception
The Changing Landscape of Persuasive Language
 , pp. 43 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). ‘Brilliant. Next question…’: High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 33(3), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3303_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., & Wetherell, M. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J. (2014). Preference and the conversation analytic endeavor. Journal of Pragmatics, 64, 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, G. B. (2009). Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 974–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, J. (2006). The hard sell: An ethnographic study of the direct selling industry. Ashgate.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. E. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In Lawler, E. J. & Thye, S. R. (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity (pp. 229–253). Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Ono, T. (2007). ‘Incrementing’ in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German, and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), 513–552. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.02couGoogle Scholar
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, M. J. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 102–128). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, B. A., & Heinemann, T. (2017). Issues in action formation: Requests and the problem with x. Open Linguistics, 3(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. (2007). The right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk. Language in Society, 36(3), 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. (2012). On the interchangeability of actually and really in spoken English: Quantitative and qualitative evidence from corpora. English Language & Linguistics, 16(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, M., & Kushida, S. (2013). Responding with resistance to wh-questions in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(3), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.810407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, M. J. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984b). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427–1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378–2166(02)00072-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Conversation analysis. In de Groot, A. M. B. & Hagoort, P. (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics: A practical guide (pp. 151–173). Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hosman, L. A. (2012). Language and persuasion. In Dillard, J. P. & Shen, L. (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 371–390). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976046.n19Google Scholar
Humă, B. (2018). The interactional organisation of initial business-to-business sales calls with prospective clients. Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/34698Google Scholar
Humă, B. (2023). Language and persuasion: A discursive psychological approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/SPC3.12755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humă, B., & Stokoe, E. (2020). The anatomy of first-time and subsequent business-to-business ‘cold’ calls. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humă, B., Stokoe, E. H., & Sikveland, R. O. (2019). Persuasive conduct: Alignment and resistance in prospecting ‘cold’ calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18783474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humă, B., Stokoe, E., & Sikveland, R. O. (2020). Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 357–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1725947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, K. H., & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.955997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, A. (2017). Accepting remote requests. In Raymond, G., Lerner, G. H., & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Enabling human conduct: Naturalistic studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel. A. Schegloff (pp. 125–143). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, N. (2015). Microstructures of economic action: Talk, interaction and the bottom line. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(3), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, D. W., & Hollander, M. M. (2014). Asking to speak to another: A skill for soliciting survey participation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.871804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazeland, H. (2004). Responding to the double implication of telemarketers’ opinion queries. Discourse Studies, 6(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604039443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, J., Pullins, E., & Kaski, T. (2021). Decision-making in salesperson–customer interaction: Establishing a common ground for obtaining commitment. In Lindström, J., Laury, R., Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.), Intersubjectivity in action: Studies in language and social interaction (pp. 163–181). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T., & Clark, C. (1986). The hard sell: ‘Patter Merchanting’ and the strategic (re)production and local management of economic reasoning in the sales routines of market pitchers. Sociology, 20(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038586020002002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2013). Overall structural organisation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 257–280). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2020a). One type of polar, information-seeking question and its stance of probability: Implications for the preference for agreement. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1826759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2020b). Revisiting preference organization in context: A qualitative and quantitative examination of responses to information seeking. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, R., & Kitzinger, C. (2007). Memory in interaction: An analysis of repeat calls to a home birth helpline. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 40(1), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikveland, R. O., & Stokoe, E. (2016). Dealing with resistance in initial intake and inquiry calls to mediation: The power of ‘willing.’ Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikveland, R. O., & Stokoe, E. (2020). Should police negotiators ask to ‘talk’ or ‘speak’ to persons in crisis? Word selection and overcoming resistance to dialogue proposals. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(3), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1785770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, E., Humă, B., Sikveland, R. O., & Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2020). When delayed responses are productive: Being persuaded following resistance in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2005). Contingent requests: Their sequential organization and turn shape. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
te Molder, H., & Potter, J. (Eds.). (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2015). Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, E., & Szymanski, M. H. (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In Richards, K. & Seedhouse, P. (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 91–106). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, A. (2020). Constituting agency in the delivery of telephone-mediated victim support. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1725951CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Angouri, J., & Wodak, R. (2014). ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: The Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society, 25(4), 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, A. (2006). Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506058057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, U. (2013). ‘If I could make it, you too can make it!’ Personal pronouns in political discourse: A CDA of president Jonathan’s presidential declaration speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(6), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n6p84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Zhang, M. (2018). Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation. In de los Ángeles Gómez González, María & Lachlan Mackenzie, J. (Eds.), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction (pp. 201–226). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, R. (2020). Angry tweets: A corpus-assisted study of anger in populist political discourse. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 8(1), 118–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00033.breCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, R. (2018). Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society, 30(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518801074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A. B. (2020). Metaphor, metonymy and evaluation as political devices in American and Spanish parliamentary political discourse. Iberica, 40, 75–99.Google Scholar
Cabrejas-Peñuelas, A. B., & Diez-Prados, M. (2014). Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates. Discourse & Society, 25(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513515601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capone, A. (2010). Barack Obama’s South Carolina speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2964–2977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing political speeches. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, C. (2010). Hyperbole in English: A corpus-based study of exaggeration. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLOS One, 14(9), e0222062. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coesemans, R., & De Cock, B. (2017). Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics, 116, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J. (2009). Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.1.03culCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2020). ‘It’s just words, folks. It’s just words’. Donald Trump’s distinctive linguistic style. In Schneider, U. & Eitelmann, M. (Eds.), Linguistic inquiries into Donald Trump’s language: From ‘fake news’ to ‘tremendous success’ (pp. 17–40). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ekström, M. (2001). Politicians interviewed on television news. Discourse & Society, 12(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/095792650101200500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A. (2014). I think, I mean and I believe in political discourse: Collocates, functions and distribution. Functions of Language, 21(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.05fetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A., & Bull, P. (2012). Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society, 23(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A., & Weizman, E. (2018). ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is…’: The construction of ordinariness through quotations in mediated political discourse. Discourse & Society, 29(5), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, C. (2013). Event-construal in press reports of violence in two recent political protests: A cognitive linguistic approach to CDA. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3), 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.05harCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Hanawi, Y. (2017). Bush and Obama’s addresses to the Arab world: Recontextualizing stance in political discourse. In Aijmer, K. & Lewis, D. (Eds.), Contrastive analysis of discourse-pragmatic aspects of linguistic genres (pp. 187–209). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, C. R. (2018). Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump: The strategic use and effect of negative evaluations in US election campaign tweets. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00004.hofCrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2021). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, F., Bramlett, J. C., McKinney, M. S., & Hardy, M. M. (2020). Tweeting along partisan lines: Identity-motivated elaboration and presidential debates. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120965518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, K. N., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2017). The exception or the rule: Using words to assess analytic thinking, Donald Trump, and the American presidency. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, R. (2017). The ‘tweet politics’ of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Wehling, E. (2016). Your brain’s politics: How the science of mind explains the political divide. Andrews UK Limited.Google Scholar
Lanning, K. (2005). The social psychology of the 2004 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00060.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, G. (2013). The television election night broadcast: A macro genre of political discourse. In Cap, P. & Okulska, U. (Eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication: Theory and practice (pp. 135–186). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, L. (2017). Politicians on celebrity talk shows. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N., & Nouri, L. (2021). The discourse of the US alt-right online: A case study of the Traditionalist Worker Party blog. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(4), 410–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1708763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundell, Å. K. (2010). The fragility of visuals: How politicians manage their mediated visibility in the press. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.03kroCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The language of evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (2008). Incumbency advantage in US presidential elections: The historical record. Political Science Quarterly, 123(2), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, M. A., & Taboada, M. (2017). Evaluation in political discourse addressed to women: Appraisal analysis of Cosmopolitan’s online coverage of the 2014 US midterm elections. Discourse, Context & Media, 18, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T. (1981). Longman lexicon of contemporary English. Longman.