Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T01:30:47.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Climate Change and Microclimate

from Part III - Environmental Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Roger G. Barry
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Peter D. Blanken
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

Global climate has undergone major changes over the last century. Mountain glaciers have retreated worldwide, exposing new land areas, and biomes have shifted their boundaries poleward and upward. Global temperatures have risen by almost 1 °C since the 1880s and in high northern latitudes the warming has been amplified several-fold. The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide increased by almost 40 percent from about 290 ppm in 1900 to 400 ppm in 2015. Atmospheric methane increased since 1750 by 250 percent to 1800 ppb. How these changes have affected microclimates is the topic of this chapter. We begin with an overview of the major changes that have been observed in the climate system.

Overview of Global Trends

Global climate is determined by a combination of natural processes and human impacts on the climate system. Natural variability on decadal to century timescales is a result of variations in solar output, volcanic eruptions, air–sea interactions, and atmospheric variability. Solar variability occurs during the solar cycle, which lasts about 11 years on average. Between solar maximum and minimum, total solar output varies by 1.3 W m−2, or 0.1 percent. However, there are larger variations in the UV spectrum. Lean et al. (1997) calculate that the variability is 1.1 percent in the 0.2–0.3 μm range and 0.25 percent in the 0.3–0.4 μm range. Counterintuitively, sunspots (cooler, darker areas on the Sun's photosphere) increase in number toward a solar maximum because the bright faculae that surround the spots are more numerous, increasing the solar output. Explosive volcanic eruptions, especially those occurring in the tropics, force fine ash and sulfur dioxide (SO2) particles into the stratosphere, where they circle the globe. These exert a cooling effect in the subsequent two to three years, lowering average temperatures significantly, particularly in the boreal summers. Sigi et al. (2015) analyze ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica for ash and SO2 signatures over the last 2500 years and correlate these with tree ring data. They find that the 5 year average cooling in three regions of the Northern Hemisphere was –0.6 °C for the 19 largest tropical eruptions in the Common Era (CE). Two very large events in the decade 530s CE led to departures in European temperatures of –1.6 to –2.5 °C and –1.4 to –2.7 °C. Cold conditions from the second event persisted for almost a decade.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, L. V., et al. 2006. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D05109.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, E. A., and Long, S. P. 2004. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytical review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. Tansley Review, New Phytologist 165 ,351–72.Google Scholar
Anthelme, F., Villaret, J-C, and Brun, J-J. 2007. Shrub encroachment in the Alps gives rise to the convergence of sub-alpine communities on a regional scale. J. Veg. Sci. 18, 355–62.Google Scholar
Badh, A. 2011. Understanding the climate-change impact on the growing g degree days for corn in the United States of America. Ph.D. Dissertation. Fargo: North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science,
Barry, R. G., and Gan, T. Y,. 2011. The global cryosphere; Past, present and future.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165–89.
Brown, R. D., and Robinson, D. A. 2011. Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover variability and change over 1922–2010 including an assessment of uncertainty. The Cryosphere 5, 219–29.Google Scholar
Christianssen, D. E, Markstrom, S. L., and Hay, L. E. 2011. Impacts of climate change on the growing season in the United States. Earth Interactions 15(33), 1–17.Google Scholar
De Frenne, P. 2013. Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 110(46), 18, 561–6.Google Scholar
Dutkiewicz, V. A. et al., 2014, Forty-seven years of weekly atmospheric black carbon measurements in the Finnish Arctic: Decrease in black carbon with declining emissions. J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7667–683,
Elmendorf, S. C. et al., 2012. Global assessment of experimental climate warming on tundra vegetation: heterogeneity over space and time. Ecology Letters 15(2), 164–75.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. E. et al. 2014 Tundra greenness. Arctic Report Card: Update for 2014. www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/tundra_greenness.html.
Feldman, D. R. et al. 2015. Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature14240Google Scholar
Fischer, E. M., and Knutti, R. 2014. Detection of spatially aggregated changes in temperature and precipitation extremes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41. doi:10.1002/2013GL058499.Google Scholar
Gavazov, K., Spiegelberger, T., and Buttler, A. 2014. Transplantation of subalpine wood-pasture turfs along a natural climatic gradient reveals lower resistance of unwooded pastures to climate change compared to wooded ones. Oecologia 174, 1425–35.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2010. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48(4), RG 4004.Google Scholar
Hao, G-C. et al. 2014. Soil thermal dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems of the conterminous United States from 1948 to 2008: An analysis with a process-based soil physical model and AmeriFlux data. Clim. Change 126, 135–50.Google Scholar
