Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The imbalances and limitations of theory and research on organizational wrongdoing
- 2 On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
- 3 Wrong paths to right: defining morality with or without a clear red line
- 4 From market enablers to market participants: redefining organizational and political-legal arrangements and opportunities for financial wrongdoing,1930s–2000
- 5 Wrongdoing and market development: an examination of the distinct roles of trust and distrust
- 6 Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: a “boundaries” perspective on professional misconduct
- 7 S/he blinded me with science: the sociology of scientific misconduct
- 8 Social networks and organizational wrongdoing in context
- 9 Falling stars: celebrity, infamy, and the fall from (and return to) grace
- 10 Compensation and employee misconduct: the inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms
- 11 Beware of organizational saints: how a moral self-concept may foster immoral behavior
- 12 “Is it me? Or is it me?” The role of coactivated multiple identities and identifications in promoting or discouraging workplace crimes
- 13 Consequences of organizational misconduct: too much and too little punishment
- 14 Who bears the brunt? A review and research agenda for the consequences of organizational wrongdoing for individuals
- 15 Organizational wrongdoing and media bias
- 16 Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn
- Index
- References
14 - Who bears the brunt? A review and research agenda for the consequences of organizational wrongdoing for individuals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- 1 The imbalances and limitations of theory and research on organizational wrongdoing
- 2 On taking the theoretical substance of outcomes seriously: a meta-conversation
- 3 Wrong paths to right: defining morality with or without a clear red line
- 4 From market enablers to market participants: redefining organizational and political-legal arrangements and opportunities for financial wrongdoing,1930s–2000
- 5 Wrongdoing and market development: an examination of the distinct roles of trust and distrust
- 6 Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: a “boundaries” perspective on professional misconduct
- 7 S/he blinded me with science: the sociology of scientific misconduct
- 8 Social networks and organizational wrongdoing in context
- 9 Falling stars: celebrity, infamy, and the fall from (and return to) grace
- 10 Compensation and employee misconduct: the inseparability of productive and counterproductive behavior in firms
- 11 Beware of organizational saints: how a moral self-concept may foster immoral behavior
- 12 “Is it me? Or is it me?” The role of coactivated multiple identities and identifications in promoting or discouraging workplace crimes
- 13 Consequences of organizational misconduct: too much and too little punishment
- 14 Who bears the brunt? A review and research agenda for the consequences of organizational wrongdoing for individuals
- 15 Organizational wrongdoing and media bias
- 16 Ethical learning: releasing the moral unicorn
- Index
- References
Summary
The subject of corporate misconduct has become a topic of particular interest for scholars in accounting, finance, and organizational studies. Corporate misconduct is broadly defined as “the organizational pursuit of any action considered illegitimate from an ethical, regulatory, or legal standpoint” (Harris and Bromiley 2007: 351). Scholars have investigated the antecedents of misconduct (e.g., Larkin and Pierce, this volume; Palmer and Moore, this volume; Ashforth and Lange, this volume), and to a lesser degree, its immediate consequences for guilty organizations and other firms to which they are linked (e.g., Greve and Teh, this Volume). Significant gaps in this literature are still ripe for exploration, particularly as concerns the longer-lasting effects that organizational wrongdoing can have on individuals employed by those organizations, to whom consequences might adhere, and the consequences of illegitimate behavior for employees below the level of the top management team. That is, although scholars have demonstrated that revelations of financial misconduct lead to immediate consequences for organizational elites, we have scant theory explaining the mechanisms through which the taint of fraud is transferred from organizations to individuals – especially the non-elite – or what the lasting impact for any of those individuals might be.
The link between misconduct at the macro-level and consequences for the individuals who are implicated, either directly or indirectly, seems like an area ripe with opportunity for meso-level theorizing. Furthermore, extending this line of inquiry to employees of organizations who have no plausible connection to wrongdoing save the source of their paycheck – for example, entry-level employees, those at satellite offices, those in completely unconnected business units or operating divisions – remains unexplored. How can what we know about individual psychology, biases, and behavior inform the process through which organizational misconduct leeches into individuals’ lives? What can our knowledge of organizational learning, routines, roles, norms, and culture tell us about the ways in which individuals are likely to react to wrongdoing within the organizations they inhabit? Despite the abundance of fertile ground for theorizing, almost none of this research has been published.
