Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Loron, Corentin and Moczydłowska, Małgorzata 2018. Tonian (Neoproterozoic) eukaryotic and prokaryotic organic-walled microfossils from the upper Visingsö Group, Sweden. Palynology, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 220.

    Castellani, Christopher Maas, Andreas Eriksson, Mats E. Haug, Joachim T. Haug, Carolin Waloszek, Dieter and Álvaro, Javier 2018. First record of Cyanobacteria in Cambrian Orsten deposits of Sweden. Palaeontology,

    Riedman, Leigh Anne and Porter, Susannah 2016. Organic-walled microfossils of the mid-Neoproterozoic Alinya Formation, Officer Basin, Australia. Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 90, Issue. 05, p. 854.

    Moczydłowska, Małgorzata 2016. Algal affinities of Ediacaran and Cambrian organic-walled microfossils with internal reproductive bodies:Tanariumand other morphotypes. Palynology, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 83.

    MOCZYDŁOWSKA, MAŁGORZATA BUDD, GRAHAM E. and AGIĆ, HEDA 2015. Ecdysozoan-like sclerites among Ediacaran microfossils. Geological Magazine, Vol. 152, Issue. 06, p. 1145.

    Agić, Heda Moczydłowska, Małgorzata and Yin, Lei-Ming 2015. Affinity, life cycle, and intracellular complexity of organic-walled microfossils from the Mesoproterozoic of Shanxi, China. Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 89, Issue. 01, p. 28.

    Schopf, J. William Sergeev, Vladimir N. and Kudryavtsev, Anatoliy B. 2015. A new approach to ancient microorganisms: taxonomy, paleoecology, and biostratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian Berkuta and Chulaktau microbiotas of South Kazakhstan. Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 89, Issue. 05, p. 695.

    Sergeev, V. N. and Seong-Joo, Lee 2006. Real eukaryotes and precipitates first found in the Middle Riphean stratotype, southern Urals. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Sergeev, V. N. 2006. The importance of Precambrian microfossils for modern biostratigraphy. Paleontological Journal, Vol. 40, Issue. S5, p. S664.

    Sharma, Mukund 2006. Palaeobiology of Mesoproterozoic Salkhan Limestone, Semri Group, Rohtas, Bihar, India: Systematics and significance. Journal of Earth System Science, Vol. 115, Issue. 1, p. 67.

    Sergeev, Vladimir N. 2001. Paleobiology of the Neoproterozoic (Upper Riphean) Shorikha and Burovaya silicified microbiotas, Turukhansk Uplift, Siberia. Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 75, Issue. 02, p. 427.

    WAGGONER, BENJAMIN M. 1994. An aquatic microfossil assemblage from Cenomanian amber of France. Lethaia, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 77.

  • Print publication year: 1992
  • Online publication date: April 2011

24 - Atlas of Representative Proterozoic Microfossils



On the following plates are illustrated microfossils from 48 geologic units (representing about 10% of the units listed in Table 22.3). Although coverage is by no means exhaustive, the fossils illustrated are representative of the diversity and level of organization exhibited by particularly well-preserved Proterozoic assemblages. In selecting the fossils illustrated, emphasis has been placed on inclusion of holotype specimens, particularly holotypes of taxa described from the Soviet Union, relatively few of which have been previously illustrated in the non-Russian language literature (and none of which has been previously illustrated using interference contrast optics). As summarized below, emphasis has also been placed on illustration of assemblages of Middle and Late Proterozoic age; this atlas therefore complements, but does not duplicate, illustrations of Early Proterozoic communities included in Hofmann and Schopf (1983). The atlas contains more than 300 new illustrations, including photomicrographs of specimens not previously figured from the Dismal Lakes Group, River Wakefield Subgroup, Skillogalee Dolomite, the Gunflint Iron Formation, and the Gaoyuzhuang, Galeros, Kwagunt, and Myrtle Springs Formations.


Soviet type specimens were provided for study by E. Aseeva, T. N. Hermann, T. Jankauskas, N. Mikhailova, V. Sergeev, and A. Weiss; photomicrography of these specimens was carried out by C. V. Mendelson, J. W. Schopf, and G. Vidal; this work, conducted at the Palaeontological Institute in Moscow, was facilitated through the courtesy of M. A. Fedonkin and B. S. Sokolov. Studies of new material from the Gaoyuzhuang Formation were carried out in collaboration with R. Mikawa (University of Chicago); studies of new specimens from the River Wakefield Subgroup and the Skillogalee Dolomite were carried out by or in collaboration with T. R. Fairchild (Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Proterozoic Biosphere
  • Online ISBN: 9780511601064
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *