Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- 10 Regulating the ‘good’ donor
- 11 Gamete donor motives, payment and child welfare
- 12 Egg-sharing, motivation and consent
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
12 - Egg-sharing, motivation and consent
Ethical, legal and policy issues
from Part III - Donors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- Part III Donors
- 10 Regulating the ‘good’ donor
- 11 Gamete donor motives, payment and child welfare
- 12 Egg-sharing, motivation and consent
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regulating Reproductive Donation , pp. 259 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Ahuja, K.K., Simons, E.G., Fiamanya, W., Dalton, M. et al. (1996). ‘Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations’. Human Reproduction, 11, 1126–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahuja, K.K., Mostyn, B.J. and Simons, E.G. (1997). ‘Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients’. Human Reproduction, 12, 2845–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahuja, K.K., Simons, E.G., Rimington, M.R., Nair, S. et al. (2000). ‘One hundred and three concurrent IVF successes for donors and recipients who shared eggs: ethical and practical benefits of egg sharing to society’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 1, 101–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, E. (2002). ‘Subsidized IVF: the development of “egg sharing” in the United Kingdom’. Human Reproduction, 17, 3254–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, E. and Golding, B. (2008). ‘Egg sharing: a practical and ethical option in IVF?’, Expert Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 465–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtin, Z.B., Ahuja, K.K. and Golombok, S. (2012a). ‘Egg-share donors’ and recipients’ knowledge, motivation and concerns: clinical and policy implications’. Clinical Ethics, 7, 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurtin, Z.B., Ahuja, K.K. and Golombok, S. (2012b). ‘Egg-sharing, consent and exploitation: examining donors’ and recipients’ circumstances and retrospective reflections’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24, 698–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurtin, Z.B., Ahuja, K.K. and Golombok, S. (2012c). ‘Emotional and relational aspects of egg-sharing: egg-share donors’ and recipients’ feelings about each other, each others’ treatment outcome and any resulting children’. Human Reproduction, 27, 1690–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haimes, E., Taylor, K. and Turkmendag, I. (2012). ‘Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women's experiences of an egg sharing scheme’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34, 1199–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (1998). Consultation on the Implementation of Withdrawal of Payments to Donors. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2005). SEED Report: A Report on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's Review of Sperm, Egg, and Embryo Donation in the United Kingdom. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011a). Donating Sperm and Eggs: A Review of the HFEA's Sperm and Egg Donation Policies 2011. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011b). Donation Review: Compensation of Donors and Benefits in Kind. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2012). ‘Egg share donors and non-patient egg donors’. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/3412.html.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2014). Egg and Sperm Donation in the UK: 2012–13. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/9386.html.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2015 [2009]). Code of Practice, 8th edn. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.H. (1999). ‘The medical ethics of paid egg sharing in the UK’. Human Reproduction, 14, 1912–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, J. and Hope, T. (2003). ‘Gametes, money, and egg sharing’. The Lancet, 362, 584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2011). Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. and Devroey, P. (2006). ‘Subsidized in-vitro fertilization treatment and the effect on the number of egg sharers’. Reproductive BioMedicine, 13, 8–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2011). Solidarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1982). Making Healthcare Decisions: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rapport, F. (2003). ‘Exploring the beliefs and experiences of potential egg share donors’. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, R., Williams, C., Ehrich, K. and Farsides, B. (2012). ‘Donation of “spare” fresh or frozen embryos to research: who decides that an embryo is “spare” and how can we enhance the quality and protect the validity of consent?’. Medical Law Review, 20(2), 255–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2011). ‘Ethical principles and the HFEA donation review’. BioNews 632. Available at www.bionews.org.uk/page_111532.asp.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2013). ‘Is the HFEA's policy on compensating egg donors and egg sharers defensible?’. Medical Law Review, 21, 173–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cases
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] 1 All E.R. 257.
Re M.B. [1997] 8 Med. L.R. 217.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 4 All E.R. 649.
U v. Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] E.W.C.A. Civ. 565.
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] 1 All E.R. 257.
Re M.B. [1997] 8 Med. L.R. 217.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 4 All E.R. 649.
U v. Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] E.W.C.A. Civ. 565.
UK
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] 1 All E.R. 257.
Re M.B. [1997] 8 Med. L.R. 217.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 4 All E.R. 649.
U v. Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] E.W.C.A. Civ. 565.
Chatterton v. Gerson [1981] 1 All E.R. 257.
Re M.B. [1997] 8 Med. L.R. 217.
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) [1992] 4 All E.R. 649.
U v. Centre for Reproductive Medicine [2002] E.W.C.A. Civ. 565.
EU legislation
Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells.
UK legislation
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act 1990, as amended by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act 2008.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by