Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T08:40:09.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Causal Thinking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Lance J. Rips
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Jonathan E. Adler
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Lance J. Rips
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

One damn thing leads to another. I forget to open the garage door this morning, back my car into the door, and splinter it. The actions we perform cause other events – my backing up causes the splintering. But events of other kinds – nonactions – have their effects, too. With no help from me, last night's storm caused a branch to fall from a tree, putting a hole in my roof.

Much as we might like to forget them, we often keep track of events like these and the causes that unite them. Although we might not have predicted these events, we can remember and reconstruct part of the causal sequences after they occur. In retelling the events of last summer, for example, we tend to relate the events in forward causal order, starting, say, at the beginning of our trip to Virginia in May and proceeding chronologically. If we want to mention other kinds of events from the same period, such as our summer work experiences, we may start again at the beginning of the summer, moving along the events in a parallel causal stream (Barsalou 1988). We also remember fictional stories in terms of the causal changes that compose their main plot line, remembering less about events falling on deadend side plots (Trabasso and Sperry 1985). We sometimes attribute causal powers to concrete objects as well as to events, but we can understand this sort of talk as an abbreviation for event causation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reasoning
Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations
, pp. 597 - 631
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, W.-K., and Graham, L. M. (1999). The impact of necessity and sufficiency in the Wason four-card selection task. Psychological Science, 10, 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, W.-K., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., and Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahn, W.-K ., and Kim, N. (2000). The causal status effect in categorization: An overview. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 40, 23–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alloy, L. B., and Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals. Psychological Review, 91, 112–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1988). The content and organization of autobiographical memories. In Neisser, U. & Winograd, E. (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered (pp. 193–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, M. E., and Komatsu, L. K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2003). A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., and Waldmann, M. R. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brem, S. K., and Rips, L. J. (2000). Evidence and explanation in informal argument. Cognitive Science, 24, 573–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, M., Gelman, R., and Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In Friedman, W. J. (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209–254). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burks, A. W. (1977). Chance, cause, reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, J. R. (1991). Intuitive statistical estimation. In Anderson, N. H. (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory (Vol. 1, pp. 187–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. M. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. M. J., Espino, O., and Santamaria, C. (1999). Counterexamples and the suppression of inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2001). What is wrong with Bayes nets?Monist, 84, 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. (2002). Against modularity, the causal Markov condition, and any link between the two. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 411–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, G. B., and Robbins, S. J. (1990). Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory & Cogntion, 18, 537–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, L. J. (1967). Illusory correlation in observational report. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, L. J., and Chapman, J. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, P. W., and Novick, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 545–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, P. W., and Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, P. W., and Novick, L. R. (2005). Constraints and nonconstraints in causal learning. Psychological Review, 112, 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavior Research, 18, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, L. B., and Oakes, L. M. (1993). How infants perceive a simple causal event. Developmental Psychology, 29, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J., Hall, N., and Paul, L. A. (2004). Causation and counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., and Camp, bell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., and Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neys, W., Schaeken, W., and Ydewalle, d' G. (2003). Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: Every counterexample counts. Memory & Cognition, 31, 581–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sessa, di A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmes, D. G., Kantowitz, B. H., and Roediger, H. L.. (1999). Research methods in psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Evans, J. S. B. T., and Over, D. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewert, J.-P. (1974). The neural basis of visually guided behavior. Scientific American, 230, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (2003). Hume variations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, S. A., and Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understanding of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, C. (2001). The mind's arrows: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L., Kushnir, T., and Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, R. L. (1978). Eye and brain (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harman, G. H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M., and Woodward, J. (1999). Independence, invariance, and the causal Markov condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, 521–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F., and Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hiddleston, E. (2005). A causal theory of counterfactuals. Nous, 39, 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, D. J. (1988). Logic and causal attribution. In Hilton, D. J. (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 33–65). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, D. J., Jaspars, J. M. F., and Clarke, D. D. (1990). Pragmatic conditional reasoning. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 791–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1967). A treatise of human nature (Selby-Bigge, L. A., Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739.)Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Levine, D. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–241). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Klem, L. (1995). Path analysis. In Grimm, L. G. and Yarnold, P. R. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 65–97). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kotovsky, L., and Baillargeon, R. (2000). Reasoning about collisions involving inert objects in 7.5-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 3, 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagnado, D. A., and Sloman, S. (2005). The advantage of timely intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 856–876.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13, 287–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M., and Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-olds perceive causality?Cognition, 25, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 556–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. In Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 214–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Luhmann, C. C., and Ahn, W.- K. (2005). The meaning and computation of causal power: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 112, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, D. (1988). The way things work. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the “possible” as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J., and Hayes, P. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In Meltzer, B. & Michie, D. (Eds.), Machine intelligence 4 (pp. 463–502). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the 4th regional meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 71–80). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., and Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1874). A system of logic (8th ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. L., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Novick, L. R., and Cheng, P. W. (2004). Assessing interactive causal power. Psychological Review, 111, 455–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, L. M. (1994). The development of infants' use of continuity cues in their perception of causality. Developmental Psychology, 30, 869–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind and Language, 18, 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelham, B. W., and Blanton, H. (2003). Conducting research in psychology (2nd ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1990). General propositions and causality. In Mellor, D. H. (Ed.), Philosophical papers (pp. 145–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1929.)Google Scholar
Rehder, B. (2006). Human deviations from normative causal reasoning. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2596). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rehder, B., and Burnett, R. C. (2005). Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 264–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehder, B., and Hastie, R. (2001). Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 323–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rescorla, R. A., and Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Black, A. H. and Prokasy, W. F. (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1983). Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review, 90, 38–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In Vosniadou, S. and Ortony, A. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, L. J. (2001). Necessity and natural categories. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 827–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rips, L. J., and Conrad, F. G. (1989). Folk psychology of mental activities. Psychological Review, 96, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roser, M. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Dunbar, K. A., Corballis, P. M., and Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology, 19, 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenblit, L., and Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In Bobrow, D. G. and Collins, A. (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saxe, R., and Carey, S. (2006). The perception of causality in infancy. Acta Psychologica, 123, 144–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schank, R. A., and Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R. A., & Riesbeck, C. K. (1981). Inside computer understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, E. G. (2005). Music and cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlottmann, A., and Shanks, D. (1992). Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 321–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanks, D. R., and Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 229–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1953). Causal ordering and identifiability. In Hood, W. C. and Koopmans, T. C. (Eds.), Studies in econometric method (pp. 49–74). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 238–241.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. (2005). Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloman, S. A., and Lagnado, D. A. (2005). Do we “do”?Cognitive Science, 29, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H., Hilton, D. J., Kim, S. H., and Garonzik, R. (1992). Knowledge-based causal inference: Norms and the usefulness of distinctiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., and Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spellman, B. A. (1996). Conditionalizing causality. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 34, 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1968). A theory of conditionals. In Rescher, N. (Ed.), Studies in logical theory (pp. 98–112). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Staudenmayer, H. (1975). Understanding conditional reasoning with meaningful propositions. In Falmagne, R. J. (Ed.), Reasoning: representation and process in children and adults (pp. 55–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Steyvers, M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Wagenmakers, E., and Blum, B. (2003). Inferring causal networks from observation and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27, 453–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L., and Niyogi, S. (in press). Intuitive theories as grammars for causal inference. In Gopnik, A. and Schulz, L. (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, V. A. (1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 742–758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabasso, T., and Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, E. (2006). Beautiful evidence. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1980). Causal schemas in judgment under uncertainty. In Fishbein, M. (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (pp. 49–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmann, M. R. (1996). Knowledge-based causal induction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 34, 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldmann, M. R., and Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldmann, M. R., and Hagmayer, Y. (2005). Seeing versus doing: two modes of accessing causal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 216–227.Google ScholarPubMed
Wasserman, E. A., Kao, S. F., Hamme, L. J., Katagiri, M., and Young, M. E. (1996). Causation and association. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 34, 207–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
White, P. A. (2005). The power PC theory and causal powers: Comments on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 112, 675–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P., Klettke, B., Ventura, T., & Song, G. (2005). Expressing causation in English and other languages. In Ahn, W.-K., Goldstone, R. L., Love, B. C., Markman, A. B., and Wolff, P. (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory (pp. 29–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1960). Path coefficients and path regressions: alternative or complementary concepts. Biometrics, 16, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×