Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- 8 Sperm donors limited
- 9 Limiting offspring numbers
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
9 - Limiting offspring numbers
Can we justify regulation?
from Part II - How many children per donor?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
Book contents
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Regulating Reproductive Donation
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors, contributors and discussants
- Book part
- Introduction
- 1 The development of governance and regulation of donor conception in the UK
- Part I International, cross-border and global issues
- Part II How many children per donor?
- 8 Sperm donors limited
- 9 Limiting offspring numbers
- Part III Donors
- Part IV Information about donors
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regulating Reproductive Donation , pp. 185 - 204Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Almeling, R. (2014). ‘Defining connections: gender and perceptions of relatedness in egg and sperm donation’, in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J.S. and Burroughs, H. (2012). ‘Seeking better health care outcomes: the ethics of using the “nudge”’. American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blyth, E. (2012). ‘Genes r us? Making sense of genetic and non-genetic relationships following anonymous donor insemination’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24, 719–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, S. (2014). ‘Stories of an absent father’, in Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F. and Richards, M. (eds.), Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2009). Authority Paper: disclosure of donor codes to gamete and embryo recipients – evaluation and review of HFEA policy. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/AM_Item_10_Jan09.pdf.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011). Authority Paper: donation review – family limit, and associated Annexes. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/6516.html.Google Scholar
Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2010). ‘Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20, 523–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millbank, J. (2014). ‘Numerical limits in donor conception regimes: genetic links and “extended family” in the era of identity disclosure’. Medical Law Review, 22, 325–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Gamete Donation Trust (2014). ‘World's first national sperm bank launching in England: thousands affected by infertility to benefit’, press release 24 July 2014. Available at www.ngdt.co.uk/press-releases.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013). Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
Plotz, D. (2005). The Genius Factory: Unravelling the Mystery of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Jadva, V. and Golombok, S. (2011). ‘Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22, 485–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Sälevaara, M., Suikkari, A.M. and Söderström-Anttila, V. (2013). ‘Attitudes and disclosure decisions of Finnish parents with children conceived using donor sperm’. Human Reproduction, 28, 2746–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saggar, A.K. and Bittles, A.H. (2008). ‘Consanguinity and child health’. Paediatrics and Child Health, 18, 244–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, E., Wright, J., Small, N., Corry, P.C. et al. (2013). ‘Risk factors for congenital anomaly in a multiethnic birth cohort: an analysis of the Born in Bradford Study’. Lancet, 382, 1350–9. See also www.borninbradford.nhs.uk/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by