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D., & Walker, B. (2010). How can corpora be used to explore the language of poetry and drama? In O’Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 516–530). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. (2017). Language Expert: Donald Trump’s Way of Speaking Is ‘Oddly Adolescent’. The 11th Hour with Brian Williams, MSNCBC, 16 September 2017. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwnpa3KhT4YGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2011). The accountability interview, politics and change in UK public service broadcasting. In Ekström, M. & Patrona, M. (Eds.), Talking politics in broadcast media: Cross-cultural perspectives on political interviewing (pp. 33–55). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oddo, J. (2011). War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. (2003). ‘Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum’: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair. Discourse & Society, 14(5), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030145002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, A., & Taylor, C. (2017). The language of persuasion in politics: An introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, A., & Semino, E. (2019). Cancer as a metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1611723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, K., & Su, L. I.-W. (2011). The 1st person plural in political discourse: American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3251–3266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E., & Wodak, R. (2009). Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: Right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(4), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903180996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06rayCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S., & McEnery, T. (2004). The UCREL semantic analysis system. Proceedings of the beyond named entity recognition semantic labelling for NLP tasks workshop, Lisbon (pp. 7–12). https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1783/1/usas_lrec04ws.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P., & Garside, R. (1998). The CLAWS web tagger. ICAME Journal, 22, 121–123.Google Scholar
Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronan, P. (2021). Tweeting with Trump. Anglistik, 32, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.33675/ANGL/2021/2/7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020). ‘Going negative’: An appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication, 70, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A. S., & Rivers, D. J. (2020). Donald Trump, legitimisation and a new political rhetoric. World Englishes, 39(4), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, U., & Eitelmann, M. (Eds.). (2020). Linguistic inquiries into Donald Trump’s language: From ‘fake news’ to ‘tremendous success’. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoor, C. (2017). In the theater of political style: Touches of populism, pluralism and elitism in speeches of politicians. Discourse & Society, 28(6), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517721082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., Hardie, A., Koller, V. & Rayson, P. (2005). A computer-assisted approach to the analysis of metaphor variation across genres. Metaphorik.de, 15, 141–160.Google Scholar
Sowińska, A. (2013). A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008). Discourse & Society, 24(6), 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopfner, M. (2021). Just thank God for Donald Trump: Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking office. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Emotions, media and politics. Polity Press.Google Scholar
White, P. R. R. (1998). Telling media tales: The news story as rhetoric [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sydney. www.prrwhite.info/prrwhite,%201998,%20Telling%20Media%20Tales%20(unpublished%20PhD).pdfGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2020). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse. Sage.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(7), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bigne, E., Ruiz, C., Currás-Pérez, R., & Martí-Parreño, J. (2020). The effects of eWOM in social media on tourism services. In International conference on tourism research (pp. I–VIII). Academic Conferences International Limited.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, K., & Graves, M. (2018). Using the LIWC program to study dreams. Dreaming, 28(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the ‘helpfulness’ of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, S., Duff, B., Karahalios, K., & Fu, W. T. (2017). The art and science of persuasion: Not all crowdfunding campaign videos are the same. In CSCW’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 755–769). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, Q., Cao, Q., & Jones, D. R. (2012). Helpfulness of online user reviews: More is less. In AMCIS 2012 proceedings 23. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/EBusiness/23Google Scholar
Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habernal, I., & Gurevych, I. (2016). Which argument is more convincing? Analyzing and predicting convincingness of Web arguments using bidirectional LSTM. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long papers) (pp. 1589–1599). ACL.Google Scholar
Hosman, L. A. (2002). Language and persuasion. In Dillard, J. P. & Pfau, M. (Eds.), The Persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 371–390). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Slade, E. (2020). Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, J., & Liu, Y. (2010). How to interpret the helpfulness of online product reviews: Bridging the needs between customers and designers. In SMUC’10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents (pp. 87–94). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Zhan, L. (2011). Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Zhang, K., Zhou, Q., & Zhang, C. (2016). Toward understanding review usefulness: A case study on Yelp restaurants. iConference 2016 proceedings. https://doi.org/10.9776/16536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., & Xiao, L. (2021). Neural-based RST parsing and analysis in persuasive discourse. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT 2021) (pp. 274–283). ACL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a helpful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensah, H., Xiao, L., & Soundarajan, S. (2019). Characterizing susceptible users on Reddit’s ChangeMyView. In SMSociety’19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 102–107). ACM.Google Scholar