Hartmann, D. L., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Rusticucci, M. et al. 2013. Observations: Atmosphere and surface. In T. F. Stocker et al. (eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I, Fifth Assessment Report of the Inter- governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–254.
Henry, G. H. R., and Molau, U. 1997. Tundra plants and climate change: The International Tundra Experiment (ITEX). Global Change Biology 3(Suppl. 1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Illán, J. G., Gutiérrez, D., and Wilson, R. 2010. The contributions of topoclimate and land cover to species distributions and abundance: Fine-resolution tests for a mountain butterfly fauna. Global Ecol., Biogeog. 19, 159–73.Google Scholar
Jia, G. J., Epstein, H. E., and Walker, D. M. 2009. Vegetation greening in the Canadian Arctic related to decadal warming. J. Environ. Monit. 11, 2231–8.Google Scholar
Jones, A. G. et al., 2014. Completing the FACE of elevated CO2 research. Environment International 73, 252–8.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, M. T., Racine, C. H., Walters, J. C., and Osterkamp, T. E. 2001. Permafrost degradation and ecological changes associated with a warming climate in central Alaska. Climate Change 48, 551–79.Google Scholar
Kirkham, M. B. 2011. Elevated carbon dioxide: Impacts on soil and plant water relations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kwok, R., and Rothrock, D. A. 2009. Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat records: 1958–2008. Geophysical. Research Letters 36 (15), L15501.Google Scholar
Lean, J. L. et al. 1997. Detection and parameterization of variations in mid- and near-ultraviolet (200–400 nm). J. Geophys. Res. 102 (D25), 29, 939–56.Google Scholar
McCabe, G. J., Betancourt, J. L., and Feng, S. 2015. Variability in the start, end, and length of frost-free periods across the conterminous United States during the past century. Int. J. Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.4315Google Scholar
Mishra, V. et al. 2015. Changes in observed climate extremes in global urban areas. Environ. Res. Lett. 10(2), 02405.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. A. et al. 2001. Elevated CO2 enhances water relations and productivity and affects gas exchange in C-3 and C-4 grasses of the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Global Change Biology 7, 451–66.Google Scholar
Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. 2011. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: Dynamics, impacts, and research priorities. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 045509.Google Scholar
Nijs, I. et al. 1996. Free Air Temperature Increase (FATI): A new tool to study global warming effects on plants in the field. Plant, Cell Environ. 19, 495–502.Google Scholar
Osterkamp, T. 2008. Thermal state of permafrost in Alaska during the fourth quarter of the twentieth century. In D. L. Kane and K. M. Hinkel (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. Fairbanks, Alaska, Vol. 2, 1333–8.
Parmesan, C., and Yohe, G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42.Google Scholar
Parrish, T. D., and Stockwell, W. R. 2015. Urbanization and air pollution then and now. Eos 96(1), 12–15.Google Scholar
Payette, S. et al. 2004. Accelerated thawing of subarctic peatland permafrost over the last 50 years. Geophys. Res. Lett. 131, L18208.Google Scholar
Pollack, I. B. et al. 2013. Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements from 1960 to 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 118(11),Google Scholar
Poorter, H., and Navas, M. L. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist 157, 175–98.Google Scholar
Robinson, C. H. et al. 1998. Plant community responses to simulated environmental change at a high Arctic polar semi-desert. Ecology 79, 856–66.Google Scholar
Serreze, M. C. et al. 2000. Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Clim. Change 46, 159–207Google Scholar
Shiklomanov, N.I. et al, 2008. The Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) program: Data collection, management, and dissemination strategies. In Proceedings, Ninth International Conference on Permafrost, 29 June–3 July 2008, Fairbanks, Alaska. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska. 1 164752.
Shiklomanov, N. I. et al, 2010. Decadal variations of active-layer thickness in moisture-controlled landscapes, Barrow, Alaska. J. Geophys. Res., Biogeosci. 115, G4, G00I04. doi:10.1029/2009JG001248.Google Scholar
Sigi, M. et al. 2015. Timing and climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years. Nature 523, 543–9.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V., Saatchi, S. S., and Rangerson, J. T. 2004. Trends in high northern latitude soil freeze and thaw cycles from 1988 to 2002.J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 109(D12). doi: 10.1029/2003JD004472.Google Scholar
Smith, S. L. 2010. Thermal state of permafrost. In North America – a contribution to the International Polar Year. Permafrost Periglac. Proc. 21, 117–35.Google Scholar
Stocker, T. E., Qin, D-H., and Plattner, G-K. (Coordinating lead authors) et al. 2013. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tape, K. D., Sturm, M., and Racine, C. H. 2006. The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Glob. Change Biol . 12, 686–702.Google Scholar
Wan, S., Luo, Y., and Wallace, L. L. 2002. Changes in microclimate induced by experimental warming and clipping in tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biol. 8, 754–68.Google Scholar
Wild, M. et al. 2009. Global dimming and brightening: A n update beyond 2000. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D 0 0D13.
Wild, M. 2012. Enlightening Global Dimming and Brightening. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 27–37.
Yan, J. W. et al. 2014. Changes in the land surface energy budget in eastern China over the past three decades: Contributions of land-cover change and climate change. J. Climate 27, 9233–52.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×