Indeed, what we know about the consequences of organizational wrongdoing on individuals is limited to a narrow set of about three dozen studies, roughly evenly distributed among the fields of organizational theory, finance, and accounting, with very little input from researchers in social psychology or organizational behavior.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Organizational WrongdoingKey Perspectives and New Directions, pp. 404 - 434Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
, , and
1999. “Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud,” Journal of Law and Economics
42(1): 309–342.Google Scholar
, , , and
2006. “A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements,” Academy of Management Journal
49(6): 1119–1136.Google Scholar
, , , and
2007. “Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering organizational taint,” Academy of Management Journal
50 (1): 149–174.Google Scholar
and
1991. “Institutional linkages and organizational mortality,” Administrative Science Quarterly
36(2): 187–218.Google Scholar
1999. “Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP,” Accounting Review
74(4): 425–457.Google Scholar
, , , and
1998. “Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies,” European Journal of Social Psychology
28(5): 697–729.Google Scholar
, , and
2012. “Time to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms,” Academy of Management Journal
55(6): 1334–1359.Google Scholar
and
1989. “An analysis of stock price reaction to management change in distressed firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics
11(1): 95–106.Google Scholar
2010. “Disciplinary measures in response to restatements after Sarbanes-Oxley,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
2(3): 195–225.Google Scholar
, , , and
2002. “Fight or flight: Managing stigma in executive careers,” Academy of Management Proceedings and Membership Directory N1–N6.
and
2003. “New evidence on the market for directors: Board membership and Pennsylvania Senate Bill 1310,” Journal of Finance
58(1): 197–230.Google Scholar
and
1985. “Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics
7(1): 43–66.Google Scholar
and
2011. “Damaged goods: Board decisions to dismiss reputationally compromised directors,” Academy of Management Journal
54(3): 509–527.Google Scholar
1989. “The aftermath of organizational culture: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms,” Academy of Management Journal
32(3): 577–605.Google Scholar
and
1995. “CEO and director turnover in failing firms: An illusion of change,” Strategic Management Journal
16(5): 393–400.Google Scholar
, , and
1993. “The stock market effects of CEO succession in bankrupt firms,” Journal of Management
19(3): 517–533.Google Scholar
, , and
2006. “The reputational penalty for aggressive accounting: Earnings restatements and management turnover,” Accounting Review
81(1): 83–112.Google Scholar
and
2003. “You are known by the directors you keep: Reputable directors as a signaling mechanism for young firms,” Management Science
49(8): 1003–1017.Google Scholar
and
1991. “Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation,” Academy of Management Journal
34(3): 517–554.Google Scholar
, , , and
1988. “Executive turnover following option backdating allegations,” Accounting Review
88(1): 75–105.Google Scholar
1994. “Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts,” Administrative Science Quarterly
39(1): 57–88.Google Scholar
and
1992. “Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impressions management theories,” Academy of Management Journal
35(4): 699–738.Google Scholar
, , and
2012. “Reputation penalties for poor monitoring of executive pay: Evidence from option backdating,” Journal of Financial Economics
104(1): 118–144.Google Scholar
1980. “Agency problems and the theory of the firm,” Journal of Political Economy
88(2): 288–307.Google Scholar
and
1983. “Separation of ownership and control,” Journal of Law and Economics
26(2): 301–326.Google Scholar
2005. “Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter?” Accounting Review
80(2): 539–561.Google Scholar
and
2000. “The consequences of forced CEO succession for outside directors,” Journal of Business
73(4): 597–627.Google Scholar
, , and
1991. “The financial and market effects of the SEC's accounting and auditing enforcement releases,” Journal of Accounting Research
29(3): 107–142.Google Scholar
and
2005. “The impact of stock-option compensation for outside directors on firm value,” Journal of Business
78(6): 2229–2254.Google Scholar
1989. “Management turnover and financial distress,” Journal of Financial Economics
25(2): 241–262.Google Scholar
and
1993. “CEO compensation in financially distressed firms: An empirical analysis,” Journal of Finance
48(2): 425–458.Google Scholar
1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Simon and Schuster, Inc.
and
2014. “How firms respond to financial restatement: CEO successors and external reactions,” Academy of Management Journal
57(2014): 1759–1785.Google Scholar
and
2004. “The effect of director linkages to stigmatized firms: Market reaction to bankruptcy,” Annual meeting of the Academy of Management.
