In 2008, Sir Ian Blair, then Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, resigned and there was a consequent sigh of relief throughout policing. He had clung to office for so long that his tenacity had become an embarrassment, and that had threatened the public's often fragile respect for the police. When Sir Paul Stephenson, Blair's successor, resigned on 17 July 2011, citing the ‘distraction’ which criticism of him would cause the Met, there was, by contrast, considerable dismay and regret. Actually, his action is typical of the man; his honesty and strong sense of public probity would not have allowed him to continue if he felt that he had himself become the story.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), known in policing as ‘the 20/20 hindsight brigade’, is investigating allegations against the former Commissioner, so it is probably premature to come to any conclusions about the ethics of the relationship between police leaders and senior editorial staff at the now defunct News of the World, as it also may be about the wider question of newspapers paying police officers for information. Assistant Commissioner John Yates has also resigned (18 July), citing similar reasons to Sir Paul's for his departure, after a week of heavy pressure and publicity. Two former chief officers at the Metropolitan Police, Andy Hayman and Peter Clarke, are also in the frame for the IPCC to look at.

This all seems to lend substance to media claims that policing is in crisis and that the police are led by inept, malign or naïve people. But there are some things we would do well to bear in mind: first, the Met is not the police. It likes to think it is sometimes, because it has some national roles, but policing is more than what happens in London. The second point is that policing goes on, whoever is at the top. Someone will step in and mind the shop, while the police go about their daily, routine, necessary and unglamorous tasks. The third point to make is that none of the allegations against any of the police leaders is yet proved and the cloud of speculation may be as evanescent as mist before sunrise.