Miller, G. R. (2013). On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In Dillard, J. P. & Shen, L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 70–82). Sage.Google Scholar
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, P. K. (2001). What makes a text persuasive? Comparing students’ and experts’ conceptions of persuasiveness. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7–8), 675–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, D. T., Dabbish, L. A., & Kiesler, S. (2015). The perverse effects of social transparency on online advice taking. In CSCW’15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 207–217). ACM.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and practice. Sage.Google Scholar
Olagunju, T., Oyebode, O., & Orji, R. (2020). Exploring key issues affecting African mobile eCommerce applications using sentiment and thematic analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 114475–114486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, A. A., Behnke, C., Nelson, D., Vorvoreanu, M., & Almanza, B. (2015). A qualitative assessment of Yelp.com users’ motivations to submit and read restaurant reviews. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 13(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peldszus, A., & Stede, M. (2013). From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: A survey. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 7(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Pennebaker Conglomerates.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas-Zárate, M. D. P., López-López, E., Valencia-García, R., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Almela, Á., & Alor-Hernández, G. (2014). A study on LIWC categories for opinion mining in Spanish reviews. Journal of Information Science, 40(6), 749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, H. W. (1976). Persuasion: Understanding, practice, and analysis. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tan, C., Niculae, V., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Lee, L. (2016). Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. In WWW’16 Companion: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 613–624). ACM.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weathers, D., Swain, S. D., & Grover, V. (2015). Can online product reviews be more helpful? Examining characteristics of information content by product type. Decision Support Systems, 79, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, M. B., & Kurby, C. A. (2017). Belief in the claim of an argument increases perceived argument soundness. Discourse Processes, 54(8), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L. (2013). The effects of a shared free form rationale space in collaborative learning activities. Journal of Systems and Software, 86(7), 1727–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L. (2018). A message’s persuasive features in Wikipedia’s Article for Deletion discussions. In SMSociety’18: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 345–349). ACM.Google Scholar
Xiao, L. (2021). Fighting disinformation in social media: An online persuasion perspective. In Luttrell, R., Xiao, L., & Glass, J. (Eds.), Democracy in the disinformation age: Influence and activism in American politics (pp. 201–220). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., & Askin, N. (2014). What influences online deliberation? A Wikipedia study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(5), 898–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., & Conroy, N. (2017). Discourse relations in rationale‐containing text‐segments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(12), 2783–2794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., & Khazaei, T. (2019). Change others’ beliefs online: Online comments’ persuasiveness. In SMSociety’19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 92–101). ACM.Google Scholar
Xiao, Y., & Xiao, L. (2020). Effects of anonymity on comment persuasiveness in Wikipedia Articles for Deletion discussions. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS) (pp. 104–115). ACL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yalch, R. F., & Elmore-Yalch, R. (1984). The effect of numbers on the route to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Androutsopoulos, J. (2011). Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Kristiansen, T. & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–159). Novus Press.Google Scholar
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022–5371(69)80002-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cenni, I. (2022). Exploring digital tourism discourse: A cross-linguistic investigation of online reviews and business responses posted on TripAdvisor [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ghent University.Google Scholar
Das, G., Wiener, H. J., & Kareklas, I. (2019). To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. Journal of Business Research, 96, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decock, S., & Depraetere, I. (2018). (In)directness and complaints: A reassessment. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decock, S., & Spiessens, A. (2017). Customer complaints and disagreements in a multilingual business environment: A discursive-pragmatic analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 77–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotis, J., Buhalis, D., & Rossides, N. (2012). Social media use and impact during the holiday travel planning process. In Fuchs, M., Ricci, F., & Cantoni, L. (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 13–24). Springer.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2003). Effect displays for Generalized Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v008.i15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glikson, E., Cheshin, A., & van Kleef, G. A. (2018). The dark side of a smiley: Effects of smiling emoticons on virtual first impressions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(5), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. B., & Paradice, D. (2007). An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotions. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12), 2081–2090.Google Scholar
Hastie, T. (2020). gam: Generalized Additive Models. R package version 1.20, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gam.Google Scholar
Hilte, L. (2019). The social in social media writing: The impact of age, gender and social class indicators on adolescents’ informal online writing practices [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Antwerp University.Google Scholar