, , , , and
2013. “Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: The 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on Parliamentary elites,” Administrative Science Quarterly
58(3): 313–345.Google Scholar
2007. “Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference,” Academy of Management Review
32(2): 393–417.Google Scholar
, , and
2010. “Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct,” Academy of Management Annals
4(1): 53–107.Google Scholar
and
1992. “Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies,” Management Science
38(10): 1445–1466.Google Scholar
and
1984. “Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers,” Academy of Management Review
9(2): 193–206.Google Scholar
and
2007. “Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation,” Organization Science
18(3): 350–367.Google Scholar
, , and
2012. “Internal corporate governance, CEO turnover, and earnings management,” Journal of Financial Economics
104(1): 44–69.Google Scholar
, , and
2008. “The importance of distinguishing errors from irregularities in restatement research: The case of restatements and CEO/CFO turnover,” Accounting Review
83(6): 1487–1519.Google Scholar
1981. Corporate Control, Corporate Power. Cambridge University Press.
, , and
2013. “The use and effectiveness of top executive dismissal,” Leadership Quarterly
24(1): 9–28.Google Scholar
2006. “Should we stay or should we go? Status accountability anxiety and client defections,” Administrative Science Quarterly
51(1): 97–128.Google Scholar
2008. “Director interlocks and spillover effects of reputational penalties from financial reporting fraud,” Academy of Management Journal
51(3): 537–555.Google Scholar
and
1990. “Outside directorships and corporate performance,” Journal of Financial Economics
27(2): 389–410.Google Scholar
, , and
2008. “The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation,” Journal of Financial Economics
88(2): 193–215.Google Scholar
and
1988. “Targeted share repurchases and top management changes,” Journal of Financial Economics
20(1–2): 493–506.Google Scholar
and
2010. “Accounting irregularities and executive turnover in founder-managed firms,” Accounting Review
85(1): 287–314.Google Scholar
and
1989. Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
1986. Directors: Myth and Reality. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
2002. “Reframing organizational misconduct: A study of deceptive sales practices at a major life insurance company,” Business & Society
41(2): 242–250.Google Scholar
and
1997. “Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality,” Organization Science
8(6): 624–647.Google Scholar
and
1982. “Predation, reputation and entry deterrence,” Journal of Economic Theory
27(2): 280–312.Google Scholar
1996. “What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories,” Annual Review of Sociology
22: 271–298.Google Scholar
2006. “The effects of fraud and lawsuit revelation on U.S. executive turnover and compensation,” Journal of Business Ethics
64(4): 405–419.Google Scholar
2012. “Accounting complexity, misreporting, and the consequences of misreporting,” Review of Accounting Studies
17(1): 72–95.Google Scholar
2011. “Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities,” Academy of Management Review
36(4): 641–662.Google Scholar
and
1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
2008. “Stigma and settling up: An integrated approach to the consequences of organizational misconduct for organizational elites,” Journal of Business Ethics
80(1): 141–150.Google Scholar
and
2015. “Organizational failure and intraprofessional status loss,” Organization Science, Published online in Articles in Advance January 15, 2015.
and
1985. “Executive succession in failing firms,” Academy of Management Journal
28(3): 680–686.Google Scholar
1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study of Politics and Organization. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
1982. “Consumer information, product quality, and seller reputation,” Bell Journal of Economics
13(1): 20–35.Google Scholar
and
2004. “Toward the construct definition of positive deviance,” American Behavioral Scientist
47(6): 828–847.Google Scholar
2005. “Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members,” Journal of Accounting Research
43(2): 291–334.Google Scholar
1995. “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches,” Academy of Management Review
20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
and
1987. “The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management,” Academy of Management Journal
30(3): 405–436.Google Scholar
and
2014. “Who cooks the books in China, and does it pay?” Available at SSRN 2391744.
1985. “Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice,” Research in Organizational Behavior
7: 297.Google Scholar
2007. “Corporate scandals and spoiled identities: How organizations shift stigma to employees,” Business Ethics Quarterly
17(3): 477–496.Google Scholar
, , and
1988. “Stock-prices and top management changes,” Journal of Financial Economics
20(1–2): 461–492.Google Scholar
1988. “Outside directors and CEO turnover,” Journal of Financial Economics
20(1–2): 431–460.Google Scholar
and
2011. “CEO Dismissal: The role of investment analyst,” Strategic Management Journal
32(11): 1161–1182.Google Scholar
and
2013. “Executive turnover in the stock option backdating wave: The impact of social context,” Strategic Management Journal
34(5): 590–609.Google Scholar
, , and
2008. “The stigmatization and devaluation of elites associated with corporate failures: A process model,” Academy of Management Review
33(1): 231–251.Google Scholar
, , and
2012. “Stay or leave: Director identities and voluntary exit from the board during organizational crisis,” Organization Science
23(3): 835–850.Google Scholar
2004. “The impact of public opinion on board structure changes, director career progression, and CEO turnover: evidence from CalPERS’ corporate governance program,” Journal of Corporate Finance
10(1): 199–228.Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by