Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Auslander–Reiten Theory of Finite-Dimensional Algebras
- 2 τ-tilting Theory – an Introduction
- 3 From Frieze Patterns to Cluster Categories
- 4 Infinite-dimensional Representations of Algebras
- 5 The Springer Correspondence
- 6 An Introduction to Diagrammatic Soergel Bimodules
- 7 A Companion to Quantum Groups
- 8 Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Multivariable Generalizations
- 9 An Introduction to Crowns in Finite Groups
- 10 An Introduction to Totally Disconnected Locally Compact Groups and Their Finiteness Conditions
- 11 Locally Analytic Representations of p-adic Groups
- References
1 - Auslander–Reiten Theory of Finite-Dimensional Algebras
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Auslander–Reiten Theory of Finite-Dimensional Algebras
- 2 τ-tilting Theory – an Introduction
- 3 From Frieze Patterns to Cluster Categories
- 4 Infinite-dimensional Representations of Algebras
- 5 The Springer Correspondence
- 6 An Introduction to Diagrammatic Soergel Bimodules
- 7 A Companion to Quantum Groups
- 8 Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Multivariable Generalizations
- 9 An Introduction to Crowns in Finite Groups
- 10 An Introduction to Totally Disconnected Locally Compact Groups and Their Finiteness Conditions
- 11 Locally Analytic Representations of p-adic Groups
- References
Summary
We give a brief introduction to the representation theory of finite-dimensional algebras via quivers and Auslander–Reiten theory. We describe the knitting algorithm, which gives a way to compute the Auslander–Reiten quiver of many algebras of finite-representation type. We also present recent work on the description of the representation theory of gentle and skew-gentle algebras via the geometry of oriented surfaces with boundary. An application of these geometric models is given in the context of τ-tilting theory.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modern Trends in Algebra and Representation Theory , pp. 5 - 45Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
[1]Adachi, T., Iyama, O. and Reiten, I. τ-tilting theory. Compos. Math., 150(3):415– 452, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Amiot, Claire, and Bru¨stle, Thomas. 2022. Derived equivalences between skewgentle algebras using orbifolds. Doc. Math., 27, 933–982.Google Scholar
[3]Amiot, Claire, Plamondon, Pierre-Guy, and Schroll, Sibylle. 2023. A complete derived invariant for gentle algebras via winding numbers and Arf invariants. Selecta Math., 29(30).Google Scholar
[4]Assem, Ibrahim. 2018. A course on cluster tilted algebras. Pages 127–176 of: Homological methods, representation theory, and cluster algebras. CRM Short Courses. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
[5]Assem, Ibrahim, and Skowron´ski, Andrzej. 1987. Iterated tilted algebras of type A˜ n. Math. Z., 195(2), 269–290.Google Scholar
[6]Assem, I., Simson, D., and Skowron´ski, A. 2006. Elements of the Representation Theory of Associative Algebras. Vol. 1. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Techniques of representation theory.Google Scholar
[7]Assem, Ibrahim, Bru¨stle, Thomas, Charbonneau-Jodoin, Gabrielle, and Plamondon, Pierre-Guy. 2010. Gentle algebras arising from surface triangulations. Algebra Number Theory, 4(2), 201–229.Google Scholar
[8]Auslander, Maurice. 1974. Representation theory of Artin algebras. I, II. Comm. Algebra, 1, 177–268; ibid. 1 (1974), 269–310.Google Scholar
[9]Auslander, M., Reiten, I., and Smalø, S. O. 1995. Representation Theory of Artin Algebras. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[10]Baur, Karin, and Coelho Simo˜es, Raquel. 2021. A geometric model for the module category of a gentle algebra. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 11357–11392.Google Scholar
[11]Bondarenko, V. M. 1991. Representations of bundles of semichained sets and their applications. Algebra i Analiz, 3(5), 38–61.Google Scholar
[12]Broomhead, Nathan. 2012. Dimer models and Calabi-Yau algebras. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 215(1011), viii+86.Google Scholar
[13]Bru¨stle, Thomas, Douville, Guillaume, Mousavand, Kaveh, Thomas, Hugh, and Yıldırım, Emine. 2020. On the combinatorics of gentle algebras. Canad. J. Math., 72(6), 1551–1580.Google Scholar
[14]Butler, M. C. R., and Ringel, Claus Michael. 1987. Auslander-Reiten sequences with few middle terms and applications to string algebras. Comm. Algebra, 15(1–2), 145–179.Google Scholar
[15]Caldero, P., Chapoton, F. and Schiffler, R. 2006. Quivers with relations arising from clusters (An case). Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 358(3), 1347–1364.Google Scholar
[16]C¸ anakc¸ı, I˙lke, and Schroll, Sibylle. 2017. Extensions in Jacobian algebras and cluster categories of marked surfaces. Adv. Math., 313, 1–49. With an appendix by Claire Amiot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]C¸ anakc¸ı, I˙lke, Pauksztello, David, and Schroll, Sibylle. 2019. Mapping cones in the bounded derived category of a gentle algebra. J. Algebra, 530, 163–194.Google Scholar
[18]Crawley-Boevey, W. W. 1989. Functorial filtrations. II. Clans and the Gelfand problem. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 40(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
[19]Deng, Bangming. 2000. On a problem of Nazarova and Roiter. Comment. Math. Helv., 75(3), 368–409.Google Scholar
[20]Fomin, S. and Zelevinsky, A. 2003. Cluster algebras. II. Finite type classification. Invent. Math., 154(1), 63–121.Google Scholar
[21]Fomin, Sergey, Shapiro, Michael, and Thurston, Dylan. 2008. Cluster algebras and triangulated surfaces. I. Cluster complexes. Acta Math., 201(1), 83–146.Google Scholar
[22]Gabriel, Peter. 1972. Unzerlegbare Darstellungen. I. Manuscripta Math., 6, 71– 103; correction, ibid. 6 (1972), 309.Google Scholar
[23]Garcia Elsener, A. 2020. Gentle m-Calabi-Yau tilted algebras. Algebra Discrete Math., 30(1), 44–62.Google Scholar
[24]Geiß, Christof. 1999. Maps between representations of clans. J. Algebra, 218(1), 131–164.Google Scholar
[25]Haiden, F., Katzarkov, L. and Kontsevich, M. 2017. Flat surfaces and stability structures. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes E´tudes Sci., 126, 247–318.Google Scholar
[26]He, Ping, Zhou, Yu, and Zhu, Bin. 2020. A geometric model for the module category of a skew-gentle algebra. 2004.11136.Google Scholar
[27]Huerfano, Ruth Stella, and Khovanov, Mikhail. 2001. A category for the adjoint representation. J. Algebra, 246(2), 514–542.Google Scholar
[28]Humphreys, James E. 1972. Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 9. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin.Google Scholar
[29]Kinsey, L. C. 1993. Topology of Surfaces. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
[30]Labardini-Fragoso, D. 2009. Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 98(3), 797–839.Google Scholar
[31]Labardini-Fragoso, Daniel, Schroll, Sibylle, and Valdivieso, Yadira. 2022. Derived categories of skew-gentle algebras and orbifolds. Glasg. Math. J., 64(3), 649–674.Google Scholar
[32]Labourie, Franc¸ois. 2013. Lectures on representations of surface groups. Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zu¨rich.Google Scholar
[33]Opper, Sebastian, Plamondon, Pierre-Guy, and Schroll, Sibylle. 2018. A geometric model for the derived category of gentle algebras. 1801.09659.Google Scholar
[34]Palu, Yann, Pilaud, Vincent, and Plamondon, Pierre-Guy. 2021. Non-kissing complexes and tau-tilting for gentle algebras. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 274(1343).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35]Riedtmann, C. 1980. Algebren, Darstellungsko¨cher, U¨ berlagerungen und zuru¨ck. Comment. Math. Helv., 55(2), 199–224.Google Scholar
[36]Ringel, Claus Michael. 1995. Some algebraically compact modules. I. Pages 419– 439 of: Abelian groups and modules (Padova, 1994). Math. Appl., vol. 343. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
[37]Rotman, Joseph J. 1979. An introduction to homological algebra. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 85. Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London.Google Scholar
[38]Schiffler, R. 2014. Quiver representations. CMS Books in Mathematics/Ouvrages de Mathe´matiques de la SMC. Springer, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[39]Schroll, Sibylle. 2015. Trivial extensions of gentle algebras and Brauer graph algebras. J. Algebra, 444, 183–200.Google Scholar
[40]Simson, Daniel, and Skowron´ski, Andrzej. 2007. Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras. Vol. 3. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 72. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Representation-infinite tilted algebras.Google Scholar