Capturing History

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139565875.013

8 - Capturing History

The Case of the Federal Radio Commission in 1927

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Jonathan B.L. Decker

Edited by

Daniel Carpenter and

David A. Moss

Show author details

Jonathan B.L. Decker: Affiliation:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Daniel Carpenter: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
David A. Moss: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

What is the role of history in the study of political economy? Perhaps its most important role in this context is as a test of theory and a source of new hypotheses. Ronald Coase, for example, famously challenged our understanding of public goods by exposing the hidden history of private light-houses when theory had imagined only public ownership.

History can also be informed by theory. With respect to regulatory capture, George Stigler once observed that important historical inferences about policy intent could be drawn from the economic theory of regulation. Noting that the “theory tells us to look…at who gains and who loses, and how much, when we seek to explain a regulatory policy,” he suggested that “the truly intended effects [of a policy] should be deduced from the actual effects.” Indeed, inferences of this sort have become common in the study of regulation.

One significant danger is that these two strategies may become intertwined – that historical inferences from theory may somehow make their way into historical tests of theory. Surely, such inferences cannot legitimately be adduced as evidence for the theory that generated them. To the extent that historical cases are regarded as support for a theory, they must be based on hard evidence, not on inference from the theory itself.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Preventing Regulatory Capture
Special Interest Influence and How to Limit it
, pp. 176 - 207

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565875.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Coase, Ronald H., “The Lighthouse in Economics,” Journal of Law and Economics 357 (1974): 357–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Stigler, George, The Citizen and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975)Google Scholar

Noll, Roger G., “Economic Perspectives on the Politics of Regulation,” in Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, eds. Schmalensee, Richard and Willig, Robert D. (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1989), 1276–77Google Scholar

Hazlett, Thomas W. and Spitzer, Matthew L., “Digital Television and the Quid Pro Quo,” Business and Politics 2 (2000): 115–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Hazlett, Thomas W., “The Rationality of U.S. Regulation of the Broadcast Spectrum,” Journal of Law and Economics 133 (1990): 154–58Google Scholar

Hazlett, Thomas W., “Physical Scarcity, Rent-Seeking and the First Amendment,” Columbia Law Review 905 (1997): 918–19Google Scholar

Hazlett, Thomas W., “Underregulation: The Case of the Radio Spectrum,” in The Regulators’ Revenge, ed. Bell, Thomas W. (Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute, 1998), 92Google Scholar

Wider Wave-Length Band,” Washington Post (March 27, 1927): 15

Atlanta Constitution (March 29, 1927): 1

Hinman, Frank, Chicago Daily Tribune (March 30, 1927): 16;

Los Angeles Times (March 30, 1927): 1;

Los Angeles Times (April 6, 1927)

Welles, Kingsley, “Meet Mr. Average Radio Enthusiast,” Radio Broadcast 531 (October 1926)Google Scholar

Moss, David and Decker, Jonathan B.L., “Rethinking the Role of History in Law and Economics: The Case of the Federal Radio Commission in 1927” (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 09-008, July 13, 2008)

Sterling, Christopher N. and Michael Kittross, John, Stay Tuned, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2002), 97Google Scholar

Frederick Schmeckebier, Lawrence, The Federal Radio Commission (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1932)Google Scholar

McChesney, Robert W., Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press), 16

Bensman, Marvin R., The Beginning of Broadcast Regulation in the Twentieth Century (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2000), 208Google Scholar

Moss, David A. and Fein, Michael R., “Radio Regulation Revisited: Coase, the FCC, and the Public Interest,” Journal of Policy History 15 (2003): 389–416CrossRef Google Scholar

Slotten, Hugh R., Radio and Television Regulation (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Dellinger, John H., “The Broadcasting Band,” in Radio and Its Future, ed. Codel, Martin (New York and London: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1930), 293Google Scholar

New York Times (January 14, 1927): 10

The New York Times (March 27, 1975): 28]

Burns, R.W., British Television: The Formative Years (London: Peter Peregrinus, 1986), 116–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Radio Broadcast 11 (April 1927): 138–39

Radio Broadcast (April 1927): 555

Department of Commerce, Commercial and Government Radio Stations of the United States (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1927), 77Google Scholar

Jome, Hiram, Economics of the Radio Industry (Chicago: A. W. Shaw & Co., 1925)Google Scholar

Smulyan, Susan, Selling of Radio: The Commercialization of American Broadcasting 1920–1934 (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Lescarboura, Austin C., “How Much It Costs to Broadcast,” Radio Broadcast (1926): 367–71

Sarnoff, David, “Art and Industry,” in Radio and Its Future (1930)]

Wall Street Journal (November 2, 1926): 9]

Proceedings of the Fourth National Radio Conference and Recommendations for Regulation of Radio, November 9–11, 1925, issued by the Government Printing Office in Washington, D.C., for the Department of Commerce (1925)

McMahon, A. Michael, The Making of a Profession: A Century of Electrical Engineering in America (New York: IEEE Press, 1984)CrossRef Google Scholar

New York World (September 19, 1928)

Hettinger, Herman S., A Decade of Radio Advertising (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934)Google Scholar

Wall Street Journal (February 7, 1927): 16

Arnold, Frank A., Popular Reactions to Radio Broadcasting (New York: National Broadcasting Company, 1928)Google Scholar

Moss, David and Oey, Mary, “The Paranoid Style in the Study of American Politics,” in Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation, eds. Balleisen, Edward and Moss, David (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Foote, L., Goette, Lorenz, and Meier, Stephan, eds., Policy-making Insights from Behavioral Economics (Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 2009)

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.