Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
9 - Conceptual Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Introduction: A ‘How-to’ Approach
- 2 How to Write Analytical Political Theory
- 3 Thought Experiments
- 4 Reflective Equilibrium
- 5 Contractualism
- 6 Moral Sentimentalism
- 7 Realism
- 8 Realistic Idealism
- 9 Conceptual Analysis
- 10 Positive Political Theory
- 11 Rational Choice Theory
- 12 Interpreting Texts
- 13 Comparative Political Thought
- 14 Ideological Analysis
- 15 How to Do a Political Theory PhD
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods in Analytical Political Theory , pp. 153 - 191Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aristotle, , 2000. Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Crisp, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John, 1998. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael, 2015. ‘Analysis’, in Zalta, Edward, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/analysis. Accessed 1 September 2015.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, 1838–43. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols., ed. Bowring, J.. Edinburgh: W. Tait.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, 2002. Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian, 2004. ‘Choice, freedom, and freedom of choice’, Social Choice and Welfare 22, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ian, 2011. ‘The myth of “merely formal freedom”’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 19, 486–95.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian, 2015. ‘Value-freeness and value-neutrality in the analysis of political concepts’, Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 1: 279–306.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., 1995. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., 2011a. ‘Freedom and money’, in On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 166–92.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A., 2011b. ‘How to do political philosophy’, in On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 225–35.Google Scholar
Connolly, William, 1983. The Terms of Political Discourse. 2nd edition. Oxford: Martin Robinson.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith, 1966. ‘Reference and definite descriptions’, The Philosophical Review 75, 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael, 2010. The Nature and Future of Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel, 2004. A Short History of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael, 2010. ‘The modest professor: interpretive charity and interpretive humility in John Rawls’s Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, 218–26.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael, 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael, 2005. ‘What should the “political” in political theory explore?’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 13, 113–34.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B., 1956. ‘Essentially contested concepts’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 167–98.Google Scholar
Gardner, John, 2001. ‘Legal positivism: 5½ myths’, American Journal of Jurisprudence 46: 199–227.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, 2000. Political Concepts and Political Theories. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gerring, John, 1999. ‘What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences’, Polity 31, 357–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, 2005. The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, Richard. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael, 2003. ‘The ordinary concept of race’, The Journal of Philosophy 100, 437–55.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, 1998. On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard, tr. Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, 1923. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning and other Legal Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony, 1987. Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 161–92.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank, 2001. ‘Précis of from Metaphysics to Ethics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 617–24.Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard, 2015. ‘Moral anti-realism’, in Zalta, Edward, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/moral-anti-realism. Accessed 20 August 2015.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, 1997. Lectures on Ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B., tr. Heath, Peter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Christian, 2011. ‘The logical space of democracy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 39: 262–97.Google Scholar
List, Christian and Valentini, Laura 2016. ‘The methodology of political theory’, in Cappelen, Herman, Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press, 525–53.Google Scholar
Locke, John, 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John, 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovett, Frank, 2012. ‘What counts as arbitrary power?’, Journal of Political Power 5: 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen, 1999. ‘Concepts and cognitive science’, in Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen, eds., Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–81.Google Scholar
Margolis, Eric and Laurence, Stephen, 2014. ‘Concepts’, in Zalta, Edward, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/concepts. Accessed 10 July 2015.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P., 2005. Philosophical Writing: An Introduction. 3rd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P., 2014. ‘Political theory and linguistic criteria in Han Feizi’s Philosophy’, Dao 13: 379–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, 1965. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volumes II and III, ed. Robson, J. M.. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, 1969. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume X, ed. Robson, J. M.. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, 1974. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volumes VII and VIII, ed. Robson, J. M.. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David, 1983. ‘Linguistic philosophy and political theory’, in Miller, David and Siedentop, Larry, eds., The Nature of Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 35–51.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, 1952. American Foreign Policy: A Critical Examination. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, Karl, 1975. ‘The term “property” in Locke’s Two Treatises of Government’, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 61, 109–15.Google Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan, 2015. ‘Why justice and injustice have no place outside the Hobbesian state’, European Journal of Political Theory 14: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix, 1981. Political Concepts: A Reconstruction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Penner, J. E., 1996. ‘The “bundle of rights” picture of property’, University of Los Angeles Law Review 43, 711–820.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, 2012. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne, 2013. Our Bodies, Whose Property? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1999a. A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 1999b. Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 47–72.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John, 2007. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand, 1923. ‘Vagueness’, Australasian Journal of Psychology and Philosophy 1, 84–92.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, 1970. ‘Concept misformation in comparative politics’, American Political Science Review 64: 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni, 1984. Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, 1987. ‘Morality through thick and thin: a critical notice of Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy’, The Philosophical Review 96, 411–34.Google Scholar
Schroeter, Laura, 2004. ‘The limits of conceptual analysis’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85: 425–53.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, 2002. Visions of Politics, Volume I: Regarding Method. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John, 2012. ‘Précis of The Domain of Reasons’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 174–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Francisco, 2015. Selections from Three Works, ed. Pink, Thomas. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Swanton, Christine, 1985. ‘On the “essential contestedness” of political concepts’, Ethics 95, 811–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, 1985. The Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, Alexis, 2003. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America, ed. Kramnick, Isaac. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter, Steiner, Hillel and Otsuka, Michael, 2005. ‘Why left-libertarianism is not incoherent, indeterminate, or irrelevant: a reply to Fried’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 201–15.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe, 1995. Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, 2002. ‘Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?’, Law and Philosophy 21: 137–64.Google Scholar
Wallis, John, 1662. Hobbius Heauton-timorumenos, or a Consideration of Mr Hobbes His Dialogues. Oxford: A. & L. Lichfield.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 2009. Philosophical Investigations, 4th edition, ed. and tr. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan, 2013. ‘Analytic political philosophy’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, ed. Beaney, Michael. Oxford University Press, 795–822.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by