Ho, V. (2017). Giving offense and making amends: How hotel management attempts to manage rapport with dissatisfied customers. Journal of Pragmatics, 109, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppänen, S., Møller, J. S., Nørreby, T. R., Stæhr, A., & Kytölä, S.(2015). Authenticity, normativity and social media. Discourse, Context & Media, 8, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebrecht, C., Hustinx, L., & van Mulken, M.(2019). The relative power of negativity: The influence of language intensity on perceived strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18808562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meinders, D. (2017). What a BAD restaurant!!! The effect of typographical intensifiers in tweets on perceived strength of message [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Sampietro, A. (2019). Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seghers, M., De Clerck, B., & Lybaert, C. (2021). Mapping the spread of Dutch non-standard language use on corporate Facebook pages: A corpus-based analysis of service-oriented interaction. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 26(3), 363–399. https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2021.3.003.SEGHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., & Rose, R. (2018). Emojional communication in digitally mediated relationships. In Geuens, M., Pandelaere, M., Tuan Phan, M., & Vermeir, I. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol 11, pp. 152–153). European Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. Continuum.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609341006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Herck, R., Decock, S., & Fastrich, B. C. (2022). A unique blend of interpersonal and transactional strategies in English email responses to customer complaints in a B2C setting: A move analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 30–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruytenbeek, N., Verschraegen, M., & Decock, S. (2021). Exploring the impact of platforms’ affordances on the expression of negativity in online hotel reviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X., Chen, R., & Liu, M. W. (2017). The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions. Marketing Letters, 28(3), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002–016-9415-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2014). Hotels’ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction. Discourse, Context & Media, 6, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anchimbe, E. A. (2018). Offers and offer refusals: A postcolonial pragmatics perspective on World Englishes. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bautista, L. S. (2004). An overview of the Philippine component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-PHI). Asian Englishes, 7(2), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, M. (2008). World Englishes, English as a lingua franca, and intelligibility. World Englishes, 27(3–4), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1994). Introduction: Situating register in sociolinguistics. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 3–12). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, K. L., & Craig, T. Y. (2011). Language use and persuasion: Multiple roles for linguistic styles. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, A. (2019). Variation in English world-wide: Registers and global varieties. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohmann, A. (2021). Register in World Englishes research. In Schneider, B. & Heyd, T. (Eds.), Bloomsbury World Englishes (1): Paradigms (pp. 80–96). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bolt, P., & Bolton, K. (1996). The International Corpus of English in Hong Kong. In Greenbaum, S. (Ed.), Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English (pp. 197–214). Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. (2022). Comment markers in World Englishes. World Englishes, 41(2), 244–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P., & Yao, X. (2013). Colloquial features in World Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(4), 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D., & Messerli, T. C. (2022). Persuasive language and features of formality on the r/ChangeMyView subreddit. Internet Pragmatics, 5(1), 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D., & Rüdiger, S. (2016). Reporting from the field: The narrative reconstruction of experience in pick-up artist online communities. Open Linguistics, 2(1), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2010). Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuber, D. (2010). Standard English and situational variation: Sociolinguistic considerations in the compilation of ICE-Trinidad and Tobago. ICAME Journal, 34, 24–40.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., Chafe, W. L., Meyer, C., Thompson, S. A., & Martey, N. (2000). Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (2019). Modeling global syntactic variation in English using dialect classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05527.Google Scholar
Fang, X. (2017). When an Indian speaks to a Chinese: Making sense of World Englishes in the framework of communication accommodation theory. Asian Englishes, 19(2), 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. (2016). The frequency of the present perfect in varieties of English around the world. In Werner, V., Seoane, E., & Suárez-Gómez, C. (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp. 223–258). de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R. (Ed.). (2023). Speech rhythm in learner and second language varieties of English. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, R., Gut, U., & Soneye, T. (2013). ‘We just don’t even know’: The usage of the pragmatic focus particles even and still in Nigerian English. English World-Wide, 34(2), 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1991). ICE: The International Corpus of English. English Today, 7(4), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. In Lenneberg, E. H. & Lenneberg, E. (Eds.), Foundations of language development (pp. 239–265). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S. (2018). The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: Unpacking the language of government blame games. Policy Sciences, 51, 545–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, R. (Ed.). (2012). Areal features of the Anglophone world. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal, 50(3), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson-Ettle, D. M., & Schmied, J. (1999). Manual to accompany the East African component of the International Corpus of English. Department of English, Chemnitz University of Technology.Google Scholar
Humă, B., Stokoe, E. H., & Sikveland, R. O. (2019). Persuasive conduct: Alignment and resistance in prospecting ‘cold’ calls. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humă, B., Stokoe, E. H., & Sikveland, R. O. (2020). Putting persuasion (back) in its interactional context. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(3), 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H., & Stockwell, P. (2011). An introduction to the nature and functions of language (2nd ed.). A & C Black.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jeffery, C. (2003). On compiling a corpus of South African English. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 21(4), 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Y. (2017). World Englishes, pragmatics, and discourse. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J., & Sharma, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of World Englishes (pp. 272–290). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kallen, J. C., & Kirk, J. (2007). ICE-Ireland: Local variations on global standards. In Beal, J. C., Corrigan, K. P., & Moisl, H. L. (Eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora (pp. 121–162). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körtvelyessy, M., Bernaisch, T., Mukherjee, J., & Mendis, D. (2012). Manual to the written component of the International Corpus of English – Sri Lanka. Justus Liebig University Giessen, Department of English.Google Scholar
