Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
Part II - English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019
Book contents
- Ontologies of English
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Ontologies of English
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Transcription Conventions
- Part I Introduction
- Part II English in/for L2 Learning and Teaching
- Part III English in Schools
- Part IV Assessing English
- Part V English in Lingua Franca Contexts
- Part VI English and Social Practice
- Part VII Commentary and Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ontologies of EnglishConceptualising the Language for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment, pp. 37 - 98Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
References
Baumgardner, R. J. (2006). Teaching World Englishes. In Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y., and Nelson, C. L., eds., The Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translation by Richard Nice of La distinction, Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les editions du minuit [1979]. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Croft, W. A. (2000). Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1996/1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). Bushes and ladders in human evolution. In Gould, S. J. (1991). Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History (pp. 56–62). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2018). Cognitive perspectives on English as lingua franca. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harder, P. (2010). Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harder, P. (2014). Variation, structure and norms. In Pütz, M., Robinson, J. A., and Reif, M., eds., Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use (pp. 53–73). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a Lingua Franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01582.xGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1982). The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1983). The Indianization of English: The English Language in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, R. (1990). Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T. (2009). The macro-social meaning of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 41, 167–192.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2014). What is to be learned: The community as the focus of social cognition. In Pütz, M., Robinson, J. A., and Reif, M., eds., Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use (pp. 23–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (eds.). 2007. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mortensen, J. (2013). Notes on English used as a lingua franca as an object of study. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 25–46. Accessed 30 June 2018 from doi: 10.1515/jelf-2013-0002Google Scholar
Nelson, C. N. (2011). Intelligibility in World Englishes. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A., eds., Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (2001). Enlightenment and Pragmatism (The Spinoza Lectures). Amsterdam: Koninklijke van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. (2005). Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R., ed. (1967). The Linguistic Turn. Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2004). 10. Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–239.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. doi: 10.1037/h0042769Google Scholar
Smith, L. (2011). Foreword to C. L. Nelson, Intelligibility in World Englishes. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, L. E. and Nelson, C. L. (2006). World Englishes and issues of intelligibility. In Kachru, B. B., Kachru, Y., and Nelson, C. L., eds., The Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1864). The Principles of Biology. London and Edinburgh: Williams & Norgate.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1998). Review of John Honey: Language is power. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2(3), 457–461.Google Scholar
VOICE (2011). Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English. Frequently Asked Questions. Online. Accessed 12 October 2012 from www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/faqGoogle Scholar
VOICE (2013). Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English. Frequently Asked Questions. Online. Accessed 6 July 2018 from www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/faqGoogle Scholar
References
Achard, M. (2007). Usage-based Semantics: Meaning and Distribution of Three French ‘Breaking’ Verbs. In Nenonen, M. and Niemi, S., eds., Collocations and Idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19–2 0, 2007. Studies in Languages, University of Joensuu, Vol. 41. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E. and MacWhinney, B. (1988). What is functionalism? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 27 , 137–152.Google Scholar
Brandt, S., Verhagen, A., Lieven, E., and Tomasello, M. (2011). German children’s productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: Testing the effects of frequency and variability. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 325–357.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, R. A. (2014). Pursuing information: A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing – A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2014). Cognitive and social language use. In Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 397–402. [Special Issue Bridging the Gap. Cognitive and Social Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning and Teaching, J. Hulstijn, R. F. Young, and L. Ortega, eds.]Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W., eds., Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 49–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. and Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 111–139.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In Pallotti, G. and Wagner, J., eds., L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives (pp. 337–373). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). Negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). The emergence of creativity in L2 English – A usage-based case-study. In Bell, N., ed., Multiple Perspectives on Language Play (pp. 281–316). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018a). “We’re learning a lot of new words”: Encountering new L2 vocabulary outside of class. Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018b). Building a semiotic repertoire for social action: Interactional competence as biographical discovery. Classroom Discourse 9(1), 68–76.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2018c). L2 constructions and interactional competence: Subordination and coordination in English L2 learning. In Tyler, A., Huang, L., and Jan, H., eds., What Is Applied Cognitive Linguistics? Answers from Current SLA Research (pp. 61–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2019). Learning behaviors in the wild: How people achieve L2 learning outside of class. In Hellermann, J., Eskildsen, S. W., Pekarek Doehler, S., and Piirainen-Marsh, A., eds., Conversation Analytic Research on Learning-in-Action: The Complex Ecology of L2 Interaction in the Wild. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (in press). “Let me help you”: Learning to do and correct public writing in the L2 classroom. In Kunitz, S., Sert, O., and Markee, N., eds., Emerging Issues in Classroom Discourse and Interaction: Theoretical and Applied CA Perspectives on Pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Cadierno, T. (2015). Advancing usage-based approaches to L2 studies. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W., eds., Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 1–18). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Kasper, G. (2019). Interactional usage-based L2 pragmatics. From form-meaning pairings to construction-action relations. In Taguchi, N., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics (pp. 176–191). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 102(supplement), 3–10.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In Alonso, R. A., ed., Learning to Speak in an L2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Theodórsdóttir, G. (2017). Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Wagner, J. (2015). Emodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65(2), 419–448.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. and Wagner, J. (2018). From trouble in the talk to new resources – The interplay of bodily and linguistic resources in the talk of a novice speaker of English as a second language. In Pekarek Doehler, S., Wagner, J., and González-Martínez, E., eds., Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T. and Li, P. (2015). On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W., eds., Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 207–232). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, A. and Wagner, J. (2007). S/FL Learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a ‘reconceptualized’ SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91(focus issue), 800–819.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. and Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and co-participation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Pekarek Doehler, S., and Hellermann, J., eds. (2011). L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Clevedon: Multilngual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, E. (2013). Stability and change in one adult’s second language English negation. Language Learning, 6(3), 463–498.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J., eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ishida, M. (2009). Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. In Nguyen, H. T. and Kasper, G., eds., Talk-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives (pp. 351–386). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 13–36.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. and Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In Atkinson, D., ed., Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. and Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34 , 171–212.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2009). Korean discourse markers in L2 Korean speakers’ conversation: An acquisitional perspective. In Nguyen, H. T. and Kasper, G., eds., Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives (pp. 317–350). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Koshik, I. (2002). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(3), 277–309.Google Scholar
Kunitz, S. and Skogmyr Marian, K. (2017). Tracking immanent language learning behavior over time in task-based classroom work. Tesol Quarterly, 51(3), 507–535.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1 of Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as basis for language instruction. In Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C., eds., Handbook of Cognitive Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Salomo, D., and Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children’s production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 20(3), 481–508.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1975). Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153–165.Google Scholar
Majlesi, A. R. and Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1 , 193–207.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second-language acquisition studies. In Tarone, E. E., Gass, S. M., and Cohen, A. D., eds., Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition (pp. 89–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602–615.Google Scholar
Markee, N. and Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, K. (2011). Acquiring interactional competence in a study abroad context: Japanese language learners’ use of the interactional particle ne. Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 519–540.Google Scholar
Mellow, J. D. (2006). The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 645–670.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. and Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518.Google Scholar
Mori, J. (2010). Learning language in real time: A case study of the Japanese demonstrative pronoun “are” in word-search sequences. In Kasper, G., Nguyen, H. T., Yoshimi, D., and Yoshioka, J. K., eds., Pragmatics in Language Learning, Vol. 12 (pp. 15–42). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. and Wagner, J., eds. (2011). L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 Interactional Competence: The Development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 9 (1).Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, S. and Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W., eds., Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 233–268). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reder, S. (2005). The “Lab School”. Focus on Basics, 8(A). Available online: www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/fob/2005/fob_8a.pdf.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. and Ellis, N. C., eds. (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction, and co-participant context. In Hovy, E. H. and Scott, D. R., eds., Conversational and Computational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account (pp. 3–35). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In Enfield, N. J. and Levinson, S. C., eds., Roots of Human Sociality (pp. 70–96). London: Berg.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., and Thompson, S. A. (1996). Introduction. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., and Thompson, S. A., eds., Interaction and Grammar (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. and Kalmeyer, W. (2001). Interaction by inscription. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 465–490.Google Scholar
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Theodórsdóttir, G. and Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). Achieving intersubjectivity and doing learning: The use of English as a Lingua Franca in Icelandic L2. Nordand, 6(2), 59–85.Google Scholar
Tode, T. and Sakai, H. (2016). Exemplar-based instructed second language development and classroom experience. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(2), 210–234.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. and Bates, E., eds. (2001). Language Development: The Essential Readings. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild. Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In Cadierno, T. and Eskildsen, S. W., eds., Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 75–104). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
References
Anderson, J. (2016). Initial teacher training courses and non-native speaker teachers. ELT Journal, 70(3), 261–274.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2018). Reimagining English language learners from a translingual perspective. ELT Journal, 72(1), 247–249.Google Scholar
Aneja, G. A. (2016a). Rethinking nativeness: Toward a dynamic paradigm of (non)native speakering. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(4), 351–379.Google Scholar
Aneja, G. A. (2016b). (Non)native speakered: Rethinking (non)nativeness and teacher identity in TESOL teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 572–597.Google Scholar
