Behavioural activation and inhibition in social adjustment

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819384.015

14 - Behavioural activation and inhibition in social adjustment

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011

Gennady G. Knyazev ,

Glenn D. Wilson and

Helena R. Slobodskaya

Edited by

Philip J. Corr

Show author details

Gennady G. Knyazev: Affiliation:
Dr, State Research Institute of Physiology Russia
Glenn D. Wilson: Affiliation:
Dr, Department of Psychologys University of London, United Kingdom
Helena R. Slobodskaya: Affiliation:
Dr, State Research Institute of Physiology Russia
Philip J. Corr: Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Gray's theory, now known as Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST), describes three major neuropsychological systems, the Behavioural Inhibition System (BIS), the Behavioural Activation System (BAS) and the Fight-Flight System (FFS). In psychometric and experimental studies, only two of these have received confirmation. In particular, psychometric evidence does not support the existence of FFS as a unified dimension orthogonal to BIS and BAS (Wilson, Gray and Barrett 1990; Wilson, Barrett and Iwawaki 1995; Slobodskaya et al. 2001; Knyazev, Slobodskaya and Wilson 2004). This chapter will therefore concentrate upon the BIS and BAS dimensions. First, we comment on the position of BIS and BAS within the hierarchy of personality and temperament traits. Then we consider certain difficulties linked with research on the social implications of RST and summarize empirical evidence linking BIS and BAS with social adjustment. Finally, we offer an interpretation of this data and review scarce evidence regarding the moderating role of environmental factors and cognitive abilities on the relationship between BAS, BIS and social outcomes.

BAS, BIS and hierarchical models of personality and temperament

To a large extent, BAS and BIS could be viewed as the two highest-order dimensions of personality. Following the ‘Big Five’ and Eysenck's ‘Giant Three’, we might perhaps dub these the ‘Gargantuan Two’. CFA studies of the Eysenck Personality Profiler usually find negative correlations between the Extraversion and Neuroticism factors (Eysenck, Wilson and Jackson 2000; Moosbrugger and Fischbach 2002; Knyazev, Belopolsky, Bodunov and Wilson 2004).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality , pp. 415 - 430

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819384.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aluja, A. (2004), Sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward and sexuality in females, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 5–10CrossRef Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (1994), Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn, Washington, DC: APA)Google Scholar

Archer, J. (1984), Gender roles as developmental pathways, British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 245–256CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Asendorpf, J. B. and Aken, M. A. G. (1994), Traits and relationship status: stranger versus peer group inhibition and test intelligence versus peer group competence as early predictors of later self-esteem, Child Development, 65, 1786–1798CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carver, C. S. and White, T. L. (1994), Behavioural inhibition, behavioural activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333CrossRef Google Scholar

Cloninger, C. R. (1987), A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: a proposal, Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Colder, C. R. and O'Connor, R. M. (2004), Gray's reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the Behavioural Approach System and Behavioural Inhibition System, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 435–451CrossRef Google Scholar

Corr, P. J. (2002a), J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory and frustrative nonreward: a theoretical note on expectancies in reactions to rewarding stimuli, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1247–1253CrossRef Google Scholar

Corr, P. J.(2002b), J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532CrossRef Google Scholar

Corruble, E., Benyamina, A., Baylec, F., Falissardd, B. and Hardy, P. (2003), Understanding impulsivity in severe depression? A psychometrical contribution, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 27, 829–833CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R. (1989), The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual Supplement (Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources)Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R.(1992), Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual (Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources)Google Scholar

Dawe, S. and Loxton, N. J. (2004), The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 343–351CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Depue, R. A. and Collins, P. F. (1999), Neurobiology of the structure of personality: dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Digman, J. M. (1997), Higher-order factors of the big five, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D. and Jackson, C. J. (2000), Eysenck Personality Profiler (Short V6) (Worthing: Psi-Press)Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P. (1995), The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929–964CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Finn, P. R. and Hall, J. (2004), Cognitive ability and risk for alcoholism: short-term memory capacity and intelligence moderate personality risk for alcohol problems, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 569–581CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fonseca, A. C. and Yule, W. (1996), Personality and antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents: an enquiry into Eysenck's and Gray's theories, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 767–781CrossRef Google Scholar

Fowles, D. C. (1980), The three arousal model: implications of Gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy, Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Franken, I. H. A. (2002), Behavioral approach system (Behavioural Approach System) sensitivity predicts alcohol craving, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 349–355CrossRef Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. (1982), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Inquiry into the Functions of the Septo-hippocampal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gray, J. A.(1987), The Psychology of Fear and Stress (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hirshfeld-Becker, D. R., Biederman, J., Calltharp, S., Rosenbaum, E. D., Faraone, S. V. and Rosenbaum, J. F. (2003), Behavioral inhibition and disinhibition as hypothesized precursors to psychopathology: implications for pediatric bipolar disorder, Biological Psychiatry, 53, 985–999CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jackson, C. J. and Francis, L. J. (2004), Are interactions in Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory proximal or distal in the prediction of religiosity: a test of the joint subsystem hypothesis, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1197–1209CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalin, N. H., Shelton, S. E., Davidson, R. J. and Kelley, A. E. (2001), The primate amygdala mediates acute fear but not the behavioral and physiological components of anxious temperament, Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2067–2074CrossRef Google Scholar

Kane, T. A., Loxton, N. J., Staiger, P. K. and Dawe, S. (2004), Does the tendency to act impulsively underlie binge eating and alcohol use problems? An empirical investigation, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 83–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G. (2004), Behavioural activation as predictor of substance use: mediating and moderating role of attitudes and social relationships, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 75, 309–321CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Knyazev, G. G. (paper submitted), Biological underpinning of personality types, Biological Psychology

Knyazev, G. G., Belopolsky, V. I., Bodunov, M. V. and Wilson, G. D. (2004), The factor structure of the Eysenck personality profiler in Russia, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1681–1692CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G. and Slobodskaya, H. R. (2006), Personality types and behavioural activation and inhibition in adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1385–1395CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskaya, H. R., Kharchenko, I. I. and Wilson, G. D. (2004), Personality and substance use in Russian youths: the predictive and moderating role of behavioural activation and gender, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 827–843CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskaya, H. R., Safronova, M. V. and Kinsht, I. A. (2002), School adjustment and health in Russian adolescents, Psychology, Health and Medicine, 7, 2, 143–155CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskaya, H. R. and Wilson, G. D. (2004), Comparison of construct validity of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire and the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1565–1582CrossRef Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G. and Wilson, G. D. (2004), The role of personality in the co-occurrence of emotional and conduct problems in adolescents: a confirmation of Corr's ‘joint subsystems’ hypothesis, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 43–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Kopecky, C. C., Sawyer, C. R. and Behnke, R. R. (2004), Sensitivity to punishment and explanatory style as predictors of public speaking state anxiety, Communication Education, 53, 281–285CrossRef Google Scholar

Lauriola, M., Russo, P. M., Lucidi, F., Violani, C. and Levin, I. P. (2005), The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 45–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, R. P., Halverson, C., Havill, V. and Lu, Y., Temperamental associations with personality in children: the role of impulsivity and inhibition (unpublished manuscript)

Matthews, G. and Gilliland, K. (1999), The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: a comparative review, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer, B., Oliver, L. and Roth, D. (2005), Please don't leave me! Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System, attachment styles, and responses to a relationship threat, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 151–162CrossRef Google Scholar

Moeller, F. G., Dougherty, D. M., Barratt, E. S., Schmitz, J. M., Swann, A. C. and Grabowski, J. (2001), The impact of impulsivity on cocaine use and retention in treatment, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21, 193–198CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moosbrugger, H. and Fischbach, A. (2002), Evaluating the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler-German version (EPP-D): a contribution to the Super Three vs. Big Five discussion, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 191–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Muris, P., Meesters, C. and Spinder, M. (2003), Relationships between child- and parent-reported behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression in normal adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 759–771CrossRef Google Scholar

Muris, P., Merckelbach, H., Schmidt, H., Gadet, B. and Bogie, N. (2001), Anxiety and depression as correlates of self-reported behavioural inhibition in normal adolescents, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 1051–1061CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mussap, A. J. (2006), Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and body change behaviour in males, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 841–852CrossRef Google Scholar

Nakao, K., Takaishi, J., Tatsuta, K., Katayama, H., Iwase, M., Yorifuji, K. and Takeda, M. (2000), The influences of family environment on personality traits, Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 54, 91–95CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neal, J. A., Edelmann, R. J. and Glachan, M. (2002), Behavioural inhibition and symptoms of anxiety and depression: is there a specific relationship with social phobia?, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 361–374CrossRef Google Scholar

Perkins, A. M. and Corr, P. J. (2005), Can worriers be winners? The association between worrying and job performance, Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 25–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Pickering, A. D. and Gray, J. A. (1999), The neuroscience of personality in Pervin, L. and John, O. (eds), Handbook of Personality (2nd edn, New York: Guilford Press), pp. 277–299Google Scholar

Pickering, A. D. and Gray, J. A. (2001), Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement, and the neuropsychology of human learning: an individual differences approach in Eliasz, A. and Angleitner, A. (eds), Advances in Individual Differences Research (Lengerich: PABST Science Publishers), pp. 117–149Google Scholar

Quay, H. C. (1988), The behavioural reward and inhibition system in childhood behavior disorders in Bloomingdale, L. M. (ed.), Attention Deficit Disorder (New York: Pergamon), vol. 3, pp. 176–186Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., John, O. P., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E. and Stouthammer-Loeber, M. (1996), Resilient, overcontrolled and undercontrolled boys: three replicable personality types, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 157–171CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Slobodskaya, H. R., Knyazev, G. G., Safronova, M. V. and Wilson, G. D. (2003), Development of a short form of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire: its use in measuring personality and adjustment among Russian adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1049–1059CrossRef Google Scholar

Slobodskaya, H. R., Safronova, M. V., Knyazev, G. G. and Wilson, G. D. (2001), Reactions of Russian adolescents to reward and punishment: a cross-cultural study of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire, Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1211–1224CrossRef Google Scholar

Slobodskaya, H. R., Safronova, M. V. and Windle, M. (2005), Personality, temperament and adolescent adjustment in modern Russia, Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 167–178

Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D. and Jackson, C. J. (2006), The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: implications for personality measurement, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–375

Tranah, T., Harnett, P. and Yule, W. (1998), Conduct disorder and personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 741–745CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., Barrett, P. T. and Gray, J. A. (1989), Human reactions to reward and punishment: a questionnaire examination of Gray's personality theory, British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509–515CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wilson, G. D., Barrett, P. T. and Iwawaki, S. (1995), Japanese reactions to reward and punishment: a cross-cultural personality study, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 198–112CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., Gray, J. A. and Barrett, P. T. (1990), A factor analysis of the Gray-Wilson personality questionnaire, Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1037–1045CrossRef Google Scholar

Windle, M. (1994), Temperamental inhibition and activation: hormonal and psychosocial correlates and associated psychiatric disorders, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 61–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.