Kruger, H., & Smith, A. (2018). Colloquialization versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(3), 293–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, H., & van Rooy, B. (2016). Constrained language: A multidimensional analysis of translated English and a non-native indigenised variety of English. English World-Wide, 37(1), 26–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, H., & van Rooy, B. (2018). Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide, 39(2), 214–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, J. (2014). Diachronic stability in Indian English lexis. World Englishes, 33(1), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuckert, S., & Rüdiger, S. (2021). Discourse markers and World Englishes. World Englishes, 40(4), 482–487.Google Scholar
Mair, C. (2009). Corpus linguistics meets sociolinguistics: Studying educated spoken usage in Jamaica on the basis of the International Corpus of English (ICE). In Siebers, L. & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.), World Englishes: Problems, properties, prospects (pp. 39–60). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, C. (2013). The World System of Englishes: Accounting for the transnational importance of mobile and mediated vernaculars. English World-Wide, 34(3), 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, C. (2015). Cross-variety diachronic drifts and ephemeral regional contrasts: An analysis of modality in the extended Brown family of corpora and what it can tell us about the New Englishes. In Collins, P. (Ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp. 119–146). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meer, P., Brato, T., & Flores, J. A. M. (2021). Extending automatic vowel formant extraction to New Englishes: A comparison of different methods. English World-Wide, 42(1), 54–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, C., & Isingoma, B. (2022). Manual to the International Corpus of English—Uganda. Ruhr-University of Bochum.Google Scholar
Narum, S. R. (2006). Beyond Bonferroni: Less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Conservation Genetics, 7, 783–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. (2002). International Corpus of English. The Singapore Corpus. User manual, (User Manual distributed with the corpus).Google Scholar
Nelson, G., Wallis, S., & Aarts, B. (2002). Exploring natural language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J., & Columbus, G. (2010). The International Corpus of English – Canada. University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Nickerson, C., & Planken, B. (2015). Introducing Business English. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nini, A. (2015). Multidimensional analysis tagger (version 1.3). Retrieved 29 October 2022 http://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltaggerGoogle Scholar
Nini, A. (2019). The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 67–94). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
O’Neill, R. (2018). Seduction: Men, masculinity and mediated intimacy. Polity.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, P. (2014). Variation in the progressive: A corpus-based study into World Englishes. Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Rocklage, M. D., Rucker, D. D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2018). Persuasion, emotion, and language: The intent to persuade transforms language via emotionality. Psychological Science, 29(5), 749–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudolf von Rohr, M.-T. (2018). Persuasion in smoking cessation online: An interpersonal pragmatics perspective [PhD Dissertation]. University of Basel.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schützler, O., Gut, U., & Fuchs, R. (2017). New perspectives on Scottish Standard English: Introducing the Scottish component of the International Corpus of English. In Beal, J. & Hancil, S. (Eds.), Perspectives on Northern Englishes (pp. 273–302). de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2005). Language variation and change: The case of English as a lingua franca. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J. (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 59–75). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shastri, S. V. (2002). Overview of the Indian component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-India). Attachment of ICE-Indian Corpus. Shivaji University, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Simons, H. W. (2011). Persuasion in society. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., & Nelson, C.. (2019). World Englishes and issues of intelligibility. In Nelson, C. L., Proshina, Z. G., & Davis, D. R. (Eds.), The handbook of World Englishes (pp. 430–446). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sönning, L., & Werner, V. (2021). The replication crisis, scientific revolutions, and linguistics. Linguistics, 59(5), 1179–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford Tagger v. 3.1.5 (2013). Retrieved from: http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tagger.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Sterling, J., Jost, J., & Bonneau, R. (2020). Political psycholinguistics: A comprehensive analysis of the language habits of liberal and conservative social media users. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 805–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2013). Grammatical variation in British English dialects: A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B. (2009). Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J., & Paulasto, H. (Eds.), Vernacular universals and language contacts: Evidence from varieties of English and beyond (pp. 33–53). Routledge.Google Scholar
van Rooy, B., Terblanche, L., Haase, C., & Schmied, J. (2010). Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide, 31(3), 311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vine, B. (1999). Guide to the New Zealand component of the International Corpus of English (ICE-NZ). School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Werner, V. (2016). Rise of the undead? BE-perfects in World Englishes. In Werner, V., Seoane, E., & Suárez-Gómez, C. (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp. 259–294). Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunder, E.-M., Voormann, H., & Gut, U. (2010). The ICE Nigeria corpus project: Creating an open, rich and accurate corpus. ICAME Journal, 34, 78–88.Google Scholar
Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×