Au, T., Kwok, A., Tong, L. et al. (2017). The social costs in communication hiccups between native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(3), 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Association of Applied Linguistics (BAAL). (2017). BAALmail. https://baalweb.wordpress.com/baalmail/Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). On EFL teachers, awareness, and agency. ELT Journal 53(3), 207–214.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua Franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939.Google Scholar
Chaloner, J., Evans, A., and Pragnell, M. (n.d.). Supporting the British Economy through Teaching English as a Foreign Language: An Assessment of the Contribution of English Language Teaching to the United Kingdom Economy. English UK. www.englishuk.com/uploads/assets/members/newsflash/2015/11_nov/Economic_impact_report_44pp__WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. and Munro, M. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J. (2018). Why the dichotomy ‘L1 Versus LX User’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’. Applied Linguistics, 39(2), 236–240.Google Scholar
Firth, A. and Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
Giles, H. and Powesland, P. F. (1975). Accommodation theory. In Coupland, N. and Jaworski, A., eds., Sociolinguistics: A Reader and Coursebook. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, J., and Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J. and Coupland, N., eds., Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, K. and Dovidio, J. (2016). Social dominance orientation, nonnative accents, and hiring recommendations. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(4), 544–551.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2005). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics: Breaking the Language Spell. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2014). Moving beyond accuracy: From tests of English to tests of ‘Englishing’. ELT Journal, 68(4), 376–385.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. (2018). Cognitive perspectives on English as a Lingua Franca. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., and Dewey, M., eds., Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 74–84). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, C. J. and Wicaksono, R. (2019). Changing Englishes: An online course for teachers (v.02). Online. www.changingenglishes.onlineGoogle Scholar
Hall, C. J., Wicaksono, R., Liu, S., Qian, Y. and Xu, X. (2017). Exploring teachers’ ontologies of English: Monolithic conceptions of grammar in a group of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 87–109.Google Scholar
Harvey, E., ed. (1480/1984). The Court of Sapience. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Higby, E., Kim, J., and Obler, L. K. (2013). Multilingualism and the brain. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 68–101.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M., ed., The New Psychology of Language (pp. 155–175). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H. (2013). The effects of accent familiarity and language teaching experience on raters’ judgments of non-native speech. System, 41, 770–785.Google Scholar
Hwang, J., Brennan, S., and Huffman, M. (2015). Phonetic adaptation in non-native spoken dialogue: Effects of priming and audience design. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 72–90.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–182.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Abingdon, Oxon, and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B., ed. (1992). The Other Tongue – English across Cultures, 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (2008). The first step: The Smith paradigm for intelligibility in world Englishes. World Englishes, 27(3–4), 293–296.Google Scholar
Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2016). The non-native English speaker teachers in TESOL movement. ELT Journal, 70(2), 180–189.Google Scholar
Leung, C., Harris, R., and Rampton, B. (1997). The idealised native speaker, reified, and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 543–560.Google Scholar
Mahboob, A. and Golden, R. (2013). Looking for native speakers of English: Discrimination in English language teaching job advertisements. Voices in Asia Journal, 1(1), 72–81.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46(4), 340–349.Google Scholar
Morrison, L. (2016). Native English speakers are the world’s worst communicators. www.bbc.com/capital/story/20161028-native-english-speakers-are-the-worlds-worst-communicatorsGoogle Scholar
Moussu, L. and Llurda, E. (2008). Non-native English speaking English language teachers: History and research. Language Teaching, 41(3), 315–348.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M. and Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. L. (1982). Intelligibility and non-native varieties of English. In Kachru, B. B., ed., The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Neuliep, J. and Speten-Hansen, K. (2013). The influence of ethnocentrism on social perceptions of nonnative accents. Language and Communication, 33, 167–176.Google Scholar
Pae, T. (2017). Effects of the differences between native and non-native English-speaking teachers on students’ attitudes and motivation toward learning English. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(2), 163–178.Google Scholar
Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101.Google Scholar
Russo, M., Islam, G., and Koyuncu, B. (2017). Non-native accents and stigma: How self-fulfilling prophesies can affect career outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 507–520.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209–239.Google Scholar
Selvi, A. F. (2014). Myths and misconceptions about nonnative English speakers in the TESOL (NNEST) movement. TESOL Journal, 5(3), 573–611.Google Scholar
Sheppard, B., Elliott, N., and Baese-Berk, M. (2017). Comprehensibility and intelligibility of international student speech: Comparing perceptions of university EAP instructors and content faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 42–51.Google Scholar
Smith, L. E. and Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333–342.Google Scholar
Street, J. A. (2017). This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of object relative clauses by native and non-native speakers of English. Language Sciences, 59, 192–203.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. and Zanini, N (2017). Native speakers in A level modern foreign languages. OFQUAL. www.gov.uk/government/publications/native-speakers-in-a-level-modern-foreign-languagesGoogle Scholar
TESOL. (2006). Position Statement against Discrimination of Nonnative Speakers of English in the Field of TESOL. www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/advocacy/position-statement-against-nnest-discrimination-march-2006.pdf?sfvrsn=2Google Scholar
TESOL. (2008). Position Statement on English as a Global Language. www.tesol.org/docs/pdf/10884.pdf?sfvrsn=2Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P. and Turuševa, L. (2015). Ethnic identity and second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 234–252.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Arndt, A. D., Singh, S. N. et al. (2013). “You Lost Me at Hello”: How and when accent-based biases are expressed and suppressed. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(4), 185–196.Google Scholar
Wicaksono, R. (2013). Raising students’ awareness of the construction of communicative (in)competence in international classrooms. In Ryan, J. ed., Cross Cultural Teaching and Learning for Home and International Students: Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar